Submitted to FDA with supporting documentation
The Bogus Prophet
>
>Almost lost in this theater of bad one-act plays was the small but
>interesting number of personal stories about adverse events that seemed to
>follow the second Lymerix shot. Maybe second shot events are a common
>factor and will be looked at in greater detail.
This is an interesting point, Nadie, Nadie, Nadie. But why would a waste of
DNA like you care? Got an angle you can work that might get you fame or
fortune?
--
"You trying to work me, boy?" - Minerva,
Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil
"It's A Business, Stupid". The Bogus Prophet
The Bogus Prophet - bok...@panix.com Copyright 2000, Mike Palij
Kathleen
>
> >From: "Jonathan R. Strong" <jst...@home.com>
> >Newsgroups: sci.med.diseases.lyme
> >Sent: Sunday, February 04, 2001 12:34 AM
> >Subject: Re: Submitted to FDA with supporting documentation, Jan 31, 2001,
> Bethesda
> >
>
> > "Kathleen" wrote:
> > > I actually gave this presentation
> > > with slides... as much of it as I
> > > could say in 5-7 minutes.
> > > So it is part of the record, now.
> > >> snip <<
> >
> > K
> >
> > This is great -and the fact that you managed to get the salient points
> >organized and presented
> >is fantastic. So many of us are aware of the issues, know of the
> >injustices and want to make a
> >difference but get mired down in lyme malaise - but *you* actually got it
> >together and
> >delivered it in a way that can make a difference. Bravo - and thanks.
> >
> >
> Actually, it wasn't great. It was a rambling, buzzsaw critique of the
> Dressler serodiagnostic criteria, with washed out, illegible
> black-and-white overheads.
They would not let me use
a Power Point presentation.
We had one, I asked. They
said they couldn't.
Worse, it had nothing to do with the topic of
> the meeting which was a "Lyme Disease Vaccine Safety Update." I think the
> only thing it accomplished was to remind the audience that 1) easy access to
> scientific and medical information is no substitute for real knowledge and
> 2) "some of these people are nuts."
>
> It wasn't helped that this off-topic diatribe was preceded by Karen
> Forschner's awkward wiggling between the fact of her taking $120,000 from
> SKB and having to admit she didn't take the vaccine herself or give it to
> her kid, followed by a lawyer disingenuously asking the Committee to suspend
> vaccine usage and thereby strengthening his case against SKB.
>
> Almost lost in this theater of bad one-act plays was the small but
> interesting number of personal stories about adverse events that seemed to
> follow the second Lymerix shot. Maybe second shot events are a common
> factor and will be looked at in greater detail.
> --
> --
I just want to make sure the whole world
knows that Ed was at this meeting.
So, this can only be Ed.
And I was not wrong about a thing I said.
And no one here expected that you would say
anything other than what you just did.
You can't prove me wrong, because I am not.
So that's why you come up with this subjective
garbage, you hateful son of a bitch.
Kathleen