My experiments

[Chris]

I have now completed my tests and sold my radio equipment.

I may continue after a pause with some experiments using a pulse of current
from a car battery.
--
Chris.
Remove ns_ to reply

[Chris]

9-10-2009
I have now completed my tests with radio frequency and sold my radio
equipment.
12-10-2009
I completed the pulsed version of the reactor using a bobbin of 40 SWG wire
as the coil, I had to make a rough connection to the near inside end of the
coil by making a hole in the bobbin bigger and soldering a wire to the
exposed wire on the inside. At �8 a bobbin this is cheaper than getting a
coil wound at �360.
When connected the 10 volt pulses yield about 3500 volt across the capacitor
and the circuit resonates at about 5000 Hz.
I'm thinking of using an audio frequency oscillator and a high power audio
amplifier set to the resonant frequency to excite it.
Image deleted
Pulsed reactor without tube
The battery is switched with a starter relay. It delivers about 300 Amp at
12 volt.

--
Chris.
Remove ns_ to reply

"Chris" <ns_cjrs@ns_chrisspages.co.uk> wrote in message
news:urNzm.22427$cD3....@newsfe05.ams2...

[Chris]

I calculated that there are about 14000 turns on the coil and that the
pulsed power is about 3600 watt but that the power in the resonator as shown
by measurements is about 2000 volts at 1.5 Amp or about 3000 watt.

--
Chris.
Remove ns_ to reply
"Chris" <ns_cjrs@ns_chrisspages.co.uk> wrote in message

news:ifKAm.29577$X31....@newsfe17.ams2...

[tom]

Chris wrote:
> I have now completed my tests and sold my radio equipment.
>
> I may continue after a pause with some experiments using a pulse of current
> from a car battery.

I am sorry to hear that Chris. Your experiments have been interesting.

tom
K0TAR

[Chris]

Well the truth is that I was under pressure from the authorities to sell
otherwise it would be taken from me. However I am no monger under suspicion
of being a bomb maker so I am allowed to buy some new equipment. I have
bought a new transmitter and run some more tests.

I was forcebly detained and made to have injections to interfere with my
mind, it dulled me down, I was held for 7 weeks unable to leave the cells
where I was held except to be treated in hospital for heart and prostate
disease.

I was allowed home on a home treatment order and given more injections but
then they made me voluntary so I refused my injection and today the officer
did not call. I have asked a lawyer to get me released from the home
treatment order.

However I now have an attorney to look after my finances and property and he
is also my patent attorney. He said I cannot afford the linear amplifier at
present and that I will have to save up.

I hope to be able to afford a new linear amplifier in the new year in about
March.

I ran another test this evening. I set the exciter on 100 watt and tuned the
reactor so give zero reverse power. The radiation meter read 34. After a
while the reverse power crept up and the radiation monitor rose to 40. Then
the exciter power dropped as the reactor went out of tune. The gamma
indicator read several cycles of 2 microsavarts per hour. I retuned the
capacitor on the reactor to bring the reverse power back to zero. When the
reactor was out of tune the tube dimmed a bit after retuning the tube
brightness returned.

The reverse power crept up so I retuned the reactor to keep the reverse
power to zero and the radiation monitor rose to 44. The reverse power crept
up again then became irreducible at 2 watt. The radiation monitor stayed at
44.

I re-calculated that the total power radiated from the device was 100 watt
approx and the radiation monitor gives a more sensitive indication of the
power but is un-calibrated.

So the power excess was approx 100x 44/34 = 30 watt.

The estimate of 64 watt is calculated from the E-field meter of 300
volts/meter. The meter is at a distance of about 400 mm. So the power
incident on the meter is 300^2/300 Watt/Meter^2 = 300 watt/m^2 so the total
power = area of sphere at 400 mm x 300 watt = 300 x 2/3 pi 0.4^2 = 100 watt.
(I think the area of a sphere of radius R is R^2 x 2/3 x pi.

