aether a TOE or an ASS?
A B
monkey banging on a typewriter because I need to know something. If it
doesn't make sense, I need you to tell me how to turn the thing
off.
In "The Evolution of Physics" by Einstein and Enfield, the physicist
was solving the mystery of anomalies that didn't fit a picture that
was drawn by everyone else. He used thought experiments for insight
into geometry, to picture the cause and effect of mechanics and
explain everything. He was looking for something, and then he drew a
circle around it because he couldn't find it. At first I thought I was
a genius, then I figured he was pulling my leg. At least we had
something in common, we can do the math on our fingers.
It was said that matter is compressed aether, and energy was the
effect of decompressed aether on the environment. If you look at this
geometry, light is squared with the interference pattern of a hologram
with negative entropy, and matter has energy because the velocity of
light in both directions is a right angle, where the sum of two parts
is the hypotenuse of a noosphere... the Third eye.
If you start with a double aether and give it a motion, it causes a
spin like an oar through water. One part goes out and the other in,
and the centrifuge is a black hole that binds positive charges into a
plasma by the orbital momentum of negative charges. Like a proton
bound by an electron, opposite charges attract, and the particles
exchange by the decay of momentum. The big bang is plasma from the
axis, which is unified with the electron by a spin, and the proton
accelerates in a vortex where the axis of an action is the least
action, and The Ark is the quickest time that connects the dots to
draw the picture in a noosphere. Then when the plasma leaves the pole
again, it breaks down into galaxies, then solar systems, then atoms...
and the light you see is caused by the unseen, because negative
entropy is the lens of an implicate order.
In my mind, I believe I can account for everything as part of the
whole by cause and effect, but then I don't know enough to speak for
everyone else. I couldn't disprove it, so when I heard about the
Ulysses Probe I predicted the Sun has a hole in it, but all I saw was
an artist rendition, and he may have thought The Earth was flat. Not
to give up, I predicted The Earth was hollow, and the axis went
through the hole in The Sun and connected the dots with the quickest
time. To me it was an original discovery, but if I believed what
everyone else did, The Earth really is flat because you can go in one
pole and come out the other as if no space/time was between. Then when
I got on a computer, it seems like a lot of people know.
In " Einstein Against The Odds: The Great Quantum Debate" by John
Gliedman, June 1983 Science Digest, Einstein wrote to his friend,
Erwin Schrodinger, that, "The Heisenberg-Bohr tranquilising philosophy
-or religion?- is so delicately contrived that, for the time being, it
provides a gentle pillow for the true believer from which he cannot
very easily be aroused.... But this religion has... damned little
effect on me". In another letter Einstein wrote, "Quantum mechanics is
most awe-inspiring. But an inner voice tells me that this is not the
real thing after all. The theory gives much, but it scarcely brings us
nearer to the secret of the Old Man". Privately Bohr called Einstein's
attitude "appalling" and "high treason".
To say the universe has negative entropy is like saying you have faith
in Jesus. If you can't see what you are talking about, they all have
different opinions and they usually do the opposite. The difference
between another one and the other one is the strong and the weak
forces are reversed, and God is the majority of fools because they
have faith in themselves. I think visualising the mechanical forces is
the key to creativity and new technology.
I would appreciate your expert opinions and thank you for your
comments, and I apologise for my previous bad attitude. This is not my
primary interest, and I need to know if I am on the right track.
Sincerely Yourself,
Prometheus