Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

WW1 torpedo engine?

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Frogwatch

unread,
Jan 1, 2010, 10:49:28 PM1/1/10
to
http://www.smokstak.com/forum/showthread.php?t=63316
OK, is this correct? is it truly a torpedo engine?

David E. Powell

unread,
Jan 2, 2010, 12:50:19 AM1/2/10
to
On Jan 1, 10:49 pm, Frogwatch <dboh...@mindspring.com> wrote:
> http://www.smokstak.com/forum/showthread.php?t=63316
> OK, is this correct?  is it truly a torpedo engine?

The 20,000 RPM figure could be off, or they could have geared it up to
that using a gearing system.

It definitely could be, it looks like it would fit into a Torpedo
housing.

BlackBeard

unread,
Jan 2, 2010, 1:36:38 AM1/2/10
to

I linked the site to a couple of the main Sub BBS's. I'll post again
if I see a valid response.

BB

Ralph E Lindberg

unread,
Jan 2, 2010, 11:10:34 AM1/2/10
to
In article
<a4bf653d-488f-4d9c...@v25g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>,
Frogwatch <dbo...@mindspring.com> wrote:

> http://www.smokstak.com/forum/showthread.php?t=63316
> OK, is this correct? is it truly a torpedo engine?

It's possible

These are the people to ask
http://www.history.navy.mil/museums/keyport/torpedotech.htm

--
--------------------------------------------------------
Personal e-mail is the n7bsn but at amsat.org
This posting address is a spam-trap and seldom read
RV and Camping FAQ can be found at
http://www.ralphandellen.us/rv

guy

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 1:52:33 PM1/3/10
to

If it ran at 20,000rpm you would need some serious gearing to turn the
prop at a sensible speed, maybe a typo for 2,000 rpm?


Guy

Jack Linthicum

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 2:24:46 PM1/3/10
to
On Jan 1, 10:49 pm, Frogwatch <dboh...@mindspring.com> wrote:
> http://www.smokstak.com/forum/showthread.php?t=63316
> OK, is this correct?  is it truly a torpedo engine?

Alcohol and liquid oxygen in WWI? I would guess alcohol and hydrogen
peroxide. The Japanese have credit for using oxygen in their Type 93
(1933) Long Lance.

Richard Casady

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 2:31:09 PM1/3/10
to
On Sun, 3 Jan 2010 10:52:33 -0800 (PST), guy
<guyswe...@googlemail.com> wrote:

>If it ran at 20,000rpm you would need some serious gearing to turn the
>prop at a sensible speed, maybe a typo for 2,000 rpm?

You need a serious gearbox for the counter-rotating props.

Casady

Jack Linthicum

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 2:38:35 PM1/3/10
to
On Jan 3, 2:31 pm, Richard Casady <richardcas...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Jan 2010 10:52:33 -0800 (PST), guy
>
> <guyswetten...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >If it ran at 20,000rpm you would need some serious gearing to turn the
> >prop at a sensible speed, maybe a typo for 2,000 rpm?
>
> You need a serious gearbox for the counter-rotating props.
>
> Casady

There was a flywheel powered torpedo in this era that turned the
flywheel up to 10k revs.

William Hamblen

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 2:59:28 PM1/3/10
to
Here is a link to a picture of a Brotherhood torpedo engine.

<http://www.btinternet.com/~philipr/images/torp16.jpg>

For what it is worth.

Bud

Ralph E Lindberg

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 8:41:22 AM1/4/10
to
In article
<bf0508b2-583f-4265...@o9g2000vbj.googlegroups.com>,
Jack Linthicum <jackli...@earthlink.net> wrote:

Correct, view top photo in my other post on this thread

Ralph E Lindberg

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 8:41:52 AM1/4/10
to
In article
<b9843173-30fd-4672...@a21g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>,
guy <guyswe...@googlemail.com> wrote:

Could be the case

Ralph E Lindberg

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 8:45:48 AM1/4/10
to
In article <6mt1k5ta08arhj5kf...@4ax.com>,
William Hamblen <william...@earthlink.net> wrote:

Which I recall was an airflask engine...right?

Back to the original question, I still haven't recalled anything about a
liquid O2 engine in Torpedo's. Since today is the first day back at work
I will ask around a bit, but I doubt there ever was such a thing

Jack Linthicum

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 8:59:37 AM1/4/10
to
On Jan 4, 8:45 am, Ralph E Lindberg <n7...@callsign.net> wrote:
> In article <6mt1k5ta08arhj5kfro6rm1q8ok7isu...@4ax.com>,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_93_torpedo

and

http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/topics/Type_93_torpedo

There was also a submarine version or byproduct Type 95.

