IT'S BEEN WELL KNOWN FOR A LONG TIME THERE'S FAR MORE
HOMOSEXUALLITY IN WESTERN NATIONS THAN EASTERN ONES.

   Asians are highly productive of children but their religion has not
interacted with human genetic variation in such a way as to favor the
re-furring--just like monkeys--of men.  They do not confuse themselves
with dogs.  They don't distinguish themselves as A-males or B-males,
to me entirely a religious perversion.

     In Western religious culture the inquisition against the gays is
aimed at making straight guys afraid of being wrongly ferreted out as
gay so as to increase population.

     This limits you, makes you an object for judgement and
scapegoating.

It's also the core basis for society's foundation in denial and
hypocrisy.  That's because Western religion CAUSES the propagation of
gays, and what's more, in a ratio of 3 lesbians per male gay person.
While in the West it's typically estimated about 10 to 13% of the
males are gay (vs. 2 to 3% in Eastern nations) that implies 30 to 39%
of the females.

That's because the gay gene only passes maternally (statistically
proven,) the gay gene is proximate to other X-based (female
chromosome) genes that DON'T CANCEL OUT UPON THE
DOUBLING OF X GENES; and, while it's been observed that later-born
sons have a higher incidence of being gay, along with left-handed men
or women, the original discoverer of that
explains that it's a statistical result caused by an extraneous
factor.  That factor was discovered at the University of Padua:
lesbians (married heterosexually) have considerably more babies than
do heterosexually married women.

Carren Strock in "A Painful Discovery" says most lesbians are not self-
aware until very very late in life (married, with children.)

The inquisition against the gays is intended to make straights afraid
of being wrongly
ferreted out as gay so as to increase population (worked with
fertility rites.)  It was mainly aimed at straight men inasmuch as
they are the ones who can either plainly perform or they cannot
(though only today, because of the ED drugs,  they can hide in hetero
marriages as easily as has been the case with lesbians.)

INCREASING POPULATION AND MAKING GUYS INADEQUATE ENABLED ANCIENT
DESPOTS TO RUMBLE.

additional science (excerpts:)
Hamer discovered at N.I.H. the gay gene ONLY PASSES
MATERNALLY. ("Previously believed the cause of male homosexuality was
man-hating mother.")
(Natl. Instit. of Health: Science, 7/16/93 and N.Y. Times, 7/16/93,
on
page 1--) means 3 lesbians per male gay.

Homosexual Sex Exploding
With US Women -15 Fold
Increase In 10 years
By Suzanne Rostler and E. J. Mundell
3-15-1
Journal of Sex Research 2001;37:333-343

"(Natl. Instit. of Health: Science, 7/16/93 and N.Y. Times, 7/16/93,
on page 1) NO WONDER psychiatrists considered man-hating mother the
prime cause of male homosexuality until discovered/apx. 75% of gay men
carry Xq28. WOMEN CAN GET ONE OR TWO COPIES (Xq28 IS ON THE FEMALE
CHROMOSOME. MEN CAN ONLY GET ONE COPY. WOMEN ARE 3 X LIKELIER TO HAVE
AT LEAST ONE. DOUBLE X's RECENTLY FOUND IN MANY GENES TO NOT CANCEL
OUT. Hamer's discovery first covered in "Science," 7/16/93, and "N.Y.
Times",7/16/93, on page 1, by Natalie Angier, incl.:"THE LATEST
RESULTS INDICATE THAT THE NEWLY REPORTED GENETIC FACTOR IS PASSED
THROUGH THE MATERNAL LINE, A CURIOUS TWIST GIVEN THAT IN THE PAST
PSYCHIATRY HAS HELD WOMEN AT LEAST PARTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR FOSTERING
THEIR SONS' HOMOSEXUALITY." THE GENE RESPONSIBLE FOR 95% OF GAYS ONLY
PASSES MATERNALLY, AND THE OTHER, RESPONSIBLE FOR ABOUT 5%, ALSO ONLY
PASSES MATERNALLY.

Breedlove: aside from a correlation with left-handedness, the
statistical connection  between
later-born sons and homosexuality is purely statistical, a external
factor likely to explain (Leslie Stahl reported on a Northwestern
study that included the first part but omitted the informative and
essential latter part.  (and after what I personally thought (opinion)
was a lying-in-wait  job on famous venture capitalist Tom Perkins.))

     Andrea Camperio-Ciani of the University of Padua discovered the
predicted external factor:
lesbians married heterosexually (for instance out of a lack of self-
awareness, to escape the inquisition against gays, for economic
support, particularly prior to the women's lib movement 40 years ago,
etc.) have higher  fecundity (they produce more babies.)

"20-20," 2000, "marriage counselors have seen a sudden
influx of middle aged married women with children complaining of
"lacking something," "not knowing what it is," and ultimately
accepting that they don't want to go further without accepting that
they in fact are lesbians.

http://historyoffear.tripod.com#science

KPBS, "MEXICO," 2000: a man interviewed in Mexico "has as many babies
as possible to
avoid being wrongly ferreted out as gay"

MANY DOUBLE X'S, SUCH AS BRCA1 AND BRCA2, HAVE BEEN FOUND
TO NOT CANCEL OUT.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/01/16/eveningnews/main2365036.shtml

CBS News: 1/16/2007:
More Women Saying "I Don't"
Analysis Finds 51% Of Women Were Single In 2005; Shift Partly Because
More Women Work

PROOF RLGN CAUSES SCAPEGOATING AND CREATES THOSE SCAPEGOATED:
Hitler's attack on the Jews was facilitated by a preceding attack on
gays. Yet,
Hitler himself is understood famously to have been a very feminine
man.
Making straight guys afraid of being wrongly ferreted out as gay
worked with fertility rites and dogma anti-abortion.

Paranoia is Greek for "all knowing," the foundation of Western
religion's omnicient god, in psychiatry, paranoids being people
assuming that inasmuch as they're all knowing, if someting goes wrong,
it can't be their fault.)

one Tripod-Screened Pop-Up/Author Prefers Anonymity for Now, Gets No
Benefit

http://historyoffear.tripod.com#mbd
http://historyoffear.tripod.com#paranoia

PLEASE TEST THE SITE FOR YOURSELF AT THE FOLLOWING:

http://www.siteadvisor.com   BY ENTERING   historyoffear.tripod.com
WHERE
IT SAYS   "Look up a site report:"  AND CLICK  "GO."   ***

Ghandi said:

First they ignore you.
Then they laugh at you.
Then they fight you.
Then you win.

about me:
I asked myself when I was about in my pre-teens, when I first saw
this
done among adults, what would it require on my part to make me enjoy
making females afraid of being wrongly ferreted out as gay; to judge
them on their femininity to others, let alone to themselves, in
front
of their faces; or, to gratuitously try limiting them.  (or to even
care
what anyone was doing or how many children they overproduce)

"Soy as contraceptive"

There was no mention in the least about sexual partner choices with which
your remarks were consumed, nor the causes of same.

The short version of the article mention in the above is that as a man's
weight over normal increases and as this is combined with a stepwise
increase in soy intake, those at the high end of the group with highest
weight and highest soy intake compared to the bottom of the group have a
smaller sperm count.

If you are high weight and low soy count is ok, if you are lower weight
and high soy intake it is ok too.