Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Daniel cell and absurdities of modern science
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  1 message - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
sorin  
View profile  
 More options Aug 30, 9:54 am
Newsgroups: sci.physics.accelerators
From: sorin <sorincosof...@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 06:54:59 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Aug 30 2009 9:54 am
Subject: Daniel cell and absurdities of modern science
Daniel cell and absurdities of modern science

A critique analysis of Daniel's cell is provided at following link
(improved):

http://www.elkadot.com/chemistry/Daniel%20cell%20and%20the%20salt%20b...

The old Daniel cell and some of its variants have not get a coherent
explanation in actual orthodox science.

A modern variant, using a salt bridge between half cells, is found to
be non-functional. More precisely, the salt bridge, formed by an inert
salt, does not participate at general reaction chain, so no reaction
takes place inside such cell. Such cell can be leaved in short-circuit
position for months without a significant consume of electrodes or
without solution color modification. Of course, in this case, there is
a small residual current due to the reaction between Zn and water, but
this is a secondary reaction and not the expected reaction able to
produce the expected current.

 Further, the actual explanation can be proved to be false using
simple chemical reactions able to be performed in any low level school
laboratory.

Regards,
Sorin Cosofret


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google