DCF "Party and Screw" social worker psychopath cult's feelings are hurt- *poor thiiiiingss!!*
Peenies, Peenies, Peenies, My Name is Chuck and I love McSweenies'
From:
kmdi...@comcast.net
[Add to Address Book]
To:
Spin...@yahoogroups.com, jdr...@nejm.org, let...@courant.com,
Jgerb...@cdc.gov, len...@courant.com, motomani...@yahoo.com,
con...@po.state.ct.us, executiv...@nytimes.com,
managin...@nytimes.com, news...@nytimes.com,
the-...@nytimes.com, biz...@nytimes.com, for...@nytimes.com,
me...@nytimes.com, nati...@nytimes.com, spo...@nytimes.com,
dv...@cdc.gov, brigidc...@optonline.net, tr...@hotmail.com,
ubi...@courant.com, spin...@yahoogroups.com, ma...@concentric.net,
camp...@courant.com, jhorn...@fff.org, thomas...@usdoj.gov,
edi...@commondreams.org, kur...@washpost.com, georg...@washpost.com,
hor...@courant.com, commissi...@po.state.ct.us,
cohen...@aol.com, leonar...@po.state.ct.us, FalN...@aol.com,
brans...@comcast.net, vts...@comcast.net, mcne...@aol.com,
o...@po.state.ct.us, da...@davila-dilzer.com,
scott....@po.state.ct.us, attorney...@po.state.ct.us,
randall...@usdoj.gov,patrick....@jud.state.ct.us,
thoma...@po.state.ct.us
CC:
fra...@ucia.gov,dr-ahma...@president.ir,
eugener...@washpost.com, dh...@courant.com, hor...@courant.com,
bmi...@newstimes.com, eliot....@oag.state.ny.us, tr...@hotmail.com,
rast...@aol.com, bill...@comcast.net, thomas...@usdoj.gov,
amcg...@rms-law.com, rjmu...@aol.com, paulcrai...@yahoo.com,
sidney_b...@yahoo.com, criminal...@usdoj.gov,
karla.d...@usdoj.gov, christophe...@usdoj.gov,
fra...@ucia.gov, govern...@po.state.ct.us, fit...@gmail.com,
patrick.f...@usdoj.gov,
model...@sbcglobal.net,dsha...@poughkeepsiejournal.com
Subject:
DCF "Party and Screw" social worker psychopath cult's feelings are
hurt- *poor thiiiiingss!!*
Date:
Saturday, December 23, 2006 2:50:13 AM
[View Source]
The poor-thing "social workers" psychopaths cult's feelings have been
hurt
DCF places children in danger just to torture the parents, and then
tells the
children that if they complain about abusive foster "care," they'll be
separated
from siblings and never see parents or siblings again. This DCF told
the Inkel
children and what they told my children.
http://www.courant.com/news/local/hc-commissioners1222.artdec22,0,2657369.story?
coll=hc-headlines-home
Welcome to Corrupticut, the "Meatgrinder State," where "Child
Protective
Services" place children in danger, sexually torture and assault them,
and deny
them medical care...
http://www.actionlyme.org/DCF_CRIMES_AND_COVER_UP_101.htm
DCF lie to the police, they party and screw with each other. DCF screws
the
children and beat up children they kidnap, and they party and screw
with the
cops, they defraud the "courts" and then "leave the country"... The
DCF
whores fabricate evidence and tamper with witnesses- and then are given
their
jobs back and do not go to prison
http://www.actionlyme.org/DCF_AND_DMHAS_PENIS_MATTERS_201.htm
http://www.actionlyme.org/MORE_DCF_KIDNAPEES_COME_RAPEES.htm
http://www.pahealthsystems.com/message719737.html
http://www.jud.ct.gov/external/news/press4.html
http://www.ct.gov/AG/cwp/view.asp?A=1779&Q=284278
http://starkravingviking.blogspot.com/2005/07/epidemic-of-abuse.html
http://www.actionlyme.org/DCF_WORKER_BRINGS_GUN_AND_DRUGS_TO_SCHOOL.htm
http://www.actionlyme.org/INKEL_ABUSE_FILE_RENDERED_31_JULY_06_2.wmv
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qioTUJXjoGY
"Social worker" declares that he will falsely arrest Chris Kennedy "for
*something*" (It didn't matter what, you see, as long as Chris was
falsely
arrested. THAT's what DCF does.)
