If the USDOJ dot guv is in collusion (US Attorney Kevin O'COnnor and John G. Rowland) with the NeoCons who believe in belligerence and pre-emptive "Defence," and the USDOJ believes that it is proper to defend the Yale criminals by inventing other people's crimes and slamming them away forever for saying they are innocent, (which was part of the entire plan), then everyone opposed to such abuses of power can become a "terrorist" and jam the DOJ/FBI's email searches with keywords like:
Unibomber chemist ammonium nitrate subversive bomb Yale command operation mail
Create several email addresses. Give all of them 950 Pennsylvania Ave NW 20530 as your address.
or, 157 Church Street, New Haven, 06510
I was falsely accused of being "a dangerously intelligent chemist," "like Ted Kaszinski," who has "command hallucinations to kill."
This was invented for me at my DCF "trial."
Then I was crminally charged with that, and not allowed access to the courts, since a Yale "psychiatrist" determined I was insane to be saying I was innocent.
Tough to figure out. =============================================
NSA's Echelon Surveillance Network In a new novel, Digital Fortress by Dan Brown, the National Security Agency (NSA) has built a code-breaking supercomputer called TRANSLTR that can crack any cryptographic cipher in a matter of seconds. Ostensibly, the purpose of this computer is to monitor the encrypted communications of terrorist groups, but the designer of this supercomputer recognizes the danger presented to the privacy of ordinary citizens by his creation and invents an unbreakable code called Digital Fortress. He threatens that, if the NSA does not make the existence of TRANSLTR publicly known, he will distribute Digital Fortress on the Internet.
Unfortunately, only in novels, I suspect, do NSA employees have consciences, much less concern for the privacy of Jane Q. Citizen. Fortunately, only in novels does the NSA have a computer that can crack codes in seconds - even the world's most powerful supercomputer, the Intel Paragon, would take a bit longer than a few seconds to crack a message by brute force that was encrypted with PGP (Pretty Good Privacy, a freely available encryption program that runs on PCs and Macs).
However, the NSA does indeed monitor all Internet communication, just as it monitors all telephone, radio, and satellite communication, and, therefore, our collective right to privacy is routinely violated by the Government without our knowledge.
But what is different about the NSA's activity on the Internet has to do with the Internet itself and the public's understanding of it. The Internet is inherently open and insecure, which makes it incredibly easy to monitor and intercept communication traffic like e-mail messages, for instance. Furthermore, the majority of the American public is largely unaware of how insecure the Internet really is - it is interesting that, thanks largely to the mainstream media's successful manufacturing of Internet paranoia, technophobic or computer illiterate people are more conscious of this aspect of the Internet than many people who use the Internet regularly. Most people have heard about government agencies tapping phone lines or even steaming open paper mail, but it seems that most people are not aware of the government's routine monitoring of Internet communication traffic, particularly e-mail traffic. This ignorance is dangerous for a society that has become almost wholly dependent on electronic mediums of communication.
The NSA's surveillance of Internet communication began at the early stages of the Internet's development when it was still populated only by government employees, university researchers, and government contractors. Many people involved with the early Internet (known then as ARPANet) were aware of this surveillance. In fact, Richard Stallman, an MIT computer scientist who was then involved with the ARPANet (and later would found the Free Software Foundation), added an optional feature to a text editor/e-mail client that he had created called EMACS; the purpose of this feature was to undermine the NSA's surveillance efforts. The optional feature added randomly selected keywords at the end of an e-mail message composed in EMACS; these keywords (i.e. revolution, terrorist, etc.) he believed would trigger interception by the NSA computers and, hopefully, if enough people made use of this feature, clog the NSA's computers with irrelevant e-mail.
In former New Zealand intelligence agent Nicky Hager's book Secret Power, one discovers that the NSA's surveillance capabilities are not hindered by political borders. Under the code-name ECHELON, and with the help of the British, Australian, New Zealand and Canadian Governments, the NSA has established a global communication surveillance network that is capable of monitoring most of the world's electronic communication.
The ECHELON system was created by the NSA as a means to interconnect surveillance systems that had existed in these countries since WWII, and to put these foreign surveillance operations under the control of the NSA. What ECHELON became was an international network of computer systems, each intercepting all fax, telex, e-mail and satellite communications in their region of the world. The intercepted communications are scanned with "dictionary" programs for certain keywords; these dictionaries not only contain keywords of interest to the intercepting agency, but also keywords that are of interest to the other intelligence agencies around the world involved in the ECHELON network. If the intercepted message contains a matching keyword, it is immediately passed on to the headquarters of the agency concerned.
