Re: Search correctly and you will find
Arindam Banerjee
"Romanise" <jos...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5b7dc9c6-b363-46be...@y11g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
On Mar 1, 11:45 am, Arindam Banerjee <adda1...@bigpond.com> wrote:
> > Was it the distrust of the editors of long established research
> > Journals of Physics that made you take the Usenet platform to publish
> > your research
>
> They are irrelevant to me and my work.
So it was not any editor publishing your research in his name that put
you off established research Journal of Physics, of India or of any
other place including Australia?
AB: They do not acknowledge my work, when I send it to them. They give
mocking or dismissive replies, and I have got quite a collection of such
from the establishment. One of them told me in so many words that if I
wrote anything that went against the theories of special relativity, let
alone entropy etc. then they would not look at anything else - I will be
dismissed as a crank and my work will be rejected directly. So the question
of their appropriating my work (when I am still around and kicking around in
Usenet and Internet) does not arise, as they do not want to know about it.
Anyone interested - and now I am crossposting to some physics ngs, may read
http://adda-enterprises.com/MMInt/MMInt.htm and find out exactly why the
theories of SR are completely wrong. I have recently spelled out all that
in simple terms, so that 10+ year old kids may understand. Hopefully, a
change in attitude will ensue from my efforts, in due course.
> or was it your Professors at IIT that guided you on the
>
> > Usenet path?
>
> No. I lost touch with them since 1978 (IIT Kharagpur) and 1989 (IIT
> Delhi).
At neither IIT Professors respect research Jpournals or transmit their
respect for research Journals on to their students?
AB: They do that to those under their control - those who want a university
life as a career. I was working for the nation, helping the Armed Forces in
the field of Defence Electronics. Later, in Australia, I was helping
Telstra with their research. I did not have any time for publishing in
journals. The technical staff would pass me any required information from
them that was valid to my particular project. You rarely publish anything
when you work in a commercial environment. Still less when you are in a
vital sector - or what is deemed a vital sector. Yes, there are journal
publications from industry from time to time, but such publication is
basically for publicity - it is NOT the main task of industry, as it is for
academia. I have many inhouse publications, internal reports, etc. which
are all confidential in scope and cannot be published wihout management
permission. I will be open for prosecution if I publish my work for which I
was paid, if I do so without management permission.
> I took the Usenet path because it is the latest technology,
> and most convenient and satisfying too.
And as per you discipline of Industrial Research and Development
depends more on Usenet to publish its path breaking research rather
than any research jounal?
AB: No. Why are you such a fool?
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee.
Romanise
> "Romanise" <josh...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:5b7dc9c6-b363-46be...@y11g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
> On Mar 1, 11:45 am, Arindam Banerjee <adda1...@bigpond.com> wrote:
>
> > > Was it the distrust of the editors of long established research
> > > Journals of Physics that made you take the Usenet platform to publish
> > > your research
>
> > They are irrelevant to me and my work.
>
> So it was not any editor publishing your research in his name that put
> you off established research Journal of Physics, of India or of any
> other place including Australia?
>
> AB: They do not acknowledge my work, when I send it to them. They give
> mocking or dismissive replies, and I have got quite a collection of such
> from the establishment. One of them told me in so many words that if I
> wrote anything that went against the theories of special relativity, let
> alone entropy etc. then they would not look at anything else - I will be
> dismissed as a crank and my work will be rejected directly. So the question
> of their appropriating my work (when I am still around and kicking around in
> Usenet and Internet) does not arise, as they do not want to know about it.
Looks every time you write something you are in a unique trance. So
naturally you cannot remember what you wrote as reply to "What other
discipline(s) of science you know which has(have) made headway, on
the back of Media, Internet and Usenet..."
> Cheers,
> Arindam Banerjee.
Romanise
> - lots of lies and rubbish snipped -
>
> Cheers,
> Arindam Banerjee
Why do you wish to hide this side of yours secret from your admirers
on sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics.electromag ?
You could have kept what you snipped off as lots of lies and rubbish
of one who you call gujju snake-rapist.
Arindam Banerjee
AB: The Hydrogen Transmission Network, for one, which will change human
lives very much for the better. When fools are not around to block same,
things will progress faster. My partner Ilya has developed a spanking new
site, which contains the most welcome print media publicity!
http://adda-enterprises.com/htnwebsite/home.htm
Ring in the new, ring out the old! Replace HV transmission lines, that are
expensive and lossy, with the HTN! And the most important Internal Force
Engines will also be on the way. Recently I have explained how thunder and
lightning indicate that sound travels at speeds depending upon the speed of
the emitter, and no doubt this breakthrough will help to advance new methods
or even technologies. But this is only about what I know, which is a very
small fraction of the extraordinary knowledge available in totality. In
telecom, medicine, health sciences, travel, IT, electronics, music,
literature, and so many other disciplines - Internet and Usenet are critical
to promote new learning. Thanks to google search engine, we are in the
forefront of a vast technological jump, which will have enormous
socio-economic benefits.
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
> Cheers,
> Arindam Banerjee.
Arindam Banerjee
He supposes all others are full of it.
