CERN. LHC. The Dearth is soon.
Magnetic
But with great probability their secretaries will drop my letters
into
rubbish.
So, if you do not want to play in Russian Roulette, compose your own
letter or agree with mine.
Dear President!
I am the author of the theory of magnetic hole. According to this
theory magnetic holes can be created soon at the Large Hadron
Collider. That will lead to the collaptical explosion of the Earth.
November the 30-th, according to the preliminary plan for the Large
Hadron Collider, the collisions of protons with energies of 0.45 TeV
will be implemented, the 14-th of December - collisions with energies
of 3.5 TeV. If the magnetic collapse starts, it will be impossible to
stop it. It will end with ejection of the Earth’s shell into outer
space.
I give the following probabilities:
A. 10% - magnetic collapse will start at 0.45 TeV;
B. 50% - magnetic collapse will start at 3.5 TeV, if A did not
happen;
C. 70% - magnetic collapse will start at 7 TeV, if B did not happen.
30% I leave to my mistake.
Why is such confidence?
Compare Newtonian black hole and magnetic hole:
GMm / r = mc^2 / 2;
pB = mc^2.
It was obtained two independent proofs that the equality pB = mc^2 is
reached at the energies, achievable in modern colliders,
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/magtren.html
There are many arguments in favor the fact that magnetic holes exist,
and astronomers see them, but call them on the error as black holes,
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/argen.html
It was found several crude errors and criminal lies in the assessment
documents about the safety of LHC, http://darkenergy.narod.ru/tezeng.html
The Earth after the magnetic collapse will transform into a small
region of exited superconducting vacuum. This region’s diameter is
about 10 meters. The thickness is about 2.5 meters
----------
Crude Errors in Risk Assessment of Colliders.
From correspondence at forums.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What will happen if pB will be equal to mc^2, where p – magnetic
moment
of a proton; B – magnetic field, created by another flying by proton
(or the field of already made magnetic hole) mc^2 – the rest energy
of
proton?
At what energy of collisions the equality pB=mc^2 is valid?
My answer: 0.255 TeV.
Note 1:
Simplest definition of magnetic hole can be made on the following
comparison:
Newtonian black hole: GMm/r = mc^2/2;
Magnetic hole: pB=mc^2.
Note 2:
The time needed the microscopic black hole capture the whole Earth is
mach greater than million years. Consequently, they are safe for now
living people on the Earth.
The time needed the magnetic hole capture the whole Earth is about
1000 seconds. Consequently, magnetic holes can explode the Earth and
Solar system.
Note 3:
We know two types of explosions chemical and nuclear.
Astronomers see the third type of explosions – collaptical.
At nuclear explosion only few thousand’s parts of explosive rest
energy is realized in the form of radiation and kinetic energy of
fragments.
At some stellar collaptical explosions about a half of rest energy of
the star is realized in the form of radiation and kinetic energy of
the rejected stellar shell.
What type of collaptical explosions do astronomers observe:
gravitational into black hole or magnetic into magnetic hole?
Is it possible to switch the magnetic collapse at collider?
My answers: The observed collapses are magnetic ones. Magnetic
collapse can be switched on by powerful colliders.
----------
LHC will be switched on in the mead-November; the first collisions
are
waited in a few weeks later. Do we survive or do we start into outer
space?
Dear physicists, you again and again repeat the biggest error of
Stephen Hawking.
In the CERN's article “The safety of the LHC”
http://public.web.cern.ch/public/en/LHC/Safety-en.html you can find a
dozen of comparisons with cosmic rays.
Hawking: "The world will not come to an end when the LHC turns on.
The
LHC is absolutely safe. ... Collisions releasing greater energy occur
millions of times a day in the earth's atmosphere and nothing
terrible
happens."
This error will cost us the life of our Civilization.
The biggest error is in the comparison of A and B.
A. Collisions of protons at LHC;
B. Collisions of cosmic protons with atmospheric protons.
Similarity: Energies in A and B are sufficient in order to make
microscopic magnetic holes.
Difference: Velocities of created holes relatively surrounding matter
are drastically great.
A. Magnetic holes, made on LHC, can have very small velocities.
B. According to conservation law of 4-momentum, cosmic holes have
relativistic velocities.
Result:
A. LHC’s holes capture slowly moving particles and grow. The bigger
hole becomes – the bigger its rate of growth.
B. Atmosphere particles move relatively holes with relativistic
velocities and, correspondingly, they have TeV kinetic energy,
relatively holes. As a result, magnetic holes evaporate immediately.
Such collisions lead to creation of showers of secondary particles.
Physicists observe such showers.
