#1-#3 New book: Revised Maxwell Equations-- the AP-Maxwell Equations, which has gravity as a term in Faraday's Law
plutonium....@gmail.com
mine on the subject and use that
as a basis for the publishing date. Apparently I began this revision
in earnest in October of 2003.
New Textbook: "Revised Maxwell Equations: AP-Maxwell Equations",
author Archimedes Plutonium
Internet book published 2003-2008, compiled in August 2008 in
sci.physics,sci.physics.electromag,
sci.math
First off I want to say that Graham Lee in 2003 was correct and I was
wrong when he said that superconductivity
of Meissner Effect conforms with the Maxwell Equations.
I was off on the revision back in 2003 for I was angling for a
revision to include the Meissner effect.
By early 2008 I had learned that the Meissner effect is a current
effect and that superconductivity
is simply a "capacitor current" and thus superconductivity and the
Meissner Effect do indeed conform
to the Maxwell Equations.
Here is a sample of a post of 2003 with regards to my attempt to begin
revising the Maxwell Equations.
By August of 2008, I would be in full shape to make the revisions,
only this time using magnetic monopole
and Dirac's ocean of positrons. I was given a booster-shot of sorts by
the fusion barrier principle to
realize that the Faraday Law needs a extra term of Displacement-
Magnetism. This extra term is in fact
gravity force.
Here is a old 2003 post showing my early attempts of Revising Maxwell
Equations:
Newsgroups: sci.physics.electromag, sci.physics, sci.math
From: Archimedes Plutonium <a_pluton...@dtgnet.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 14:50:49 -0500
Local: Mon, Oct 20 2003 2:50 pm
Subject: Re: should Gauss's Law of Magnetism be: Integral B dot dA = q/
p + q/p_t
Mon, 20 Oct 2003 10:26:07 GMT Igor wrote:
(snip)
> I'm not as well versed on the Meissner effect as I probably should be,
> but I do know a bit about it. I know it relates to superconducting
> currents. But that's the problem with your idea, as far as I can
> tell. We're still talking about current based fields, where del dot B
> still vanishes and that gives us Gauss's law for magnetism. Ampere's
> law will still give the field based on the current.
The Meissner Effect geometrically is that it exludes an external
magnetic field from its
volume. So, in a sense, geometrically the Meissner Effect is a
monopole. For when we
consider Gauss's Law of Magnetism del dot B, geometrically, the
vanishing is because the
"+" pole or "-" pole vanishes the lines of force of one to the other.
You cannot have a
monopole with del dot B simply because you cannot make the lines of
force vanish into the
second pole.
But the Meissner Effect is an obstruction of this vanishing. And
although it is not a
monopole in terms of north and south magnetic poles or "+" or "-"
poles, the Meissner
Effect is not a example of del dot B. Gauss's Law of Magnetism does
not describe the
Meissner Effect, nor do the other 3 Maxwell Equations.
So to fix and remedy the problem is that the 4 Maxwell Equations are
missing a term. A
term that belongs in the Gauss Law of Magnetism that will incorporate
the Meissner
Effect.
In their most general form the Maxwell Equations look like this:
curl E = -c B
curl B = c E + c J
div E = p
div B = 0
To correct the Maxwell Equations by incorporating the Meissner Effect
we need them to
look like this in most general form:
curl E = -c B
curl B = c E + c J
div E = p
div B = -pu + qu
note: not sure exactly where the negative sign goes
The Meissner addition makes the Maxwell Equations fully symmetrical.
Note: The difference between Classical Physics and Quantum Physics is
that if one can
write out mathematics for the inner workings such as the Maxwell Eq
then one is dealing
with Classical Physics but if one is unable to write out any math
equations for the
workings of a piece of physics (example: Heisenberg Uncertainty
relationship, or the
StrongNuclear Force) then one is dealing with Quantum Physics. If a
piece of physics is
able to be penetrated by math equations then it is Classical Physics.
If all we can do is
attach probabilities then it is Quantum Physics. If BCS and Cooper
pairing are correct
then we will never have math equations describing superconductivity.
But if I am correct
that superconductivity is merely maximum electronegativity plus
conduction bands, well,
then we shall have math equations for a full description of
superconductivity.
And also, if the BCS and Cooper pairing are not fake theories, then
the Meissner Effect
would also be Quantum Physics and not Classical Physics. And the
Meissner Effect would
never be attached to the Maxwell Equations in any manner or degree to
which I am
attaching. You simply cannot have the Meissner Effect as part of
Maxwell theory and the
rest of superconductivity with a BCS and Cooper pairing explanation.
