Kris Newby Lyme Crook Rebuttal
Mort Zuckerman
pkru...@princeton.edu, Stanle...@fiu.edu,
emcsw...@niaid.nih.gov, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
Spin...@yahoogroups.com, kshe...@calea.org, fit...@gmail.com,
patrick.f...@usdoj.gov, model...@sbcglobal.net,
jdr...@nejm.org, let...@courant.com, Jgerb...@cdc.gov,
michae...@po.state.ct.us, con...@po.state.ct.us, executive-
edi...@nytimes.com, managin...@nytimes.com, news-
ti...@nytimes.com, biz...@nytimes.com, for...@nytimes.com,
nati...@nytimes.com, dv...@cdc.gov, brigidc...@optonline.net,
tr...@hotmail.com, illino...@aol.com, jle...@courant.com,
tinaj...@yahoo.com, jhorn...@fff.org, thomas...@usdoj.gov,
thoma...@po.state.ct.us, kur...@washpost.com,
georg...@washpost.com, p...@allegorypress.com,
commissi...@po.state.ct.us, brans...@comcast.net,
vts...@comcast.net, o...@po.state.ct.us, freet...@charter.net,
scott....@po.state.ct.us, govern...@po.state.ct.us,
attorney...@po.state.ct.us, randall...@usdoj.gov,
Robert....@yale.edu, edi...@greenwich-post.com,
harol...@yale.edu, sedm...@nswbc.org, rrmcg...@aol.com
Cc: fra...@ucia.gov, dr-ahma...@president.ir,
eugener...@washpost.com, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
bmi...@newstimes.com, tr...@hotmail.com, rast...@aol.com,
billc...@gmail.com, amcg...@rms-law.com, rjmu...@aol.com,
paulcrai...@yahoo.com, sidney_b...@yahoo.com,
criminal...@usdoj.gov, karla.d...@usdoj.gov,
christophe...@usdoj.gov, richar...@yale.edu,
harol...@yale.edu, james.p...@yale.edu, inq...@aldf.com,
ly...@idsociety.org, meganm...@theatlantic.com,
bob.d...@latimes.com
Subject: Kris Newby Lyme Crook Rebuttal
Date: Jul 15, 2009 8:50 PM
Kris,
The Lyme crooks have never told us what OspA was
http://www.actionlyme.org/PresPam14.htm
and they never discuss their own biomarkers of disease:
http://www.actionlyme.org/BIOMARKERS2.htm
Isn't Chronic Epstein-Barr, like, um, Chronic Mono?
http://www.actionlyme.org/PHILLIPS_JE_PERVERT.htm
And doesn't it lead to Multiple Sclerosis?
They tell us we're nuts and don't have any real disease,
despite investigating and proving, *THEMSELVES,* that
we have real disease and biomarkers of it.
IDSA does not respond to rational arguments and
they think they can win by declaring us all nuts,
and what's winnable about that tack is rampant
mysogyny among this nation's physicians.
Males *LIKE* to hear all that derogatory crap about
women.
Because we scare them. Because we're not as dumb
as they like to self-convince of it.
"Accordingly, the methods of the invention provide a powerful and
selective approach for modulating the innate immune response pathways
in animals without giving rise to the toxicities often associated with
the native bacterial components that normally stimulate those
pathways."
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=/netahtml/PTO/srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=6,800,613.PN.&OS=PN/6,800,613&RS=PN/6,800,613
The IDSA crooks don't tell us what OspA (Pam3Cys) is, and they
never mention Pam2Cys and how big that is, internationally
and in the real world's labs.
IDSA is stupid, they're stuck in a loop with all of their lies,
they can think up no new lies, and they missed the boat on
Pam2Cys. Plum Island was taken away from them and the
USA Nobels (Albany Awards) were given to the people who
discovered why LYMErix failed. Yale missed out on $1,009,000,000
worth of grants in 2008 and the bioweapons work went to Texas.
They got the AG up their butts and you caught Shapiro lying
his eyeballs out about congenital Lyme in your movie, which
was the reason the fake NPR.org radio show allowed Shapiro
a platform to regurgitate Yale/ALDF's same old BS about
Lyme being only a bad knee. Paul Duray was recognized for
his work:
http://www.actionlyme.org/CORIXARICO.htm
in addition to being hailed an American Hero for still
serving in the military (in Iraq) at age 70 years:
http://www.ascp.org/FunctionalNavigation/members/Paul-H-Duray-Pathologist-and-Public-Servant.aspx
Duray is the guy who really solved the New Great Imitator:
http://www.actionlyme.org/{PresPam14.htm
but we have to listen to these tards, and I note: They
never say anything scientific, ever, at all.
They're simply terrified of criminal charges at this
point, so they hired this loud-mouth tard, this Rush Limbaughesque
He-Man-Woman-Hater, Viagra-toting Oxycontine-head
simply to show the world they have one remaining Lyme
Kool-Aid Addict with a microphone and hypothetical audience
of medical red-necks.
Don't take them seriously.
Kathleen
http://www.actionlyme.org
===============================================
http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/news/local/rodricks/blog/2009/07/more_on_lyme_disease.html
I respectfully disagree with Dr. Dr. Paul Auwaerter's comment that the
IDSA Lyme authors' conflicts of interest were insignificant. Ideally
authors of medical guidelines should have no financial conflicts when
they make their recommendations. But if you look at the current IDSA
guidelines authors:
--6 of the 14 authors or their universities hold patents associated
with Lyme or tick-borne coinfections, including one author from Johns
Hopkins.
--4 of the 14 have received money from Lyme or coinfection test kit
manufacturers, and the 2006 IDSA guidelines made Lyme and coinfection
testing MANDATORY for non-rash cases.
--6 of 14 have written insurance policy guidelines or testified
against Lyme doctors in Medical Board reviews
--9 of 14 authors or their universities have received money from Lyme
Disease vaccine manufacturers, past or present.
If Lyme disease is so easy to diagnose, treat and cure, then why are
most of the IDSA Lyme guidelines authors working on and spending
millions of gov't dollars on the upcoming Baxter Lyme vaccine?
In my opinion, the $250,000 that the IDSA spent on legal fees is a
drop in the bucket compared to what they might spend on legal fees if
the Atty General disclosed the detailed list of conflicts and
antitrust violations by the panel members. The IDSA is not a small,
patient-focused medical society. With net assets over $18 million
according to their 2007 tax forms, one of their main activities is to
help get Big Pharma clinical trials subsidized by government grants
that flow through IDSA member universities. The end result is that
this large amount of Big Pharma money is corrupting the evidence that
comes out of our universities in ways were just beginning to discover.
Kris Newby
Senior Producer
"[Real] scientists are *fiercely* independent. That's the good
news."-- NIH's Top Fool, Anthony Fauci