File 3_01 , A.Plutonium ; requested by
Archimedes Plutonium
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 1996 21:57:34 -0700
X-Sender: rein...@popd.ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.2 (16)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: bib...@smartlink.net
From: robert reinbold <rein...@ix.netcom.com>
Subject: FS: 74 Communist Booklets from 1930's
Sender: owner-...@smartlink.net
Precedence: bulk
STRONG NUCLEAR FORCE = Hydrogen Atom Systems (HYASYS)
Introduction to History of HYASYS
Brief Introduction:
Virtually nothing was known of the Strong Nuclear Force until
starting
September 1995. Before then little to no math was known of the Strong
Nuclear
Force and, little to no predictions from the current theories which
dealt with
the Strong Nuclear Force, namely QCD, The Standard Model and Quark
theory. In
September 1995 I applied an old idea of mine which I had in my mind
since 1990.
It took until Sep'95 for me to realize that this old idea was in fact
the
Strong Nuclear Force itself. The old idea was that a neutron is really
a
Hydrogen Atom System. All matter, all atoms are just superpositioned
Hydrogen
Atom Systems, hyasys. Thus, hyasys looks at a neutron as a nuclear
electron ---
an electron at close range to the protons. These nuclear electrons are
what
hold the protons of any nucleus together. Below is an historical
chronological
accounting of HYASYS and the details of the theory are contained
within.
______________________________________________________
History of Hydrogen Atom Systems composing or producing all matter
and
energy and is the Strong Nuclear Force starts from my copyrighted USA
Library
of Congress, 1990 and1992 text --
PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY:
Unification of Physics, Chemistry, Biology, and Math
--- quote on "hydrogen atom systems" from my text ---
The concept of atoms superpositioned onto atoms, that is, atoms
inside
atoms, or atoms inside subatomic particles is true, as evidenced by
radioactive
decay. As examples, uranium 232U decays into lead 208Pb and neon 24Ne,
and
nobelium 252No decays into radon 214Ra and sulfur 38S. From
radioactive decay
products it is seen that atoms were inside atoms. Atoms are built-up
from other
atoms. A quantum definition of the term inside is superpositioned
onto, and it
comes from the quantum superposition principle.
The concept that subatomic particles such as a neutron, are
built-up
from an atom is true because every neutron has the potential of
radioactively
decaying into a hydrogen atom. An atom contains other atom parts, atoms
inside
atoms. Atoms inside atoms is the Bohr complementary principle, where
whole and
parts complement each other. This is true because a hydrogen atom
consists of 1
electron moving around 1 proton, and the subatomic particle, the
neutron, in
any particular atom when it radioactively decays emits 1 proton, 1
electron,
and perhaps 1 neutrino. Thus, a neutron emits a hydrogen atom. A
hydrogen
atom is superpositioned onto (inside) a neutron which is a subatomic
particle.
Before the Plutonium Atom Totality, most books termed
electrons,
protons, neutrons, and quarks, and the many other particles as
"elementary
particles." Implying that electrons, protons, neutrons, and quarks
were more
elementary, more fundamental than atoms. This textbook argues that
atoms are
the most elementary of particles. Electrons, protons, neutrons, quarks
have no
meaning without atoms. Atoms are the last elementary particle, since
every
proton is associated with an electron and thus it is a hydrogen atom.
Plutonium 231Pu under this scheme with its 94 protons and 94 electrons
are 94
hydrogen atom systems plus the 137 hydrogen atom systems inside each of
the 137
neutrons in the nucleus. When the 94 and 137 hydrogen atom systems are
superpositioned as one, they make the atom 231Pu. Before this
textbook,
elementary particles were seen as subatomic particles; after this
textbook,
subatomic particles are parts-totality complementarity. Electrons are
constructed from atoms. Quarks are made of atoms. And since quarks are
impossible to isolate, that is the strongest argument against calling
quarks as
elementary, for they can only exist in combinations. Quarks are more of
a math
construction than a physical construction, see my geometry discussions
below.
Atoms are the last and most elementary particles that there are. Atoms
are all
and everything; the only things that exist are atoms. The void between
atoms is
the electron space of our atom totality.
A math analogy is the best illustration for the concept of
elementary
particle. What is the smallest positive number? That is, what is the
smallest
(most elementary) positive number? If we take zero as positive then
zero
serves that function but if zero is not taken as positive then there is
no
smallest positive number. Zero is the neutron, and a neutron is a
hydrogen
atom inside of it. The number 1 is a hydrogen atom, and the hydrogen
atom is
superpositioned onto (inside) a neutron which is 0.
