Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Electrons ALL emit packets of energy just like photons, but much smaller scale.

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Y.Porat

unread,
Feb 27, 2010, 12:35:30 AM2/27/10
to
On Feb 25, 6:00 pm, john <vega...@accesscomm.ca> wrote:
> What do we call these tiny photon-like packets of energy
> coming off every electron?
> Nanophotons?
> I think they have already been named:
>
> Magnetons.
>
> john

see my thread
'A new corrected definition for a ' real single photon' energy
emission

it is
=======================
E single photon = n hf
while
0 < n <<<< 1.0000
=======================
ATB
Y.Porat
------------------------

BURT

unread,
Feb 27, 2010, 1:33:00 AM2/27/10
to

Set H bar to zero and the energy of light is all in its frequency.

Mitch Raemsch

Y.Porat

unread,
Feb 27, 2010, 2:28:43 AM2/27/10
to
--------------------------
frequency is a scalar associated with time

therefore frequency in itself is
time duratiion dependent
or if you like --
the number of wave lengths per second

if you want to say that f is defining
th e ***amount** of energy
then i am with you!!
you must be more accurate ....

ATB
Y.Porat
--------------------

bert

unread,
Feb 27, 2010, 11:43:22 AM2/27/10
to
> --------------------- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

My electron being a structure made of photons is more,and more
accepted. Naturally its cloud structure is both virtual photons and
the ones in the macro realm. It all fits So when do I pick up my
Nobel? oi ya trebert

Inertial

unread,
Feb 28, 2010, 2:54:34 AM2/28/10
to
"Y.Porat" <y.y....@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:a2a0d888-09cf-4ede...@b30g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...

Don't bother reading .. its crap. Porat is an idiot who cannot understand
basic physics.

Inertial

unread,
Feb 28, 2010, 2:56:47 AM2/28/10
to
"Y.Porat" <y.y....@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:eb60131d-30bf-48d3...@j27g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...

NOPE .. the frequency is the same regardless of the time duration

> or if you like --
> the number of wave lengths per second

Its just UNITS. It does NOT mean that frequency depends on time duration AT
ALL

> if you want to say that f is defining
> th e ***amount** of energy
> then i am with you!!

It says nothing of the sort. F says what the frequency of the EMR is.

E = hf defines the energy in a single photon corresponding to EMR of
frequency f

> you must be more accurate ....

You have NO idea what you're talking about.

0 new messages