Amateur Physicist Makes Massive Blunder, Seeks Definition of Smallest Possible Mass

[Anti Vigilante]

Ok so I made a big mistake.

I was working with the assumption that
#1. It was really cool that the Gravitational constant could be expressed
in terms of the Planck length, Planck time, and the Planck mass.

#2. The Planck mass was an expression of the smallest possible mass/
energy that could exist. Like at the border of is and isn't.

Well, the Planck mass isn't at all like its brethren. It's an arrogant
obnoxious 22 milligrams.

So now I shall define AntiVigilante's mass: The smallest possible brain
fart in the universe or such. I kid. In order for my proposal to have any
proposability (even if wrong) I need to know what the smallest mass could
be.

Naturally I imagine it would be the mass at which the smallest change in
its momentum would produce the smallest detectable event.

I also would bet that the smallest mass, smallest change, and smallest
detectable event would be a reference to the same thing: the smallest
amount of energy which can cause change.

The reason for this is that my proposal suggests negative masses repel
each other gravitationally. But if they are below the smallest detectable
(able to cause effect) mass then none of their momentum related
properties could be activated anyway because there isn't enough energy to
overcome quantum mechanical discreteness. Like a tire that can't make it
over the curb.

I imagine that would be the energy/mass just above where atoms collapse
into Bose Einstein Condensates. They have so little energy that
electromagnetic and nuclear forces can't keep them apart.

--
Fuck the Enlightenment! Viva la Renaissance!