> --
> "Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it". -- George
> Santayana"Mark Thorson" <nos
...@sonic.net> wrote in message
> news:478E6D44.51054201@sonic.net...
> > Quoting from:
> >http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/bmj.39440.525752.BEv1
> > Vascular events in healthy older women receiving calcium
> > supplementation: randomised controlled trial
> > Mark J Bolland, research fellow1, P Alan Barber, senior
> > lecturer, Robert N Doughty, associate professor, Barbara
> > Mason, research officer, Anne Horne, research fellow,
> > Ruth Ames, research officer, Gregory D Gamble, research
> > fellow, Andrew Grey, associate professor, Ian R Reid,
> > professor
> > Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health
> > Sciences, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019,
> > Auckland, New Zealand
> > OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of calcium
> > supplementation on myocardial infarction, stroke,
> > and sudden death in healthy postmenopausal women.
> > DESIGN: Randomised, placebo controlled trial.
> > SETTING: Academic medical centre in an urban setting
> > in New Zealand.
> > PARTICIPANTS: 1471 postmenopausal women (mean age 74):
> > 732 were randomised to calcium supplementation and 739
> > to placebo.
> > MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Adverse cardiovascular events
> > over five years: death, sudden death, myocardial
> > infarction, angina, other chest pain, stroke,
> > transient ischaemic attack, and a composite end point
> > of myocardial infarction, stroke, or sudden death.
> > RESULTS: Myocardial infarction was more commonly
> > reported in the calcium group than in the placebo
> > group (45 events in 31 women v 19 events in 14 women,
> > P=0.01). The composite end point of myocardial
> > infarction, stroke, or sudden death was also more
> > common in the calcium group (101 events in 69 women
> > v 54 events in 42 women, P=0.008). After adjudication
> > myocardial infarction remained more common in the
> > calcium group (24 events in 21 women v 10 events
> > in 10 women, relative risk 2.12, 95% confidence
> > interval 1.01 to 4.47). For the composite end point
> > 61 events were verified in 51 women in the calcium
> > group and 36 events in 35 women in the placebo group
> > (relative risk 1.47, 0.97 to 2.23). When unreported
> > events were added from the national database of
> > hospital admissions in New Zealand the relative risk
> > of myocardial infarction was 1.49 (0.86 to 2.57) and
> > that of the composite end point was 1.21 (0.84 to
> > 1.74). The respective rate ratios were 1.67 (95%
> > confidence intervals 0.98 to 2.87) and 1.43 (1.01 to
> > 2.04); event rates: placebo 16.3/1000 person years,
> > calcium 23.3/1000 person years. For stroke
> > (including unreported events) the relative risk
> > was 1.37 (0.83 to 2.28) and the rate ratio was 1.45
> > (0.88 to 2.49).
> > CONCLUSION: Calcium supplementation in healthy
> > postmenopausal women is associated with upward
> > trends in cardiovascular event rates. This
> > potentially detrimental effect should be balanced
> > against the likely benefits of calcium on bone.
> I believe that if calcium is not given with magnesium in the correct 3:1
> ratio, and if either excessive or even inadequate vitamin D levels are not
> maintained, then there is the possiblity of calicium plaques developing
> within arteries. However, the risk:benefit trade-off of calcium
> supplemenatation favors the prevention and treatment of osteopoorosis, which
> has a significant mortality of its own.
something totally stupid, such as you have suggested above.
These people are bigoted, plain and simple. Totally devoid of any
research ethics, they will stoop to any low-level to prove that taking
supplements is dangerous.