Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Gravitational Propulsion
9 views
Skip to first unread message
ilia...@gmail.com
Nov 15, 2012, 12:51:15 AM11/15/12
to
Hi everyone,
I would like to briefly introduce myself.
For many years I had an interest in non-conventional technologies, like gravitational propulsion. This year, we (with my assistant) attempted to experiment with electro-gravity technics to see if it can be applied to vehicle propulsion.
In term of background, I have a degree in aerospace/aeronautical design and manufacturing from National institute of Aeronautics and a degree in Mechanical engineering from Montreal's Institute of technology. Also, I worked in some of well-known aerospace companies.
At this time, I’m searching for people who have been working on gravitational propulsion technologies to establish a kind of collaboration. They don’t necessarily have to be professional engineers or scientists.
The prime objective is to develop an effective and economically viable propulsion system for an aerial vehicle as soon as possible. So any help would be appreciated.
Thank you
Ilia
I would like to briefly introduce myself.
For many years I had an interest in non-conventional technologies, like gravitational propulsion. This year, we (with my assistant) attempted to experiment with electro-gravity technics to see if it can be applied to vehicle propulsion.
In term of background, I have a degree in aerospace/aeronautical design and manufacturing from National institute of Aeronautics and a degree in Mechanical engineering from Montreal's Institute of technology. Also, I worked in some of well-known aerospace companies.
At this time, I’m searching for people who have been working on gravitational propulsion technologies to establish a kind of collaboration. They don’t necessarily have to be professional engineers or scientists.
The prime objective is to develop an effective and economically viable propulsion system for an aerial vehicle as soon as possible. So any help would be appreciated.
Thank you
Ilia
bja...@iwaynet.net
Nov 15, 2012, 5:40:52 PM11/15/12
to
work for no known government agency. And as such I ALSO have an interest
in anyone developing non-conventional technologies that threaten the
current oil-based power structure of the world. My prime objective is to
find people interested in gravitational, aether, and free energy
research who can be observed and then neutralized by whatever means are
required. If you aren't working for us, then most likely you are working
against us. Get the picture?
HVAC
Nov 16, 2012, 10:00:16 AM11/16/12
to
On 11/15/2012 5:40 PM, bja...@teranews.com wrote:
>
>
> Hi, I'm HVAC. Let me introduce myself. My name is Harlow Campbell and I
> work for no known government agency.
Yes. I categorically deny this
>
>
> Hi, I'm HVAC. Let me introduce myself. My name is Harlow Campbell and I
> work for no known government agency.
> And as such I ALSO have an interest
> in anyone developing non-conventional technologies that threaten the
> current oil-based power structure of the world. My prime objective is to
> find people
> interested in gravitational, aether, and free energy
> research
> who can be observed and then neutralized by whatever means are
> required.
> If you aren't working for us, then most likely you are working
> against us. Get the picture?
--
"OK you cunts, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo .. 变亮
http://www.richardgingras.com/tia/images/tia_logo_large.jpg
Mahipal
Nov 16, 2012, 3:38:52 PM11/16/12
to
On Nov 16, 9:59 am, HVAC <h...@physisist.net> wrote:
> > And as such I ALSO have an interest
> > in anyone developing non-conventional technologies that threaten the
> > current oil-based power structure of the world. My prime objective is to
> > find people
>
> Kooks
That will be easy, there are nearly 7 billion people you Kook.
> > interested in gravitational, aether, and free energy
> > research
>
> In other words, 'kooks'.
Yawn, You Kook You so misspelled "Cranks."
> > who can be observed and then neutralized by whatever means are
> > required.
>
> I don't stop anyone from posting, do I?
Would that you could.
Precisely why Usenet is better than any other Social Media IT. Read
link...
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/christian-demoted-for-posting-his-opposition-to-gay-marriage-on-facebook-wins-breach-of-contract-action-8323128.html#disqus_thread
same as http://tinyurl.com/cknewlj
> > If you aren't working for us, then most likely you are working
> > against us. Get the picture?
