Works very good, our estimate is it uses 1/2 to 1/3 of the
wood a standard wood stove uses.
It took a lot of study and experimentation to get a practical
application of the theory. It's been subsequently improved.
Regards
Ken S. Tucker
It looks like this patent is expired. Let me know if you need any help
patenting any improvements.
Best,
Jay
"Ken S. Tucker" <dyna...@vianet.on.ca> wrote in message
news:d89b9517-2ac6-42a3...@a21g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
On Dec 15, 9:03 pm, "Jay R. Yablon" <jyab...@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
> Hi Ken,
> It looks like this patent is expired. Let me know if you need any help
> patenting any improvements.
> Best,
> Jay
The demand for woodstoves is pretty much in proportion to the
cost of conventionally heating a home using electricity, gas or
oil. Since filing that patent the regulations for woodstoves has
become much more strict. I think I can get around that using
copyrighted plans with a mail-order self assembly kit.
Something that maybe of interest is this,
(The Law of Unintended Consequences),
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unintended_consequence
It appears to apply to 'new and improved' energy efficient stop lights
because they get snowed over, clogged up, and cause accidents,
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=121498684
and
http://www.todaystmj4.com/news/local/79008352.html
I'm following the story for litigation fallout.
What a hoot eh, it's applied physics.
I wonder if the inventor could get sued, (rhetorical).
Best regards,
Ken
> "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@vianet.on.ca> wrote in messagenews:d89b9517-2ac6-42a3...@a21g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
>
> > To Jay et al.
> > Hardly earthshaking, but for a light read on thermodynamics
> > is a note on a "wood stove" patent we own online here,
>
> >http://brevets-patents.ic.gc.ca/opic-cipo/cpd/eng/patent/1241883/summ...