Children violently sexually assaulted in "foster care" and then DCF has
the
foster carer blame the genital injuries to all three children on the
mother,
when it was the foster "carer" herself who did it:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Nnh6aH2CpM
DCF abuse of children in foster care and cover up 06:05 YouTube
Corrupticut DCF aware of sexual violence to Inkel children (Jo-El
Suroviak)
Parents denied legal representation.
http://www.actionlyme.org/DCF_CRIMES_AND_COVER_UP_101.htm
They defraud the "courts" and "leave the country" and can't be cross
examined in
the 10 days allowed ;which they did to the Inkel's too- (They're
always
"leaving the country"... Hmmm)]
http://www.actionlyme.org/LEEBENS_DEFRAUDING_THE_COURT.htm
As you can see, I had my kid to Yale for her 504 eval for 6 full days
prior to
the kidnapping, so how could they be in "imminent danger?" They were
not, and
that is so stated on the actual "Order" even though "imminent danger"
is
supposed to be the ONLY reason they can take your kids...
This is not a cult that can be fixed by removing Dunbar. DCF has to be
prosecuted for their crimes. That is the best deterrent.
DCF placed my children in danger and have denied them medical care:
http://www.actionlyme.org/THE_REAL_DON_DICKSON.htm
http://www.actionlyme.org/Schoen.htm
DCF obstructed justice and denied all kids with Lyme medical care:
http://www.actionlyme.org/USDOJ_COMPLAINT_RICO.htm
The reason DCF is such a failure is because they are lying morons.
They are
*FAR* *TOO* *STUPID* to be a "child protection agency," and this is
well-known:
http://www.actionlyme.org/HOWE_BBC_SCIENCE_EVIDENCE.htm
The DCF do not know any big words. I got their "training manual." It
reads
like it was meant for 6th graders. Everyone should order it from Gary
Kleeblat
and you will see that I am right. The same is true for the cops. They
strut
around like George W. Moron but they have no real reason to think
themselves
superior to the rest of us. They're all morons and are taught to think
like
morons from their moron superiors. If every day life is not a crime,
who needs
600,000,000 cops and social workers? It's make-work. It's providing
more and
more bodies to guarantee there will be no budget cuts to their
department and
layoffs.
They only have to "work" 20 years.
The cops party and screw with the DCF "social workers," too, who dance
on the
tables at the bars with the cops.
http://www.actionlyme.org/05_27_06_Cathy_Elllison_Interview2.wma
DCF can be used as a weapon and the psychopathic cops torture their
wives and
girlfriends by making threats to call DCF....
This is all documented, except for the audio interview with the
psychopathic
cops' wife, but the story sounds believable and it all fits the rest of
the
data.
This is what we pay for, folks. I think it is outrageous that the poor
things
dare to complain about Dunbar getting axed. She was axwed because she
could not
control the criminally insane DCF union members:
"We're hoping this is an opportunity for the governor to appoint
somebody who
will have more understanding of the front-line staff and what they've
gone
through in the past few years," said Sandy Dearborn, president of
AFSCME Local
2663, which represents DCF workers. "We haven't been listened to very
well in
the past couple of years."
More understanding of what DCF poor things go through? Most of the DCF
kidnappees end up in jails which was why Ragaglia
wanted the national string of jails and prisons enterprise for which
all went to
jail except she, the CHIEF SLUT:
http://www.actionlyme.org/RAGAGLIA_GRANDJURY_DETAILS.htm
"On another occasion, a sober Rowland adviser was deputized to warn
another
Republican she ought to start wearing underwear beneath her short
skirts when
she was around the governor. Mrs. Rowland was said to be especially
insistent
that the message be delivered."
"Connecticut's political world is tiny and given to ennui. Witness the
fact that
the U.S. Attorney, Kevin O'Connor, was barred from participating in the
prosecution of the Rowland scandals because of his and his wife's close
ties to
the former governor. Kathleen O'Connor worked in the office of
Rowland's legal
counsel. In most places, that would raise an alarm. Connecticut only
shrugs.
