"Catholic Invectives" ?? It was the CT Medical Board who refused to investigate Reardon
Mort Zuckerman
Durlan...@yale.edu, Aa...@columbia.edu, gary_w...@nymc.edu,
scientifi...@ostp.gov, pkru...@princeton.edu,
Stanle...@fiu.edu, emcsw...@niaid.nih.gov, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
Spin...@yahoogroups.com, kshe...@calea.org, fit...@gmail.com,
patrick.f...@usdoj.gov, model...@sbcglobal.net,
jdr...@nejm.org, let...@courant.com, Jgerb...@cdc.gov,
michae...@po.state.ct.us, con...@po.state.ct.us, executive-
edi...@nytimes.com, managin...@nytimes.com, news-
ti...@nytimes.com, biz...@nytimes.com, for...@nytimes.com,
nati...@nytimes.com, dv...@cdc.gov, brigidc...@optonline.net,
tr...@hotmail.com, illino...@aol.com, jle...@courant.com,
tinaj...@yahoo.com, jhorn...@fff.org, thomas...@usdoj.gov,
thoma...@po.state.ct.us, kur...@washpost.com,
georg...@washpost.com, p...@allegorypress.com,
commissi...@po.state.ct.us, brans...@comcast.net,
vts...@comcast.net, o...@po.state.ct.us, freet...@charter.net,
scott....@po.state.ct.us, govern...@po.state.ct.us,
attorney...@po.state.ct.us, randall...@usdoj.gov,
Robert....@yale.edu, edi...@greenwich-post.com,
harol...@yale.edu, sedm...@nswbc.org, rrmcg...@aol.com,
fr...@nytimes.com, dpr...@stmartin.edu, saint....@sbcglobal.net
Cc: fra...@ucia.gov, dr-ahma...@president.ir,
eugener...@washpost.com, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
bmi...@newstimes.com, tr...@hotmail.com, rast...@aol.com,
billc...@gmail.com, amcg...@rms-law.com, rjmu...@aol.com,
paulcrai...@yahoo.com, criminal...@usdoj.gov,
karla.d...@usdoj.gov, christophe...@usdoj.gov,
richar...@yale.edu, harol...@yale.edu, james.p...@yale.edu,
inq...@aldf.com, ly...@idsociety.org, meganm...@theatlantic.com
Subject: "Catholic Invectives" ?? It was the CT Medical Board who
refused to investigate Reardon
Date: Apr 9, 2010 2:58 PM
ARTICLE BELOW
=========================
CT Medical Board:
"Yale and UConn perverts
and malpractioners can do
whatever they want to their
victims":
http://www.actionlyme.org/CT_MED_BOARD_BLOW_OFF.htm
Everyone will remember that
the pervert Reardon was
reported to the CT Medical
Board, who did nothing, presumably
because they were in favor of the
sexual abuse of children at the time,
as duh DCF is now:
http://www.actionlyme.org/andersonpenisbiter.htm
DCF Outcomes:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/07/us/07foster.html?scp=2&sq=foster%20care&st=cse
"81% of the males taken from
their parents end up in jail."
UConn's Larry Zemel and the dead
Lupus girl, killed by DCF?
http://www.cga.ct.gov/kid/docs/HS_DCF/121808/Kimberly%20Castro%20December%2018%202008.pdf
Lyme and LYMErix a cause of Lupus?
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20178121
Yale, however, and UConn, and duh CT
DCF are allowed to execute all kinds
of life-altering trauma on whomever
they want, however. Yet, to my
knowledge, there is no statute
of limitations on murder:
http://www.actionlyme.org/SV_PPT_2.htm
And ^^^ THAT is murder.
UConn's participation in the crime:
http://www.actionlyme.org/UCONN_NO_HOSPITAL.htm
Eh, they're a funny group that
Yale/CT Medical Board. Ya never
know what silly ridiculous thing
they're gonna pull next...
Kathleen M. Dickson
http://www.relapsingfever.org
http://www.actionlyme.org
==================
http://blogs.courant.com/susan_campbell/2010/04/catholic-invective-against-a-c.html
Catholic invective against a Connecticut bill
By
Susan Campbell
on April 9, 2010 11:17 AM | Permalink | Comments (31)
0_61_112807_Reardon.jpgThe Connecticut Catholic Public Affairs
Conference, which represents the Archdiocese of Hartford, as well as
the Dioceses of Bridgeport and Norwich, and the Ukranian Catholic
Diocese of Stamford, is distributing a church bulletin insert this
weekend against House Bill 5473, which would eliminate the statute of
limitations for victims of childhood sexual assault and abuse.
Why is the Roman Catholic Church concerned about this bill? Mostly,
they're worried that multiple lawsuits filed against St. Francis
Hospital and the Archdiocese of Hartford for the sexual abuse and
assault committed by George Reardon, a St. Francis endocrinologist,
now deceased, will cost them.
There is no accounting for the cost of the stolen childhoods, is
there? Interesting the wording in the letter, that the bill "puts all
assets at risk." Are we talking about physical plant? Or are we
talking about the children hurt by Reardon?
"[Real] scientists are *fiercely* independent. That's the good
news."-- NIH's Top Fool, Anthony Fauci