Cord Blood and Polluted Primordial Soup
Mort Zuckerman
lPick...@cdc.gov, Durlan...@yale.edu, Aa...@columbia.edu,
gary_w...@nymc.edu, scientifi...@ostp.gov,
pkru...@princeton.edu, Stanle...@fiu.edu,
emcsw...@niaid.nih.gov, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
Spin...@yahoogroups.com, kshe...@calea.org, fit...@gmail.com,
patrick.f...@usdoj.gov, model...@sbcglobal.net,
jdr...@nejm.org, let...@courant.com, Jgerb...@cdc.gov,
michae...@po.state.ct.us, con...@po.state.ct.us, executive-
edi...@nytimes.com, managin...@nytimes.com, news-
ti...@nytimes.com, biz...@nytimes.com, for...@nytimes.com,
nati...@nytimes.com, dv...@cdc.gov, brigidc...@optonline.net,
tr...@hotmail.com, illino...@aol.com, jle...@courant.com,
tinaj...@yahoo.com, jhorn...@fff.org, thomas...@usdoj.gov,
thoma...@po.state.ct.us, kur...@washpost.com,
georg...@washpost.com, p...@allegorypress.com,
commissi...@po.state.ct.us, brans...@comcast.net,
vts...@comcast.net, o...@po.state.ct.us, freet...@charter.net,
scott....@po.state.ct.us, govern...@po.state.ct.us,
attorney...@po.state.ct.us, randall...@usdoj.gov,
Robert....@yale.edu, edi...@greenwich-post.com,
harol...@yale.edu, sedm...@nswbc.org, rrmcg...@aol.com,
fr...@nytimes.com, dpr...@stmartin.edu, saint....@sbcglobal.net
Cc: fra...@ucia.gov, dr-ahma...@president.ir,
eugener...@washpost.com, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
bmi...@newstimes.com, tr...@hotmail.com, rast...@aol.com,
billc...@gmail.com, amcg...@rms-law.com, rjmu...@aol.com,
paulcrai...@yahoo.com, criminal...@usdoj.gov,
karla.d...@usdoj.gov, christophe...@usdoj.gov,
richar...@yale.edu, harol...@yale.edu, james.p...@yale.edu,
inq...@aldf.com, ly...@idsociety.org, meganm...@theatlantic.com
Subject: Cord Blood and Polluted Primordial Soup
Date: Jul 2, 2010 4:51 AM
B and J,
Yale knows chronic Lyme is really
activated Epstein-Barr (et al) and
badly cloned B cells.
The treatment for it will be
antibiotics, antivirals and probably
stem cell (cord blood) B cell transfer,
like cancer/leukemia treatment.
These treatments will be even more
expensive than just treating chronic
Lyme alone.
The idea - should we live that long
(and I mean "stay intact as a nation") -
will be to have a person's own cord
blood stored for them at birth for
the purpose of a disease/immunity reset,
... which will be even more necessary
as we pollute ourselves to hell (= more
exposures to molds and these primordial
polluted-soup types).
Nobody needs to be talking about
any "Lyme bills." The bad guys
know what is going on. The NIH
knows what we're dealing with. The
more that Lyme activism is run by
tards and inadvertant PsyOps like the
Pat Smith (The Queens), and the mental
midgets of MMI and ILADS, the more the
bad guys laugh.
I am pretty sure I have demonstrated
the mechanisms of illness (PubMed articles),
here, about 700 bahzilliondy times. We,
the people who actually suffer chronic Lyme
and all of the related political (means,
"before the indictments") abuse, have
to realize that that MMI/ILADS gang would
prefer to talk about far-out flaky nonsense
indefinitely, because none of them
are scientists.
They don't "get" that they have an
obligation to stick to the scientific
facts. They're all that psychiatric type
who prefer to look at all the ways stuff
could be discussed without rising to
the Scientific Validity occasion.
It's just plain laziness (in combination
with arrogance).
Kathleen
http://www.actionlyme.org
"[Real] scientists are *fiercely* independent. That's the good
news."-- NIH's Top Fool, Anthony Fauci
Jen
> Subject: Cord Blood and Polluted Primordial Soup
> B and J,
>
> Yale knows chronic Lyme is really
> activated Epstein-Barr (et al) and
> badly cloned B cells.
>
> The treatment for it will be
> antibiotics, antivirals and probably
> stem cell (cord blood) B cell transfer,
> like cancer/leukemia treatment.
>
> These treatments will be even more
> expensive than just treating chronic
> Lyme alone.
>
> The idea - should we live that long
> (and I mean "stay intact as a nation") -
> will be to have a person's own cord
> blood stored for them at birth for
> the purpose of a disease/immunity reset,
> ... which will be even more necessary
> as we pollute ourselves to hell (= more
> exposures to molds and these primordial
> polluted-soup types).
