Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
an improved mock-up of Cavendish Experiment #161 New Physics #270 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Archimedes Plutonium
Feb 2, 2012, 2:15:39 AM2/2/12
to
Alright I have improved the mock-up Cavendish Experiment. My materials
are
two 50 lb steel weights. These are rectangular in shape and have
stamped on them 50 lbs and they have a steel handle molded. They
measure about 6in by
6in by 8in or 15cm by 15cm by 20cm.
One of them is suspended on a steel cable wire.
Now I applied a fulcrum to the back of the suspended weight, for the
fulcrum
allows me to get the weight to stop vibrating so much.
Now I take a second weight and place it as close to the suspended so
that the
weights have a gap of 5mm and have a 5mm wood dowel to separate them.
I try to keep the vibrations to a minimum and look to see if the 5mm
gap is closed in any way due to mass gravity. In today's experiment I
found no shrinking of that 5 mm gap.
Tomorrow I will apply a magnet to one mass and see if the gap is
closed. And then two magnets if the one does not close the gap.
My intuition tells me that no massive object alongside another massive
object is going to have a measurable closing of the gap. If we had
just two tiny magnets separated by a 5mm gap, the gap is closed
instantly and we see it clearly and perceptively. In Newtonian gravity
or GR, we never have the sense nor the perception, nor the feel of an
attraction.
Since EM is 10^39 stronger of a force and since all masses have
electric charge imbalances, that the force of mass gravity is merely a
fake idea, and that the gravity force is nothing more than the net
imbalances of all the charges inside two objects.
Why are all the imbalances an attraction force? I have no good answer
at the moment, other than to say that in Faraday's law, it matters not
whether the charges are the same for the motion of the electrons in
the closed loop wire move regardless of like charges.
Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
are
two 50 lb steel weights. These are rectangular in shape and have
stamped on them 50 lbs and they have a steel handle molded. They
measure about 6in by
6in by 8in or 15cm by 15cm by 20cm.
One of them is suspended on a steel cable wire.
Now I applied a fulcrum to the back of the suspended weight, for the
fulcrum
allows me to get the weight to stop vibrating so much.
Now I take a second weight and place it as close to the suspended so
that the
weights have a gap of 5mm and have a 5mm wood dowel to separate them.
I try to keep the vibrations to a minimum and look to see if the 5mm
gap is closed in any way due to mass gravity. In today's experiment I
found no shrinking of that 5 mm gap.
Tomorrow I will apply a magnet to one mass and see if the gap is
closed. And then two magnets if the one does not close the gap.
My intuition tells me that no massive object alongside another massive
object is going to have a measurable closing of the gap. If we had
just two tiny magnets separated by a 5mm gap, the gap is closed
instantly and we see it clearly and perceptively. In Newtonian gravity
or GR, we never have the sense nor the perception, nor the feel of an
attraction.
Since EM is 10^39 stronger of a force and since all masses have
electric charge imbalances, that the force of mass gravity is merely a
fake idea, and that the gravity force is nothing more than the net
imbalances of all the charges inside two objects.
Why are all the imbalances an attraction force? I have no good answer
at the moment, other than to say that in Faraday's law, it matters not
whether the charges are the same for the motion of the electrons in
the closed loop wire move regardless of like charges.
Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
David R Tribble
Feb 2, 2012, 6:05:45 PM2/2/12
to
Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Alright I have improved the mock-up Cavendish Experiment. My materials
> are
> two 50 lb steel weights. These are rectangular in shape and have
> stamped on them 50 lbs and they have a steel handle molded. They
> measure about 6in by
> 6in by 8in or 15cm by 15cm by 20cm.
>
> One of them is suspended on a steel cable wire.
> [...]
> Alright I have improved the mock-up Cavendish Experiment. My materials
> are
> two 50 lb steel weights. These are rectangular in shape and have
> stamped on them 50 lbs and they have a steel handle molded. They
> measure about 6in by
> 6in by 8in or 15cm by 15cm by 20cm.
>
> One of them is suspended on a steel cable wire.
>
> My intuition tells me that no massive object alongside another massive
> object is going to have a measurable closing of the gap.
How are you measuring the torsion on the steel wire?
> My intuition tells me that no massive object alongside another massive
> object is going to have a measurable closing of the gap.
Archimedes Plutonium
Feb 2, 2012, 11:39:27 PM2/2/12
to
To replace each of four lead balls by the
Coulomb force to get the same deflection
David R Tribble
Feb 6, 2012, 3:21:23 PM2/6/12
to
Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>> One of them is suspended on a steel cable wire.
>> [...]
>> My intuition tells me that no massive object alongside another massive
>> object is going to have a measurable closing of the gap.
>
>> One of them is suspended on a steel cable wire.
>> [...]
>> My intuition tells me that no massive object alongside another massive
>> object is going to have a measurable closing of the gap.
>
David R Tribble wrote:
>> How are you measuring the torsion on the steel wire?
>
>> How are you measuring the torsion on the steel wire?
>
Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Compute how many electrons or protons
> To replace each of four lead balls by the
> Coulomb force to get the same deflection
And how are you measuring that deflection?
> Compute how many electrons or protons
> To replace each of four lead balls by the
> Coulomb force to get the same deflection
0 new messages