Re: added term to Faraday's Law is a gravity-magnetism not gravity-current; new book Coulomb Unification of Forces of Physics
plutonium....@gmail.com
(snipped)
>
>
> I do not know if Dirac spent any time on changing the Maxwell
> Equations with his desire of the
> existence of a Magnetic Monopole. Did Dirac ever display what the
> Maxwell Equations would be
> if there exists at least one magnetic monopole? I doubt it, but maybe
> he did.
>
> Also, Dirac came up with a great insight of the Dirac Ocean of
> Positrons, where space is filled
> with positrons. This is the force of gravity in an Atom Totality.
>
> So what I am going to venture to do is to update the Maxwell
> Equations. I will change the Gauss's
> Law on magnetism since there exists a magnetic monopole.
>
> Then, I will include an additional term in Faraday's Law to make it
> symmetrical with Maxwell-Ampere Law.
>
> When we have a changing Magnetic Field to produce a electric field or
> electric current, we also have
> a change in "Space" where space is Dirac's Ocean of Positrons. In
> other words, when we have
> Faraday's Law, we have a "gravity current" term. Much like the
> Displacement current added to Ampere's
> Law, we have a "gravity current" term added to Faraday's Law.
>
Alright, sorry, I should have spent just a little more time in
reflection of what this
added term would be to make the Maxwell Equations perfectly
symmetrical. Well,
not perfectly symmetrical since the Universe is one atom containing
all the atoms
and moving towards the next Atom Totality, so we should expect some
symmetry
breaking. That the Faraday Law has a negative sign and the Ampere-
Maxwell Law
have a positive sign.
But I think my biggest mistake above is that I should not have called
it a "gravity current".
I should have called it gravity-magnetism. For in a sense, the reason
an apple falls from
a tree going towards the center of Earth is a magnetic pull by the
Ocean of Positrons that
occupy the space of Earth of its matter-atoms. The space of Earth is
also occupied by
positron-antimatter and it is this attraction of the positron-
antimatter for the associative
normal matter that composes Earth is where gravity comes to light. So
the gravity pull
of an apple from a tree is due to the positron-antimatter that the
Earth occupies in Space.
Now when we perform the Faraday Induction Experiment of changing
magnetic field
yields a electric field (or electric current), it also yields an
additional term. A term that is
very tiny because, well, gravity is very tiny compared to
electromagnetism. This additional term
for the Faraday Law is a term similar to the added term that Maxwell
put onto the Ampere Law.
Only the Maxwell term was a "displacement current". For the Faraday
Law the added term is
not a displacement current but a "displacement magnetism". In
Faraday's Law the changing magnetic
field yields an electric current in the closed loop but also yields a
displacement of the Positron ocean
of antimatter that is involved in the Space of the experiment. So this
is gravity, the force of gravity
is the added term to the Faraday Law which makes the Maxwell Equations
symmetrical of its
Faraday with Ampere laws.
In Ampere's Law the added term is a current, in Faraday's law the
added term is an additional form
of magnetism. It is the magnetism of the Space of the positrons that
is affected.
Already I am thinking of how to set up an experiment to verify that in
Faraday's Induction, we alter the
Space around the experiment that includes the positron "backdrop
space". So as the induction yields
a current in the closed loop, the induction also changes the Space
surrounding the experiment.
It is going to be tough to measure that "displacement magnetism"
because it is on the order of 10^-40
weaker than the current produced in Faraday Induction. But I am
optimistic that such experiments
are easy to set up because of the past history of very delicate
experimental measures.
So, has any physicist in the past history ever looked for a slight
change in the Faraday's Induction
experiment, a change of gravity? I like to call it Displacement
Magnetism.
So the new added term to Faraday's Law will be a Displacement
Magnetism and make the Faraday
and Ampere laws symmetrical.
Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
plutonium....@gmail.com
(snipped)
>
> Already I am thinking of how to set up an experiment to verify that in
> Faraday's Induction, we alter the
> Space around the experiment that includes the positron "backdrop
> space". So as the induction yields
> a current in the closed loop, the induction also changes the Space
> surrounding the experiment.
>
> It is going to be tough to measure that "displacement magnetism"
> because it is on the order of 10^-40
> weaker than the current produced in Faraday Induction. But I am
> optimistic that such experiments
> are easy to set up because of the past history of very delicate
> experimental measures.