More Here..."
- Ragaglia said she received limousine trips, expensive dinners and
nights at
fine hotels, the same gifts federal prosecutors said contractor William
Tomasso used to bribe
Rowland's office.
- Ragaglia said she had a yearlong affair with Rowland's deputy chief
of staff,
Lawrence Alibozek, and assumed he was paying for the trips.
*** - Although she said she never drank on the job, Ragaglia told
investigators
that while running her department she battled an alcohol problem so
severe, some
memories are spotty. ***
It's pervasive. They're paid too much and never are prosecuted for
their
crimes.
Rowland was right. "It's the unions."
Please distribute so no one will make the mistake of moving to
Corrupticut.
False DCF allegations have never been prosecuted ever, in this state.
Why
should there be a deterrent to the DCF's unions' guarantee of only
having to
"work" 20 years? They don't care if the allegations are false.
In fact, the more the merrier. The more kids kidnapped, the more the
PARTY AND
SCREW!!!
Merry Christmas! May we all pretend we're social workers, and get too
drunk and
drugged up to remember what we're supposed to be doing !!!
Kathleen M. Dickson
Dan Sullivan
zzzzzzzzzzzz
Peenies, Peenies, Peenies, My Name is Chuck and I love McSweenies'
Peenies, Peenies, Peenies, My Name is Chuck and I love McSweenies'
wrote:
Dan Sullivan
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Peenies, Peenies, Peenies, My Name is Chuck and I love McSweenies'
Peenies, Peenies, Peenies, My Name is Chuck and I love McSweenies'
wrote:
Dan Sullivan
zzzzzzzzzzzz
Chuck Hearts Foley
Peenies, Peenies, Peenies, My Name is Chuck and I love McSweenies'
wrote:
Dan Sullivan
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Chuck Hearts Foley
Peenies, Peenies, Peenies, My Name is Chuck and I love McSweenies'
wrote:
Dan Sullivan
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Chuck Hearts Foley
Peenies, Peenies, Peenies, My Name is Chuck and I love McSweenies'
wrote:
Dan Sullivan
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Chuck Hearts Foley
Peenies, Peenies, Peenies, My Name is Chuck and I love McSweenies'
wrote:
Harvester of Sorrow
Chuck Hearts Foley ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
Peenies, Peenies, Peenies, My Name is Chuck and I love McSweenies'
Peenies, Peenies, Peenies, My Name is Chuck and I love McSweenies'
wrote:
Dan Sullivan
Peenies, Peenies, Peenies, My Name is Chuck and I love McSweenies'
Peenies, Peenies, Peenies, My Name is Chuck and I love McSweenies'
wrote:
8man12
Peenies, Peenies, Peenies,ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
Ordinary
Peenies, Peenies, Peenies, My Name is Chuck and I love McSweenies'
wrote:
8man12
Peenies, Peenies, Peenies, My Name is Chuck and I love McSweenies'
Peenies, Peenies, Peenies, My Name is Chuck and I love McSweenies'
wrote:
renab...@aol.com
"Party and Screw" ?
Sounds like my fraternity days !
Where do I sign up ?
krp
<renab...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1166967915.5...@a3g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
>
> "Party and Screw" ?
>
> Sounds like my fraternity days !
>
> Where do I sign up ?
Who in their right mind wants to screw a social worker?
When I was an undergrad, common knowledge was those in the school of
social work were "desperate and dateless."
Harvester of Sorrow
krp wrote:
> <ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
Jack Linthicum
Harvester of Sorrow
JackZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
Peter Skelton
wrote:
You went to the wrong school.
Peter Skelton
freedom
He didn't go to school at all. He ordered his degree from a "diploma mill"
called Shaftesbury University, which is unaccredited.
http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com/degree.html proves this.
http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A
iQA/AwUBRY6aZgu6zDezw650EQKaGACeJJUC6uiJT1PeWEt4tpR/K8NfbWMAnj7w
Ysc12esb4LeNTTvotC+1BlNA
=9aNr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Harvester of Sorrow
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
krp
"Peter Skelton" <skel...@cogeco.ca> wrote in message
news:l66to29qqkaems5em...@4ax.com...