Analogy:
Let’s compare the behavior of “nuclear quasi-hole” with the behavior
of magnetic hole. Let’s investigate two cases:
A. Bombarding particles are neutrons, having the kinetic energies,
equal to several in eV.
B. Bombarding neutrons have kinetic energies, equal to several TeV.
Approximate result:
A. Collapse:
p+n -> d;
d+n -> t -> He3+e;
He3+n -> He4;
He4+n -> He5;
He5+n -> He6 -> Li6+e;
Li6+n -> Li7;
Li7+n -> Li8 -> Be8+e;
Be8+n -> Be9;
Be9+n -> Be10;
...
U235+n -> X+Y+2n
X+n ->...; Y+n ->...
two branches;
...
four branches;
...
eight branches;
...
Collaptical explosion!
B. Evaporation. TeV-energy neutrons will ruin the nucleus in the
backward order in crude approximation.
Nuclear collapse is impossible because the repulsive electrostatic
forces of protons. That is way, I named nucleus by “nuclear quasi-
holes”.
Magnetic collapse has no limit. Magnetic hole will grow till there is
the food, - the matter of planet or star.
Physicists, did you see the difference?
Look here: fig. SN 1987A.
That is an image of remnants of exploded star.
You can see there three beautiful semi axial rings.
Axial symmetry says us that there was the magnetic collapse, but not
the gravity collapse.
Magnetic hole has axial symmetry because it is a compact magnetic
dipole.
Black hole must have spherical symmetry, if it is not rotate.
The Earth after the magnetic collapse will transform into a small
region of exited superconducting vacuum. This region’s diameter is
about 10 meters. The thickness is about 2.5 meters. The strength of
magnetic field in this region is about 10^16 teslas. Because of the
strong magnetic interaction, this small magnetic hole will move on
spiral trajectory to the Sun. As a result, the Sun will explode and
astronomy amateurs from neighbor stellar systems (alien free
thinkers)
will observe novae or supernovae phenomenon. Alien stephen hawkings
will say: “The world will not come to an end when the LHC turns on.
The LHC is absolutely safe. ... Collisions releasing greater energy
occur millions of times a day in the earth's atmosphere and nothing
terrible happens”
The second crude error is made by the authors of
http://doc.cern.ch/yellowrep/2003/2003-001/p1.pdf They wrote
"magnetic monopoles can catalyse proton decay. Can this be a problem?
At each catalysis event energy is released by the decaying proton,
causing the monopole to move. It is straightforward to estimate the
number of protons that could be destroyed before the monopole escapes
the Earth. Monopoles are expected to have a strong cross-section with
normal matter. As a result the mean free path of a monopole moving
through iron is given by (formula)..
In each collision a nucleon is destroyed so the escaping monopole
will
destroy 1018 nucleons: negligibly small compared to the total number
of nucleons".
The author’s logic would be correct only in the case of isotropic
medium. But the Earth has it’s own gravity field and it’s own
magnetic
field. Both these fields are not isotropic. Created monopoles will
not
go far from the attracting places. They will randomly move around
these places till destroy all protons of the Earth. So the correct
number is not 10^18 but the total number of Earth's protons, divided
by the number of created
monopoles.
III. The third error is hidden in the formula of monopole catalyses
of
proton decay
M + p = M + e^+.
More correct formula must contain the number n:
M_n + p = M_{n+1} + e^+.
This number shows the number of x-bosons in magnetic monopole (one
more type of magnetic holes). These bosons have the equal quantum
numbers. Magnetic hole works as laser. The word laser originated as
an
acronym for Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation.
Laser creates the same photons, which are bosons with zero mass
energy. Because of zero mass, photons fly away from laser with the
speed of light. Magnetic trap creates x-bosons, which have non-zero
rest mass. These bosons do not fly away but becomes the constituent
part of magnetic hole. The bigger the number n – the bigger the rate
of magnetic collapse of ordinary matter into magnetic hole.
People, I am in shock from your silence!
Humans, like a herd of obedient sheep, are lead to the abyss. I, as a
mortally frightened lamb, run from side to side of the herd, but the
herd do not hear me. They laugh at me and moves slowly, plucking the
juicy grass.
People, please, wake up! Open your eyes!
November the 30-th, according to the preliminary plan for the Large
Hadron Collider, the collision of protons with energies of 0.45 TeV
will be implemented, 14 December - collision with energies of 3.5
TeV.
If the magnetic collapse starts, it will be impossible to stop it. It
will end with ejection of the Earth’s shell into space.
Humans, are you really obedient sheep, ready to be killed?
Greg Neill
[snip crapola]
Idiot. (Sorry, Al).
Magnetic
>
> [snip crapola]
I want to live and write everywhere I can.
