Re: THE WORLD NEEDS COLD FUSION
Richard Schultz
In sci.chem go...@rock.com <goo...@rock.com> wrote:
: Cold fusion is for real. Just like the light bulb it may take many
: attempts to get it right.
In March 1989, Pons and Fleischmann claimed that they had a *working
prototype* of a cold fusion based water heater.
Note that they were not claiming to have been in Edison's position of needing
to test 1000 different filament compositions -- they claimed to have had
a water heater prototype that already worked.
Nearly 20 years later, where's the water heater?
-----
Richard Schultz sch...@mail.biu.ac.il
Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University
-----
". . .Mr Schutz [sic] acts like a functional electro-terrorist who
impeads [sic] scientific communications with his too oft-silliness."
-- Mitchell Swartz, sci.physics.fusion article <EEI1o...@world.std.com>
kiloVolts
[snip garbage]
>
> Note that they were not claiming to have been in Edison's position of
> needing
> to test 1000 different filament compositions -- they claimed to have had
> a water heater prototype that already worked.
>
> Nearly 20 years later, where's the water heater?
>
> Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
Ricard Schultz is a fraudulent academic. Any activist can spout the same
tired slogans and rhetoric for twenty years. A tenured academic is expected
to have something to say within and about the published scientific
literature. Twenty years is a long time for one man to have a hard-on
against one publication.
Fleischmann, M., S. Pons, and M. Hawkins, Electrochemically induced nuclear
fusion of deuterium. J. Electroanal.
Chem., 1989. 261: p. 301
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/Fleischmanelectroche.pdf
This paper has been cited by other authors 323 times in the scientific
literature. Richard Schults is an asshole and an idiot unless he can
demonstrate similar citation numbers for himself.
In the paper above.Pons and Fleischman wrote,
"We have to report here that under the conditions of the last experiment,
even using D2O alone, a substantial portion of the cathode fused (melting
point 1544ºC), part of it vapourised, and the cell and contents and a part
of the fume cupboard housing the experiment were destroyed."
Within three short years a young electrochemist was killed trying to better
the work of Pons and Fleischman, in the face of relentless criticism of such
work.
Richard Schultz is beneath contempt. He belongs in an insane asylum or a
prison cell.
kiloVolts
>> Nearly 20 years later, where's the water heater?
>>
>> Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
>
> Ricard Schultz is a fraudulent academic.
Richard Schultz gives as his organization, in the headers of his postings:
Organization: Israel Inter-University Computation Cente, [sic]
which can be found at:
Whereas, within his email signature, he claims attachment to Department of
Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel, which can be found at:
http://www.ch.biu.ac.il/php/general/people.php?status=fac&l_id=people_bar
which in turn lists names of Faculty, Senior Researchers, PostDocs, Graduate
Students and Administrative Staff.
A careful search of the IUCC and Bar-Ilan U. reveals that none of the two
groups to which Schultz claims attachment admit any attachment to him.
Schultz has become unhinged and meaningless. He is nothing but a glorified
Archimedes Plutonium. Please do not feed the troll.
Richard Schultz
: Richard Schultz gives as his organization, in the headers of his postings:
:
: Organization: Israel Inter-University Computation Cente, [sic]
Idiot. The IICC is the organization that *runs the usenet server* for
the universities in Israel.
: A careful search of the IUCC and Bar-Ilan U. reveals that none of the two
: groups to which Schultz claims attachment admit any attachment to him.
Take a look at http://tinyurl.com/5z2fak and ask yourself how I managed
to get away with the institutional affiliation listed therein.
-----
Richard Schultz sch...@mail.biu.ac.il
Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University
-----
"You don't even have a clue about which clue you're missing."
kiloVolts
> Take a look at http://tinyurl.com/5z2fak and ask yourself how I managed
> to get away with the institutional affiliation listed therein.
You've denied nothing. All you claim is you had an affiliation with a
university in 2001. Big deal. Go away idiot.
number6
> "Richard Schultz" <schu...@mail.biu.ack.il> wrote
>
> > Take a look athttp://tinyurl.com/5z2fakand ask yourself how I managed
> > to get away with the institutional affiliation listed therein.
>
> You've denied nothing. All you claim is you had an affiliation with a
> university in 2001. Big deal. Go away idiot.
You're way out of line there ... I doubt I've ever agreed with Richard
Schultz over the years politically ... but he's a chemist with some
good contributions to this group over many years ... I don't know what
his exact position is at that school ... but as a chemist he's part of
it ...
I don't think it's necessary for him to post more information ... with
the nuts roaming USENET ... even the sci groups ... I feel he's given
out too much already ...
kiloVolts
> On Aug 11, 5:01 am, "kiloVolts" <man....@n0spam.com> wrote:
>
> > "Richard Schultz" <schu...@mail.biu.ack.il> wrote
>
> > > to get away with the institutional affiliation listed therein.
>
> > You've denied nothing. All you claim is you had an affiliation with a
> > university in 2001. Big deal. Go away idiot.