>
> So, has any physicist in the past history ever looked for a slight
> change in the Faraday's Induction
> experiment, a change of gravity? I like to call it Displacement
> Magnetism.
>
> So the new added term to Faraday's Law will be a Displacement
> Magnetism and make the Faraday
> and Ampere laws symmetrical.
>
Maybe I am in a bit of luck here. I do remember that several of the
planets such as
Mercury, or Venus or Mars or the satellites of various planets have a
tiny and weak
magnetic field yet they have no dynamo mechanism inside those bodies
to produce
a magnetic field. But as these planets or satellites have small
electrical storms or
currents and as their motion through space, would set up a
"Displacement Magnetism".
So, perhaps the magnetism of Mercury is just what the doctor ordered.
And if true, then
all astro bodies have a small and tiny magnetism since they all have
electric currents.
So, has anyone measured what the electric currents on Mercury would
be? And if so, we
plug that data into a Faraday's Law encompassing the entire planet
Mercury and compute
what its Displacement Magnetism should be. If it matches the current
data, we have
found proof of Displacement Magnetism.
Some other bodies such as Europa and Io maybe even better measuring
sites.
plutonium....@gmail.com
Here is a case where scientists have not provided adequate data. A
website that lists
all the current planet and satellite magnetic fields. A table that
lists all the magnetic fields.
Here is a website that speaks of the Moon's magnetic field
http://www-ssc.igpp.ucla.edu/personnel/russell/papers/measure(9)/
-4.23 x 10^22 Gauss-cm^3
I found alot of websites talking about Mercury's magnetic field but
none that state
what it actually is.
Apparently the magnetic field of Mercury is anomalous for Mercury
rotates about 60 times
slower than Earth.
Here is a website that talks of the anomaly of gas giant planet's
magnetic field.
--- quoting from http://www.phy6.org/earthmag/planetmg.htm ---
The magnetic axes of Uranus and Neptune, on the other hand, are
inclined by about 60° to their rotation axes. The shape and properties
of a planetary magnetosphere depends on the angle between the flow of
the solar wind (i.e. the direction from the Sun) and the magnetic
axis, and for those two planets, that angle is rapidly changing all
the time. As a result, their magnetospheres undergo wild variations
during each rotation, although both manage to contain trapped
particles. The origin of all those field is unknown: Saturn is big
enough to produce metallic hydrogen in its core, but Uranus and
Neptune are not.
--- end quoting ---
So here maybe this added term to the Faraday Law can clear up and
clear out all these anomalies.
Consider that the Moon is like a loop in Faraday Induction where the
magnet is planet Earth. So that
Earth creates not only a current but also a magnetic field center at
the Moon's center.
As for the gas giants, the solar wind or the magnetosphere of Jupiter
can be the magnet of Faraday's
Law causing a Displacement Magnetism in the center of gas giants.
As for Mercury, that really is anomalous for the Dynamo theory people.
However, if you consider Mercury's
magnetic field as due to the extra term in Faraday's Law of a
Displacement Magnetism caused by the
Sun as the magnet of Faraday's Law, then the explanation of how astro
bodies with no apparent
dynamo is given.
Even Mars has a larger magnetic field than it is supposed to have. But
if you take the solar winds as
the magnet, or even the nearby Jupiter's magnetosphere as the magnet
of Faraday's Law would induce
not only a current in Faraday's Law but a Displacement Magnetism
centered in the center of Mars.
So this added term to Faraday's Law now gives astronomers two means of
accounting for astro body
magnetic moment. Either created by Dynamo means or created as a result
of the added term in
Faraday's Law-- Displacement Magnetism.
The Moon's puzzling magnetism is thus easily explained. Not because of
an iron or ironsulfide
core for the Moon, but simply because of the Moon's acting as the loop
in Faraday Law and Earth
acting as the moving bar magnet in Faraday's Law setting up a current
but also a permanent magnetic
moment at the center of the Moon.
Now, does this number : -4.23 x 10^22 Gauss-cm^3 look about correct
for a Displacement-Magnetism
for the Moon with Earth as the bar-magnet in Faraday's Law. It looks
about right to me.
I wonder if I can do a Ampere-Maxwell Law on Jupiter and its moon of
Io and see if the magnetic moment
of Io would agree with the Displacement Current, not Displacement
Magnetism, but Displacement
Current of Ampere-Maxwell Law.
In other words, a checking of the added terms for Faraday Law and
Ampere Law.