Maxwell electrodynamics needs a concept of classical spin for completing

[khrap...@hotmail.com]

It is a submission to "Nature":
Angular momentum conservation law is a fundamental law of nature. It is
considered that no violation of the law exists. However, it was found
the celebrated Beth's optics experiment contradicted the law in the
frame of Maxwell electrodynamics. Really, in this experiment, a
circularly polarized light passes through a birefringent plate, and the
plate experiences a torque, but, according to the electrodynamics,
there is no angular momentum flux in the surrounding space. This
violation shows incompleteness of Maxwell electrodynamics. To reveal an
angular momentum flux in Beth's experiment a concept of classical
spin is added to the electrodynamics. The classical expression for spin
flux density works excellently in other cases.
See: Khrapko, R. I. in "Unfolding the Labyrinth: Open Problems in
Mathematics, Physics, Astrophysics, and Other Areas of Science" 57-71
(Phoenix, AZ, 2006) http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/math.GM/0609238;
www.mai.ru/projects/mai_works/;
mp_...@mail.ma.utexas.edu Numbers 03-307, 03-311, 03-315 and
www.sciprint.org (see folder user Khrapko).
Absorption and reflection of a circularly polarized beam is calculated
there, a radiation of a rotating electrical dipole and other topics are
considered in these works.
Radi Khrapko

[khrap...@hotmail.com]

Nature Administration ignored the paper. Thus I am forced to send the
message to "Nature":

Dear "Nature Administration",
You affirm that "Nature" is not interested in violations of laws of
nature in the frame of the modern physics. I cannot believe it. So,
(1) I ask you to send the paper to referees.
(2) Let me know your name please.

Radi Khrapko

[khrap...@hotmail.com]

"Nature" and the scientific community keep silence concerning the
violation of the angular momentum conservation law in the frame of
Maxwell electrodynamics. Nature administrator even keeps his name from
us. Well, we will watch and work.

Meanwhile, I have submitted the paper "Maxwell electrodynamics needs a
concept of classical spin for completing" to JPA.

Radi Khrapko

[khrap...@hotmail.com]

As soon as I sent the paper "Maxwell electrodynamics needs a concept of
classical spin for completing" to JPA, I received three infected
messages. I think my post "Institute of Physics Journals defend
corporate interests" was remembered.
The messages are
Inet Mail Delivery S... bug letter Oct 27
Security Assistance New Internet Upgrade Oct 27
Network Mail Deliver... error announcement Oct 25
For example, the virus "pack44.exe" was in "Security Assistance":

khrap...@hotmail.com Messenger:
>From : Security Assistance <ubbwxto...@support.com>
Sent : Friday, October 27, 2006 8:30 AM
To : "Customer" <custome...@support.com>
Subject : New Internet Upgrade
Attachment : image6.gif (< 0.01 MB), image7.gif (< 0.01 MB)
Hotmail has permanently blocked the following potentially unsafe
attachment(s): pack44.exe (0.10 MB) More Info...
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from smtp6.orange.fr ([193.252.22.25]) by
bay0-mc7-f19.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444);
Fri, 27 Oct 2006 01:30:40 -0700
Received: from smtp-msa-out06.orange.fr (mwinf0606 [172.22.137.34])by
mwinf0605.orange.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id CD30C800394;Fri, 27 Oct
2006 10:30:39 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from wtvzk (Mix-Reims-107-4-62.w193-250.abo.wanadoo.fr
[193.250.84.62])by mwinf0606.orange.fr (SMTP Server) with SMTP id
1A5C81C00297; Fri, 27 Oct 2006 10:30:09 +0200 (CEST)
X-Message-Info: LsUYwwHHNt0IWQ01zjtMucTl4blwLWuH8nnSUsgyvvc=
X-ME-UUID: 200610270830101...@mwinf0606.orange.fr
Return-Path: aleph-clau...@wanadoo.fr
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Oct 2006 08:30:41.0012 (UTC)
FILETIME=[2FE3E340:01C6F9A2]
Microsoft Customer
this is the latest version of security update, the "October 2006,
Cumulative Patch" update which eliminates all known security
vulnerabilities affecting MS Internet Explorer, MS Outlook and MS
Outlook Express as well as three newly discovered vulnerabilities.
Install now.. .. etc

You can read about other virus attacks at
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/USENET-talk-arXiv

Radi Khrapko

[khrap...@hotmail.com]

Editors of JPA have been unable to refute the violation of the angular
momentum conservation law in the frame of standard electrodynamics that
was demonstrated in the paper "Maxwell electrodynamics needs a concept
of classical spin for completing". So, after a three-week
consideration, they have used a stock-phrase:
"To be publishable in this journal, papers must be scientifically
valid, contain significant new physics, be of high quality and
scientific interest, and be recognised as an important contribution to
the literature. Your paper has been seen by a member of the Editorial
Board who finds it does not meet these criteria and thus does not
warrant publication in JPA. It has therefore been withdrawn from
consideration. We will not give it further consideration for JPA unless
you can demonstrate that it contains significant new physics of high
quality and scientific interest.
Yours sincerely Anna Coombs, Nina Blakesley, Neil Scriven, Sarah
Williams, Laura Jackson, Laura Smith and Adrian Corrigan."