Given this massive technological arsenal, how can citizens protect their privacy on the Internet? There is one method that has proven to be an effective monkey wrench in the Government's efficient surveillance machine, and that is strong encryption. Despite the claims of fiction writers, there is no such thing as an unbreakable code or uncrackable encryption, but what good encryption can ensure is that if someone wants to snoop on your e-mail communications they are going to have to put a good deal of effort into it. Cracking encrypted electronic communications is the labor-intensive equivalent of steaming open envelopes, whereas intercepting and reading unencrypted mail is as easy as reading the back of a postcard. Not surprisingly, the FBI and NSA have asked Congress to outlaw strong encryption. We as citizens should be fighting their efforts every step of the way.
In the documentation for PGP, the program's author, Phil Zimmermann, poses the following to users who may be skeptical about the need for publicly available strong encryption programs:
"Perhaps you think your E-mail is legitimate enough that encryption is unwarranted. If you really are a law-abiding citizen with nothing to hide, then why don't you always send your paper mail on postcards? Why not submit to drug testing on demand? Why require a warrant for police searches of your house? Are you trying to hide something? You must be a subversive or a drug dealer if you hide your mail inside envelopes. Or maybe a paranoid nut. Do law-abiding citizens have any need to encrypt their E-mail?"
The answer is obvious, of course they do. In the next issue I'll demonstrate how to use PGP (still the best personal encryption software, and it's free) as well as demonstrate other ways one can enhance one's privacy and security on the Internet. Silicon Spooks Part 2: Personal Security on the Internet
Last month, I described how the government routinely snoops on our electronic communications and violates our right to privacy.
However, for most people, the government is the least of our troubles when it comes to protecting our privacy when we use computers and the Internet. Other common snoops are our bosses in our workplaces, commercial Internet sites, and criminals. And of those three threats to our privacy, our bosses and commercial Internet sites are the most common threats. In this short article,
I'll try to give some tips on how to protect yourself.
But first, as promised in my last article, here is a brief tutorial on how to obtain and use PGP. I'm going to concentrate on the PC version of PGP because 1) it requires more explanation, 2) it is in much wider use than the Mac version, and 3) the Mac version is easier to use and understand. What is PGP?
PGP is powerful encryption software. Meaning, it is a piece of software that enables you to encrypt your data (typically documents and e-mail messages). Where to get PGP?
There really are only two places you can get it. The first is PGP Inc., and the second is at MIT - I recommend the MIT distribution site. Which version you should get?
There are two commonly used versions of PGP available, PGP 2.6.2 and PGP 5.0. I recommend PGP 2.6.2.
PGP 5.0 is newer and easier to use, but unfortunately it uses an entirely new (though not necessarily better) system for encrypting your data that is not compatible with older versions of PGP. PGP 2.6.2 has a steeper learning curve in terms of usability but it is, hands down, the most widely used version of PGP in the U.S. and, therefore, will enable you to exchange encrypted messages with a much wider number of PGP users. How to use PGP
Once you've downloaded and installed PGP the first thing you need to do is generate what's called a PGP 'key pair". (Installing PGP 2.6.2 is relatively straightforward for people who are moderately familiar with their computer. Print out the setup.doc file in the PGP distribution and follow the instructions for your operating system.)
To generate your PGP key pair, issue the following command at a DOS prompt: pgp -kg
1) Lyme is a borreliosis (a permanent brain infection), and we're not "CRAZY"
Alan Barbour: http://www.ucihs.uci.edu/microbio/index.html?top.html&menu.html&facul... "These tick-borne infections are notable for multiphasic antigenic variation through DNA recombinations in the case of relapsing fever, the occurrence of chronic arthritis in the case of Lyme disease, and invasion of and persistence in the brain in the case of both diseases."
Borrelia and Brain (MedLine): (nearly 200 citations)
2) The blood testing standard for Lyme is bogus. Steere knows there is a different antibody profile for neuroborreliosis, and that OspA (LymeRIX) and B produced strong antibodies in people with arthritis, so it never should have been left out of the standard.
Borrelia is a "stealth pathogen," thus there is not typically a high antibody response.
Antigens of Borrelia burgdorferi recognized during Lyme disease. Appearance of a new immunoglobulin M response and expansion of the immunoglobulin G response late in the illness.
