Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

gun goofballs cannot carry shotgun at U.S. Capitol... Re: ...carrying a handgun

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Dr. James West, Ph.D.

unread,
Apr 6, 2008, 10:41:51 AM4/6/08
to

Scout wrote:
>
> Oh, then you can show me where criminals don't have guns because the law
> prohibits it.

Easy. No one, including you law-abiding gun goofballs, can carry shotguns
onto U.S. Capitol grounds. Because gun control works, son.


> otherwise the point stands that gun control does not prevent violent
> criminals from getting guns and using them in crime.

Wrong, son, gun control works for the U.S. Capitol.

ya fuckin gun goofball moron
;-)

PLMerite

unread,
Apr 6, 2008, 10:54:36 AM4/6/08
to

"Dr. James West, Ph.D." <na...@nobull.com> wrote in message
news:SMKdnWoFwaC2fGXanZ2dnUVZ_jSdnZ2d@toastnet...

"Some years ago, Kennedy bodyguard Chuck Stein was arrested at the Russell
Senate Office Building with a handgun, two submachine guns and 146 rounds of
ammunition. "


http://www.ccrkba.org/pub/rkba/press-releases/CC-Snoopdogg.htm

Regards, PLMerite


--
"Confronting Liberals with the facts of reality is very much akin to
clubbing baby seals. It gets boring after a while, but because Liberals are
so stupid it is easy work." Steven M. Barry

Dr. James West, Ph.D.

unread,
Apr 6, 2008, 11:27:36 AM4/6/08
to
PLMerite wrote:

> "Dr. James West, Ph.D." <na...@nobull.com> wrote in message
> news:SMKdnWoFwaC2fGXanZ2dnUVZ_jSdnZ2d@toastnet...
>
>>Scout wrote:
>>
>>>Oh, then you can show me where criminals don't have guns because the law
>>>prohibits it.
>>
>>Easy. No one, including you law-abiding gun goofballs, can carry shotguns
>>onto U.S. Capitol grounds. Because gun control works, son.
>>
>>
>>
>>>otherwise the point stands that gun control does not prevent violent
>>>criminals from getting guns and using them in crime.
>>
>>Wrong, son, gun control works for the U.S. Capitol.
>>
>>ya fuckin gun goofball moron
>>;-)
>
>
>
>
> "Some years ago, Kennedy bodyguard Chuck Stein was arrested at the Russell
> Senate Office Building with a handgun, two submachine guns and 146 rounds of
> ammunition. "

So? Is this, in your mind, some kind of a rebuttal to the effectiveness
of gun control at the U.S. Capitol?

PLMerite

unread,
Apr 6, 2008, 11:43:03 AM4/6/08
to

"Dr. James West, Ph.D." <na...@nobull.com> wrote in message
news:b5idnYkn-YR5dmXanZ2dnUVZ_hynnZ2d@toastnet...

It just illustrates that Teddy Kennedy while fighting to disarm the American
People, has armed bodyguards to protect him.

Some pigs are more equal than others.


Regards, PLMerite


--
"Whether they admit it or not, the Democrats need lawbreakers such as
illegal aliens -- who are being illegally registered as Democrats -- and
killers, rapists and robbers in order to increase their base of far-left
voters." Mike Baker, political strategist and pollster.


Don Ocean

unread,
Apr 6, 2008, 11:46:06 AM4/6/08
to
PLMerite wrote:
> "Dr. James West, Ph.D." <na...@nobull.com> wrote in message

> It just illustrates that Teddy Kennedy while fighting to disarm the American

> People, has armed bodyguards to protect him.
>
> Some pigs are more equal than others.
>
>
> Regards, PLMerite

Damned good point!

>
>

Dr. James West, Ph.D.

unread,
Apr 6, 2008, 12:07:44 PM4/6/08
to
PLMerite wrote:

Yep. Thanks for the info. I see your point. It is that we should all
be able to carry shotguns wherever we go if we feel we need protection, right?

Say to a GW Bush rally...we should all be able to take shotguns with us, right?


>
>
> Regards, PLMerite
>
>

qkd...@nospam.net

unread,
Apr 6, 2008, 12:14:46 PM4/6/08
to

In <bc6Kj.2249$3w2.1079@trnddc05>, on 04/06/2008

...just like bush sending his department to court to take away the right
to have guns... Yes son, he is doing that. Or don't you pay attention
to what bush does?