Romanise
> Since the gujju snake-rapist is full of shit,.
> He supposes all others are full of it.
Earlier you referred to groups
sci.physics.particle
sci.physics.research
as totally irrelevant for publishing your path-breaking research,
instead you referred to following as the groups where your research
gets grassroots support
sci.physics
sci.physics.relativity
sci.physics.electromag
sci.math
I did go on one of the groups and found not one thread where got any
support.
It would be relevant if you give a link of a thread where you
enunciated your refutation of Einestein and the posters acclaimed your
enormous genius.
By the way did not find sci.math, instead found
Groups matching sci.math
sci.math.num-analysis
Numerical Analysis.
4046 members - 1 day ago
sci.math.symbolic
Symbolic algebra discussion.
1075 members - 0 days ago
and
Groups matching sci.maths
fr.sci.maths
Discussion sur les mathématiques.
445 members - 0 days ago
faq.maths
La FAQ du groupe usenet fr.sci.maths
1 member - 0 days ago
Romanise
> - ignorant and ridiculous drivel deleted, no point in answering fools, make
> fun of them instead -
Arindam Banerjee
> On Mar 2, 9:12 pm, "Arindam Banerjee" <adda1...@bigpond.com> wrote:
>
> > Since the gujju snake-rapist is full of shit,.
> > He supposes all others are full of it.
>
> Earlier you referred to groups
> sci.physics.particle
> sci.physics.research
> as totally irrelevant for publishing your path-breaking research,
> instead you referred to following as the groups where your research
> gets grassroots support
> sci.physics
> sci.physics.relativity
> sci.physics.electromag
> sci.math
> I did go on one of the groups and found not one thread where got any
> support.
And why should I get support for new ideas? New ideas do not get
support. Those who proposed new ideas used to be burnt at the stake.
We have made some progress since.
Why don't you study the thread "exactly why the theory of special
relativity is total rubbish" in our very sci, which is also
crossposted to science groups where all scientists may have a fair go
at it? Some 200 articles have been written there. I have defended
myself more than adequately. NO one managed to *prove* my ideas
wrong, whereas I made many startling new observations and deductions
in support of my new theories in physics.
Since mediocre at best people like you (who search irrelevant ngs,
make stupid and sensless comments, do not understand new things, hang
on to the old, worship institutions, support those who get prizes,
thus do not have to think for themselvs, thus perfectly lazy and
completely corrupt, and of course, totally wrong) are in fact so very
many, and hold all important offices through unity and persecution of
the talented and inventive, not just now but for the entire history of
human civilisation - for you, from my side, on behalf of the creative
and wonderful people who have truly helped human progress, and got
persecuted accordingly, my most sincere contempt and revulsion.
Now, fuck off, you old and evil fool. I have no more time to waste on
you, and your vile sort.
Arindam Banerjee
Inertial
"Arindam Banerjee" <adda...@bigpond.com> wrote in message
news:d99aa830-12e6-44ef...@b5g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
> On Mar 3, 7:22 pm, Romanise <josh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mar 2, 9:12 pm, "Arindam Banerjee" <adda1...@bigpond.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Since the gujju snake-rapist is full of shit,.
>> > He supposes all others are full of it.
>>
>> Earlier you referred to groups
>> sci.physics.particle
>> sci.physics.research
>> as totally irrelevant for publishing your path-breaking research,
>> instead you referred to following as the groups where your research
>> gets grassroots support
>> sci.physics
>> sci.physics.relativity
>> sci.physics.electromag
>> sci.math
>> I did go on one of the groups and found not one thread where got any
>> support.
That's because Arindam Banerjee is basically dishonest and a coward. A
typical crackpot with all the hallmarks.
He also refused to discuss the mistakes in the article he keeps pasting
links to, despite saying he will discuss it with anyone.
Romanise
> On Mar 3, 7:22 pm, Romanise <josh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Mar 2, 9:12 pm, "Arindam Banerjee" <adda1...@bigpond.com> wrote:
>
> > > Since the gujju snake-rapist is full of shit,.
> > > He supposes all others are full of it.
>
> > Earlier you referred to groups
> > sci.physics.particle
> > sci.physics.research
> > as totally irrelevant for publishing your path-breaking research,
> > instead you referred to following as the groups where your research
> > gets grassroots support
> > sci.physics
> > sci.physics.relativity
> > sci.physics.electromag
> > sci.math
> > I did go on one of the groups and found not one thread where got any
> > support.
>
> And why should I get support for new ideas? New ideas do not get
> support. Those who proposed new ideas used to be burnt at the stake.
> We have made some progress since.
>
> Why don't you study the thread "exactly why the theory of special
> relativity is total rubbish" in our very sci, which is also
> crossposted to science groups where all scientists may have a fair go
> at it?
I know only word Physics and its translated name bhautiki or
bhautikshastra used by most Indian languages. As I suggested "It would
be relevant if you give a link of a thread where you enunciated your
refutation of Einestein and the posters acclaimed your enormous
genius"
soc.culture.indian group as you know cannot do justice to your
brilliance.
What I would like to see if proper scientists enter into serious
discussion with you.