Craft JE, Fischer DK, Shimamoto GT, Steere AC.
Using immunoblots, we identified proteins of Borrelia burgdorferi bound by IgM and IgG antibodies during Lyme disease. In 12 patients with early disease alone, both the IgM and IgG responses were restricted primarily to a 41-kD antigen. This limited response disappeared within several months. In contrast, among six patients with prolonged illness, the IgM response to the 41-kD protein sometimes persisted for months to years, and late in the illness during arthritis, a new IgM response sometimes developed to a 34-kD component of the organism. The IgG response in these patients appeared in a characteristic sequential pattern over months to years to as many as 11 spirochetal antigens. The appearance of a new IgM response and the expansion of the IgG response late in the illness, and the lack of such responses in patients with early disease alone, suggest that B. burgdorferi remains alive throughout the illness. PMID: 3531237 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Changes in infectivity and plasmid profile of the Lyme disease spirochete, Borrelia burgdorferi, as a result of in vitro cultivation.
Schwan TG, Burgdorfer W, Garon CF.
Laboratory of Pathobiology, Rocky Mountain Laboratories, National Institue of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Hamilton, Montana 59840.
In vitro cultivation of Borrelia burgdorferi, the etiologic agent of Lyme spirochetosis, allows for the isolation and growth of this bacterium from infected tissues. However, continuous cultivation in modified Kelly medium causes a reduction in the number of detectable plasmids and the loss of infectivity in the white-footed mouse, Peromyscus leucopus. In an unpassaged culture of B. burgdorferi, nine plasmids were present, including seven linear plasmids ranging in size from 49 to 16 kilobases (kb) and two circular plasmids of 27 and 7.6 kb. The 7.6-kb circular and 22-kb linear plasmids were no longer detectable in spirochetes noninfective in white-footed mice, suggesting that a gene(s) encoding for factors responsible for infection may be present on one or more of these extrachromosomal elements. Furthermore, changes in spirochetal proteins and lipopolysaccharide-like material were observed also during early cultivation and may be related to loss of infectivity. PMID: 3397175 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
NIH: Don't use high passage strains: They lose OspA and B plasmid expression
(1988) European Patent Application Number 93201345.1 Assigned to Alan Barbour, Louis Magnarelli, Sven Bergstrom
"It has been shown that the earliest IgM antibodies formed against antigens of the B. burgdorferi strain B31, which was deposited in the American Type Culture Collection in 1983 with the accession number ATCC 35210, are directed against a genus-specific flagellar poly-peptide termed flagellin having a molecular weight of 41 kd (10) and which reacts with monoclonal antibody H9724 (22). IgG antibodies are also first directed to the 41 kd flagellin, but with advancing disease IgG antibodies form against other immunogens, especially against two abundant proteins with molecular weights of 31 kd and 34 kd. These two proteins, which have been denoted OspA (31 kd) and OspB (34 kd), have been found to be located at the B. burgdorferi surface and embedded in its outer fluid cell membrane (11).
-OspA is meant to be a diagnostic antigen (it is now not)
1990 CDC Publication Lyme blood testing standard: Perform serial Western blots
Molecular characterization of the humoral response to the 41-kilodalton flagellar antigen of Borrelia burgdorferi, the Lyme disease agent.
Berland R, Fikrig E, Rahn D, Hardin J, Flavell RA.
Section of Immunobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510.
The earliest humoral response in patients infected with Borrelia burgdorferi, the agent of Lyme disease, is directed against the spirochete's 41-kDa flagellar antigen. In order to map the epitopes recognized on this antigen, 11 overlapping fragments spanning the flagellin gene were cloned by polymerase chain reaction and inserted into an Escherichia coli expression vector which directed their expression as fusion proteins containing glutathione S-transferase at the N terminus and a flagellin fragment at the C terminus. Affinity-purified fusion proteins were assayed for reactivity on Western blots (immunoblots) with sera from patients with late-stage Lyme disease. The same immunodominant domain was bound by sera from 17 of 18 patients. This domain (comprising amino acids 197 to 241) does not share significant homology with other bacterial flagellins and therefore may be useful in serological testing for Lyme disease. PMID: 1894359 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
(1992) "Western blotting in the Serodiagnosis of Lyme Disease" 1992, July Dressler/Steere
Steere knowingly using a weakened strain intending to leave OspA and B out of the serologic standard, decreasing the likelihood that people will be diagnosed with Lyme disease, and with the intention of capturing all the post-LymeRIX or ImmuLyme approval testing for Lyme. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&... 1: J Infect Dis. 1993 Feb;167(2):392-400.
