Re: The form of atomic shells for electrons
Y.Porat
> In article <c74cb44e-7f11-43e0-99b5-ba1bca3b4465
> @x25g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, macromi...@yahoo.com says...
>
>
>
> > I believe they are round. There are 4 fundamental sizes of the atom.
>
> Wow. What are these sizes?
>
> > They can change when there is a quantum jump as in heating water or
> > light absorbtion for energy level transition. 4 electron shells mean 4
> > sizes of the atom.
>
> Amazing. Do you think that *every* atom has four electron shells? What
> about subshells? How do you explain anything heavier than Krypton?
>
> > This is important.
>
> You conflate crazy with important.
--------------------
fucker idiot gangster Aleph - Varney
IS YOUR KNOWLEDGE BETTER THAN THAT??
moron piggy gangster !!
Y.P
-------------------
Aleph
3e5618...@a32g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, sent to sci.physics on Thu,
19 Nov 2009 23:39:57 -0800 (PST), Y.Porat <y.y....@gmail.com> imparted
these words of wisdom:
Temper temper, stalkerboi. Have I upset your alter ego Burt? Are you
really Burt with a nymshift? Did you feel neglected because I wasnt
insulting you enough?
Dont spread your cluelessness any further than you need to.
--
Aleph
This article was posted to USENET, please reply in that manner. Emails
to this account will be ignored.
Y.Porat
> Check out the Wikipedia article:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_orbital
>
> Electrons arrange in shells called orbitals.
> Their shape is known.
>
> Gerard
>
> Y.Porat wrote:
> > On Nov 20, 2:23 am, PD <thedraperfam...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Nov 19, 3:42 pm, BURT <macromi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >>> I believe they are round. There are 4 fundamental sizes of the atom.
> >>> light absorbtion for energy level transition. 4 electron shells mean 4
> >>> Mitch Raemsch
> >> Chapter 8 of any introductory chemistry book.
>
> > -----------------
> > a lot of fairy tales !!!
> > in aheavy Atom
> > there is no direct connection between
> > number of elctrons and Protons
>
> > some of the Protons lost their
> > electric charge
> > while making the inner nuc connections!!
>
> > in your fucking crippled models
> > there are no' inner' Protons and
> > peripheral -outer Protons
> > for you it is all one big mess
> > (of ignorance !!)
> > so you teach people your ignorance !!
>
> > Y.P
> > -------------------------
just forget about it as soon as possible -
in case you dont want to live in the
'modern physics medieval times''
including armis of 'priests'
that make their living from their
' crippled religion '
Robert Higgins
Like Poor Rat has.
>
> in case you dont want to live
like Poor Rat, envious of people who actually bothered to learn
something.
> in the
> 'modern physics medieval times''
Hate to tell you, Mr. Rat, but this is the standard theory in
chemistry. It has been such a "failure" that we have synthesized
millions of compunds with it.
> including armis of 'priests'
> that make their living from their
> ' crippled religion '
Yet strangly, sick people race to the pharmacy to buy the products of
this "crippled religion" whenever they get sick.
Y.Porat
wrote:
---------------------
nothig to do with your fucken
many shell moddel
of one electron for one proton
you use only the outer 'shells'
2
pharmacy has very little to do with
**any* tetail of your fucken model
and besides
pharmacy as is now
is
(listen careful idiot parrot crook)
IT IS MOSTLY A TRIAL AND ERROR
PRACTICE !!
nasty fuckers lairs like you
are experts of decorating THEMSELVES
WITH THE FEATHERS OF OTHERS !!!
BYE
nasty pig
Aleph
bb438e...@31g2000vbf.googlegroups.com>, Y.Porat sat down and wrote the
following words of wisdom:
> BYE
> nasty pig
Are you leaving this newsgroup? (Please say yes)
--
Aleph
This message was posted to usenet so please reply that way. Emails to
this account are very likely to be ignored.
Robert Higgins
As you've been told a hundred times, shells are for high school. We
use ORBITALS.
> 2
> pharmacy has very little to do with
> **any* tetail of your fucken model
> and besides
> pharmacy as is now
> is
> (listen careful idiot parrot crook)
>
> IT IS MOSTLY A TRIAL AND ERROR
> PRACTICE !!
Yes, if the make an error in the dosage, there will be a trial!
You know something about medicinal chemistry? Hahaha...
> nasty fuckers lairs like you
> are experts of decorating THEMSELVES
>
> WITH THE FEATHERS OF OTHERS !!!
