Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
The Higgs Boson May Have 'Five Faces'
8 views
Skip to first unread message
socr...@bezeqint.net
Jul 29, 2012, 4:24:50 AM7/29/12
to
The Higgs Boson May Have 'Five Faces'
And they've come up with a doozy:
maybe there isn't just one Higgs boson
(the as-yet-undiscovered subatomic particle believed to impart mass);
maybe, instead, there are five different versions,
with similar masses but different electric charges.
http://news.discovery.com/space/the-higgs-boson-may-have-five-faces.html
==.
Now we have more 5 bosons , . . . . ! ?
5 different bosons with 5 different negative electric charges.
And they must have 5 different antibosons with 5 different
positive electric charges.
Physicists searched for one boson and found 5 different bosons.
And when they create bigger LHC they would find much more
different bosons.
It is good perspective.
It is very happy news.
I only think that this project is too expensive for normal man.
==.
Physicists searched for one ‘God particle’ and found
5 different ‘ God bosons particles’.
Who will say now: ‘God Does Not Play Dice’ ?
=.
And they've come up with a doozy:
maybe there isn't just one Higgs boson
(the as-yet-undiscovered subatomic particle believed to impart mass);
maybe, instead, there are five different versions,
with similar masses but different electric charges.
http://news.discovery.com/space/the-higgs-boson-may-have-five-faces.html
==.
Now we have more 5 bosons , . . . . ! ?
5 different bosons with 5 different negative electric charges.
And they must have 5 different antibosons with 5 different
positive electric charges.
Physicists searched for one boson and found 5 different bosons.
And when they create bigger LHC they would find much more
different bosons.
It is good perspective.
It is very happy news.
I only think that this project is too expensive for normal man.
==.
Physicists searched for one ‘God particle’ and found
5 different ‘ God bosons particles’.
Who will say now: ‘God Does Not Play Dice’ ?
=.
socr...@bezeqint.net
Jul 29, 2012, 6:41:23 AM7/29/12
to
Concerning CERN:
Cliff Burgess on the discovery of the Higgs boson
http://phys.org/news/2012-07-cern-cliff-burgess-discovery-higgs.html
===…
My comment.
Dirac was one of the first who said how vacuum is important.
" The problem of the exact description of vacuum, in my opinion,
is the basic problem now before physics. Really, if you can’t correctly
describe the vacuum, how it is possible to expect a correct description
of something more complex? "
/ Paul Dirac ./
And Cliff Burgess ( himself a theoretical particle physicist
and professor of physics and astronomy ) forgot Dirac name.
In 1928 Dirac said that ‘ virtual particles’ exist in vacuum
but until now we don’t know their essence.
Why?
Because as ‘a theoretical particle physicist and professor
of physics and astronomy’ said :
‘Suppose you were interested in the properties of fish and how
they move and why some fish move faster than others given
the same amount of effort. This would be very hard if you
did not understand what water was.
In order to understand properly the motion of fish, you must first
also understand the environment through which they move.’
=.
It means that to know properties of fish- particles at first we need
to understand environment – VACUUM through which the
fish- particles move.
=.
But today.
Today physicists refuse to take vacuum as a real conception
as a fundament of Universe.
Book : ‘Dreams of a final theory’
by Steven Weinberg. Page 138.
‘ It is true . . . there is such a thing as absolute zero; we cannot
reach temperatures below absolute zero not because we are not
sufficiently clever but because temperatures below absolute zero
simple have no meaning.’
/ Steven Weinberg. The Nobel Prize in Physics 1979 /
=.
Therefore theoretical physics full with abstractions and puzzles.
P.S.
The most fundamental question facing 21st century physics will be:
What is the vacuum? As quantum mechanics teaches us, with
its zero point energy this vacuum is not empty and the word
vacuum is a gross misnomer!
/ Prof. Friedwardt Winterberg /
==.
Cliff Burgess on the discovery of the Higgs boson
http://phys.org/news/2012-07-cern-cliff-burgess-discovery-higgs.html
===…
My comment.
Dirac was one of the first who said how vacuum is important.
" The problem of the exact description of vacuum, in my opinion,
is the basic problem now before physics. Really, if you can’t correctly
describe the vacuum, how it is possible to expect a correct description
of something more complex? "
/ Paul Dirac ./
And Cliff Burgess ( himself a theoretical particle physicist
and professor of physics and astronomy ) forgot Dirac name.
In 1928 Dirac said that ‘ virtual particles’ exist in vacuum
but until now we don’t know their essence.
Why?
Because as ‘a theoretical particle physicist and professor
of physics and astronomy’ said :
‘Suppose you were interested in the properties of fish and how
they move and why some fish move faster than others given
the same amount of effort. This would be very hard if you
did not understand what water was.
In order to understand properly the motion of fish, you must first
also understand the environment through which they move.’
=.
It means that to know properties of fish- particles at first we need
to understand environment – VACUUM through which the
fish- particles move.
=.
But today.
Today physicists refuse to take vacuum as a real conception
as a fundament of Universe.
Book : ‘Dreams of a final theory’
by Steven Weinberg. Page 138.
‘ It is true . . . there is such a thing as absolute zero; we cannot
reach temperatures below absolute zero not because we are not
sufficiently clever but because temperatures below absolute zero
simple have no meaning.’
/ Steven Weinberg. The Nobel Prize in Physics 1979 /
=.
Therefore theoretical physics full with abstractions and puzzles.
P.S.
The most fundamental question facing 21st century physics will be:
What is the vacuum? As quantum mechanics teaches us, with
its zero point energy this vacuum is not empty and the word
vacuum is a gross misnomer!
/ Prof. Friedwardt Winterberg /
==.
Y.Porat
Aug 8, 2012, 10:14:56 AM8/8/12
to
why not 10 000 faces
while
ENERGY HAS MASS - THE ONLY KIND OF MASS !!!
ATB
Y.Porat
------------------------------
0 new messages