According to Russian online “opinion pole” at November 6, 2009, 52%
of
respondents had said that LHC is the dearth threat.
> Are you seriously suggesting that science should be driven by public
> opinion?
Physicists in their majority are confident that heavy particles,
created at LHC will decay.
That is a crude error.
LHC can create a particle with the mass by 10 000 times greater than
the mass of proton.
To imagine this, compare the masses of a human and of a railway
train.
Imagine the situation if biologists would make a creature with the
mass of railway train, but having the human size. What will happen to
you if this creature would seat at the roof of your house, exactly
over you? Any roof will be broken and you would be smashed into a
thin
film and pushed deep into the ground.
Now imagine a proton, as soup babble, and a liquid drop of the same
size.
What will happen to protons, if the babble has a field, attracting
protons?
Protons would be ruined and their remnants would condense onto the
drop.
Particle physicists have no such imagination. Those idiots think that
proton consists from three point-like quarks. In fact proton is
composed from some continuous substance, rotating with relativistic
velocity. This rotating substance creates three mixed electro-
magneto-
weak poles: u, u, d. At strong magnetic field this three-pole
construction can be ruined, and the two-pole construction can be
created. This process is accompanied by ejection of positron.
There are two independent math proves that this reconstruction can be
performed at energies about 0,25 TeV per colliding particle, if the
magnetic moment of resulting two-pole particle is the same as the
magnetic moment of proton. If its value is different, then the needed
energy would also be different.
Official science is corrupted and rotten organism. It will never
approve the idea, created at the camp of independent researchers.
Official science would better explode the Earth, than say that
magnetic holes are possible and that LHC is deadly dangerous for our
civilization. That is why the official science is criminal now. So,
do
not think that CERN would stop the LHC. CERN will kill us all with
probability about 50%
alie...@gmail.com
> According to Russian online “opinion pole” at November 6, 2009, 52%
By the way, "pole" in English has several meanings, none of which
have anything to do with taking and comparing opinions.
The word you want is "poll".
> of respondents had said that LHC is the dearth threat.
By the way, "dearth" in English means "lack of".
The English word for "termination of life" is "death".
> > Are you seriously suggesting that science should be driven by public
> > opinion?
>
> Physicists in their majority are confident that heavy particles,
> created at LHC will decay.
Not responsive to my question. Physicists actually have some idea of
what they're talking about. The public at large is horribly stupid.
> That is a crude error.
You keep saying things like that, but you offer no evidence in
support.
> LHC can create a particle with the mass by 10 000 times greater than
> the mass of proton.
(snip imaginative stuff)
> Particle physicists have no such imagination. Those idiots think that
> proton consists from three point-like quarks. In fact proton is
> composed from some continuous substance, rotating with relativistic
> velocity. This rotating substance creates three mixed electro-
> magneto-
> weak poles: u, u, d. At strong magnetic field this three-pole
> construction can be ruined, and the two-pole construction can be
> created. This process is accompanied by ejection of positron.
What evidence have you to support these claims?
> There are two independent math proves that this reconstruction can be
> performed at energies about 0,25 TeV per colliding particle, if the
> magnetic moment of resulting two-pole particle is the same as the
> magnetic moment of proton. If its value is different, then the needed
> energy would also be different.
You keep saying these things but offer no evidence, nor even refer
to evidence gathered by others that would support your claims.
Mark L. Fergerson
Autymn D. C.
Learn the meaning of dearth and babble.
Learn about gravitomagnetism--which is a misnomer, as it's not
"magnetic"--or frame dragging, or Lense-Thirring effect.
There was a similar doomsday site about magnetic monopoles, which I
also refutd here: http://egroups.com/message/free_energy/31089.
Holes are a breakdown in maths, not in mekanics. Therefore they are
impossibil, and there are no singularities of any kind, build, or
brand: http://twitter.com/alysdexia/status/4323682209. By the way,
holes break conservation of momentum in your very argument.
Here was my argument against Planck singularities:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Orders_of_magnitude_(temperature).
Would you like to bet me all of your money? Hell, everyone should bet
me there are any black holes.
-Aut
Ron Dean
Since E = MC^2
then
M = C^2/E
Since we know the speed of light and the mass of most known subatomic
particles, How much energy is needed to create an atom of H.?
alie...@gmail.com
Take algebra again.
Mark L. Fergerson
Androcles
"Ron Dean" <"Ron Dean"@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:D9Lan.51164$Np1....@newsfe19.iad...
Since you and your coidiots know the speed of light and the mass of
most known subatomic particles, you answer the question.
Ronald Dean Jr.