So the power due to fusion was 30 watt appox.

--
Chris.
Remove ns_ to reply

"tom" <news...@taring.org> wrote in message
news:4ae118ec$0$42847$8046...@newsreader.iphouse.net...

[Chris]

The tube I used is an old tube and the markings have come off so I do not
know the pressure inside. I think it is higher than 10^-7 Tor.

The reason that I think it is higher is that is has not been deformed by
melting as much as the others.

--
Chris.
Remove ns_ to reply

"Chris" <ns_cjrs@ns_chrisspages.co.uk> wrote in message

news:_NAPm.59114$tF6....@newsfe28.ams2...

[Chris]

I calculated that I got 1 microwatt out of a tube with a pressure of 10^-8
Tor

That would imply that the tube I am using has hydrogen at a pressure of
10^-4 Tor. (30 Watt)

This fits the curve given in my book on fusion reactions for D-D reactions
at 100 KeV. My collision energy is about 800 KeV and I am using the P-P
reaction.

With a pressure of 1 Tor a power of 100000 watt would be expected and to
obtain collision energy of 800 KeV at 1 Tor the power of the exciter would
need to be: 1000000 x 100 watt = 100 megawatt.

At atmospheric pressure the power would be 1E9 and the exciter power 1470 x
100 MW = 1.47 E11.

It looks like we won't get ignition at all. Why do H-bombs work? How does
the sun work?

I tried a 1 Tor tube and there was no excess RF power with exciter power of
100 watt.

It seems that the exciter power density has to be proportional to the
pressure and the power density generated is proportional to the pressure so
to make the thing self exciting you need to change something else. Ignition
is not possible like that.

--
Chris.
Remove ns_ to reply
"Chris" <ns_cjrs@ns_chrisspages.co.uk> wrote in message

news:WlBPm.35550$UY....@newsfe23.ams2...

[Chris]

In fact the power density is proportional to the square of the pressure so
ignition is possible and the exciter power density is linearly proportional
to the pressure.

1E-8 Tor....1E-6 watt
1E-4 Tor.....30 watt. .... 100 watt
1 Tor...........1000 watt ... 1E6 Watt
10 Tor ........100,000 watt ... 1E7 Watt
100 Tor ......1E7 Watt ..........1E8 Watt
1000 Tor ....1E9 Watt ..........1E9 Watt.

--
Chris.
Remove ns_ to reply
"Chris" <ns_cjrs@ns_chrisspages.co.uk> wrote in message

news:gXDPm.104642$cN3....@newsfe30.ams2...

[Chris]

Deuterons fuse at a lower energy than Protons and so my guess is that 10
Watt exciter would yield 30 watt and so would start up at <10 watt.

--
Chris.
Remove ns_ to reply
"Chris" <ns_cjrs@ns_chrisspages.co.uk> wrote in message

news:XeEPm.34121$Z_5....@newsfe10.ams2...

[Chris]

I did another run today and something remarkable happened. As the RF meter
rose to read 40 the reverse power rose to about 7 watt and the transmitter
automatically cut the exciter power from 100 watt to 80 watt the protect the
transistor however the RF meter remained steady at 40. The calibrated
E-field meter did not change either.

This appears to indicate that the power out remained at about 120 watt for
an exciter power of 80 watt making the power generated by fusion to be 40
watt.

I repeated this some time later with the same result.

--
Chris.
Remove ns_ to reply
"Chris" <ns_cjrs@ns_chrisspages.co.uk> wrote in message

news:2gVPm.127811$Qc7....@newsfe17.ams2...

[Chris]

All I can be sure of is that as the reverse power rose the RF meter which is
monitering radiated power increased its value. These changes were by more
than the thikness of the line and about one division of the RF meter and at
about the 5 watt point of the reverse power meter.

--
Chris.
Remove ns_ to reply
"Chris" <ns_cjrs@ns_chrisspages.co.uk> wrote in message

news:xtyRm.31683$ng.1...@newsfe19.ams2...