>
> You're way out of line there ... I doubt I've ever agreed with Richard
> Schultz over the years politically ... but he's a chemist with some
> good contributions to this group over many years ... I don't know what
> his exact position is at that school ... but as a chemist he's part of
> it ...
> I don't think it's necessary for him to post more information ... with
> the nuts roaming USENET ... even the sci groups ... I feel he's given
> out too much already ...
Dear Professor number6,
In my university career (B.Sc., M.Sc., Ph.D.), I encountered numerous
military personnel from many nations. University education is of value to
the officer corps. Israel is surrounded by enemies, so Professor Richard
Schultz would be remiss in his duties to his nation to avoid an attachment
to the Israeli military. Truth is the first casualty of war. I respect the
military individuals with whom I still maintain personnel contact but I can
tell you they are skilled in deceipt. For twenty years Professor Richard
Schultz has conducted a specific form of deceipt and disinformation with
respect to a specific controversial but respected publication. During that
time Professor Richard Schultz has not demonstrated any learning or
evolution in his scholarship. He has never submitted an original newsgroup
post. It has been discovered that he no longer has an academic attachment of
the sort that he claims in his signature line. Maybe he works in the library
stacking books or maybe he has retired. He is trapped in his own web of
lies. So he is a chemist, big deal, we are also chemists. If Professor
Richard Schultz is unable to withstand the heat of criticism he should stay
out of the kitchen.
Having said that, my good friend Richard is welcome back here if he drops
the pretensions. He needs to drop the deceitful signature line, immediately.
If he has a need for the intimacy of a name, he can use 'Rick' or 'Ricky',
something that does no convey false authority. There are hundreds of
respectable professionals named "Richard Schultz" who should not be shamed
by connection to his lies. Under a reduced climate of pretension, he would
be welcome contribute to the public domain discourse we know and love as
'Usenet', just like Archimedes Plutonium does.
Yours Respectfully.
Professor kiloVolts
Richard Schultz
: In my university career (B.Sc., M.Sc., Ph.D.),
I very seriously doubt that you have a Ph.D., or any university education
to speak of.
: Israel is surrounded by enemies, so Professor Richard
: Schultz would be remiss in his duties to his nation to avoid an attachment
: to the Israeli military.
Now it's the Israeli military who I represent. I'm beginning to lose track
of the number of different Forces of Evil for whom I'm working.
: For twenty years Professor Richard
: Schultz has conducted a specific form of deceipt and disinformation with
: respect to a specific controversial but respected publication.
Name a single thing I have said about Pons & Fleischmann's original paper
that is not true. For that matter, name a single thing about *any* cold
fusion paper that I have said that is not true.
On the other hand, the notion that P&F's original paper is "respected"
is, to put it succinctly, laughable.
: He has never submitted an original newsgroup post.
That is a lie.
-----
Richard Schultz sch...@mail.biu.ac.il
Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University
-----
"It is terrible to die of thirst in the ocean. Do you have to salt your
truth so heavily that it does not even quench thirst any more?"
kiloVolts
> Take a look at http://tinyurl.com/5z2fak and ask yourself how I managed
> to get away with the institutional affiliation listed therein.
Thank you Richard, for providing information regarding your publication
prowess. This must be your best work. It is interesting to note that you
have been cited a total of eleven times. ELEVEN TIMES for your most coveted
work. What a hypocrite you are Richard. Your favorite pass time is to
criticize work which has been cited 323 times. I repeat to you Richard, you
need to go away.
Please do not assume that I am so stupid to reply to your every message like
you do to mine. No one else will read your posts. You are wasting your time.
kiloVolts
Dear Richard,
You appear to be a stupid person to engage in fraud like you do, so I have
decided to bait you some more. This action may be justified because you
apparently made an ass of yourself in the newsgroup
'misc.health.alternative', so you are getting what you deserve.
There is incontrovertible evidence that you *were* employed as a lecturer at
Bar-Ilan University, but that you are no longer so employed.
Bar-Ilan University provides a search engine at the URL below:
Any one can search this to find evidence that you have departed. If this
search engine provides incorrect evidence about you, the only explanation
would be that you are as unpopular on your home turf as you are here.
Richard Schultz
:
:> Take a look at http://tinyurl.com/5z2fak and ask yourself how I managed
:> to get away with the institutional affiliation listed therein.
:
: Thank you Richard, for providing information regarding your publication
: prowess. This must be your best work.
No, it is the first article that came up in a scholar.google search.
How many publications do you have in Angewandte Chemie?
: Please do not assume that I am so stupid to reply to your every message like
: you do to mine. No one else will read your posts. You are wasting your time.
It is obvious that you are impervious to logic or scientific argument; if
you were not, you would address the scientific issues that I raise instead
of spending your time making random personal attacks against me that only
reveal your utter cluelessness. It is obvious that you are a coward, since
you are only willing to make those attacks from behind a pseudonym. If my
goal were to convince *you* that the evidence for the reality of Cold Fusion
is far from compelling, then you are correct, I would be wasting my time.