>Regards, PLMerite


Zomby...@cox.net

unread,
Apr 6, 2008, 1:44:30 PM4/6/08
to
On Sun, 06 Apr 2008 14:54:36 GMT, "PLMerite"
<stoc...@smokebombhill.com> wrote:

>
>"Dr. James West, Ph.D." <na...@nobull.com> wrote in message
>news:SMKdnWoFwaC2fGXanZ2dnUVZ_jSdnZ2d@toastnet...
>>
>> Scout wrote:
>>>
>>> Oh, then you can show me where criminals don't have guns because the law
>>> prohibits it.
>>
>> Easy. No one, including you law-abiding gun goofballs, can carry shotguns
>> onto U.S. Capitol grounds. Because gun control works, son.
>>
>>
>>> otherwise the point stands that gun control does not prevent violent
>>> criminals from getting guns and using them in crime.
>>
>> Wrong, son, gun control works for the U.S. Capitol.
>>
>> ya fuckin gun goofball moron
>> ;-)
>
>
>
>"Some years ago, Kennedy bodyguard Chuck Stein was arrested at the Russell
>Senate Office Building with a handgun, two submachine guns and 146 rounds of
>ammunition. "
>
>
>http://www.ccrkba.org/pub/rkba/press-releases/CC-Snoopdogg.htm
>
>

Quite recently one of the Aids for our esteemed Senator from Va, James
Webb, had one of his Aids try & sneak a handgun into the office
complex. Of course he denied it was his & let the aid take the wrap!
--
"Before all else, be armed" -- Machiavelli

Jim Bianchi

unread,
Apr 6, 2008, 2:32:55 PM4/6/08
to
On Sun, 06 Apr 2008 09:07:44 -0700, Dr. James West, Ph.D. wrote:
> Yep. Thanks for the info. I see your point. It is that we should all be
> able to carry shotguns wherever we go if we feel we need protection,
> right?
>
> Say to a GW Bush rally...we should all be able to take shotguns with us, right?

To the man on the street, 'guncontrol' implies something more than
being able to take a shotgun to a Bush rally. As I've told you before, the
commonly accepted implication is the theft of my rifles, pistols, and/or
shotguns under color of law based on an exceedingly braindead idea that if
this is done, somehow the use of these devices by the criminal element will
somehow be curtailed.

--
ji...@sonic.net

PLMerite

unread,
Apr 6, 2008, 4:35:20 PM4/6/08
to

"Dr. James West, Ph.D." <na...@nobull.com> wrote in message
news:wpednfBlHYHRaGXanZ2dnUVZ_veinZ2d@toastnet...


Actually I'd be happy with my 9mm semi-auto. I can nail anything in threat
range with it.

> Say to a GW Bush rally...we should all be able to take shotguns with us,
> right?


Sure. I'm no threat, why should I be disarmed.

Would you be a threat to the President?


Regards, PLMerite


--

"If I could have banned them all: 'Mr. and Mrs. America turn in your guns' -
I would have!"
U.S. Sen. Diane Feinstein, D-Calif., on "60 Minutes," Feb. 5, 1995.


PLMerite

unread,
Apr 6, 2008, 4:36:36 PM4/6/08
to

<qkd...@nospam.net> wrote in message news:WF6Kj.3571$Ug4.1999@trndny01...

Yeah, like you're suddenly pro-gun and a Bush supporter.


Like I tell all the gun grabbers - come get 'em when you grow a pair, pops.

>>Regards, PLMerite
>
>
>
>


PLMerite

unread,
Apr 6, 2008, 4:37:22 PM4/6/08
to

<Zomby...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:4t2iv3dc7ufnhcjcg...@4ax.com...


I remember that. I hope the dupe's loyalty was well rewarded.

Dr. James West, Ph.D.

unread,
Apr 6, 2008, 4:47:47 PM4/6/08
to
Jim Bianchi wrote:

Son, my response was to PLMerite, not you. You dishonestly snipped important stuff.

You are unable to address the point of you wanting the "right" to carry
a shotgun wherever you want...wherever you feel you might be threatened, including
a GW Bush rally or inside the U.S. Capitol.

You are extremists goofballs who see no middle ground. i.e. you are the fringe.

George Kauffman

unread,
Apr 6, 2008, 5:26:27 PM4/6/08
to

What is your full name and address? I will come take your guns from you.