>
> It's better to be on my side.
I'm on your side Harlow!
http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/print/2000/mar/02/dirac-einstein-and-physics
for the on topic significance of and 2 c me.
Do not dissect other people's post. Is that possible Harlow Kook?!
Enjo(y)...
--
Mahipal
http://mahipal7638.files.wordpress.com/
> On 11/15/2012 5:40 PM, bjac...@teranews.com wrote:
>
> > Hi, I'm HVAC. Let me introduce myself. My name is Harlow Campbell and I
> > work for no known government agency.
>
> Yes. I categorically deny this
Lost punctuation? Incomplete starement
>
> > Hi, I'm HVAC. Let me introduce myself. My name is Harlow Campbell and I
> > work for no known government agency.
>
> Yes. I categorically deny this
> > And as such I ALSO have an interest
> > in anyone developing non-conventional technologies that threaten the
> > current oil-based power structure of the world. My prime objective is to
> > find people
>
> Kooks
> > interested in gravitational, aether, and free energy
> > research
>
> In other words, 'kooks'.
> > who can be observed and then neutralized by whatever means are
> > required.
>
> I don't stop anyone from posting, do I?
Precisely why Usenet is better than any other Social Media IT. Read
link...
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/christian-demoted-for-posting-his-opposition-to-gay-marriage-on-facebook-wins-breach-of-contract-action-8323128.html#disqus_thread
same as http://tinyurl.com/cknewlj
> > If you aren't working for us, then most likely you are working
> > against us. Get the picture?
>
> It's better to be on my side.
http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/print/2000/mar/02/dirac-einstein-and-physics
for the on topic significance of and 2 c me.
Do not dissect other people's post. Is that possible Harlow Kook?!
Enjo(y)...
--
Mahipal
http://mahipal7638.files.wordpress.com/
HVAC
Nov 16, 2012, 4:00:56 PM11/16/12
to
On 11/16/2012 3:38 PM, Mahipal wrote:
>
>>> who can be observed and then neutralized by whatever means are
>>> required.
>>
>> I don't stop anyone from posting, do I?
>
> Would that you could.
I never would, even if I had that power.
>
>>> who can be observed and then neutralized by whatever means are
>>> required.
>>
>> I don't stop anyone from posting, do I?
>
> Would that you could.
I am a free speech advocate. I defeat people with my razor sharp mind,
my boyish charm, and my youthful good looks.
>> It's better to be on my side.
>
> I'm on your side Harlow!
> Do not dissect other people's post. Is that possible Harlow Kook?!
Mahipal
Nov 16, 2012, 5:02:36 PM11/16/12
to
On Nov 16, 4:00 pm, HVAC <h...@physisist.net> wrote:
> On 11/16/2012 3:38 PM, Mahipal wrote:
>
> >>> who can be observed and then neutralized by whatever means are
> >>> required.
>
> >> I don't stop anyone from posting, do I?
>
> > Would that you could.
>
> I never would, even if I had that power.
Messages speak louder than words. Feel my doubt Harlow.
> On 11/16/2012 3:38 PM, Mahipal wrote:
>
> >>> who can be observed and then neutralized by whatever means are
> >>> required.
>
> >> I don't stop anyone from posting, do I?
>
> > Would that you could.
>
> I never would, even if I had that power.
> I am a free speech advocate. I defeat people with my razor sharp mind,
> my boyish charm, and my youthful good looks.
> >> It's better to be on my side.
>
> > I'm on your side Harlow!
>
> Then fall in line and NEVER question me.
silly.
> > Do not dissect other people's post. Is that possible Harlow Kook?!
>
> I do not 'dissect', I deconstruct.
thing. I can sincerely fake that.
Here's some advice, deconstruct the messages and the thoughts of your
perceived Kooks. Leave Their word sequences undissected intact.