Since that is not my goal, responding to your posts is no more a waste of
time than posting to usenet in general is.
-----
Richard Schultz sch...@mail.biu.ac.il
Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University
-----
Tom Kunich
news:g7r4kq$8ac$1...@news.iucc.ac.il...
> In sci.physics.fusion kiloVolts <man...@n0spam.com> wrote:
>
> : In my university career (B.Sc., M.Sc., Ph.D.),
>
> I very seriously doubt that you have a Ph.D., or any university education
> to speak of.
His PhD easily provable but then he'd have to tell you his "real" name
(honest, kiloVolts is just a pen name) and it might embarrass all of us.
Richard Schultz
: "Richard Schultz" <sch...@mail.biu.ack.il> wrote in message
I can see how it would embarrass *him* -- I assume that's why he's too
cowardly to tell us his name. I can't see how it would embarrass the rest
of us, since we as a group are not responsible for his actions.
-----
Richard Schultz sch...@mail.biu.ac.il
Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University
-----
Tom Kunich
> In sci.physics.fusion Tom Kunich <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote:
> : "Richard Schultz" <sch...@mail.biu.ack.il> wrote in message
> : news:g7r4kq$8ac$1...@news.iucc.ac.il...
> :> In sci.physics.fusion kiloVolts <man...@n0spam.com> wrote:
>
> :> : In my university career (B.Sc., M.Sc., Ph.D.),
>
> :> I very seriously doubt that you have a Ph.D., or any university
> education
> :> to speak of.
>
> : His PhD easily provable but then he'd have to tell you his "real" name
> : (honest, kiloVolts is just a pen name) and it might embarrass all of us.
>
> I can see how it would embarrass *him* -- I assume that's why he's too
> cowardly to tell us his name. I can't see how it would embarrass the rest
> of us, since we as a group are not responsible for his actions.
(Shaking head) Richard, Richard, Richard - we could be embarrassed for not
immediately recognizing the genius he has written here and also not
immediately placing it at the foot of the throne of the Doctorate of
Everything.
Richard Schultz
: "Richard Schultz" <sch...@mail.biu.ack.il> wrote in message
:> : His PhD easily provable but then he'd have to tell you his "real" name
:> : (honest, kiloVolts is just a pen name) and it might embarrass all of us.
:> I can see how it would embarrass *him* -- I assume that's why he's too
:> cowardly to tell us his name. I can't see how it would embarrass the rest
:> of us, since we as a group are not responsible for his actions.
: (Shaking head) Richard, Richard, Richard - we could be embarrassed for not
: immediately recognizing the genius he has written here and also not
: immediately placing it at the foot of the throne of the Doctorate of
: Everything.
Oh, *that* kind of embarrassment. My bad.
Dieter Britz
[...]
> In my university career (B.Sc., M.Sc., Ph.D.), I encountered numerous
> military personnel from many nations. University education is of value to
> the officer corps. Israel is surrounded by enemies, so Professor Richard
> Schultz would be remiss in his duties to his nation to avoid an attachment
> to the Israeli military. Truth is the first casualty of war. I respect the
> military individuals with whom I still maintain personnel contact but I
> can tell you they are skilled in deceipt. For twenty years Professor
> Richard Schultz has conducted a specific form of deceipt and
Reading this, I ask myself, how did you get a Ph.D. if you can't spell
correctly? Personell? Deceipt? Aaargh.
--
Dieter Britz (britz<at>chem.au.dk)
kiloVolts
>
>> Take a look at http://tinyurl.com/5z2fak and ask yourself how I managed
>> to get away with the institutional affiliation listed therein.
>
> Thank you Richard, for providing information regarding your publication
> prowess. This must be your best work. It is interesting to note that you
> have been cited a total of eleven times. ELEVEN TIMES for your most
> coveted work. What a hypocrite you are Richard. Your favorite pass time is
> to criticize work which has been cited 323 times. I repeat to you Richard,
> you need to go away.
What a small dick Richard Schultz must have. One paper I published way back
in the 1970s has received 34 citations last time I checked.
7
> [followups trimmed and spf -- the appropriate group -- added]
>
> In sci.chem go...@rock.com <goo...@rock.com> wrote:
>
> : Cold fusion is for real. Just like the light bulb it may take many
> : attempts to get it right.
>
> In March 1989, Pons and Fleischmann claimed that they had a *working
> prototype* of a cold fusion based water heater.
>
> Note that they were not claiming to have been in Edison's position of
> needing to test 1000 different filament compositions -- they claimed to
> have had a water heater prototype that already worked.
>
> Nearly 20 years later, where's the water heater?
Still working.
It was on the news in April (search youtube.com)
Like flight before the Wright Brothers,
the problem was and still is reproducibility and understanding
the success/failure mechanism.
It was 1:10 success wien Pons and Fleishmann reported it.
Now its better than 2:3 success.
Electron micrographs of palladium show pin holes
whenever success is measured. So its a clear
measurable signal.
Patterson Cell also working but its not plagued with
reproducibility. It works first time every time.