>>> "Party and Screw" ?
>>>
>>> Sounds like my fraternity days !
>>>
>>> Where do I sign up ?
>>
>>Who in their right mind wants to screw a social worker?
>>
>> When I was an undergrad, common knowledge was those in the school of
>>social work were "desperate and dateless."
>>
> You went to the wrong school.
Naw, in my work over the years I have visited many universities over the
country. It's universal.
krp
"freedom" <nob...@4096.net> wrote in message
news:bdae3e7f1a22715e...@4096.net...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>> "Party and Screw" ?
>>>>
>>>> Sounds like my fraternity days !
>>>>
>>>> Where do I sign up ?
>>>
>>>Who in their right mind wants to screw a social worker?
>>>
>>> When I was an undergrad, common knowledge was those in the school of
>>>social work were "desperate and dateless."
>>>
>>You went to the wrong school.
>>
>>Peter Skelton
>
> He didn't go to school at all.
Moore you KNOW that's not true, BUT it's your best shot at me..
TIME FOR SOME TIME TRAVEL BACK TO YOUR ORIGINS
Here's what some other VICTIMS of yours once said on their website.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
REINHAGEN WEBSITE CONTENT
"Introduction - Who David D. Moore is and who we are
The David D. Moore we are speaking of is an ex-Marine currently living in
the Chicago, Illinois area. He posts on a regular basis to
alt.child-support. Please click here for a list of his current and past
screen names. My name is Joe O'Connor and my associate's name is John
Reinhagen. We both are or have been moderately frequent posters to men's
rights/father's rights-related newsgroups. We've put together this web site
to showcase Moore's abusive behavior on the newsgroups we post to and on the
Internet in general.
A bit of history
About two years ago we witnessed a bizarre Usenet episode where an alleged
NOW rep calling herself "a...@infinity.net" started making ominous threats
to
self-styled fathers-rights advocate David Moore (he was calling himself
"Jeff Johnson" back then) on several of those newsgroups and demanded that
he take down his web pages. There was just one little problem; a comparison
of the subject headers of "Johnson's" posts with those of "ara" showed that
they were coming from the same computer. We both concluded that "ara" was a
sock-puppet cooked up by Moore to get hits on his web-counter and told him
he wasn't going to get any sympathy from us. Moore was quite angry with our
judgement and accused me of betraying him. I suppose he felt that the
pro-father's rights stance that we shared exempted him from critical
scrutiny. A few days later, he lost his Worldnet account (I wonder why).
Moore insisted that he was innocent and blamed his sudden departure from
Worldnet on a cabal of NOW feminists (he posted this on Usenet); although an
independent investigation proved otherwise. I finally got sick of his lying
and exposed him on his pet newsgroup alt.child-support. He didn't take too
kindly to this and a few months later retaliated by taking an old post of
mine and forging in an anti-Semitic comment. Unfortunately for him the
forgery was traced back to his workplace at Sara Lee and he lost his temp
job there. Again he was quite angry and made several posts that looked like
veiled threats of retaliation.
Ever since then, we have both had the displeasure of being treated to the
following:
a.. Repeated complaints to our ISPs.
b.. A mysterious anonymous remailer chorus that loves to post in Moore's
defense and seems excessively interested in his reputation and well-being.
c.. Virulent racist and ethnic forgeries under our screen names.
d.. Anonymous threats of violence.
e.. Anonymous posts begging for personal information about us.
Unfortunately, we're far from the only people who this has happened to, nor
do we claim to be his worst victims . It seems that whoever dares to speak
out against Moore's bizarre online behavior stands a good chance of getting
the same or worse directed against them. This is especially true for his
female 'marks'; Moore's ravings show a singular hatred of women.
About a year ago I put these pages at Geocities; it was taken down shortly
afterwards due to the sheer offensiveness of its content (Geocities didn't
seem to care that I wasn't the author of the crap that I was showcasing).
John generously offered to host the pages and and they've been here ever
since.