Western blotting in the serodiagnosis of Lyme disease.
Dressler F, Whalen JA, Reinhardt BN, Steere AC.
Division of Rheumatology/Immunology, Tufts University School of Medicine, New England Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts 02111.
There are currently no accepted criteria for positive Western blots in Lyme disease. In a retrospective analysis of 225 case and control subjects, the best discriminatory ability of test criteria was obtained by requiring at least 2 of the 8 most common IgM bands in early disease (18, 21, 28, 37, 41, 45, 58, and 93 kDa) and by requiring at least 5 of the 10 most frequent IgG bands after the first weeks of infection (18, 21, 28, 30, 39, 41, 45, 58, 66, and 93 kDa). When these definitions were tested in a prospective study of all 237 patients seen in a diagnostic Lyme disease clinic during a 1-year period and in 74 patients with erythema migrans or summer flu-like illnesses, the IgM blot in early disease had a sensitivity of 32% and a specificity of 100%; the IgG blot after the first weeks of infection had a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 95%. Among patients with indeterminate IgG responses by ELISA, 6 of 9 patients with active Lyme disease had positive blots compared with 2 of 34 patients with other illnesses (P < .001). Thus, Western blotting can be used to increase the specificity of serologic testing in Lyme disease. PMID: 8380611 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Let's see how you like it kathleen EVERY time you post, I will change the title of the thread and I will post these questions until you answer them one by one and answering them means NOT talking about mcsweegan or former governor rowland and all your typical diversionary crap anyway.
PLUS you are cross posting ONCE AGAIN TOTALLY OFF TOPIC and you're selfish to do this to one newsgroups CRIMINAL to do it to multiple newsgroups--yes here is your "crime": You are preventing people who need help from getting help for your selfish personal reasons that you are so completely egocentric along with delusional paranoid schizophrenic with psychotic features that you just can't see past your
own twisted delusional psychotic personal agenda--which ought to be about getting your kids back and solving your own enormous problems in life instead of trying to solve anyone else's. By preventing people from getting help you are responsible for the consequences. Surely people are dying as a result so you are a murderer (trying out a little
kathleen "logic" here. So you are now being reported to the DOJ FBI and
CIA and WHO and UN and DCF and the federal and state courts and homeland insanity department and all over the planet as a murderer.
How do you like them apples?
Now answer the questions. And stop the off topic cross posting. Answer the questions TRUTHFULLY for a change. Focus on the question. If there's a question yuo don't understand which is hard to believe given your self declared genius IQ, let us know and we'll rephrase it.
Don't LIE as you do and don't try your diversionary tactics. Ignore this and I will keep reposting it kathleen. Not only that but your silence will be construed as admissions to all of the facts listed as questions.
PS: This is NOT "taunting" You have put your credibility at issue. You have repeatedly said that you NEVER lie. We deserve the answers to these questions. Straight answers.
Nope we're talking about YOU. ANSWER THE QUESTIONS
And come back and tell us when Steere or McSweegan or anyone else is actually charged with your "Lyme Crymes" instead of telling us what you, in all your infinite wisdom, think will happen.
Now let's talk not about who WILL be convicted but WHO already has been--YOU.
Here's the question list. One by one give us some answers. Your post is
just like the Bush White House trying to DIVERT attention from what Karl Rove did to Joe Wilson--by attacking him AGAIN.
Nope answer the questions kathleen. Stop trying to change the subject. I know you're delusional but try to focus. Here is a list of questions for YOU. We've already heard your ramblings about 100,000 times. Now dish some TRUTH for a change--I'm going to leave space between the questions for your answers:
Was your case appealed and was your conviction overturned?
And what isn't true? Everything can be backed up with your own posts kathleen. Not a big secret how people know since you posted it all here.
Were you charged with and convicted of threatening and harassing Jessica Gauvin?
Did you flee to Canada?
Did you tell everyone that your case was a custody case against DCF when the truth was that it was a criminal case against you and your kids had been taken away many months earlier and you didn't even appeal
that?
Did you threaten to bomb the stonington schools, joke or not?
Did you show up at your kid's safe house with a bag full of drugs whether you meant to give them to your lawyer or not?
Come on specifically what isn't true?