Naturally, my answer is:
"Dear Editors, in accordance with your request, I demonstrate that the
paper contains significant new physics of high quality and scientific
interest.

Angular momentum conservation law is a fundamental law of nature. It is
considered that no violation of the law exists. However, it was found
the celebrated Beth's optics experiment contradicted the law in the
frame of Maxwell electrodynamics. Really, in this experiment, a
circularly polarized light passes through a birefringent plate, and the
plate experiences a torque, but, according to the electrodynamics,
there is no angular momentum flux in the surrounding space. This
violation shows incompleteness of Maxwell electrodynamics. To reveal an
angular momentum flux in Beth's experiment a concept of classical
spin is added to the electrodynamics. The classical expression for spin
flux density works excellently in other cases."

Radi Khrapko
P.S.
We will watch and work.

[Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com]

Hi Radi.

I also am having trouble with this. Even the simplest physics problem
exposes the contortion of conservation of angular momentum. I cannot
find anyone willing to discuss Jx, Jy, and Jz and their motivation.
Attempts at spin filtration of electron beams yield just 80% at 60
microamps with poor signals of achieving 100%.

We are humans doing math and science and so fallibility is a
possibility. The mimicry that allows us the progression prevents the
masses from variations that conflict with prior established 'facts'.
The difference between a faction and a fiction is very slight. For such
people to make a break with their faction is a momentous occassion and
so we should not expect it on a daily basis. Should one make such a
break publicly they face a credibility problem. The human social animal
is wired for such behavior. Mimicry lies at the heart of our being.
Most of us have spent twenty years engaged in the mimicry of others,
knitting our internal structures with the external establishment,
seeking approval like happy dogs the whole way. Those who refuse are
failures.

-Tim

[khrap...@hotmail.com]

Dear Tim,
You write somewhat hazily. What is the spin filtration? And what does
the mimicry allow us?
Mimic [verb] is "to operate in exactly the same way as someone else".
Radi

[Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com]

Spin filtration is the attempt to build an electron gun emitting 100%
spin up electrons.
This is the context of "spin polarization". Please look at Figure 5 of:
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-wrap/getdoc/slac-pub-6606.pdf
If this is a characteristic curve then 100% polarization implies 0%
intensity. It drops down hard as they try to
raise the percentage. This figure I believe to be an up/down binary
type of dichotomy, so 80% up and 20% down is about the best that can be
achieved currently. Here the actual is 75% and that sends a strong math
signal.

I may be misinterpreting this data. My understanding of electron spin
is limited. If you can set me straight on this I would appreciate it.

Mimicry is claimed by some psychologists to be the human basis of
learning. It is only our abilities to play out variations on these
learned patterns that allow progress. In an academic environment one is
forced into strong mimicry since in order to succede one must mimic the
professor. Enough failing grades will eliminate you. At this level we
have been trained out of performing some variations because they are in
conflict with our training. For instance my own work on polysign
numbers:
http://BandTechnology.com/PolySigned
is very challenging since it rebuilds the real number from a different
context. Modern humans are overly fixated upon the real number.

Now I am on a tangent that allows for a smallest distance. This comes
from questioning the real numbered physical representation of space:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.math/msg/9e29d8446869e707
If that's too burdensome to read I understand you not bothering with
it. Methods such as these may lead to a change in context that will be
of value. The ability of the modern human mind to absorb these ideas is
questionable due to the fixation upon the real number.
This would then explain some of the contortions of modern physics; an
invalid basis has been chosen transparently. The burden of proving the
existence of the finite world about us is alleviated when the minimal
distance is imposed within the basis.

-Tim

[khrap...@hotmail.com]

Dear Tim
I think four-signed numbers are equivalent to complex numbers rather
than three-signed. E.g. +x-x+ix-ix=0
Radi

[Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com]

Your interpretation dictates that
- x + x = 0
and
+ ix - ix = 0
whereas P4 dictates only that
- x + x * x # x = 0 .
It makes no imposition of the dual inverses you point to.
The symmetry is satisfied in three dimensions on a tetrahedral
coordinate system.
Each unit vector points from the center of a tetrahedron to its
vertices. These four unit vectors sum to yield zero and retain perfect
symmetry.

-Tim