>>
>> Since we know the speed of light and the mass of most known subatomic
>> particles, How much energy is needed to create an atom of H.?
>
> Take algebra again.
>
how to solve this. But E = MC^2 transposed M = E/C^2 is as far as I
can get.
>
> Mark L. Fergerson
Androcles
"Ronald Dean Jr." <"Ronald Dean Jr."@BCHS.net> wrote in message
news:mPYan.79056$CM7....@newsfe04.iad...
Put very crudely, in the Sun four hydrogen atoms turn into one helium
atom that has less mass than the four H atoms (it is missing 2 electrons).
The difference is radiated as energy (the Sun shines).
You do not get to make a hydrogen atom with just energy alone,
you need to split the two protons and two neutrons of the helium
atom into four protons and four electrons, so you need to add
two electrons in the form of energy. Only then do you get m = E/c^2.
It's a little like a car that goes along the road by burning fuel. There's
a lot more to it than 60 mph for five minutes = 1 litre of gasoline,
and can you make a litre of fuel by pulling the car uphill with a
horse?
alie...@gmail.com
wrote:
You got it right *this* time.
E/c^2 is rather not the same as c^2/E.
What process are you assuming "creates" an atom of hydrogen?
What exactly are you trying to get at? There's more than one way to
get at most "answers; you just seem to be asking a silly question.
Mark L. Fergerson
William Stead
I can because I said. I need no proof, you just have to believe.
Antares 531
<Headm...@Hogwarts.physics_u> wrote:
>
>"Ronald Dean Jr." <"Ronald Dean Jr."@BCHS.net> wrote in message
>news:mPYan.79056$CM7....@newsfe04.iad...
>>
>>>>
>>>> Since we know the speed of light and the mass of most known subatomic
>>>> particles, How much energy is needed to create an atom of H.?
>>>
>>> Take algebra again.
>>>
>> I'm taking Algebra 1 and first years physics this year. I don't know
>> how to solve this. But E = MC^2 transposed M = E/C^2 is as far as I
>> can get.
>
>Put very crudely, in the Sun four hydrogen atoms turn into one helium
>atom that has less mass than the four H atoms (it is missing 2 electrons).
>The difference is radiated as energy (the Sun shines).
>
This energy/mass difference associated with the solar core fusion
processes is first released as momentum of the helium end product and
as neutrinos. Helium atoms (ions, since electrons can not be captured
at or near the fusion temperature) formed by solar fusion go through a
very long process of mass collisions with other helium ions until,
finally, the momentum/energy reaches the surface of the sun. In the
outer region of the sun, helium ions and other ions can capture
electrons and become atoms. These atoms continue to collide with each
other, during which process the valence electrons experience the
required change in excitation state, which then collapses back to a
lower state, releasing a photon in the process...light.
Gordon
Androcles
"William Stead" <nic...@ws.se> wrote in message
news:023647-...@quarkbomb.dyndns.org...
I'm not going to just believe, so fuck off.
*plonk*
Do not reply to this generic message, it was automatically generated;
you have been kill-filed, either for being boringly stupid, repetitive,
unfunny, ineducable, repeatedly posting politics, religion or off-topic
subjects to a sci. newsgroup, attempting cheapskate free advertising
for profit, because you are a troll, because you responded to George
Hammond the complete fruit cake, simply insane or any combination
or permutation of the aforementioned reasons; any reply will go unread.
Boringly stupid is the most common cause of kill-filing, but because
this message is generic the other reasons have been included. You are
left to decide which is most applicable to you.
There is no appeal, I have despotic power over whom I will electronically
admit into my home and you do not qualify as a reasonable person I would
wish to converse with or even poke fun at. Some weirdoes are not kill-
filed, they amuse me and I retain them for their entertainment value
as I would any chicken with two heads, either one of which enables the
dumb bird to scratch dirt, step back, look down, step forward to the
same spot and repeat the process eternally.
This should not trouble you, many of those plonked find it a blessing
that they are not required to think and can persist in their bigotry
or crackpot theories without challenge.
You have the right to free speech, I have the right not to listen. The
kill-file will be cleared annually with spring cleaning or whenever I
purchase a new computer or hard drive.
Update: the last clearance was 25/12/09. Some individuals have been
restored to the list.
I'm fully aware that you may be so stupid as to reply, but the purpose
of this message is to encourage others to kill-file fuckwits like you.
I hope you find this explanation is satisfactory but even if you don't,
damnly my frank, I don't give a dear. Have a nice day and fuck off.
Androcles
William Stead
1. See above for dumbass.
2. See below for lengthy reply that nobody cares about proving point 1
further.
*PLONK*
William Stead
Poor, dumb Androcles. Back to masturbating!