You were charged tried and convicted in a court of law. Right or wrong,
admit or deny?
Now you say you've proven you're innocent.
In what court were your convictions overturned?
In fact, tell us what the charges were. Give some detail. What exactly were you convicted of doing or threatening to do to Jessica Gauvin?
Tell us what your diagnosis was in the mental institution?
You admit or deny that your kids were taken away by child services in CT?
Admit or deny you were charged with crimes?
Admit or deny you feld to canada?
Admit or deny you were convicted?
Admit or deny you were institutionalized in a mental ward locked wing?
Admit or deny that your convictions were never reversed, in fact you never filed an appeal did you?
So who's lying about what?
Yeah sure, you say everyone lied about the charges. But that's not what
the court thought was it?
Did you register a website claiming on it you were working for Pfizer at the time when you had "retired" years before?
Was Lymeraft which solicited funds for YOU, ever a proper legally registered charity?
kathleen you're the liar here.
Do you really expect everyone to believe that the rest of the world is crazy, not you?
And that the rest if the world has conspired to frame you? Because of your lyme activism which you have even admitted amounts to more posting
on the internet than any real accomplishments?
Come on kathleen. What isn't true specifically issue by issue above. Tell us specifically which items you say aren't true. We can go back and find the posts where you admitted stuff and show what a liar YOU are!
kathleen wrote: > 1) Lyme is a borreliosis (a permanent brain infection), and we're not > "CRAZY"
> Alan Barbour: > http://www.ucihs.uci.edu/microbio/index.html?top.html&menu.html&facul... > "These tick-borne infections are notable for multiphasic antigenic > variation through DNA recombinations in the case of relapsing fever, > the occurrence of chronic arthritis in the case of Lyme disease, and > invasion of and persistence in the brain in the case of both > diseases."
> Borrelia and Brain (MedLine): (nearly 200 citations)
> 2) The blood testing standard for Lyme is bogus. Steere knows there > is a different antibody profile for neuroborreliosis, and that OspA > (LymeRIX) and B produced strong antibodies in people with arthritis, so > it never should have been left out of the standard.
> Borrelia is a "stealth pathogen," thus there is not typically a > high antibody response.
> "Multiclonal populations therefore can exist in an infected patient > so that immunological defenses are severely tested if not totally > overwhelmed."
> Antigens of Borrelia burgdorferi recognized during Lyme disease. > Appearance of a > new immunoglobulin M response and expansion of the immunoglobulin G > response > late in the illness.
> Craft JE, Fischer DK, Shimamoto GT, Steere AC.
> Using immunoblots, we identified proteins of Borrelia burgdorferi bound > by IgM > and IgG antibodies during Lyme disease. In 12 patients with early > disease alone, > both the IgM and IgG responses were restricted primarily to a 41-kD > antigen. > This limited response disappeared within several months. In contrast, > among six > patients with prolonged illness, the IgM response to the 41-kD protein > sometimes > persisted for months to years, and late in the illness during > arthritis, a new > IgM response sometimes developed to a 34-kD component of the organism. > The IgG > response in these patients appeared in a characteristic sequential > pattern over > months to years to as many as 11 spirochetal antigens. The appearance > of a new > IgM response and the expansion of the IgG response late in the illness, > and the > lack of such responses in patients with early disease alone, suggest > that B. > burgdorferi remains alive throughout the illness. > PMID: 3531237 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
> Changes in infectivity and plasmid profile of the Lyme disease > spirochete, > Borrelia burgdorferi, as a result of in vitro cultivation.
> Schwan TG, Burgdorfer W, Garon CF.
> Laboratory of Pathobiology, Rocky Mountain Laboratories, National > Institue of > Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Hamilton, Montana 59840.
> In vitro cultivation of Borrelia burgdorferi, the etiologic agent of > Lyme > spirochetosis, allows for the isolation and growth of this bacterium > from > infected tissues. However, continuous cultivation in modified Kelly > medium > causes a reduction in the number of detectable plasmids and the loss of > infectivity in the white-footed mouse, Peromyscus leucopus. In an > unpassaged > culture of B. burgdorferi, nine plasmids were present, including seven > linear > plasmids ranging in size from 49 to 16 kilobases (kb) and two circular > plasmids > of 27 and 7.6 kb. The 7.6-kb circular and 22-kb linear plasmids were no > longer > detectable in spirochetes noninfective in white-footed mice, suggesting > that a > gene(s) encoding for factors responsible for infection may be present > on one or > more of these extrachromosomal elements. Furthermore, changes in > spirochetal > proteins and lipopolysaccharide-like material were observed
Let's see how you like it kathleen EVERY time you post, I will change the title of the thread and I will post these questions until you answer them one by one and answering them means NOT talking about mcsweegan or former governor rowland and all your typical diversionary crap anyway.
