Weston Price, a dentist, is well known for his notorious views on nutrition and how it affected dental health.
Mr-Natural-Health
nutrition and how it affected dental health.
http://naturalhealthperspective.com/tutorials/weston-price.html
Find out the real truth standing behind this legendary figure in the
wellness movement.
http://naturalhealthperspective.com/food/whole-grains.html
--
John Gohde,
Achieving good Nutrition is an Art, NOT a Science!
The nutrition of eating a healthy diet is a biological factor of the
mind-body connection. Now, weighing in at 18 web pages, the
Nutrition of a Healthy Diet is with more documentation and
sharper terminology than ever before.
http://naturalhealthperspective.com/food/
rubbit
Whole-grain cereals are even worse than white flour.
TC
incapacity actually possesses a platform whereby he can pontificate his
nonsense over the wisdom of Weston Price's legacy.
The contrast between Price's genious and Gohde's mental retardation is
absolutely blinding.
for real information about Price go to:
http://www.price-pottenger.org/price.htm
or
http://www.westonaprice.org/index.html
TC
TC
"Beyond nutrition, Weston Price was also notoriously known for having
advocated the large scale removal of all root canals for being a source
of infections. His root canal infection theory led to the needless
extraction of hundreds of thousands of root canals until well-designed
research studies, conducted during the 1930s, demonstrated that his
theory was wrong."
Hey Gohde, how does one advocate "removing" a root canal. How does one
"remove" a root canal? Huh? How do you extract a root canal? The root
canal is a passage thru which a roots nerve or nerves pass thru. How do
you remove it? Idiot.
Mr. Natural-Health
> Here is an excerpt from Gohde's webpage on Price:
>
> "Beyond nutrition, Weston Price was also notoriously known for having
> advocated the large scale removal of all root canals for being a source
> of infections. His root canal infection theory led to the needless
> extraction of hundreds of thousands of root canals until well-designed
> research studies, conducted during the 1930s, demonstrated that his
> theory was wrong."
>
> Hey Gohde, how does one advocate "removing" a root canal. How does one
> "remove" a root canal? Huh? How do you extract a root canal? The root
> canal is a passage thru which a roots nerve or nerves pass thru. How do
> you remove it? Idiot.
Obviously, you got yourself drunk before mustering up the nerve to
reply. You were simply pissing in your pants for the last several
weeks, eh?
Dud, ... You remove the root canal by pulling the tooth!
But, I would imagine that those fools paid a dentist to remove their
perfectly good dead teeth.
Boy, are you dumb ... TC.
Cubit
tooth, which had been treated with a root canal.
I have suspected that the post-root canal structure could be a repository
for infection. I don't understand how the wire or fiber could seal the
bottom of the tooth root. I imagine the decay that led to the procedure
would infect the canal and lead to a slow stream of bacteria and bacteria
by-products into the body from the bottom of the treated root.
"TC" <tund...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1144861696.6...@t31g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
TC
does not just stop at the end of the tooth, it continues as far as the
nerve(s) go. The canal is the void that the nerve follows thru the jaw
bone to and into the tooth. A root canal cannot be removed. It could
conceivably be filled, but that is probably not a reasonable thing to
do.
This isn't just semantics. It shows clearly how Gohde fails to
understand even simple and basic language concepts.
TC
TC
You cannot remove a "root canal". Idiot. If you had said to remove a
tooth, that is one thing, but you cannot remove a "root canal". And it
is not just semantics, it is basic languistic application and basic
common sensical terminology.
Every time you open your mouth you show indisputably just how brain
damaged you are.
TC
Mr. Natural-Health
Your comments do not merit a reply.
You have my condolences. :)
TC
Mr. Natural-Health wrote:
> > > Boy, are you dumb ... TC.
> >
> > You cannot remove a "root canal". Idiot. If you had said to remove a
> > tooth, that is one thing, but you cannot remove a "root canal". And it
> > is not just semantics, it is basic languistic application and basic
> > common sensical terminology.
> >
> > Every time you open your mouth you show indisputably just how brain
> > damaged you are.
> >
> > TC
>
> Your comments do not merit a reply.
>
> You have my condolences. :)
Actually no... I am not professing to be an expert on root canals. But
I do know what a root canal is.
What I am saying is that YOU do not know what a root canal is because
you seem to think that a root canal can be removed.
So mister root canal expert.... how do you remove a root canal?
TC
Mr. Natural-Health
root canal was in my lower jaw. It was never a problem.
And, why are you telling me this? Weston Price was the Kook who pulled
out thousands of teeth with perfectly good root canals, not me. :)
The Quackwatch web site, reports that Weston's Price theory about root
canals was proved wrong, back during the 1930's. I have no reason not
to believe them.
Knowing how lawyers are so happy to sue anybody with money, if root
canals were indeed bad for your health; all dentists would have been
sued into bankruptcy by now.
TC, you are the biggest Arse that I have seen in a long time. :)
Just thought that you might want to know.
TC
Mr. Natural-Health wrote:
> I had one root canal. It was removed along with all my teeth. That
> root canal was in my lower jaw. It was never a problem.
Is that what you base your root canal "expertise" on? Idiot.
>
> And, why are you telling me this? Weston Price was the Kook who pulled
> out thousands of teeth with perfectly good root canals, not me. :)
>
> The Quackwatch web site, reports that Weston's Price theory about root
> canals was proved wrong, back during the 1930's. I have no reason not
> to believe them.
Quackwatch is where you get your information from? Now you are a
confirmed idiot, yet again. You have proven beyond a doubt that you are
getting all your information from very dubious sources. And you
discount some of the best sources of information as being quackery.
Your critical thinking abilities and independence of thought is highly
suspect,and I am being generous in the terms I use here. You are not
even close to being an authority on matters related to nutrition. You
are just embarassing yourself.
TC