--- end of "hydrogen atom systems" quote from my text ---
______________________________________________________
--- start of neutron quote from 1992 (c) text PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY
and
posted to Internet ---
Subject: ELEMENT 0, THE NEUTRON
Message-ID: <CEK6D...@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 1993 03:15:11 GMT
[lines deleted]
Element 0, neutron, Xyz, is a subatomic particle which has an overall
neutral
charge, a 0 charge, but has an internal distribution of charge as
revealed
through scattering experiments. Neutrons are small magnets allowing
for the
production of beams of neutrons. Neutrons are indispensable in the
building-up
of the elements for it is impossible for 2 or more protons to exist in
a stable
condition in a nucleus (distance range of about 10^-13 cm) without
neutrons.
The neutron has spin of +1/2 in terms of h/(2pi), and so acts as a
fermion.
The neutron with atomic mass of 1.008665 has slightly more mass than a
hydrogen
atom at 1.00794. Of all the atoms, only the hydrogen atom has no
neutron. A
neutron by itself is very unstable and it quickly radioactively decays
into a
hydrogen atom system of proton plus electron. The half-life of a
neutron is
10.61+ 0.16 minutes, and it radioactively decays into a hydrogen atom.
In the
free state, neutrons are important as a propagating agent for fission
chain
reactions.
--- end of neutron quote ---
______________________________________________________
--- start quote from 1991 and 1993 USA patent filing and posted to
Internet
1993 ---
NEUTRON MATERIALIZATION DEVICES
Inventor: Ludwig Plutonium (legal name as of 08/8/91), previous
name Ludwig van Ludvig
Assignee: none
Ser. No.: 07/737,170
Filing Date: 07/29/91
Reformatted filing: 11JUNE1993
--- quote in part re: "hydrogen atom systems" from filing ---
On a microscopic level the answer on how to induce rsnm is that it
occurs
most frequently when an additional electron, one more than the number
of
protons in the nucleus of that particular atom results.
Microscopically, where
rsnm occurs and what induces it is an atom which is topheavy with an
additional
electron beyond its chemical element number of electrons, thus exciting
the
materialization of a neutron from out of nowhere. For example, a
hydrogen atom
has only 1 electron and 1 proton, but for an instant-of-quantum-time a
hydrogen
atom can have 2 electrons and 1 proton. Or in the case of a plutonium
atom with
94 electrons and 94 protons, it can for an instant-of-quantum-time have
95
electrons, but still have only 94 protons and remain still a plutonium
atom. A
hydrogen atom with 1 electron and 1 proton, if when another electron is
added
to the hydrogen atom system then for that instant-of-quantum-time this
hydrogen
atom consists of 2 electrons and 1 proton. The additional electron
quantum
mechanically induces rsnm in the nucleus. Subsequently, this neutron,
having
materialized, can either stay as a neutron in the original atom system,
or
radioactively decay into a proton, electron, and neutrino. If the
materialized
neutron remains in the nucleus of the original atom system of hydrogen,
then
that hydrogen atom can transform into a helium atom plus energy
subsequent to
the materialization of two more neutrons.
--- end of quoting re: "hydrogen atom systems" in part from patent
filing ---
______________________________________________________
From: Archimedes...@dartmouth.edu (Archimedes Plutonium)
Newsgroups: alt.sci.physics.plutonium,sci.physics,sci.astro
Subject: Re: More news that oldest stars in younger universe is true
Date: 15 Sep 1995 23:23:48 GMT
Organization: Plutonium College
Lines: 145
Message-ID: <43d1u4$e...@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>
References: <4357o5$i...@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>
<4383h2$c...@dartvax.dartmouth.edu> <43afue$3...@ixnews5.ix.netcom.com>
[lines deleted]
> Your attempt to involve Democritus in this theory is a big stretch,
> considering that he did not even know about the existence of electrons.
> If he had known about them, are you sure that he would have extended
> his statement in the same way that you have? In fact, why involve
> Democritus at all? Surely there is someone more modern who has said
> something that you can agree with?
> ^^^^^^^^^
I think you have gaps in your understanding of the history of
physics. Read the history so that your summary of it is not eclectic
bumbling.
Democritus taught "The only existing things are the atoms and empty
space;
all else is mere opinion."
Democritus's one sentence above taken to its logical conclusion says
that the
whole, or everything has to be an atom itself. So what to attach to
"empty
space"? Answer: the space of electrons. What element fits all the
special
numbers of both math and physics best? Answer: plutonium.