>
>
>
>
>
>>>Regards, PLMerite
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

Peter Kelsey

unread,
Apr 6, 2008, 5:29:11 PM4/6/08
to
George Kauffman wrote:
> What is your full name and address? I will come take your guns from you.
>

I don't know about HIM, you ignorant, lying pinhead, but
why don't you come get MINE?

Peter Kelsey
10 Causeway St, #791
Boston, MA
02114

You don't even have to call first.

Chicken shit.

qkd...@nospam.net

unread,
Apr 6, 2008, 6:06:32 PM4/6/08
to

Son, you have once again proven that you are an idiot.

My comment had nothing to do with liking bush, and everything to do with
leading YOU dumbass, to understand the bush is in favor of gun control
too.

In <ovakj.13369$Ah1.2684@trnddc08>, on 04/06/2008

George Kauffman

unread,
Apr 6, 2008, 6:45:50 PM4/6/08
to
On Sun, 06 Apr 2008 17:29:11 -0400, Peter Kelsey <peter_a_...@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote:

>George Kauffman wrote:
>> What is your full name and address? I will come take your guns from you.
>>
>
>I don't know about HIM, you ignorant, lying pinhead, but
>why don't you come get MINE?

Hey Bigboy, post your REAL name and REAL address.

Sam Buckland

unread,
Apr 6, 2008, 6:48:54 PM4/6/08
to

What makes you think he didn't, you lying coward?

Still haven't posted YOURS, have you??

LOL!!

Jim Bianchi

unread,
Apr 7, 2008, 12:29:38 AM4/7/08
to
On Sun, 06 Apr 2008 13:47:47 -0700, Dr. James West, Ph.D. wrote:
> Jim Bianchi wrote:
>> On Sun, 06 Apr 2008 09:07:44 -0700, Dr. James West, Ph.D. wrote:
>>
>>>Yep. Thanks for the info. I see your point. It is that we should all be
>>>able to carry shotguns wherever we go if we feel we need protection,
>>>right?
>>>
>>>Say to a GW Bush rally...we should all be able to take shotguns with us, right?
>>
>> To the man on the street, 'guncontrol' implies something more than
>> being able to take a shotgun to a Bush rally. As I've told you before, the
>> commonly accepted implication is the theft of my rifles, pistols, and/or
>> somehow be curtailed.
>>
> Son, my response was to PLMerite, not you. You dishonestly snipped
> important stuff.

Dishonestly? I don't think so. I was pointing out to you that the
arg is NOT about carrying shotguns to a Bush rally. Nothing said by you or
PLMerite bore on that, so I snipped it.

--
ji...@sonic.net

Zomby...@cox.net

unread,
Apr 7, 2008, 2:25:45 AM4/7/08
to

And more sober as well.

Dr. James West, Ph.D.

unread,
Apr 7, 2008, 11:10:27 AM4/7/08
to
Dr. James West, Ph.D. wrote:
> Jim Bianchi wrote:
>> On Sun, 06 Apr 2008 09:07:44 -0700, Dr. James West, Ph.D. wrote:
>>
>>> Yep. Thanks for the info. I see your point. It is that we should
>>> all be
>>> able to carry shotguns wherever we go if we feel we need protection,
>>> right?
>>>
>>> Say to a GW Bush rally...we should all be able to take shotguns with
>>> us, right?
>>
>> [ whiney crap snipped ]

>>
>
> You are unable to address the point of you wanting the "right" to carry
> a shotgun wherever you want...wherever you feel you might be threatened,
> including a GW Bush rally or inside the U.S. Capitol.
>
> You are extremists goofballs who see no middle ground. i.e. you are the
> fringe.

Well said!!!

;-)

Tiger

unread,
Apr 8, 2008, 11:12:53 AM4/8/08
to
Dr. James West, Ph.D. wrote:
>

Would you mind not cross posting off topic stuff............

The.S...@gmail.com

unread,
Apr 8, 2008, 11:33:51 AM4/8/08
to

Yeah, goof balls like Samuel Adams:

"The Constitution shall never be construed to prevent the people of
the
United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms."
Samuel Adams, During the Massachusetts U.S. Constitution ratification
convention, 1788

Or Thomas Jefferson:

No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms. The strongest
reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as
a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.
-Thomas Jefferson, Proposed Virginia Constitution, 1776, Jefferson
Papers 344


Or perhaps this one is more your speed; seems that way from reading
your posts:

Cause the registration of all firearms on some pretext, with the view
of confiscating them and leaving the population defenseless. --
Vladimir Ilich Lenin

0 new messages