text-to-speech podcast
Repeated antibiotic use alters gut's composition of beneficial
microbes, study shows
Repeated use of an antibiotic that is considered generally benign,
because users seldom incur obvious side effects, induces cumulative
and persistent changes in the composition of the beneficial microbial
species inhabiting the human gut, researchers at the Stanford
University School of Medicine have found.
By a conservative estimate, something like 1,000 different varieties
of microbes coexist harmoniously within a typical healthy person's
gut, said David Relman, MD, professor of medicine and of microbiology
and immunology at the medical school and chief of the infectious
diseases division at the Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care
System. Relman is the senior author of a paper, which will appear
online Sept. 13 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
The study examined the effects of ciprofloxacin (trade name Cipro), an
antibiotic that is widely prescribed for intestinal, urinary and a
variety of systemic infections. In an earlier, short-term study,
Relman's group had concluded that people's intestinal microbial
communities seem to bounce back reasonably well within weeks after a
five-day regimen of ciprofloxacin. This new study involved two courses
of antibiotic administration, six months apart, and it revealed more-
subtle, long-term effects of ciprofloxacin use - such as the
replacement of multiple resident bacterial species by other, closely
related varieties and the occasional complete eradication of a
species.
The infrequent occurrence of easily visible side effects such as
bloating and diarrhea from ciprofloxacin use has given rise to an
assumption that the drug spares most beneficial gut-dwelling bacteria.
Overall similarities between pre-regimen gut bacterial strains and
their post-regimen replacements explain why such side effects aren't
typically seen after ciprofloxacin use. Still, the more nuanced
differences between the pre-existing communities and those that appear
in the wake of this repeated disturbance present a new set of
problems, said Relman, who is also the Thomas C. and Joan M. Merigan
Professor at the medical school. A bacterial species whose presence
was lost or diminished may have been performing a valuable job - for
example, secreting a protein that's toxic to a particular pathogen -
that is shirked by its replacement. The abandoned function might not
be noticed until, perhaps, years later when the pathogen in question
invaded the person's gut.
While the study's findings shouldn't be interpreted to mean that
ciprofloxacin is dangerous and should be avoided, Relman said, they do
raise questions about possible long-term effects of antibiotic
administration, in addition to concerns about spurring the evolution
of drug-resistant organisms. The new findings underscore the
desirability of finding ways to pinpoint not just which bacteria have
been lost or whose numbers were diminished by an antibiotic, but also
which important beneficial functions performed by the patient's gut
microbial community as a whole have been impaired - such as signaling
cells of the intestinal lining, which are constantly turning over, to
maintain an appropriate barrier against ingested toxic compounds, or
secreting anti-inflammatory substances that may prevent allergic or
autoimmune diseases.
For this study, the Stanford scientists collected more than 50 stool
samples from each of three healthy adult females over a period of 10
months. Then they used advanced, molecular techniques to count the
number of different microbial species represented in each sample, as
well as relative population sizes of the different species in that
sample.
Twice during this 10-month period, the researchers perturbed their
subjects' gut ecosystems by giving them five-day courses of
ciprofloxacin at a standard dose. During the first course, overall
bacterial populations in each subject - which had previously waxed and
waned but, on the whole, been quite stable - plummeted and remained
depressed for about a week. Roughly one-third to one-half of the
resident species' populations declined, with some disappearing
entirely. A few originally less-abundant species grew in number, as
they filled in the ecological niche abandoned by bugs adversely
affected by the drug.
Within a week after the first course's completion, two of the three
subjects' internal microbial ecosystems had largely returned to a
state fairly similar to that before the regimen, as measured by the
broad classes to which the microbial constituents belonged. One
subject's overall ecosystem, however, still had not recovered even by
that rough measure a full six months later.
The second course of antibiotic administration produced a stronger
effect. "Even the one subject whose gut bacterial community fully
recovered after the first ciprofloxacin course experienced an
incomplete recovery after the second one," said Relman. The
communities in the other two subjects partially recovered from the
second course, but never returned to their original state. In essence,
each subject's community of gut-dwelling microbes shifted to a new,
"alternative" state and remained in that state for at least two months
after the second antibiotic course had been completed. Thus, all three
subjects experienced significant and lasting changes in the specific
membership of their internal microbial communities at the end of the
10-month study period.
"Ecologists have found that an ecosystem, such as a wildlife refuge,
that is quite capable of rebounding from even huge occasional
perturbations - forest fire, volcanic eruption, pests - may yet be
undone by too rapid a series of such perturbations," said Les
Dethlefsen, PhD, a research scientist in Relman's lab and the study's
first author. "In the same way, recurring antibiotic use may produce a
cumulative effect on our internal microbial ecosystems with
potentially debilitating, if as yet unpredictable, consequences."
"It's as if your beneficial bacteria 'remember' the bad things done to
them in the past," said Relman. "Clinical signs and symptoms may be
the last thing to show up."
The precise counts of gut-dwelling microbes in this study were made
possible by a new technique, pioneered in recent years by Relman and
others. The older method - growing the microbes in culture - simply
doesn't work for many species and, even when it does, rare species are
often swamped by more common ones and don't get counted. The new
technique reads short, telltale DNA snippets that distinguish microbes
both from human cells and one from another. This allowed the Stanford
researchers to assess both the total number of different microbial
varieties and the relative size of each variety's population.
Similar techniques now make it possible to assess, before and after
antibiotic administration, the abundance in a patient's gut of
microbial genes known to code for important functions performed by one
or more members of the patient's gut community, Relman said. In the
future, if it becomes known that a key function has been impaired,
clinicians might perhaps restore that function by prescribing specific
probiotics or nutrients that encourage the return of appropriate
beneficial bugs.
Provided by Stanford University Medical Center
http://m.phys.org/_news203613111.html