Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
A crazy thoughts about structure of Electron.
23 views
Skip to first unread message
socratus
May 5, 2012, 12:16:10 AM5/5/12
to
A crazy thoughts about structure of Electron.
=.
Electron isn’t a point.
Electron has a geometrical form.
Electron’s geometrical form isn’t static, isn’t firm.
Electron’s geometrical form can be changed by his own inner spin.
Electron’s own inner spin can be described with three ( 3 ) formulas:
Plank: h=Et,
Einstein: h=kb,
Goudsmit-Uhlenbeck: h*=h/2pi.
The speed of photon is minimal : c=1.
The speed of electron is c>1
Quantum of light, photon and electron are one and the same
particle in different conditions.
=.
Question:
Where did electron come from?
Answer:
Electron came from the Kingdom of Coldness: T=0K.
=.
All the best.
Israel Socratus
===.
=.
Electron isn’t a point.
Electron has a geometrical form.
Electron’s geometrical form isn’t static, isn’t firm.
Electron’s geometrical form can be changed by his own inner spin.
Electron’s own inner spin can be described with three ( 3 ) formulas:
Plank: h=Et,
Einstein: h=kb,
Goudsmit-Uhlenbeck: h*=h/2pi.
The speed of photon is minimal : c=1.
The speed of electron is c>1
Quantum of light, photon and electron are one and the same
particle in different conditions.
=.
Question:
Where did electron come from?
Answer:
Electron came from the Kingdom of Coldness: T=0K.
=.
All the best.
Israel Socratus
===.
Y.Porat
May 5, 2012, 6:31:08 AM5/5/12
to
i agree only about some of your assertions
not all of them
for instance:
the photon is not an electron
(unless you are joking !!
ATB
Y.Porat
-------------------
holog
May 8, 2012, 8:10:52 PM5/8/12
to
the either
holog
socratus
May 9, 2012, 2:11:43 AM5/9/12
to
Electron’s fine structure constant.
=.
It is interesting to understand the Sommerfeld formula:
a= e^2 / h*c, where {a} is fine structure constant: 1/137
Feynman expressed (a ) quantity as
‘ by the god given damnation to all physicists ‘.
But the fine structure constant is not independent quantity,
it is only part of formula of an electron: e^2=h*ca .
The constant {a} is only one of three constants which
belong to the formula of electron: e^2=h*ca.
(a), (c), (h*) are three constants which created the electron.
And if we don’t know (a) then we don’t know what electron is.
Therefore in the internet is possible to find 100 different models
of electron. For example.
The book "What is the Electron?"
Volodimir Simulik
Montreal, Canada. 2005. /
In this book:
‘ More than ten different models of the electron are presented here.
(!!!)
More than twenty models are discussed briefly. (!!!)
Thus, the book gives a complete picture of contemporary theoretical
thinking (traditional and new) about the physics of the electron.’
ftp://210.45.114.81/physics/%CA%E9%BC%AE/What%20Is%20the%20Electron%20by%20Volodimir%20Simulik%20.pdf
All of these models are problematical.
We can read hundreds books about philosophy of physics.
But how can we trust them if we don’t know what electron is.
And somebody wrote:
If I well remember Einstein once said about particle physics:
"why do we study some many particles?
Understand really what is an electron would be enough."
. . .
‘ Finding the structure of the electron will be the key
to finding the origin of the natural laws.’
=.
By my peasant logic at first it is better to understand
the closest and simplest particle photon /electron and
then to study the far away spaces and another particles.
=.
Best withes.
Israel Sadovnik Socratus
==.
=.
It is interesting to understand the Sommerfeld formula:
a= e^2 / h*c, where {a} is fine structure constant: 1/137
Feynman expressed (a ) quantity as
‘ by the god given damnation to all physicists ‘.
But the fine structure constant is not independent quantity,
it is only part of formula of an electron: e^2=h*ca .
The constant {a} is only one of three constants which
belong to the formula of electron: e^2=h*ca.
(a), (c), (h*) are three constants which created the electron.
And if we don’t know (a) then we don’t know what electron is.
Therefore in the internet is possible to find 100 different models
of electron. For example.
The book "What is the Electron?"
Volodimir Simulik
Montreal, Canada. 2005. /
In this book:
‘ More than ten different models of the electron are presented here.
(!!!)
More than twenty models are discussed briefly. (!!!)