Is there any chance that new stem cell technologies will fix this
issue in the future?
I know Amy Scher is touting her Indian treatment, but I have no proof
whatsoever that her treatment really worked or she went into remission
spontaneously.
I haven't seen the registered patent for her treatment, either... but
it's probably so vague as to encompass as many technologies as
possible in order to keep Dr. Geeta Shroff in the black.
> Nobody needs to be talking about
> any "Lyme bills." The bad guys
> know what is going on. The NIH
> knows what we're dealing with. The
> more that Lyme activism is run by
> tards and inadvertant PsyOps like the
> Pat Smith (The Queens), and the mental
> midgets of MMI and ILADS, the more the
> bad guys laugh.
The Lyme bills are of limited use. The LLMDs will continue treat as
they do, while everyone else continues to treat as they do.
The only thing that would begin to force the issue are bills that
require insurance companies and gov't healthcare to cover long term
antibiotic treatment. That would be a bill with actual teeth in it.
At the same time, is it right for people to be on antibiotics for a
really long time? I've taken Flagyl at lower than usual doses and got
concerned that will get *non-Borrelia* antibiotic resistant organisms
due to this treatment. And as I've developed more allergies to
antibiotics, there could be a point where if I'm getting treated for
chronic Lyme, I might have to resort to other (who knows what even
works besides western medicine... a lot of the alternative stuff is
not proven to work) treatments at that time. How does anyone even
begin to deal with that situation?
> I am pretty sure I have demonstrated
> the mechanisms of illness (PubMed articles),
> here, about 700 bahzilliondy times. We,
> the people who actually suffer chronic Lyme
> and all of the related political (means,
> "before the indictments") abuse, have
> to realize that that MMI/ILADS gang would
> prefer to talk about far-out flaky nonsense
> indefinitely, because none of them
> are scientists.
I think one of my questions after reading your group is what is your
history of demonstrating the mechanisms to which audience(s)? I think
I read that you were an analytical chemist who worked for Pfizer and
testified about LymeRIX vaccines. So I know you showed up in court and
made your points then... But who else have you shared this information
with who has any power to change things; who will listen and
understand the science? Fine, if MMI and ILADS doesn't get it, then
who does? Who can you tell this to who will understand the science and
the implications of having Lyme/Borreliosis?
> They don't "get" that they have an
> obligation to stick to the scientific
> facts. They're all that psychiatric type
> who prefer to look at all the ways stuff
> could be discussed without rising to
> the Scientific Validity occasion.
I thought some of the ILADS crowd *weren't* just psychiatrists? Or
altie docs? I am pretty sure some of them are general practitioners
and internists. Not just psychiatrists. But I admit I've seen a number
of them referred to.
> It's just plain laziness (in combination
> with arrogance).
>
> Kathleenhttp://www.actionlyme.org
One more question: Why "Mort Zuckerman" and not "Kathleen" in your
username? I don't see the significance for using this username on this
google group... I mean, Mort Zuckerman is the publisher and owner of
the New York Daily News since 1993 and, as of 2007, is the current
editor-in-chief of U.S. News & World Report. (See me looking
puzzled...)
Jen
Mort Zuckerman
the answer/treatment, in addition
to antibiotics and anti-virals.
I myself have the same issues
with allergies to antibiotics as you
have.
ILADS and MMI are deliberately not
doing anything because Nick Harris
actually runs ILADS. He makes all
the final calls. And he has a monopoly
on testing because his is the best
lab in the country and everyone knows it.
If proper testing were to come along and
be made available to every lab to perform
(Yale's specific flagellin method, plus all
the specific borrelial flagellins), then Nick
would not be a bahzillionaire.
ILADS does not take IDSA to court
also because Bransfield consults for
so many BigPharmas on psych drugs.
Were this gang to take IDSA to court,
he would be under scrutiny. Thus, they
have no leadership with integrity or brains
or balls.
ILADS does not have the brains, balls
nor would they survive the court proceedings;
they are a dead end for us.
Yes, I am a chemist. I trained ILADS in
scientific validity. I wrote their original
Klempner rebuttal, which they then decided
to make into a formal paper.
The rest is already answered.
I do not care if no one in America listens or
does a thing. For years I have known that
my main audience is Europe, Asia, the Middle
East, Japan, Russia, and South American countries.
The rest of the world is my audience. They
can watch Americans be 100% incompetent to
science and care. And then in the end, no
one will support America's wars.
We 100% suck and the world should ignore us.
They should boycott and protest against everything
we do and stand for. They should dump our currency...
Kathleen
http://www.actionlyme.org
http://www.relapsingfever.org