Give couple of links where you started a thread and scholars joined
in.
Romanise
> Why don't you study the thread "exactly why the theory of special
> relativity is total rubbish" in our very sci, which is also
> crossposted to science groups where all scientists may have a fair go
> at it? Some 200 articles have been written there. I have defended
> myself more than adequately. NO one managed to *prove* my ideas
> wrong, whereas I made many startling new observations and deductions
> in support of my new theories in physics.
Are following from the same thread?
-* That's nonsense. Few physicists monitor these newsgroups, and fewer
still
respond to obviously idiotic postings like yours.
====
-* This is like claiming that you have found a cure for cancer. Then
to
test whether your claim is correct, you walk into the lobby of a
medical insurance company and holler to everyone standing there, "I
have a cure for cancer! Now is your chance to prove that it's not!"
And if you are ignored in the lobby of an office building, you tell
yourself that you've given the world a chance to prove you wrong, and
they didn't, so you must be right, and could somebody please award you
some fame for having cured cancer now.
====
-* as expected you run away from the challenge, as you know you are
wrong. Typical cowardly crackpot.
Though I'm sure you'll be back sometime soon spouting the same lies
and nonsense and claiming that noone has proved you wrong .. which is
the biggest lie of all.
Arindam Banerjee
Heh-heh, these one-sided quotes prove beyond doubt what an old
treacherous fool you are! Highly unbalanced and stupid, you do not
even note what I have been saying. You can only understand what other
fools and scoundrels like you are saying - thus ignoring the responses
of Zinnic, who is the only one who is worthy of attention, because his
approach is at least scientific unlike all others, and who has been
half-convinced so far. If all else with similar honesty follow him,
e=mcc will go down the drain, for by allowing the extra distance +/- d
for all light travel D along measured lengths, he outs the Lorentz
transformation.
And why should you support me in any way, as a typical traitor you
must stab your own kind, or at least pull them down as a malevolent
crab. What with the abominable example of the unspeakable great-unca
gandi, what else can be expected from old and despicable fools, rotten
to the core?
Enough, it is evident that you have been a parasite all your life,
living off the productivity of others. Genius is its own reward, and
I enjoy it immensely. I don't write for the fools and scoundrels, for
I don't write for money. Which, of course, is all you snake-rapists
can understand. Sad, but it does take all types to make a world.
Romanise
I am sure all your hopes from and efforts on Usenet will be brought to
fruition by poster Zinnic.
Have you no limerick for other posters who make fun of you like the
editors of Journals did before you were pushed onto Usenet?
J. Clarke
Is "snake-rapist" some kind of Hindu thing?
Romanise
> Is "snake-rapist" some kind of Hindu thing?
Speakers of Indic languages have limited vowel phonemes and have to
struggle coping with English vowel phonemes. This genius is no
exception except he keeps trying to foist that limitation on speakers
of languages other than Bengali, in this case Gujarati as he has
always been made feel low compared with Gujaratis.
So he puts his hyper-correction in pronouncing snack and wrap onto
Gujaratis (his gujju). For us with Indian mother tongues
differentiating bet bat bate consistely is hard.
Myself,PresentContinuouslyTenseMallu
But hearing Bengalis speak English will either make you cringe or go
absolutely 'bonanas.' :-)
Arindam Banerjee
>
> - Show quoted text -
Not Hindu, but Gujarati. They mangle their vowel sounds. snack is
thus snake to them, and wrap is rape. The consequences are thus
hilarious. When instead of seeking to overcome such limitations, one
among them proposing to institutionalise this corruption by corrupting
the age-old sanskritic alphabet in formal education processes (by
deleting some vowels they do not know how to use) the term snake-
rapist was coined as a fitting description. A lot of effort has gone
over the past thousands of years in getting some Indians at least to
speak most beautifully. You got to be a) a snake to be a snake-rapist
and b) something really low to be a snake-rapist. What could be lower
than trying hard to make gujaratis keep on speaking like gujaratis?
The entire world of acting, in the Indian vernaculars - bar gujarati -
has got to be horrified!
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
J. Clarke
So what--you're calling him an enchilada?
Arindam Banerjee
Not really, if there is beef in it. These gujju blokes are a
sanctimonious lot, way beyond the Indian average, and that due to
their vegetarian diet. A matter of habit, not compassion, but they
wring out the utmost moral standing from same. Calling him an
enchilada would be annoying him rather more than is my intention -
besides it would not be justified for as I said they are vegetarian
after all. Really, I want them to speak better and so be better -
thus, not treacherous and truly disastrous humbugs like the
unspeakable great-unca gandi.
Romanise
> of Zinnic, who is the only one who is worthy of attention, because his
> approach is at least scientific unlike all others, and who has been
> half-convinced so far.
You could not convince him full, could you?
Darwin123
I am sure that I speak for the entire mainstream scientific society
when I say,
Huh?
Arindam Banerjee
How unscientific, but we live in decadent and degenerate times, don't
we.
Arindam Banerjee
He has not replied to my last long post, so I don't know. I can only
do so much, the rest is up to others to understand.