> --
> "OK you cunts, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girlhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo.. 变亮http://www.richardgingras.com/tia/images/tia_logo_large.jpg
Painius
Nov 16, 2012, 6:02:48 PM11/16/12
to
On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 10:00:16 -0500, HVAC <hv...@physisist.net> wrote:
>On 11/15/2012 5:40 PM, bja...@teranews.com wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi, I'm HVAC. Let me introduce myself. My name is Harlow Campbell and I
>> work for no known government agency.
>
>
>Yes. I categorically deny this
>
>
>> And as such I ALSO have an interest
>> in anyone developing non-conventional technologies that threaten the
>> current oil-based power structure of the world. My prime objective is to
>> find people
>
>
>Kooks
>
>
>> interested in gravitational, aether, and free energy
>> research
>
>
>In other words, 'kooks'.
>
>
>> who can be observed and then neutralized by whatever means are
>> required.
>
>
>I don't stop anyone from posting, do I?
>
>
>> If you aren't working for us, then most likely you are working
>> against us. Get the picture?
>
>
>It's better to be on my side.
Since you're a bottom dweller, where does that put your "side"?
>On 11/15/2012 5:40 PM, bja...@teranews.com wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi, I'm HVAC. Let me introduce myself. My name is Harlow Campbell and I
>> work for no known government agency.
>
>
>Yes. I categorically deny this
>
>
>> And as such I ALSO have an interest
>> in anyone developing non-conventional technologies that threaten the
>> current oil-based power structure of the world. My prime objective is to
>> find people
>
>
>Kooks
>
>
>> interested in gravitational, aether, and free energy
>> research
>
>
>In other words, 'kooks'.
>
>
>> who can be observed and then neutralized by whatever means are
>> required.
>
>
>I don't stop anyone from posting, do I?
>
>
>> If you aren't working for us, then most likely you are working
>> against us. Get the picture?
>
>
>It's better to be on my side.
--
Indelibly yours,
Paine @ http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/
"Science is on my side, except those few times when it's not."
HVAC
Nov 16, 2012, 7:02:13 PM11/16/12
to
On 11/16/2012 5:02 PM, Mahipal wrote:
>
>> I never would, even if I had that power.
>
> Messages speak louder than words. Feel my doubt Harlow.
Hey... *I* ain't gonna feel nothing of yours!
>
>> I never would, even if I had that power.
>
> Messages speak louder than words. Feel my doubt Harlow.
>> I am a free speech advocate. I defeat people with my razor sharp mind,
>> my boyish charm, and my youthful good looks.
>
> Well perhaps. Notice how I write less than a Tweet responding to You.
>> Then fall in line and NEVER question me.
>
> I am not in that line for Anyone. I even slap my own reflections
> silly.
Perhaps you'll knock the ugly off your face.
>> I do not 'dissect', I deconstruct.
>
> I will feign accepting you are not bothered by that Freedom of Speech
> thing. I can sincerely fake that.
> Here's some advice, deconstruct the messages and the thoughts of your
> perceived Kooks. Leave Their word sequences undissected intact.
--
Mahipal
Nov 16, 2012, 7:14:35 PM11/16/12
to
On Nov 16, 7:01 pm, HVAC <h...@physisist.net> wrote:
> On 11/16/2012 5:02 PM, Mahipal wrote:
>
> >> I never would, even if I had that power.
>
> > Messages speak louder than words. Feel my doubt Harlow.
>
> Hey... *I* ain't gonna feel nothing of yours!
You can feel my doubt about your statements.
> On 11/16/2012 5:02 PM, Mahipal wrote:
>
> >> I never would, even if I had that power.
>
> > Messages speak louder than words. Feel my doubt Harlow.
>
> Hey... *I* ain't gonna feel nothing of yours!
> >> I am a free speech advocate. I defeat people with my razor sharp mind,
> >> my boyish charm, and my youthful good looks.
>
> > Well perhaps. Notice how I write less than a Tweet responding to You.
>
> Tweets are gay.
> >> Then fall in line and NEVER question me.
>
> > I am not in that line for Anyone. I even slap my own reflections
> > silly.
>
> Try slapping it a bit harder.
> Perhaps you'll knock the ugly off your face.