Igor, the Meissner Effect is not described by the div B = 0, and
neither by the other 3
Maxwell Equations. That leaves us with the problem of incorporating.
The remedy is simple in that the "exclusion of an external magnetic
field from
volume" is the add on of a new term to the Gauss Law of Magnetism.
I am not sure of the negative sign where it goes. But if the other
Gauss law is
this: div E = c p
then the new Gauss Law of Magnetism would look like this:
div B = - c p u + c q u
where the second term is the exclusion of magnetism of the first term.
And where the
second term is like a monopole although not a true monopole. If I had
to give it a name I
would call it a psuedomonopole. It imitates a monopole.
Archimedes Plutonium, a_pluton...@hotmail.com
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
--- end of old post ---
As you can see, alot of mistakes in the above but the reason I repost
it is to show the beginnings
of my quest to revise the Maxwell Equations.
I may have to end up reading everything that Dirac wrote about the
Maxwell Equations, since he
so staunchly believed a magnetic monopole exists because it would
quantize electric charge. But
did Dirac then proceed to say what changes would occurr to the Maxwell
Equations if a monopole were
discovered? So I have to track that down. I suspect he did not venture
to say what changes must happen
with the Maxwell Equations.
As for the other "asymmetry" of the Faraday Law versus Ampere-Maxwell
Law, I just recently found
out how to make those symmetrical using the Dirac ocean of positrons.
And given a little help from
the Fusion Barrier Principle.
The Revised Maxwell Equations have alot of implications and alot of
predictions. It predicts that gravity
is the added term in Faraday's Law. It predicts that planets and
satellites which have no dynamo
set-up still can have very large magnetic moments such as Mercury or
our Moon. Here again due to the
added term in the Faraday Law which I am going to call Displacement
Magnetism. James Maxwell
called his extra term for Ampere's Law as Displacement Current. I call
mine the Displacement Magnetism.
So the Moon and Mercury and Mars can have huge magnetic moments, yet
have no dynamo in their cores.
The magnetic moment is a result of Displacement-Magnetism caused by
nearby magnetic fields such
as the Sun's magnetosphere or the Earth's magnetosphere or the Solar
Winds.
Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
Dr. Physics
"Tiresome Unlaid Chump"
plutonium....@gmail.com
(snipped)
>
> In their most general form the Maxwell Equations look like this:
>
> curl E = -c B
>
> curl B = c E + c J
>
> div E = p
>
> div B = 0
>
> To correct the Maxwell Equations by incorporating the Meissner Effect
> we need them to
> look like this in most general form:
>
> curl E = -c B
>
> curl B = c E + c J
>
> div E = p
>
> div B = -pu + qu
>
Wrong, wrong, wrong. Goes to show that when a scientist is not on the
correct program overall,
that most things he says are wrong. We see that today in those who in
physics endorse Big Bang
or Cooper pairing or geology convection for plate tectonics, or
Nebular Dust Cloud in astronomy,
or Darwin evolution. When you use the basis of your science a false
basis, you end up with
your own work as further falsity.
I kept trying to put the Meissner Effect into the Maxwell Equations,
and what a false road to travel
on that idea.
What I should have done was continue the travel of Dirac. He believed
the world had a magnetic
monopole and how would that affect the Maxwell Equations if true? So,
the only sensible road
for me was not to inject Meissner Effect, but inject a magnetic
monopole.
That would mean the Gauss's law of magnetism in the Maxwell Equations
would look like this:
div B = -p
div E and div B would be related since the existence of a magnetic
monopole determines the
quantization of electric charge. One thing is certain, div B would no
longer be equal to zero.
So, firstly I should have made the magnetic monopole revision.
Secondly, I should have
made the revision of the Faraday Law to make it symmetrical with curl
B.
To make curl E symmetrical to curl B:
> curl E = -c B
>
> curl B = c E + c J
would mean a displacement-magnetism rather than a displacement-current
J in curlB
So the new symmetrical Faraday Law would be:
curl E = -c B + (-c) M
Now, how in the world are we going to measure in experiments a
displacement-magnetism?
I believe the magnetism of planets like Mercury, Mars and satellites
like Moon, Io provide us with
clear evidence of displacement-magnetism.
