photons that orbit atoms rather than electrons Chapt15.63 electrons of Helium seeking to be a photon structure #1362 New Physics #1566 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Alright, the idea that antiparticles are nonexistent and are just
merely a phase change of an original fundamental particle is stunning
in its implications. I am just beginning to fathom some of its
spectacular implications. For instance, a filled suborbital such as in
helium or neon or zinc or magnesium would not have 2 paired electrons,
one up and one down, but would have an electron with positron and
those two would combine to form a energetic photon or light wave.

So that having electrons in orbit around a nucleus of an atom, we have
most generally photons in orbit around a nucleus in almost every atom.
In case a atom has a unpaired last electron, it quickly finds a
chemical bond with another atom, so that in the chemical bond, the
lonely electron is paired up with another electron to fulfill this
quest of having two electrons turn into a photon.

--

Approximately 90 percent of AP's posts are missing in the Google
newsgroups author search starting May 2012. They call it indexing; I
call it censor discrimination. Whatever the case, what is needed now
is for science newsgroups like sci.physics, sci.chem, sci.bio,
sci.geo.geology, sci.med, sci.paleontology, sci.astro,
sci.physics.electromag to
be hosted by a University the same as what
Drexel
University hosts sci.math as the Math Forum. Science needs to
be in education
not in the hands of corporations chasing after the
next dollar bill.
Besides, Drexel's Math Forum can demand no fake
names, and only 5 posts per day, of all posters which reduces or
eliminates most spam and hate-spew, search-engine-bombing, and front-
page-hogging. Drexel has
done a excellent, simple and fair author-
archiving of AP sci.math posts since May 2012
as seen
here:

http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

[Brad Guth]

On May 11, 6:26 pm, Archimedes Plutonium

Your topics and self-replies are even more ignored than are mine. You
must be onto something big and even a little too dark and scary
because, our resident Usenet army of rusemasters and FUD-masters are
not even bothering to topic/author stalk and bash your stuff.

[Archimedes Plutonium]

On May 14, 8:30 am, Brad Guth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 11, 6:26 pm, Archimedes Plutonium
>

(snip)

>
> Your topics and self-replies are even more ignored than are mine.  You
> must be onto something big and even a little too dark and scary
> because, our resident Usenet army of rusemasters and FUD-masters are
> not even bothering to topic/author stalk and bash your stuff.

My last 2 years have been my most productive science years on Usenet;
coinciding with few replies. Now that is likely due to a congealing of
my ideas or the organizing of those ideas over the past 17 years. From
1993 to 2010, I had vast replies and from 2010 to 2013, I had few to
no replies, yet from 2010 to 2013 was my most productive years.

Replies often are distractions rather than focusing on what one must
do.

Now some replies changed my thinking altogether, such as the time
where replies enticed me to look for a infinity borderline, and I
completely abandoned infinity and started to look for the borderline
of finite with infinity. So some replies can be of a major importance,
but in the past 2 years, my productivity has been huge and immense,
something that has even surprised me where I trashcanned all of Old
Physics.

Just one tiny realization-- all of physics from the Maxwell Equations
is so powerful as to revolutionize all of physics. That realization
came from quietness and no replies and allowed me to come upon that
realization. If there had been a cacophony of replies with
distractions, I would not have found this idea of the Maxwell
Equations as the axioms over all of physics with its outpouring of
true physics. So be thankful for times of few replies, besides, who
wants to share new discoveries with others who made a reply. When you
have few replies, you reap all the rewards and not have to share
anything with a co-discoverer.

So a lot of replies and interest is more of distraction and not good
for science productivity.

Science is best with few replies. Best science is in quiet peaceful
surroundings.