We'll be adding to this archive as time permits. Unfortunately keeping up
with Moore is a full-time occupation which neither of us really has time
for, so they will probably always be somewhat out of date.Please email me at
jmo...@snet.net or John at welcomer...@savageoasis.fc.net if you have any
questions or concerns.
This page ©1999 Joseph M. O'Connor and John Reinhagen."
renab...@aol.com
SNIP
That made 'em even more eager to get rid of their panties
Not that we, gentlemen that we were, would have ever taken advantage of
that
Overheard at one party
Brother A - surveying the crowd - "Man, what a herd of porkers"
Brother B - "But they <blank>, man, they <blank> !"
krp
<renab...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1167040076.0...@73g2000cwn.googlegroups.com...
>> >>> "Party and Screw" ?
>> >>>
>> >>> Sounds like my fraternity days !
>> >>>
>> >>> Where do I sign up ?
>> >>
>> >>Who in their right mind wants to screw a social worker?
>> >>
>> >> When I was an undergrad, common knowledge was those in the school
>> >> of
>> >>social work were "desperate and dateless."
>> >>
>> > You went to the wrong school.
>>
>> Naw, in my work over the years I have visited many universities over
>> the
>> country. It's universal.
> SNIP
> That made 'em even more eager to get rid of their panties
Regardless of the "consent" issue you need "takers" and who wants a date
whose photo is on the front of the Alpo can?
> Not that we, gentlemen that we were, would have ever taken advantage of
> that
Well I was one of those guys who learned to go after the best looking
women in the room, the ones other guys were afraid to talk to. So I always
had the best looking dates at the prom. Been married 3 times. All 3 are
great looking women. There is something more important about a woman than
her willingness to spread her legs. Although, that being said, it was a key
factor in why I married my first wife and why it didn't last. I was so young
then I didn't know that you'd actually have to TALK to a woman afterward.
<snicker>
> Overheard at one party
>
> Brother A - surveying the crowd - "Man, what a herd of porkers"
> Brother B - "But they <blank>, man, they <blank> !"
If your life revolves around your
penis...........................................
Usenet Supreme Loser ChuckWorth
That's why I always went for the older ones.
Most of us women require more than one topic.
Men obviously don't.
Thanks for sharing this insight, however.
Perhaps you could share it with younger people
in a more deliberate way.
There's *no excuse* for these women to be such sluts.
They ruin all of our reputations are are responsible for
the glass ceiling. There's always a whore around to
validate a young man's perception that women are
chattel and in the case of the head of the DCF, her
reputation was so well-known, that The State Rumor
was that Governor Rowland was the father of one of
her children.
"On another occasion, a sober Rowland adviser was deputized to warn
another Republican she ought to start wearing underwear beneath her
short skirts when she was around the governor. Mrs. Rowland was said to
be especially insistent that the message be delivered."
http://www.actionlyme.org/RAGAGLIA_GRANDJURY_DETAILS.htm
Kathleen
Dan Sullivan
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Usenet Supreme Loser ChuckWorth
Dan Sullivan
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Usenet Supreme Loser ChuckWorth
Usenet Supreme Loser ChuckWorth wrote:
Dan Sullivan
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Beach
> another
> Republican she ought to start wearing underwear beneath her short
> skirts when
> she was around the governor. Mrs. Rowland was said to be especially
> insistent
> that the message be delivered."
>
Dan Sullivan
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Beach
Dan Sullivan
zzzzzzzzzzzzz
krp
"Usenet Supreme Loser ChuckWorth" <quarte...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1167055404.1...@48g2000cwx.googlegroups.com...
>
>> > That made 'em even more eager to get rid of their panties
>> Regardless of the "consent" issue you need "takers" and who wants a
>> date
>> whose photo is on the front of the Alpo can?
>> > Not that we, gentlemen that we were, would have ever taken advantage of
>> > that
>> Well I was one of those guys who learned to go after the best looking
>> women in the room, the ones other guys were afraid to talk to. So I
>> always
>> had the best looking dates at the prom. Been married 3 times. All 3 are
>> great looking women. There is something more important about a woman than
>> her willingness to spread her legs. Although, that being said, it was a
>> key
>> factor in why I married my first wife and why it didn't last. I was so
>> young
>> then I didn't know that you'd actually have to TALK to a woman afterward.