Richard Casady

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 9:44:59 AM1/4/10
to
On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 05:45:48 -0800, Ralph E Lindberg
<n7...@callsign.net> wrote:

>Which I recall was an airflask engine...right?

Liquid oxygen has a density of ,85, and so you would still need a
large air tank for bouyancy, even if the O2 tank was small. Maybe not
so small, depending on the insulation. Fish are always near neutral
bouyancy, and some sink, some float,[ and some blow up. at the end of
run.] The WWI Brits retrieved floating misses and reloaded them. No
thanks.

Casady

ken...@cix.compulink.co.uk

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 2:16:54 PM1/4/10
to
In article
<53e98170-6586-49b6...@r12g2000vbm.googlegroups.com>,
jackli...@earthlink.net (Jack Linthicum) wrote:

> Alcohol and liquid oxygen in WWI? I would guess alcohol and hydrogen
> peroxide.

Nobody used O2 or for that matter hydrogen peroxide during WW1. Nobody
used liquid O2 during WW2 for that matter. Attempts to use hydrogen
peroxide in torpedoes was post WW2. Using alcohol as a fuel on the other
hand is possible.

Ken Young

Ralph

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 3:17:07 PM1/4/10
to
On Jan 4, 5:59 am, Jack Linthicum <jacklinthi...@earthlink.net> wrote:

>
> > Back to the original question, I still haven't recalled anything about a
> > liquid O2 engine in Torpedo's. Since today is the first day back at work
> > I will ask around a bit, but I doubt there ever was such a thing
>
> > --
> > --------------------------------------------------------
> > Personal e-mail is the n7bsn but at amsat.org
> > This posting address is a spam-trap and seldom read
> > RV and Camping FAQ can be found athttp://www.ralphandellen.us/rv
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_93_torpedo
>
> and
>
> http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/topics/Type_93_torpedo
>

> There was also a submarine version or byproduct Type 95.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Em... did you bother to actually read either of those articles?
Neither the Type 93 nor Type 95 had a ->LIQUID<- O2 tank

It was compressed

Here is another hint, there is a (modified) Type 93 not 200 yards from
me, that I was just looking at last week (the Brother-in-law wanted a
tour of the Museum)

Jack Linthicum

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 3:20:44 PM1/4/10
to

Where did I say they did?

Ralph

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 3:23:04 PM1/4/10
to

All the (modern) torpedos I am familar with are negitively bouyant,
when fueled and ready to go (war-shot). They would go very positive at
the end-of-run. They also tend to have a EOR scuttle valve now days

Exercise unist start out positive

In figuring the bounancy, don't forget all that air-space around the
engine, piping, cables and tanks, etc. Those area's add to the bounancy

Ralph

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 3:28:43 PM1/4/10
to
On Jan 4, 12:20 pm, Jack Linthicum <jacklinthi...@earthlink.net>
wrote:

>
> Where did I say they did?-

The discussion started out about LIQUID O2 engines, you linked to
compressed 02 engines

What else would you have been refering to?

Jack Linthicum

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 3:53:16 PM1/4/10
to

What I said:

"Alcohol and liquid oxygen in WWI? I would guess alcohol and hydrogen
peroxide. The Japanese have credit for using oxygen in their Type 93
(1933) Long Lance."

Notice the difference?

"oxygen" not "liquid oxygen"

ken...@cix.compulink.co.uk

unread,
Jan 5, 2010, 12:58:59 AM1/5/10
to
In article
<3b56469c-0cf6-4613...@k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>,
jackli...@earthlink.net (Jack Linthicum) wrote:

> There was also a submarine version or byproduct Type 95.

The Japanese O2 torpedoes used O2 gas under pressure.

Ken Young

Ralph

unread,
Jan 5, 2010, 9:29:08 AM1/5/10
to
On Jan 4, 9:58 pm, ken...@cix.compulink.co.uk wrote:
> In article
> <3b56469c-0cf6-4613-8bfe-534bb2511...@k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>,

>
> jacklinthi...@earthlink.net (Jack Linthicum) wrote:
> > There was also a submarine version or byproduct Type 95.
>
>  The Japanese O2 torpedoes used O2 gas under pressure.
>
>  Ken Young

Looks like Jack could have been a lol clearer, more then one person
thought that he was infering that the Type 93 used liquid O2

0 new messages