Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Goodbye to British tanks
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Paul F Austin  
View profile  
 More options Jun 3 2012, 5:49 pm
Newsgroups: rec.aviation.military, sci.military.naval
From: Paul F Austin <pfaus...@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2012 17:49:25 -0400
Local: Sun, Jun 3 2012 5:49 pm
Subject: Re: Goodbye to British tanks
On 6/3/2012 10:16 AM, Eugene Griessel wrote:

> One of the design criteria of the Merkava was agility.  And range -
> something you cannot achieve with a gas turbine.  The Merkava Mk3 has
> the same horsepower as an M1.  Mobility and agility were always high
> on the list of any IDF tank.  Any new lame excuses?

One blindingly unexpected aspect of the Abrams/Bradely designs was
unprecedented automotive reliability, even in the desert. That showed up
in the Desert Storm operations where very long road marches by the 24th
ID that experienced no tracks falling out. How has the Merkava shown in
this respect?

Paul


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.