> >> I do not 'dissect', I deconstruct.
>
> > I will feign accepting you are not bothered by that Freedom of Speech
> > thing. I can sincerely fake that.
>
> What is your 1st language?
> > Here's some advice, deconstruct the messages and the thoughts of your
> > perceived Kooks. Leave Their word sequences undissected intact.
>
> Don't fucking tell ME what to do. Do you know who I am?
Salmon Egg
Nov 16, 2012, 7:42:49 PM11/16/12
to
In article <1b0740d1-4eb9-4894...@googlegroups.com>,
> propulsion technologies to establish a kind of collaboration. They donıt
but I am not going to expend much effort to understand what that is. I
suggest the following:
1. Define "gravitational propulsion" using no more than 1000 characters.
2. Using fewer than 2000 explain the essence of the scientific
underpinning upon which gravitational propulsion is based.
--
Sam
Conservatives are against Darwinism but for natural selection.
Liberals are for Darwinism but totally against any selection.
ilia...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> I would like to briefly introduce myself.
> For many years I had an interest in non-conventional technologies, like
> gravitational propulsion. This year, we (with my assistant) attempted to
> experiment with electro-gravity technics to see if it can be applied to
> vehicle propulsion.
>
> In term of background, I have a degree in aerospace/aeronautical design and
> manufacturing from National institute of Aeronautics and a degree in
> Mechanical engineering from Montreal's Institute of technology. Also, I
> worked in some of well-known aerospace companies.
>
> At this time, Iım searching for people who have been working on gravitational
> Hi everyone,
> I would like to briefly introduce myself.
> For many years I had an interest in non-conventional technologies, like
> gravitational propulsion. This year, we (with my assistant) attempted to
> experiment with electro-gravity technics to see if it can be applied to
> vehicle propulsion.
>
> In term of background, I have a degree in aerospace/aeronautical design and
> manufacturing from National institute of Aeronautics and a degree in
> Mechanical engineering from Montreal's Institute of technology. Also, I
> worked in some of well-known aerospace companies.
>
> propulsion technologies to establish a kind of collaboration. They donıt
> necessarily have to be professional engineers or scientists.
>
> The prime objective is to develop an effective and economically viable
> propulsion system for an aerial vehicle as soon as possible. So any help
> would be appreciated.
>
> Thank you
As you may realize, you come off as a crackpot. You may have something,
>
> The prime objective is to develop an effective and economically viable
> propulsion system for an aerial vehicle as soon as possible. So any help
> would be appreciated.
>
> Thank you
but I am not going to expend much effort to understand what that is. I
suggest the following:
1. Define "gravitational propulsion" using no more than 1000 characters.
2. Using fewer than 2000 explain the essence of the scientific
underpinning upon which gravitational propulsion is based.
--
Sam
Conservatives are against Darwinism but for natural selection.
Liberals are for Darwinism but totally against any selection.
bjacoby
Nov 16, 2012, 11:58:12 PM11/16/12
to
On 11/16/2012 7:02 PM, HVAC wrote:
> Don't fucking tell ME what to do. Do you know who I am?
>
>
>
>
>
Actually we don't, Harlow (if that is your real name). So why don't you
> Don't fucking tell ME what to do. Do you know who I am?
>
>
>
>
>
fill us in. Naturally we are not asking you to violate any security
non-disclosure agreements you may have signed... with any known or
unknown agencies.
HVAC
Nov 17, 2012, 8:50:21 AM11/17/12
to
On 11/16/2012 11:58 PM, bjacoby wrote:
> On 11/16/2012 7:02 PM, HVAC wrote:
>
>> Don't fucking tell ME what to do. Do you know who I am?
>>
>>
>
> Actually we don't, Harlow
"We"?
> On 11/16/2012 7:02 PM, HVAC wrote:
>
>> Don't fucking tell ME what to do. Do you know who I am?