>> <snicker>
>>
>> > Overheard at one party
>> >
>> > Brother A - surveying the crowd - "Man, what a herd of porkers"
>>
>> > Brother B - "But they <blank>, man, they <blank> !"
>>
>> If your life revolves around your
>> penis...........................................
> That's why I always went for the older ones.
Well I like older ones too, maybe because I am older myself. But I find
any women under 40 to be still a child. Women like to boast about being more
"mature" than men. Sorry - I know better!
> Most of us women require more than one topic. Men obviously don't.
Bullshit! Depends on the man. My wife (who I adore) was a Judge in Cuba
before she came here. (Tax court) We talk on a rage of subjects (thousands)
from Music to film, to world events, to medicine, to my work to her work. My
ex wife was also bright. She had 7 IQ points on me with a 153, so we talked
a lot, my first wife was a total mistake. She couldn't even handle the ONE
subject.
> Thanks for sharing this insight, however. Perhaps you could share it with
> younger people in a more deliberate way.
I have shared it with my children. So far two have college degrees and
the third is working on it.
> There's *no excuse* for these women to be such sluts.
It is a product of our society. They wouldn't be sluts if there were no
takers.
> They ruin all of our reputations are are responsible for
> the glass ceiling. There's always a whore around to
> validate a young man's perception that women are
> chattel and in the case of the head of the DCF, her
> reputation was so well-known, that The State Rumor
> was that Governor Rowland was the father of one of
> her children.
It's the "Playboy Philosopy." Women are too damn DUMB to know that
Gloria Steinem was a PLAYBOY BUNNY! You've been HAD chick. See if you can
put that one together Kathleen. Most women can't.
Peenies, Peenies, Peenies, My Name is Chuck and I love McSweenies'
I've never been a "HAD chick."
I've never been a "chick."
No one could ever accuse me of being a "chick:"
http://www.actionlyme.org/Sports.htm
In fact, I am accused of just the opposite.
Geek and Athlete.
Anyway, your story is a good one.
I did not know Gloria Steinem was a Bunny.
Freud was one too.
http://www.actionlyme.org/FREUD_VERIFIED_TO_BE_PROJECTING_OWN_LACK_OF_SELF_CONTROL_ON_OTHERS.htm
Dan Sullivan
zzzzzzzzzzzzz
Peenies, Peenies, Peenies, My Name is Chuck and I love McSweenies'
Pix weren't loaded.
SPORTS AND BOOKS.
No social worker ho, man.
SCIENTIST:
http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/01/slides/3680s2_11.pdf
CHILDREN WITH LYME
http://www.actionlyme.org/Schoen.htm
Where's their father?
Exposing his genitals, beating us all up, and strangling the children:
http://www.actionlyme.org/THE_REAL_DON_DICKSON.htm
Peenies, Peenies, Peenies, My Name is Chuck and I love McSweenies'
wrote:
krp
"Peenies, Peenies, Peenies, My Name is Chuck and I love McSweenies'"
news:1167135866.4...@79g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
Well, GOOD for you!
Dan Sullivan
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Peenies, Peenies, Peenies, My Name is Chuck and I love McSweenies'
Peenies, Peenies, Peenies, My Name is Chuck and I love McSweenies'
Dan Sullivan
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Peenies, Peenies, Peenies, My Name is Chuck and I love McSweenies'
Peenies, Peenies, Peenies, My Name is Chuck and I love McSweenies'
wrote:
Dan Sullivan
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Peenies, Peenies, Peenies, My Name is Chuck and I love McSweenies'
Peenies, Peenies, Peenies, My Name is Chuck and I love McSweenies'
wrote:
Dan Sullivan
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Peenies, Peenies, Peenies, My Name is Chuck and I love McSweenies'
Peenies, Peenies, Peenies, My Name is Chuck and I love McSweenies'
wrote:
Dan Sullivan
Peenies, Peenies, Peenies, My Name is Chuck and I love McSweenies'
Peenies, Peenies, Peenies, My Name is Chuck and I love McSweenies'
wrote:
Dan Sullivan
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Harvester of Sorrow
Peenies, ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