Now I want to mention something looming large in this theoretical
revision of Maxwell Equations,
and much larger than the magnetic monopole. It is the Dirac ocean of
positrons as Space itself.
The reason we have a magnetic monopole is that the Atom Totality
itself is the single magnetic
monopole.
The added term in Faraday's Law of (-c)M , the displacement-magnetism
is part and partial of the
Dirac ocean of positrons. This displacement-magnetism is the force of
gravity which is the ocean
of positrons.
So the reason that Mercury and Moon have a magnetic moment yet have no
interior dynamo to create
the magnetic field is because the field is a Displacement-magnetism.
The magnetic field of Mercury
and Moon is caused by the Sun acting as a Faraday Law upon Mercury and
the magnetic field of
our Moon is caused by the Faraday Law of the Sun and Earth acting on
the Moon.
Most of the magnetic field of Earth is caused by the cores acting as a
dynamo, but a portion of
Earth's magnetic field is due to Displacement-Magnetism.
You see, in an Atom Totality, there no longer exists a force of
gravity, for it becomes a weakest
form of the Coulomb force. We no longer see the Sun as bending the
space around Earth and Earth
thus following the path of that bent-space. We no longer see gravity
as the apple falls from the tree
and takes a path towards the center-of-Earth. What we now see is that
gravity is a Coulomb force of
attraction. That all matter we see such as the Sun and Earth occupy a
space as positron antimatter.
And the positron antimatter that is the space of the Sun acts as if
all the Sun's positrons were in the
center-of-the-Sun, and likewise for the Earth. So now, why does Earth
revolve around the Sun? Because
the Sun's positrons have that Coulomb-attraction for the mass of
Earth. Why does the apple fall
towards the center of Earth? Because the Earth's positrons pull the
apple (since it is matter and
the positrons are antimatter).
So you see, I have eliminated the force of gravity, for it is now a
weakest form of the Coulomb force.
Gravity is electromagnetism. Gravity is part of that Displacement-
magnetism in the revised Faraday
Law.
P.S. I probably someday will have to read everything Dirac wrote about
the Maxwell Equations, to
see if he ventured out as to what a magnetic monopole would do to the
equations. I am almost certain
that Dirac never ventured out to see what his Ocean of Positrons would
do to the Maxwell Equations.
So, in retrospect, the Universe not only has complimentarity of
particle and wave and complimentarity
of electric and magnetism, but the Universe has complimentarity of
matter and antimatter where
the antimatter is Space itself. The old Maxwell equations written in
1860s never had the idea that the
Space involved in Faraday and Ampere laws was electric and magnetic
also, but of course quantum
mechanics had to wait until 1930s.
This is the first major revision of the old Maxwell Equations. They
are the heart and cornerstone of physics.
Many obtuse physicists do not recognize the Maxwell Equations as the
heart of physics and incorporated
within quantum mechanics. The Maxwell Equations are simply the quantum-
mechanics of charge and
magnetism and thus the Maxwell Equations are quantum mechanics.
P.S. one of the reasons noone ever saw a "displacement magnetism" in
experiments was simply because
of its very small measure of magnetism. We are talking of a "effect"
that is close to 10^-40 weaker
than other measures of the Maxwell Equations. We have to get to the
size of planets like Mercury or
our Moon before we have a noticeable and measurable Displacement
Magnetism.
plutonium....@gmail.com
> On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:00:38 -0700 (PDT),
> plutonium....@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >
> >John Polasek wrote:
> >> On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 22:59:32 -0700 (PDT),
> >> plutonium....@gmail.com wrote:
> >>
> >> snip
> >> >In their most general form the Maxwell Equations look like this:
> >> >
> >> > curl E = -c B
> >
> >No, I am taking the (-c) to be the term -1/c
> You are??
>
> >I am taking the B to be the term dB/dt (gaussian)
> You are??
>
> >I am being more of a mathematician, not concerned over thousands of
> >piddle paddle constants
> >and consolidating them all into one term "c".
> It's clearly beyond your grasp that a pure mathematician cannot do
> physics while ignoring units or reality. Your mendacity thus far
> guarantees you are building new theories on sand. New theories need
> new insight, and your algebraic numerology is of no value.
> As a minimum, you need 4 variables E D B and H.
Thanks and indeed I have four variables. I am going to call them:
B = magnetic field
E = electric field
J = displacement-current
M = displacement-magnetism
Rather than your D and H, I prefer to use J and M
So, being a mathematician rather than a physicist worried about every
minutia detail of every
minutia constant, I am going to write the Maxwell Equations in their
very most generalized
form.
