Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
two major important errors of Solar System science Chapt13.4007 Strong Nuclear Force as a chemical bond #469 New Physics #590 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
1 view
Skip to first unread message
Archimedes Plutonium
Apr 30, 2012, 2:48:57 PM4/30/12
to
Alright, this data is correct:
Mass:
Sun 2 x 10^30 kg
Jupiter 1.9 x 10^27 kg
Earth 6 x 10^24 kg
Volume:
Sun 1.4 x 10^18 km^3
Jupiter 1.4 x 10^15 km^3
Earth 1. x 10^12 km^3
Notice in those masses that they are successively 10^3 larger and
notice in the
volume size they are successively 10^3 larger. What that means is the
composition
of Jupiter was all wrong in thinking that Jupiter is composed of 75%
hydrogen and 24% helium when in fact it must be composed of an
intermediate composition between that of the Sun's 75% hydrogen 24%
helium and Earth's silicon-metal composition. In other words, Jupiter
is mostly ice-rock and not hydrogen-helium.
The second major important error of the Solar System is the fusion of
the Sun accounting. That accounting is mostly of the Proton-Proton
Chain Reaction Cycle.
Eddington in the 1920s proposed that fusion of 1/10 of the hydrogen of
the Sun would it keep it shining as it does now for a billion years.
If we consider the Sun to be 5 billion years old and with its current
75% hydrogen, 24% helium, the accounting does not add up because that
would mean the Sun started off with 100% hydrogen.
1st billion years: 90% hydrogen
2nd billion years: 81% hydrogen
3rd billion years: 73% hydrogen
4th billion years: 66% hydrogen
5th billion years: 59% hydrogen
Obviously that cannot be true for the Sun is 75% hydrogen
On the other hand, if the Sun was borne with 45% hydrogen and that
Strong Nuclear
Force is a chemical bond which allows for total-ionization of the
nucleus of other atoms:
1st billion years: 50% hydrogen
2nd billion years: 55% hydrogen
3rd billion years: 61% hydrogen
4th billion years: 67% hydrogen
5th billion years: 74% hydrogen
And it should be obvious to most people that the proton-proton chain
reaction is a contradiction to the Maxwell Equations with its silly
notion of a positron and beta decay
into a neutron via weak-nuclear force.
What is really going on in the Sun is a plasma soup of free protons,
free neutrons and free electrons for which we totally skip the "di-
proton" formation and which we directly go into a neutron bonding with
a proton. So we never needed the di-proton.
These two errors are major flaws of Old Physics and Old Astronomy, for
it changes not only the perspective of the Solar System but of all of
Cosmology such as what are and how are quasars?
The important lesson for the Sun's chain reaction cycle, is that if
you are going to contradict the Maxwell Equations-- the di-proton,
then it is not long before your error filled science is uncovered.
Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
Mass:
Sun 2 x 10^30 kg
Jupiter 1.9 x 10^27 kg
Earth 6 x 10^24 kg
Volume:
Sun 1.4 x 10^18 km^3
Jupiter 1.4 x 10^15 km^3
Earth 1. x 10^12 km^3
Notice in those masses that they are successively 10^3 larger and
notice in the
volume size they are successively 10^3 larger. What that means is the
composition
of Jupiter was all wrong in thinking that Jupiter is composed of 75%
hydrogen and 24% helium when in fact it must be composed of an
intermediate composition between that of the Sun's 75% hydrogen 24%
helium and Earth's silicon-metal composition. In other words, Jupiter
is mostly ice-rock and not hydrogen-helium.
The second major important error of the Solar System is the fusion of
the Sun accounting. That accounting is mostly of the Proton-Proton
Chain Reaction Cycle.
Eddington in the 1920s proposed that fusion of 1/10 of the hydrogen of
the Sun would it keep it shining as it does now for a billion years.
If we consider the Sun to be 5 billion years old and with its current
75% hydrogen, 24% helium, the accounting does not add up because that
would mean the Sun started off with 100% hydrogen.
1st billion years: 90% hydrogen
2nd billion years: 81% hydrogen
3rd billion years: 73% hydrogen
4th billion years: 66% hydrogen
5th billion years: 59% hydrogen
Obviously that cannot be true for the Sun is 75% hydrogen
On the other hand, if the Sun was borne with 45% hydrogen and that
Strong Nuclear
Force is a chemical bond which allows for total-ionization of the
nucleus of other atoms:
1st billion years: 50% hydrogen
2nd billion years: 55% hydrogen
3rd billion years: 61% hydrogen
4th billion years: 67% hydrogen
5th billion years: 74% hydrogen
And it should be obvious to most people that the proton-proton chain
reaction is a contradiction to the Maxwell Equations with its silly
notion of a positron and beta decay
into a neutron via weak-nuclear force.
What is really going on in the Sun is a plasma soup of free protons,
free neutrons and free electrons for which we totally skip the "di-
proton" formation and which we directly go into a neutron bonding with
a proton. So we never needed the di-proton.
These two errors are major flaws of Old Physics and Old Astronomy, for
it changes not only the perspective of the Solar System but of all of
Cosmology such as what are and how are quasars?
The important lesson for the Sun's chain reaction cycle, is that if
you are going to contradict the Maxwell Equations-- the di-proton,
then it is not long before your error filled science is uncovered.
Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
0 new messages