Pentagon. 911 When you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains - however improbable - must be the truth.?

[Plane Fixer]

Jason Christie <spamsp...@spam.spam> wrote in
news:s8o0jv846ueock0qb...@4ax.com:

> On Tue, 05 Aug 2003 02:48:08 -0400, Hit1Hard <Hit.On...@iaehv.nl>
> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 04 Aug 2003 22:14:00 -0400, Jason Christie wrote:
>>> In addition, both pictures were taken
>>> after the collapse of the Pentagon structure. So, you were saying?
>>
>>I admitt, you are right. The building has collapsed there.
>
> So tell the troll Jason that he is wrong.
>
>
>

Did I ever say the building didn't collapse?

1. Lack of a right side engine - with conflicting stories

2. Lack of 757 in Security Camera Frames

3. Trail of White Smoke

4. WRONG ANGLE OF APPROACH ON THE SECURITY CAMERA FRAMES

5. Smoke at the Pentagon 15 minutes too early for a 757.

6. Looping mystery plane over the White House

7. Conflicting eyewitnesses

--
Can I borrow a feeling?
http://www.mp3.com/gortician

Bass for your anus:
http://www.mp3.com/manticore
http://www.mp3.com/meterversusyard
http://www.mp3.com/highc
http://www.mp3.com/measurerecs.

"[The artwork of Andrew Penland] is REAL...what I mean by "real" is that
it made NEW THOUGHTS occur in my head, which would have never otherwise
occurred." --Full Force Frank

[Jason Christie]

On Wed, 06 Aug 2003 15:20:35 GMT, Plane Fixer <spamsp...@spam.spam>
wrote:

>Jason Christie <spamsp...@spam.spam> wrote in
>news:s8o0jv846ueock0qb...@4ax.com:
>
>> On Tue, 05 Aug 2003 02:48:08 -0400, Hit1Hard <Hit.On...@iaehv.nl>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 04 Aug 2003 22:14:00 -0400, Jason Christie wrote:
>>>> In addition, both pictures were taken
>>>> after the collapse of the Pentagon structure. So, you were saying?
>>>
>>>I admitt, you are right. The building has collapsed there.
>>
>> So tell the troll Jason that he is wrong.
>>
>>
>>
>
>Did I ever say the building didn't collapse?

Yes, as a matter of fact you did.

From: Flonkbane (spamsp...@spam.spam)
Subject: Re: No, No, No! It FLEW OVER THE PENTAGON was Re: The
Pentagon Fraud Explained In Simple Terms
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy, alt.disasters.aviation, alt.aviation,
sci.military, alt.gossip.celebrities
Date: 2003-08-04 09:50:10 PST

> How many accident scenes have you ever seen, for that
> matter? Of any kind, Jason.

I see no damage to the Pentagon in those photos, Rhonda. Look again.
I'm going to blow them up a bit for you, soon.