>
> BYE
> nasty pig
Nothing tastier than poor RAT-ON-A-STICK.
Autymn D. C.
wrote:
> On Nov 23, 10:47 am, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Yet strangly, sick people race to the pharmacy to buy the products of
> > > this "crippled religion" whenever they get sick.
>
> > ---------------------
> > nothig to do with your fucken
> > many shell moddel
> > of one electron for one proton
> > you use only the outer 'shells'
>
> As you've been told a hundred times, shells are for high school. We
> use ORBITALS.
You don't say subshell?
Why don't ye stick with English: trender, trendel.
Y.Porat
> On Monday 23 November 2009 15:47, in <ccb90702-920b-48ac-9351-
> following words of wisdom:
>
> > BYE
> > nasty pig
>
> Are you leaving this newsgroup? (Please say yes)
>
> --
> Aleph
>
> This message was posted to usenet so please reply that way. Emails to
> this account are very likely to be ignored.
----------------
over your dead stinking body (:-)
nasy pig psychopath
Josef could be proud of you
------------------------
Aleph
@f16g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, sent to sci.physics on Sat, 28 Nov 2009
03:07:49 -0800 (PST), Y.Porat <y.y....@gmail.com> imparted these words
of wisdom:
>
> over your dead stinking body (:-)
> nasy pig psychopath
> Josef could be proud of you
> ------------------------
A shame, still, without you USENET would be one person closer to being a
place where rational, intelligent people can discuss sensible things. We
can't have that, can we?
Why didnt you call me a gangster? I am hurt.
Y.Porat
> In article <5abc1854-6b88-4c03-8806-365dcd0f12c6
> @f16g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, sent to sci.physics on Sat, 28 Nov 2009
> of wisdom:
>
>
>
> > ----------------
> > over your dead stinking body (:-)
> > nasy pig psychopath
> > Josef could be proud of you
> > ------------------------
>
> A shame, still, without you USENET would be one person closer to being a
> place where rational, intelligent people can discuss sensible things. We
> can't have that, can we?
>
> Why didnt you call me a gangster? I am hurt.
>
> --
> Aleph
>
> This article was posted to USENET, please reply in that manner. Emails
> to this account will be ignored.
-------------------
Josef Goebbels could be proud of you
you never spoke a single word of science
it is a fact that
anyone can see it
fucken homo gangster psychopath
i just wonder who is the idiot gangster who pay your salary !!
---------------------------------
----------------------
Aleph
36f538...@j19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>, sent to sci.physics on Sat,
28 Nov 2009 20:31:31 -0800 (PST), Y.Porat <y.y....@gmail.com> imparted
these words of wisdom:
> Josef Goebbels could be proud of you
I doubt it, in fact I think we would disagree on pretty much everything.
You dont realise that though, because you are blinded to reality by the
mix of your senility and frothing hatred of everyone who disagrees with
you.
> you never spoke a single word of science
Neither have you. Your vague "predictions" are not science.
> it is a fact that
> anyone can see it
woooo... I am so hurt.
> fucken homo gangster psychopath
Since when did I become gay, or is this just you letting us know what
your fantasies are. Is your real name Bernie Maddoff?
> i just wonder who is the idiot gangster who pay your salary !!
Do you know how many times you have asked this? Do you know how many
times I have answered?
Y.Porat
> In article <2997d6bd-dbb1-41ee-83db-
> 36f538a82...@j19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>, sent to sci.physics on Sat,
> 28 Nov 2009 20:31:31 -0800 (PST), Y.Porat <y.y.po...@gmail.com> imparted
> these words of wisdom:
>
> > Josef Goebbels could be proud of you
>
> I doubt it, in fact I think we would disagree on pretty much everything.
> You dont realise that though, because you are blinded to reality by the
> mix of your senility and frothing hatred of everyone who disagrees with
> you.
>
> > you never spoke a single word of science
>
> Neither have you. Your vague "predictions" are not science.
>
> > it is a fact that
> > anyone can see it
>
> woooo... I am so hurt.
>
> > fucken homo gangster psychopath
>
> Since when did I become gay, or is this just you letting us know what
> your fantasies are. Is your real name Bernie Maddoff?
>
> > i just wonder who is the idiot gangster who pay your salary !!
>
> Do you know how many times you have asked this? Do you know how many
> times I have answered?
>
> --
> Aleph
>
> This article was posted to USENET, please reply in that manner. Emails
> to this account will be ignored.
----------------
psychopath
------------------------