Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Electrostatics and absurdities of modern physics

1 view
Skip to first unread message

sorin

unread,
Jun 5, 2010, 11:11:07 AM6/5/10
to
Electrostatics and absurdities of modern physics

For more then two centuries scientists have been used Coulomb law
without questioning its validity. Based on well known experimental
facts the presented text advocate for a limited validity of Coulomb
law; this is pedagogical fact in order to not scare too many actual
orthodox physicists. Further work will clearly tackle with the nature
of Coulomb force and its place inside electricity theory.
Second subject takes intro discussion the working principle for common
capacitors and supra capacitors. Despite their wide spread use as
electric and electronic components, their actual explanation for
what’s happen inside such device at atomic level are a monument of
absurdity.
The link:
http://www.elkadot.com/en/magneticity/Electrostatic.htm

Starting with this point the advertisement will be directed for a
larger category of readers not only to English speakers. All the time,
the Romanian version of the text will serve as reference.
The link:
http://www.elkadot.com/ro/magneticitate/Electrostatica.htm

Except Romanian version, all other variants can present some
translation errors. In order to cover the intellectual’s rights, the
Romanian and English texts will appear first because are written by
me. The variants in other languages (French, German, Spanish, etc)
will appear few weeks later, when their translations are finished.
All translations are made by amateur so if a reader is not con content
with a specific translation, he/she can make appeal to Romanian
reference text and to search for a better translator.
If there are persons willing to help translation in other languages
please contact me by email.

Best regards,

Sorin Cosofret

sorin

unread,
Jun 5, 2010, 11:34:53 AM6/5/10
to
Electrostatics and absurdities of modern physics

For more then two centuries scientists have been used Coulomb law
without questioning its validity. Based on well known experimental
facts the presented text advocate for a limited validity of Coulomb
law; this is pedagogical fact in order to not scare too many actual
orthodox physicists. Further work will clearly tackle with the nature
of Coulomb force and its place inside electricity theory.
Second subject takes intro discussion the working principle for common
capacitors and supra capacitors. Despite their wide spread use as
electric and electronic components, their actual explanation for
what’s happen inside such device at atomic level are a monument of
absurdity.
The link:
http://www.elkadot.com/en/magneticity/Electrostatic.htm

Starting with this point the advertisement will be directed for a
larger category of readers not only to English speakers. All the time,
the Romanian version of the text will serve as reference.
The link:
http://www.elkadot.com/ro/magneticitate/Electrostatica.htm

Except Romanian version, all other variants can present some
translation errors. In order to cover the intellectual’s rights, the
Romanian and English texts will appear first because are written by
me. The variants in other languages (French, German, Spanish, etc)
will appear few weeks later, when their translations are finished.

All translations are made by amateur so if a reader is not content

glen herrmannsfeldt

unread,
Jun 5, 2010, 3:04:27 PM6/5/10
to
sorin <sorinc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Electrostatics and absurdities of modern physics

> For more then two centuries scientists have been used Coulomb law
> without questioning its validity. Based on well known experimental
> facts the presented text advocate for a limited validity of Coulomb
> law; this is pedagogical fact in order to not scare too many actual
> orthodox physicists.

Which part of Coulomb's law are you asking about?

Many books, including the Feynman Lectures, have a good explanation
on testing the inverse square law. The field inside a metal can
is zero, pretty much because of the inverse square law. Very small
deviations are detectable.

-- glen

Luyang Han

unread,
Jun 14, 2010, 6:30:36 PM6/14/10
to
I took a bit of time to read the posted link and especially the first part,
which is much simple to argue. It is clear that a reasonable formulation is
lacking and the author does not have the ability to use mathematics.

The author claims:

> On the surface charges are mobile and, ,,in principle”, they have the
possibility to change their position in order to equilibrate their repulsion
and to arrive a minimum interaction energy.
>
> Contrary to this ,,common sense” assumption, these charges situated around
edges don’t know the principle of minimum energy and they like a strange
distribution with a higher interaction energy.

This is a misunderstanding of the concept of the energy minimization. In
this problem the reasonable saying is that the charge will redistribute on
the surface so that the global interaction energy of the charge is
minimized. Remember that the charge is mobile. It is true that the charge
density on the top of the tip is high, but the global energy is minimized.

>there is no ,,serious” reason for electric charges to remain only at the
surface of body

This is a serious reason even from the simple assumption of the author. If,
in case, there the charge are all sitting inside the body, because the
repulsive forces, and the charges are mobile, and the surface prevent the
charge from escaping, finally the charge will take the 'least energy' state,
so to say take the maximum possible distance, i.e., to the surface.

0 new messages