Here are the old Maxwell Equations of 1860s:
curl E = -k B
curl B = k E + k' J
div E = p
div B = 0
where k, k', p represent constants (and even variables are possible)
Here is the new Atom-Totality-Maxwell Equations of 2008:
curl E = -k B + (-)k" M
curl B = k E + k' J
div E = p
div B = p'
The k-- constants are related as well as the p-- constants are
related. The p constants are related
because the existence of a magnetic monopole determines the
quantization of electric charge and
vice versa. The k constants are related because Space itself where
Maxwell Equations are experimentally
conducted is a ocean of positrons that attracts matter. What James
Clerk Maxwell could not have
anticipated when he formulated the Equations is that Space itself is
"both charged and magnetized"
And that is the missing term in Faraday's Law. Space is Dirac's ocean
of positrons and is the "seat"
of the force of gravity. It is very weak for it is 10^40 weaker and so
ordinary experiments would
usually fail to recognize the Displacement-Magnetism. Larger
experiments such as the magnetic
moment of Mercury or the Moon would reveal this Displacement
Magnetism.
Modern day physics has to give up on its old nasty practice of
littering physics with all its weird and
odd symbols, mostly Greek symbols. We have to get rid of that nonsense
practice and use what the
letters of the alphabet provide. And use basically what I have used
above and to say things in plain language
rather than to hide concepts under Greek symbols. The old way of
writing physics has to cease in
our modern day Internet. The symbols in mathematics has to cease and
desist and to change into
what is provided by the keyboard or say it in plain language. No
longer do we leave concepts open
to anyone's penchant of weird symbols.
plutonium....@gmail.com
There is another place in physics experiments that can easily reveal
the added term
in Faraday's Law-- Displacement-Magnetism. It is the old and familar
Double Slit Experiment.
Physicists have been troubled to this day as to how an electron or
photon can split itself up
upon entering the slit and then rejoining itself at the detection
monitor. It was given in modern
day physics as a Quantum Strangeness, as something no logic can make
sense of.
Well, today I am going to make sense of the Double Slit Experiment and
to connect it and join
it to the Maxwell Equations.
If we see the Double Slit Experiment as not just slits but see it as a
closed loop, then the Double
Slit experiment is Faraday's Law and Ampere's Law.
However, the Double Slit is explanable as the Ampere-Maxwell Law where
the splitting up of the
electron and then subsequent reforming into one solid electron at the
monitor screen, well, that is
simply the initial current ending up as the displacement-current. You
see, Ampere-Maxwell Law
says a changing electric field produces either a magnetic field or
another electric field. So in
the Double-Slit Experiment the electron before it enters the slits is
a Electric field, as it enters the
slits it is broken apart and divided up into a magnetic field, but as
it approaches the screen monitors
it reassembles itself back into a displacement current or back into
its wholesome whole electron.
So the Double Slit Experiment is nothing more than Ampere-Maxwell Law
of Maxwell Equations.
Now I said that we can easily observe the truth of the Displacement
Magnetism in Faraday's Law
by the magnetic field of Mercury or Moon. But another easy way to
observe the Displacement Magnetism
is the Double Slit Experiment. If we shot light-waves at the Double
Slit, then the same thing happens
where the lightwaves disassemble at the slit openings and then reform
at the screen monitor. Now the
only way this is possible is that the Faraday Law in Maxwell Equations
is missing a huge term. That
missing term is a Displacement Magnetism.
So, Mercury, Moon and Double-Slit Experiment demand there to be a
Displacement-Magnetism in
Faraday's Law.
plutonium....@gmail.com
John Polasek wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 12:39:24 -0700 (PDT),
> plutonium....@gmail.com wrote:
>
(snipped)
>
> OK, then, full speed ahead!
> John Polasek
In a case of revising the Maxwell Equations, I reckon, is not one in
which we
play around with the mathematics first and say, does that look nice
and symmetrical.
Do the math first and then run out and see if experiments agree.
But rather, one in which we have a good idea of what is missing or
needs changing-- magnetic monopole, displacement-magnetism of Dirac-
positron-ocean,
and how to satisfy Double Slit Experiment Results.
Then do the experiments or measurements-- magnetic field of Mercury
and Moon.
Finally, sort out the mathematics and fine-tune the mathematics with
all its physical
constants and variables.
