Ionization energy, work function and absurdity of modern science
The neglected ionization energy variation for isoelectronic series can reveal more useful information about electrons structure; the problem is these data are in contradiction with actual quantum theory. The quantum prediction for work functions values are in contradiction with experiments; for metals, ionization energy and work function must be equal but in reality they are not. For other classes of compounds quantum mechanic fails again to predict something. A striking example is the case of metallic oxides having work functions values smaller then metals. It is outrageous how a covalent or ionic bound liberate electrons easier then a metallic bound in frame of actual physics.
--- On Sat, 8/22/09, sorincosofret <sorincosof...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>The neglected ionization energy variation for isoelectronic series can >reveal more useful information about electrons structure; the problem is >these data are in contradiction with actual quantum theory. >The quantum prediction for work functions values are in contradiction >with experiments; for metals, ionization energy and work function must be >equal but in reality they are not.
That is your prediction, shit-head cretin liar, not QM's. Work function on room-temperature solid elements is smaller than the atomic state due to a shallower charge weall.
>For other classes of compounds quantum mechanic fails again to predict >something. A striking example is the case of metallic oxides >having work functions values smaller then metals. It is outrageous >how a covalent or ionic bound liberate electrons easier then a metallic >bound in frame of actual physics.
bond, retard It does not and is not, nor did you ever use quantum mekanics to predict anything. This is elèctrokemics and elementary maths, which you fail again. Thorium has four valent charges, whereas thoria has 16 from the oxygen atoms; therefore whatever enthalpy the latter contribute is overwhelmed by the extra charges. Work function is a specific enthalpy rather than molar.
|