Thus, the book gives a complete picture of contemporary theoretical
thinking (traditional and new) about the physics of the electron.’
ftp://210.45.114.81/physics/%CA%E9%BC%AE/What%20Is%20the%20Electron%20by%20Volodimir%20Simulik%20.pdf
All of these models are problematical.
We can read hundreds books about philosophy of physics.
But how can we trust them if we don’t know what electron is.
And somebody wrote:
If I well remember Einstein once said about particle physics:
"why do we study some many particles?
Understand really what is an electron would be enough."
. . .
‘ Finding the structure of the electron will be the key
to finding the origin of the natural laws.’
=.
By my peasant logic at first it is better to understand
the closest and simplest particle photon /electron and
then to study the far away spaces and another particles.
=.
Best withes.
Israel Sadovnik Socratus
==.
holog
May 9, 2012, 8:24:09 PM5/9/12
to
On May 9, 2:11 am, socratus <socra...@bezeqint.net> wrote:
> It is interesting to understand the Sommerfeld formula:
> a= e^2 / h*c,
> It is interesting to understand the Sommerfeld formula:
> a= e^2 / h*c,
we trust them if we don’t know what electron is.And somebody wrote:
>
> If I well remember Einstein once said about particle physics:
> "why do we study some many particles?
> Understand really what is an electron would be enough."
> . . .
> ‘ Finding the structure of the electron will be the key
> to finding the origin of the natural laws.’
> =.
> By my peasant logic at first it is better to understand
> the closest and simplest particle photon /electron and
> then to study the far away spaces and another particles.
> =.
> Best withes.
> Israel Sadovnik Socratus
>
> ==.
you can study particles, but the real missing piece is (c), fore
>
> If I well remember Einstein once said about particle physics:
> "why do we study some many particles?
> Understand really what is an electron would be enough."
> . . .
> ‘ Finding the structure of the electron will be the key
> to finding the origin of the natural laws.’
> =.
> By my peasant logic at first it is better to understand
> the closest and simplest particle photon /electron and
> then to study the far away spaces and another particles.
> =.
> Best withes.
> Israel Sadovnik Socratus
>
> ==.
(c) relies on time, and it is time , that is the true missing piece of
your puzzle.
holog
holog
May 9, 2012, 8:31:50 PM5/9/12
to
holog
holog
May 9, 2012, 8:44:10 PM5/9/12
to
On May 9, 8:24 pm, holog <ho...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
which it travels, it alone is not a constant.
holog
socratus
May 13, 2012, 2:32:10 AM5/13/12
to
What is the electron configuration ?
Is the electron a photon with toroidal topology?
http://www.cybsoc.org/electron.pdf
Is the electron a photon with toroidal topology?
http://www.cybsoc.org/electron.pdf
Y.Porat
May 13, 2012, 3:22:30 AM5/13/12
to
no!!
it is sub divided
compsed by sub particles with mass
that are connected linearly
as a
'chain of orbital ''
and that is why it can stretch to longish shapes
from the nuc
outwards
BTW
dis you ever saw a picture of a lightening ??
it stretches longitudinal as
as a
tree with branches''
that is more or less the idea of
CHAIN OF ORBITALS
TIA
Y.Porat
-------------------
holog
May 13, 2012, 3:37:57 AM5/13/12
to
field(clouds) around it move , side note this is a 2dimensional
example.
holog
socratus
May 13, 2012, 10:51:32 AM5/13/12
to
Y.Porat
May 14, 2012, 3:48:21 AM5/14/12
to
(:-)
ddi you see my prove that electron energy of a single photon
is
E min photon = hf times n
while
0 > n <<<<1.0000 !!
it is dfrom a few years ago !!!
2
later i wen further and suggested an EXACT FIGURE
FOR smllest PHOTON MASS
WHILE
puting n as
THE SCALAR PART OF PLANCK TIME !!
it gives about photon mass
as
theoretically exo -90 kilograms !!!
and i indicated there that
no human made apparatus will ever be able to detect it !!!
so Mr Socrates where have youbeen while i published it ??
BTW
i noticed that you are an Israeli
and i suggest that we will be in private contact
how about that ??
ATB
Y.Porat
--------------------
holog
May 15, 2012, 7:41:57 PM5/15/12
to
Y.Porat
May 28, 2012, 5:19:47 AM5/28/12
to
??????
Y.Porat
-------------------------
0 new messages