Who gives a kaka about electrons in Democritus's time. Our present
day physicists have never realized that atoms are the last and
fundamental things. And there is a easy proof of that. A neutron is a
hydrogen atom. Democritus in his primitive understanding of atoms had
that much
correct, more than I can say for most modern day physicists. And the
modern day
nitwits still do not realize that it stops with atoms. Sure you can
poke around
inside, but do you really think that "electrons in isolation" or
"protons in
isolation" have independent existence like a stable atom? And what is a
neutron
but of course a hydrogen atom inside of it, yet a neutron is subatomic.
[lines deleted]
______________________________________________________
From: Archimedes...@dartmouth.edu (Archimedes Plutonium)
Newsgroups: alt.sci.physics.plutonium,sci.physics,sci.math
Subject: Re: AP's theory/Democritus/numerology/hand waving
Date: 17 Sep 1995 15:22:00 GMT
Organization: Plutonium College
Message-ID: <43heeo$b...@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>
References: <43fdf3$e...@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>
<43finv$h...@ixnews7.ix.netcom.com>
[lines deleted]
> This is an oversimplification. A neutron is NOT a proton with an
> electron orbiting around it. Also, how do you explain that Hydrogen
> atoms are "stable", while a free neutron will spontaneously decay in
> approx. 10-20 minutes?
If not a hydrogen atom system what does the neutron decay into?
______________________________________________________
From: Archimedes...@dartmouth.edu (Archimedes Plutonium)
Newsgroups: alt.sci.physics.plutonium,sci.physics,sci.math
Subject: .....thinks the universe is unbalanced in electric charge
Date: 19 Sep 1995 01:31:41 GMT
Organization: Plutonium College
Message-ID: <43l6ht$l...@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>
[lines deleted]
> A free neutron decays into a proton and an electron. This is not the
> same thing as a Hydrogen atom. A Hydrogen atom is a proton that has an
> electron ORBITING it. I doubt that very many free neutron decay events
> have the result of forming a hydrogen atom. The proton and electron
> are far more likely to "go their own way". If I am wrong on this, I'd
> like to hear your sources.
I am looking through Feynman or other sources. But, it is my
intuition that in a neutron decay, the universe is balanced in charge
by seeing quantum physics wise that the neutron was a hydrogen atom
inside it.
No matter, how separate or which directions the neutron decay must be a
hydrogen atom system.
In fact, all atoms are simply composed of hydrogen atoms plus added
energy.
Thus, 231PU is just 231 hydrogen atoms plus energy. Such a conception
of all
atoms violates no quantum mechanics rules or principles. But the
opposite
conception implies "free" charge which does violate QM.
______________________________________________________
From: Archimedes...@dartmouth.edu (Archimedes Plutonium)
Newsgroups: alt.sci.physics.plutonium,sci.physics,sci.physics.
electromag,sci.physics.fusion,sci.physics.accelerators,sci.physics.parti
cle
Subject: All atoms are Hydrogen Atom Systems -> Superposition Principle
Date: 20 Sep 1995 00:37:44 GMT
Organization: Plutonium College
Lines: 45
Message-ID: <43nnoo$e...@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>
All atoms are hydrogen atom systems (hasys). By system I mean it is a
hydrogen
atom + extra energy. When the extra energy term is 0, then it is just a
ordinary hydrogen atom. A neutron is a hydrogen atom with extra energy.
The Superposition Principle of QM, is merely an equivalent statement
to the
fact that all matter is the linear equations sums of Hydrogen Atom
Systems.
Reverse, if all atoms were not the sum total of Hydrogen Atom
Systems, eg, 231PU, plutonium is merely 231 Hydrogen Atom Systems,
then,
physics esq Quantum Physics would have never had a Superposition
principle.
In other words, I have reduced the Superposition Principle of QM, and
the fact that physics is linear, linear, linear partial
differential equations, is because all matter, all atoms are built up
from one building block Hydrogen Atom Systems.
The reason neutrons act as glue for the protons is because the
neutron shares that electron inside it with neighboring protons. The
nucleus is sort of like a "metallic bond".
The Superposition Principle = Hydrogen Atom Systems.
Now, the bleeding gutter snipes of physics will be quick to spew
"well what about quarks?" And I tell you what is about quarks. Quarks
are
merely the fact that in math, there exists 3 and only 3
geometries-- Riem, Eucl, and Loba and when you have an entity that is
not ever
reducible down further, or incapable of being further cut,
like a proton, then it reveals all 3 possible geometries
simultaneously. Quarks are not physics reality. Quark are merely the
statement that a particle like a proton is bundled up into the 3 and
only 3 existing geometries simultaneously. So do not bother about the
mindrot
of quarks when talking about the real physics, that of Hydrogen Atom
Systems.
And don't drivel about a electron beam or proton beam being protons
and electrons in "isolation". That is circus clown physics. The Bell
Inequality evinces that proton and electron are always tied or
correlated.
