how autism is given to millions children worldwide by an out of control drug industry and equally out of control governments and medical establishments the media being silenced
the health agenda being hijacked by industry and commerce funded lobby groups, leaving parents without warning and the dangers to their children and child health safety going unreported - so starting and continuing avoidable nightmares for the unlucky many families around the world
> how autism is given to millions children worldwide by an out of control > drug industry and equally out of control governments and medical > establishments > the media being silenced
> the health agenda being hijacked by industry and commerce funded lobby > groups, leaving parents without warning and the dangers to their children > and child health safety going unreported - so starting and continuing > avoidable nightmares for the unlucky many families around the world
The MMR has been in use since 1971. Did austism become prevelent then?
Just post the PubMed indexed articles... random webpages are not real evidence.
Yes I thought this a bit one sided. Besides, I heard a long item about this on a station only a couple of weeks ago, and it seemed it was far from a silent media. The facts seem to be that as you say, its been in use for many years, so if this is even partly true, what has changed? Is there an environmental factor nobody has found yet. No I agree that certain drug companies are discriminating when it comes to what they release, but its human nature, and out in the real world you could not surely hide the effects if what has been claimed was true.
All substances have other effects to those desired but its a judgement call as to whether is serious or not, or even if its provable. Who is going to risk children in a trial when not to inoculate is risking epidemic. OK you say, give them the single versions, but does this cause any less problems? Brian
-- Brian Gaff....Note, this account does not accept Bcc: email. graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them Email: bria...@blueyonder.co.uk ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________
>> how autism is given to millions children worldwide by an out of control >> drug industry and equally out of control governments and medical >> establishments >> the media being silenced
>> the health agenda being hijacked by industry and commerce funded lobby >> groups, leaving parents without warning and the dangers to their children >> and child health safety going unreported - so starting and continuing >> avoidable nightmares for the unlucky many families around the world
> The MMR has been in use since 1971. Did austism become prevelent then?
> Just post the PubMed indexed articles... random webpages are not real > evidence.
> Yes I thought this a bit one sided. Besides, I heard a long item about > this on a station only a couple of weeks ago, and it seemed it was far > from a silent media. The facts seem to be that as you say, its been in use > for many years, so if this is even partly true, what has changed?
It changed because the UK decided to dump its vaccine that had a cruddy mumps component (Urabe strain), for the MMR vaccine that was approved in the USA in 1971 (using the Jeryl Lynn mumps strain) in 1988.
Then some lawyer found a doctor willing to do "research" to come up with specific results to support a lawsuit. That doctor was a gastroenterologist who had no clinical experience with children. The doctor did not reveal this very significant funding fact when he published a paper in the Lancet. He also neglected to change the data when one person testing for measles viruses from tissue invasively retrieved from a dozen children (provided by the lawyer, since they were party to the lawsuit) found the PCR results were useless. One of the children whose intestines were scoped for tissue now has lifelong health problems because his intestines were perforated in 12 places!
> Is there an environmental factor nobody has found yet. > No I agree that certain drug companies are discriminating when it comes to > what they release, but its human nature, and out in the real world you > could not surely hide the effects if what has been claimed was true.
> All substances have other effects to those desired but its a judgement > call as to whether is serious or not, or even if its provable. Who is > going to risk children in a trial when not to inoculate is risking > epidemic. OK you say, give them the single versions, but does this cause > any less problems?
No it does not cause less problems. There is no evidence to suggest that giving kids three times as many jabs is any safer.
> -- > Brian Gaff....Note, this account does not accept Bcc: email. > graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them > Email: bria...@blueyonder.co.uk > ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________
>>> how autism is given to millions children worldwide by an out of control >>> drug industry and equally out of control governments and medical >>> establishments >>> the media being silenced
>>> the health agenda being hijacked by industry and commerce funded lobby >>> groups, leaving parents without warning and the dangers to their >>> children and child health safety going unreported - so starting and >>> continuing avoidable nightmares for the unlucky many families around the >>> world
>> The MMR has been in use since 1971. Did austism become prevelent then?
>> Just post the PubMed indexed articles... random webpages are not real >> evidence.
"the person who commissioned Deer was Paul Nuki, Sunday Times' sometime Head of Newsroom investigations and "Focus" editor. Paul Nuki is son of Professor George Nuki. Professor George Nuki in 1987 sat on the Committee on Safety of Medicines when the CSM was considering Glaxo company Smith Kline & French Laboratories' Pluserix MMR vaccine for safety approval."
> Horton just been caught lying, as was Zuckerman.
And Wakefield has been lying all the time.
Still doesn't change the fact that the MMR has been around since 1971, and it only became an issue after a lawyer decided to pay for specific research to bolster a now failed lawsuit.
> "the person who commissioned Deer was Paul Nuki, Sunday Times' sometime > Head of Newsroom investigations and "Focus" editor. Paul Nuki is son of > Professor George Nuki. Professor George Nuki in 1987 sat on the Committee > on Safety of Medicines when the CSM was considering Glaxo company Smith > Kline & French Laboratories' Pluserix MMR vaccine for safety approval."
> It changed because the UK decided to dump its vaccine that had a cruddy > mumps component (Urabe strain), for the MMR vaccine that was approved in > the USA in 1971 (using the Jeryl Lynn mumps strain) in 1988.
> Still doesn't change the fact that the MMR has been around since 1971, and > it only became an issue after a lawyer decided to pay for specific > research to bolster a now failed lawsuit.
>> It changed because the UK decided to dump its vaccine that had a cruddy >> mumps component (Urabe strain), for the MMR vaccine that was approved in >> the USA in 1971 (using the Jeryl Lynn mumps strain) in 1988.
>> Still doesn't change the fact that the MMR has been around since 1971, >> and it only became an issue after a lawyer decided to pay for specific >> research to bolster a now failed lawsuit.