PLUS you are cross posting ONCE AGAIN TOTALLY OFF TOPIC and you're selfish to do this to one newsgroups CRIMINAL to do it to multiple newsgroups--yes here is your "crime": You are preventing people who need help from getting help for your selfish personal reasons that you are so completely egocentric along with delusional paranoid schizophrenic with psychotic features that you just can't see past your
own twisted delusional psychotic personal agenda--which ought to be about getting your kids back and solving your own enormous problems in life instead of trying to solve anyone else's. By preventing people from getting help you are responsible for the consequences. Surely people are dying as a result so you are a murderer (trying out a little
kathleen "logic" here. So you are now being reported to the DOJ FBI and
CIA and WHO and UN and DCF and the federal and state courts and homeland insanity department and all over the planet as a murderer.
How do you like them apples?
Now answer the questions. And stop the off topic cross posting. Answer the questions TRUTHFULLY for a change. Focus on the question. If there's a question yuo don't understand which is hard to believe given your self declared genius IQ, let us know and we'll rephrase it.
Don't LIE as you do and don't try your diversionary tactics. Ignore this and I will keep reposting it kathleen. Not only that but your silence will be construed as admissions to all of the facts listed as questions.
PS: This is NOT "taunting" You have put your credibility at issue. You have repeatedly said that you NEVER lie. We deserve the answers to these questions. Straight answers.
Nope we're talking about YOU. ANSWER THE QUESTIONS
And come back and tell us when Steere or McSweegan or anyone else is actually charged with your "Lyme Crymes" instead of telling us what you, in all your infinite wisdom, think will happen.
Now let's talk not about who WILL be convicted but WHO already has been--YOU.
Here's the question list. One by one give us some answers. Your post is
just like the Bush White House trying to DIVERT attention from what Karl Rove did to Joe Wilson--by attacking him AGAIN.
Nope answer the questions kathleen. Stop trying to change the subject. I know you're delusional but try to focus. Here is a list of questions for YOU. We've already heard your ramblings about 100,000 times. Now dish some TRUTH for a change--I'm going to leave space between the questions for your answers:
Was your case appealed and was your conviction overturned?
And what isn't true? Everything can be backed up with your own posts kathleen. Not a big secret how people know since you posted it all here.
Were you charged with and convicted of threatening and harassing Jessica Gauvin?
Did you flee to Canada?
Did you tell everyone that your case was a custody case against DCF when the truth was that it was a criminal case against you and your kids had been taken away many months earlier and you didn't even appeal
that?
Did you threaten to bomb the stonington schools, joke or not?
Did you show up at your kid's safe house with a bag full of drugs whether you meant to give them to your lawyer or not?
Come on specifically what isn't true?
You were charged tried and convicted in a court of law. Right or wrong,
admit or deny?
Now you say you've proven you're innocent.
In what court were your convictions overturned?
In fact, tell us what the charges were. Give some detail. What exactly were you convicted of doing or threatening to do to Jessica Gauvin?
Tell us what your diagnosis was in the mental institution?
You admit or deny that your kids were taken away by child services in CT?
Admit or deny you were charged with crimes?
Admit or deny you feld to canada?
Admit or deny you were convicted?
Admit or deny you were institutionalized in a mental ward locked wing?
Admit or deny that your convictions were never reversed, in fact you never filed an appeal did you?
So who's lying about what?
Yeah sure, you say everyone lied about the charges. But that's not what
the court thought was it?
Did you register a website claiming on it you were working for Pfizer at the time when you had "retired" years before?
Was Lymeraft which solicited funds for YOU, ever a proper legally registered charity?
kathleen you're the liar here.
Do you really expect everyone to believe that the rest of the world is crazy, not you?
And that the rest if the world has conspired to frame you? Because of your lyme activism which you have even admitted amounts to more posting
on the internet than any real accomplishments?
Come on kathleen. What isn't true specifically issue by issue above. Tell us specifically which items you say aren't true. We can go back and find the posts where you admitted stuff and show what a liar YOU are!
|