If Hydrogen Atom Systems is not true, then the Superposition
Principle of QM plus the Conservation of Charge plus the Bell
Inequality are not true.
______________________________________________________
From: Archimedes...@dartmouth.edu (Archimedes Plutonium)
Newsgroups:
alt.sci.physics.plutonium,sci.physics,sci.physics.electromag,sci.physics
.fusion,
sci.physics.accelerators,sci.physics.particle,sci.chem
Subject: Equation which tells the limit of what isotopes exist
Date: 20 Sep 1995 11:41:42 GMT
Organization: Plutonium College
Lines: 90
Message-ID: <43oulm$p...@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>
In article <43nnoo$e...@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>
Archimedes...@dartmouth.edu (Archimedes Plutonium) writes:
> All atoms are hydrogen atom systems (hasys). By system I mean it is a
> hydrogen atom + extra energy. When the extra energy term is 0, then it
> is just a ordinary hydrogen atom. A neutron is a hydrogen atom with
> extra energy.
>
> The Superposition Principle of QM, is merely an equivalent statement
> to the fact that all matter is the linear equations sums of Hydrogen
> Atom Systems.
>
> Reverse, if all atoms were not the sum total of Hydrogen Atom
> Systems, eg, 231PU, plutonium is merely 231 Hydrogen Atom Systems,
> then, physics esq Quantum Physics would have never had a Superposition
> principle.
>
> In other words, I have reduced the Superposition Principle of QM, and
> the fact that physics is linear, linear, linear partial
> differential equations, is because all matter, all atoms are built up
> from one building block Hydrogen Atom Systems.
>
> The reason neutrons act as glue for the protons is because the
> neutron shares that electron inside it with neighboring protons. The
> nucleus is sort of like a "metallic bond".
>
> The Superposition Principle == Hydrogen Atom Systems.
>
> Now, the bleeding gutter snipes of physics will be quick to spew
> "well what about quarks?" And I tell you what is about quarks. Quarks
> are merely the fact that in math, there exists 3 and only 3
> geometries-- Riem, Eucl, and Loba and when you have an entity that is
> not ever reducible down further, or incapable of being further cut,
> like a proton, then it reveals all 3 possible geometries
> simultaneously. Quarks are not physics reality. Quark are merely the
> statement that a particle like a proton is bundled up into the 3 and
> only 3 existing geometries simultaneously. So do not bother about the
> mindrot of quarks when talking about the real physics, that of Hydrogen
> Atom Systems.
>
> And don't drivel about a electron beam or proton beam being protons
> and electrons in "isolation". That is circus clown physics. The Bell
> Inequality evinces that proton and electron are always tied or
> correlated.
>
> If Hydrogen Atom Systems is not true, then the Superposition
> Principle of QM plus the Conservation of Charge plus the Bell
> Inequality are not true.
For a long time now I have had my search modes on for finding the
formula which gives the limits of existence for each elements isotopes.
Can an
isotope of say 10 neutrons and 1 proton for a hydrogen atom exist? Can
an
isotope of say 350 neutrons for plutonium exist?
These questions are very very important to physics and more
important is the nature of the beast of Strong Nuclear force.
Now, with Hydrogen Atom Systems I believe I have found the correct
path. I
will use Bose Einstein Condensate. I will picture the Strong Nuclear
Force as
really not much different than the Metallic Bond. Recall in metallic
bonding
that the electron is a sea of electrons and that which gives the metal
its
properties of malleable and ductile etc.
Picture the Strong Nuclear Force as electrons shared by protons.
Picture the Neutron as a Hydrogen Atom System which has a very very
energetic
electron. The reason that nuclei are held together is because the
Nucleus is
nothing but a sea of protons which greedily share those
sparse electrons which are delivered to the nucleas by neutrons. Once
neutrons get into the nucleus, they are merely Hydrogen Atom Systems
which Share, share their energetic electrons with the other protons.
This picture of electron sharing which makes up the Strong Nuclear
force is also the beginnings of the way for explaining muon mass and
muon catalyzed fusion. The Muon is a quantization of Hydrogen Atom
Systems.
Within the Bose Condensate and muon characteristics and with
Hydrogen Atom Systems, within those particulars lies the beginnings for
a equation or formula expressing the total possible number of isotopes
each element has.
All of this deal about Hydrogen Atom Systems must be correct, because
it is consistent with these QM principles, laws and experiments ---
Superposition principle, Schroedinger Eq. linearity of form, quantum
conservation of charge, Bell Inequality.
If Hydrogen ATom Systems is false, then the Superposition Principle
and
Schroedinger linearity, charge conservation and Bell Inequality are all
false
ideas.