Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Higgs signal gains strength

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Y.Porat

unread,
Feb 9, 2012, 9:19:42 AM2/9/12
to
On Feb 8, 6:21 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Higgs signal gains strength
>    http://www.nature.com/news/higgs-signal-gains-strength-1.9992
>
> Today the two main experiments at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), the
> world’s most powerful particle accelerator, submitted the results of
> their latest analyses. The new papers boost the case for December’s
> announcement of a possible Higgs signal, but let’s not get too excited.
>
> See:http://www.nature.com/news/higgs-signal-gains-strength-1.9992
>
> New Papers:https://cdsweb.cern.ch/collection/CMS%20Papers?ln=en
>              https://cdsweb.cern.ch/collection/ATLAS%20Papers?ln=en
------------------
imbecile moron shameless crooks !!
Y.Porat
--------------------

Matthew Lybanon

unread,
Feb 9, 2012, 11:25:33 AM2/9/12
to
In article
<115640e3-ee5f-4225...@j14g2000vba.googlegroups.com>,
"Y.Porat" <y.y....@gmail.com> wrote:

. . .
> ------------------
> imbecile moron shameless crooks !!
> Y.Porat
> --------------------

Who can argue with logic like this?

micro...@hotmail.com

unread,
Feb 9, 2012, 6:03:57 PM2/9/12
to
The universal beginning does not require a creation of Higgs mass but
only Neutrons.

Mitchell Raemsch

holog

unread,
Feb 9, 2012, 10:12:28 PM2/9/12
to
On Feb 9, 6:03 pm, "microm2...@hotmail.com" <microm2...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
read it quickly, are they still colliding protons? or have they
changed over to neutrons?

holog

Sam Wormley

unread,
Feb 9, 2012, 11:54:11 PM2/9/12
to
On 2/9/12 9:12 PM, holog wrote:

>
> read it quickly, are they still colliding protons? or have they
> changed over to neutrons?
>
> holog

Read it again!

micro...@hotmail.com

unread,
Feb 10, 2012, 4:17:41 PM2/10/12
to
> holog- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

How do they observe protons colliding...
How do we see the subatomic at all?
If all it takes is to accelerate a charge
to create radiation then that is a form of
free energy.

Mitchell Raemsch

holog

unread,
Feb 10, 2012, 7:11:02 PM2/10/12
to
ok read it again , got this

"First, there are no new data in there — the LHC stopped colliding
protons back in November, and these latest results are just rehashes
of that earlier run. "

this could be interpreted many ways

why do they bring it up now?

possible answer is --they changed to neutrons and found something, or
they need a new accountant

holog

micro...@hotmail.com

unread,
Feb 10, 2012, 7:21:19 PM2/10/12
to
It's a matter of statistics with regards to measuring the subatomic;
even in an accelerator.

Mitchell Raemsch; the dual prize

xxein

unread,
Feb 10, 2012, 8:51:54 PM2/10/12
to
On Feb 10, 4:17 pm, "microm2...@hotmail.com" <microm2...@hotmail.com>
xxein: You should have quit with your last post.

micro...@hotmail.com

unread,
Feb 10, 2012, 10:00:08 PM2/10/12
to
> xxein:  You should have quit with your last post.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

How do we see the subatomic?
If it landed somewhere how would we know?
Acceleration does not create radiation.
There would be free energy by excess if
all that was needed for new light was the
acceleration of the electric...

Mitchell Raemsch

RLW

unread,
Feb 11, 2012, 3:03:07 PM2/11/12
to
On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:12:28 -0800, holog wrote:
> read it quickly, are they still colliding protons? or have they changed
> over to neutrons?

Just out of curiosity, how does one accelerate neutrons in a ring?

--
RLW

Androcles

unread,
Feb 11, 2012, 3:38:37 PM2/11/12
to

"RLW" <rlwa...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:bI2dnbW9eezmVKvS...@giganews.com...
Superglue them to a pair of protons, they come already prepared
in these containers:
http://s.ecrater.com/stores/227944/4eb6982c87ed9_227944n.jpg



holog

unread,
Feb 11, 2012, 6:52:21 PM2/11/12
to
actually the neutron will be stationary, but you accelerate protons
and hit the neutrons, thats one way to move it.

holog

micro...@hotmail.com

unread,
Feb 11, 2012, 7:32:42 PM2/11/12
to
How do we unlock neutrons outside of stimulating radioactivity?

Mitchell Raemsch; the Two Prizes are here...

holog

unread,
Feb 11, 2012, 7:47:40 PM2/11/12
to
On Feb 11, 7:32 pm, "microm2...@hotmail.com" <microm2...@hotmail.com>
you want to find gravity, you want to find the higgs, just hope they
don't make a big hole

holog

micro...@hotmail.com

unread,
Feb 11, 2012, 7:54:54 PM2/11/12
to
On Feb 9, 6:19 am, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...@gmail.com> wrote:
Since when do particles give off signals?
By what light could the eye percieve?
The eye works with huge amounts of light.
Many waves are still a signal that won't be detected.
It takes statistical quantities; Like Einstein pointed
out about the atoms of Quantum mechanics..

Mitchell Raemsch; the prize

holog

unread,
Feb 11, 2012, 9:17:14 PM2/11/12
to
of course there is always the other way, instead of smashing
particles, -- pull them apart

holog

holog

unread,
Feb 11, 2012, 9:18:43 PM2/11/12
to

holog

unread,
Feb 11, 2012, 9:18:25 PM2/11/12
to

micro...@hotmail.com

unread,
Feb 11, 2012, 11:16:48 PM2/11/12
to
> holog- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

The holes go away...
By limited gravity there is no black hole.
There is a better answer to the extreme of gravity
that won't violate the math and motion laws...

Mitchell Raemsch

Sam Wormley

unread,
Feb 12, 2012, 9:53:18 AM2/12/12
to
On 2/11/12 8:18 PM, holog wrote:
> of course there is always the other way, instead of smashing
> particles, -- pull them apart
>
> holog

How?

micro...@hotmail.com

unread,
Feb 12, 2012, 5:41:13 PM2/12/12
to
Since when do particles give off signals?
No. There is a better particle answer than Higgs...

Mitchell Raemsch

holog

unread,
Feb 13, 2012, 8:37:57 PM2/13/12
to
On Feb 12, 5:41 pm, "microm2...@hotmail.com" <microm2...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
and the answer is?


holog

micro...@hotmail.com

unread,
Feb 13, 2012, 8:50:12 PM2/13/12
to
Neutrons as first energy at the Big Bang instead...
They would decay and make first Hydrogen....

Mitchell Raemsch; the dual prize

>
> holog

0 new messages