>>
>>
>
> Actually we don't, Harlow
> (if that is your real name). So why don't you
> fill us in. Naturally we are not asking you to violate any security
> non-disclosure agreements you may have signed... with any known or
> unknown agencies.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask.
bja...@iwaynet.net
Nov 17, 2012, 11:32:30 AM11/17/12
to
On 11/17/2012 8:50 AM, HVAC wrote:
> On 11/16/2012 11:58 PM, bjacoby wrote:
>> On 11/16/2012 7:02 PM, HVAC wrote:
>>
>>> Don't fucking tell ME what to do. Do you know who I am?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Actually we don't, Harlow
>
>
>
> "We"?
>
>
>> (if that is your real name). So why don't you
>> fill us in. Naturally we are not asking you to violate any security
>> non-disclosure agreements you may have signed... with any known or
>> unknown agencies.
>
>
> I'm not going to write ANOTHER autobiography.
>
> If you have any questions, feel free to ask.
>
>
>
>
>
Another question cleverly dodged!
> On 11/16/2012 11:58 PM, bjacoby wrote:
>> On 11/16/2012 7:02 PM, HVAC wrote:
>>
>>> Don't fucking tell ME what to do. Do you know who I am?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Actually we don't, Harlow
>
>
>
> "We"?
>
>
>> (if that is your real name). So why don't you
>> fill us in. Naturally we are not asking you to violate any security
>> non-disclosure agreements you may have signed... with any known or
>> unknown agencies.
>
>
> I'm not going to write ANOTHER autobiography.
>
> If you have any questions, feel free to ask.
>
>
>
>
>
HVAC
Nov 17, 2012, 11:47:55 AM11/17/12
to
On 11/17/2012 11:32 AM, bja...@teranews.com wrote:
>
>>
>> If you have any questions, feel free to ask.
>>
>>
>
> Another question cleverly dodged!
What question?
>
>>
>> If you have any questions, feel free to ask.
>>
>>
>
> Another question cleverly dodged!
Mahipal
Nov 17, 2012, 11:07:29 PM11/17/12
to
On Nov 17, 11:30 am, "bjac...@teranews.com" <bjac...@iwaynet.net>
wrote:
> >> (if that is your real name). So why don't you
> >> fill us in. Naturally we are not asking you to violate any security
> >> non-disclosure agreements you may have signed... with any known or
> >> unknown agencies.
>
> > I'm not going to write ANOTHER autobiography.
>
> > If you have any questions, feel free to ask.
A link to your first autobiography?
> Another question cleverly dodged!
wrote:
> On 11/17/2012 8:50 AM, HVAC wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 11/16/2012 11:58 PM, bjacoby wrote:
> >> On 11/16/2012 7:02 PM, HVAC wrote:
>
> >>> Don't fucking tell ME what to do. Do you know who I am?
>
> >> Actually we don't, Harlow
>
> > "We"?
We your Gods. Yes, We knew you were going to assK.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 11/16/2012 11:58 PM, bjacoby wrote:
> >> On 11/16/2012 7:02 PM, HVAC wrote:
>
> >>> Don't fucking tell ME what to do. Do you know who I am?
>
> >> Actually we don't, Harlow
>
> > "We"?
> >> (if that is your real name). So why don't you
> >> fill us in. Naturally we are not asking you to violate any security
> >> non-disclosure agreements you may have signed... with any known or
> >> unknown agencies.
>
> > I'm not going to write ANOTHER autobiography.
>
> > If you have any questions, feel free to ask.
> Another question cleverly dodged!
Rob Chambers
Dec 15, 2012, 7:08:01 PM12/15/12
to
On 11/15/2012 06:51 AM, ilia...@gmail.com wrote:
> At this time, I�m searching for people who have been working on gravitational propulsion technologies to establish a kind of collaboration. They don�t necessarily have to be professional engineers or scientists.
Contact the Tau Zero Foundation at http://www.tauzero.aero
Rob
> At this time, I�m searching for people who have been working on gravitational propulsion technologies to establish a kind of collaboration. They don�t necessarily have to be professional engineers or scientists.
Contact the Tau Zero Foundation at http://www.tauzero.aero
Rob
0 new messages