Natural Medicine Wiki
Dan Nedelko
I've been working for months on building a Wik devoted to natural
medicine. Please help me out and participate. Together we can build the
world's largest encyclopedia of accurate Naturopathic Medicine!
Once this get built we will work on the vertical search engine which
will index and consolidate the same materials and subjects!
Best Regards,
Dan Nedelko
Webmaster
http://www.naturopath.ws
out...@citynet.net
seem the world's most complete source would by definition include the full
spectrum of views, research or lack thereof, etc. that all sources might
offer.
mail4er...@yahoo.com
out...@citynet.net wrote:
> Will information to the contrary be accepted? If not why not? It would
> seem the world's most complete source would by definition include the full
> spectrum of views, research or lack thereof, etc. that all sources might
> offer.
>
Good point. Edits and contributions to the existing Wikipedia
must conform to the "views" of the "higher-up" administrators,
which consist of a self-righteous club that dictates which edits
or contributions stay, and which one's get kicked out.
All that "free-for-all" editing sounds great until you check out
the final decision-making editors (and their agendas), that have
the ultimate say, and you see ultimate bias in action.
::E::
Mr-Natural-Health
> Good point. Edits and contributions to the existing Wikipedia
> must conform to the "views" of the "higher-up" administrators,
> which consist of a self-righteous club that dictates which edits
> or contributions stay, and which one's get kicked out.
> All that "free-for-all" editing sounds great until you check out
> the final decision-making editors (and their agendas), that have
> the ultimate say, and you see ultimate bias in action.
Let us not forget that the founder of Wikipedia, Jimbo 'the Bimbo' is
in the SEX business selling XXX rated pictures on the web.
Once you have figured out that little detail, what do you expect from
an organization run by slime?
Academia has been against Wikipedia from the very beginning. I have
documented this on my user page.
Just thought that you might want to know. And, if you don't, I don't
care. Ha, ... Hah, Ha!
out...@citynet.net
the SEX business selling XXX rated pictures on the web.
Once you have figured out that little detail, what do you expect from an
organization run by slime?
Academia has been against Wikipedia from the very beginning. I have
documented this on my user page."
Mr natural health stands in the perfect moral place to pass judgement on
others, naturally. Mr. "natural health" just being a natural bigot
recently posted the below, naturally:
"I love to watch a bunch of scientist want-a-bees make fools out of
themselves by parading around like a bunch of niggers living in New
Orleans."
"Sounds like something the nigger would say to the white lady that he was
raping in the Astro Dome.
The more slime is offended, the better I like it."
Mr-Natural-Health
out...@citynet.net wrote:
> "Let us not forget that the founder of Wikipedia, Jimbo 'the Bimbo' is in
> the SEX business selling XXX rated pictures on the web.
> Mr natural health stands in the perfect moral place to pass judgement on
> others, naturally. Mr. "natural health" just being a natural bigot
> recently posted the below, naturally:
What? You never let facts stand in you way, Jimbo?
Jimbo is in the SEX business. I am NOT.
out...@citynet.net
Jimbo is in the SEX business. I am NOT."
You might have a point, a bigot and a pornographer might be at a better
place to judge each other.