Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Covalent bound and absurdities of modern science

0 views
Skip to first unread message

sorin

unread,
Sep 18, 2009, 5:30:23 AM9/18/09
to
Covalent bound and absurdities of modern science

A cornerstone for quantum mechanic and entire chemistry is represented
by actual description of chemical bounds.
It is accepted that covalent bonds are formed as a result of the
sharing of one or more electrons between atoms. There is no conceptual
explanation, how the electrons participating at bound are moving
around or between atoms. As usual, quantum mechanic, in its variants,
Valence theory and Orbital Molecular theory, predict a certain
probability for electrons to be in certain region of space, without an
intuitive explanation.
In proposed model, a covalent bound is formed as result of coupling
between electron magnetic moments. No sharing of electrons is allowed,
no increased density of electrons in the space between atoms
participating at bound formation. Quantum mechanic is ruled out and an
analogy with an interaction between two macroscopic magnets can be
made. The interaction between these magnetic moments can explain the
covalent bound formation. Their spatial orientation can explain the
orientation of covalent bounds in space.
The old text about covalent bound is corrected and improved at new
link :
http://www.elkadot.com/chemistry/COVALENT%20BOND.htm


Ionic, coordinative bound and metallic bound are revised in the new
chemistry book, too.

Sorin Cosofret

7

unread,
Nov 15, 2009, 10:09:05 AM11/15/09
to
sorin wrote:

I am not criticising your work directly but please bear this in mind.

If atoms are magnetic, then under a strong magnetic field, ALL materials
will line up with in a strong magnetic field and will see the material
break down chemically and become strongly magnetic. But we don't see that
with common materials like plastic, glass, metal and ceramics. May be
it could be done and we just don't have strong enough magnets to prove it
just yet. But you can do some calculations to estimate that perhaps?

There is something amiss with magnetism and cooling that physics is aware
of. Materials cooled rapidly by pouring the melt over a rapidly spinning
wheel cools the materials very fast and the result are materials that have
superior magnetic properties.

With your theory that would be a regular happening thing because the
magnetic dipoles are not aligned and the atoms got frozen in a way that
allows superior magnetic properties to be seen.

0 new messages