I do not recall the actual history of Maxwell discovering the
displacement-current. Whether
he did it purely by a mathematical motivation or whether some
experimental results
bothered him.
In the case of Displacement-Magnetism, it is a magnetism that conforms
to the center-of-gravity.
So this magnetism is different from the magnetism we are used to. And
so the mathematics is
going to be different.
In my case, rather than Maxwell's, it is better to see experiment
results and later adjust the mathematics
rather than have the math first.
plutonium....@gmail.com
First off I am going to shorten the title of this book to that of Atom-
Totality-Maxwell Equations,
because the two key essential revisions involve the existence of one
magnetic monopole
and the concept that Space is a ocean of positrons. You can only have
those two features
in a Atom Totality. So noone was in any position to revise the old
Maxwell Equations unless
they had a Atom Totality theory as their foundation.
To add on or revise or change the old Maxwell Equations is likely the
pie in the sky dream of
every physicist. Probably every physicist has either tried or dreamed
of trying to tinker with the
Maxwell Equations. The fact that noone has changed them since Maxwell
of 1860s is testament
to how well of a job Maxwell did. And the fact that under the Big Bang
theory as the foundation of
physics, the Big Bang is unable to change the Maxwell Equations. But
the Atom
Totality theory is up and running and demands changes and improvements
in the old Maxwell
Equations.
One of the things that is rather impressive and a urging for change in
the Maxwell Equations is
the dependence of Special Relativity on the Maxwell Equations. Even
the village-idiot would
recognize that moving a bar magnet in a closed loop is Faradays Law
which is the same thing
as moving the closed loop and holding the bar magnet stationary. So if
Special Relativity is a
example of Faradays Law. It is logical and reasonable to expect that
the reversal of Ampere-Maxwell
Law with its Displacement Current should have the same mathematical
form given to the Faraday Law.
So that in Ampere-Maxwell we have a changing electric field producing
a magnetic field and displacement
current. That would dictate that Faraday Law is missing a term of a
magnetic-displacement.
So if Special Relativity comes out of the Maxwell Equations. And we
see that the Double Slit
Experiment is the Ampere-Maxwell Law, we then expect that Faraday's
law needs that extra term.
We could actually go further and say that Special Relativity can be
expanded to the dynamic Maxwell
Equations of Faraday versus Ampere-Maxwell Law. That one should be the
same form as the other
where we replace E by B. Where we have:
changing electric field yields magnetic field plus electric field
changing magnetic field yields electric field
So those two laws violate a Generalized-Special-Relativity
If the Faraday law had been:
changing magnetic field yields electric field plus magnetic field
then we see that we can apply Special Relativity fully
But even more important and drastic is the Double Slit Experiment, for
if the electrons going through the slits break apart at the aperature
and rejoin
before hitting the monitor then that is a Ampere-Maxwell Law routine
for those
electrons where the splitting apart is the displacement-current. But
now, we
send light-waves through the Double Slit, and here we have Faraday's
Law.
It does not work, since it does not yield a newer magnetic field, and
yields only
an electric field.
So not only does Special Relativity demand an extra term in Faraday's
Law but also
the Double Slit Experiment demands an extra term.
plutonium....@gmail.com
a table of the
current up to date information of the quantity and size of astro body
magnetic fields. It
should not be the case where I have to search every planet and
satellite for information
on their magnetism.
Earth magnetic field 30,000 to 60,000 nT
Mercury 300 nT
Moon at most 300 nT
Venus near zero
Mars near zero
Now I need to find out about the magnetic fields of the gas giants and
their satellites.
Magnetic-Displacement, the missing term in Faraday's Law should give a
positive
valued magnetic field to every astro body for they act as a component
of Faraday's Law.
Displacement-Magnetism would thus predict close to zero field for
isolated objects such
as Venus and Mars. Since Moon is close to Earth with its huge
magnetosphere would
give the Moon a larger valued magnetic field than normal.
As for Mercury, it may have a dynamo but the close proximity to the
Sun and its solar
winds would make the Magnetic-displacement cancelling out its own
magnetic dynamo.
Magnetic-displacement would then predict abnormally high magnetic
fields for the gas
giant satellites and also abnormally high magnetic fields for Saturn,
Uranus and Neptune.
Magnetic-displacement should predict an abnormally high magnetic field
for Pluto and
Charon, even though it is small compared to say Moon's 300 nT