WaPo Editor on Healthcare Paralysis (National Inst of Immune Deficiencies?)
Mort Zuckerman
Durlan...@yale.edu, Aa...@columbia.edu, gary_w...@nymc.edu,
scientifi...@ostp.gov, pkru...@princeton.edu,
Stanle...@fiu.edu, emcsw...@niaid.nih.gov, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
Spin...@yahoogroups.com, kshe...@calea.org, fit...@gmail.com,
patrick.f...@usdoj.gov, model...@sbcglobal.net,
jdr...@nejm.org, let...@courant.com, Jgerb...@cdc.gov,
michae...@po.state.ct.us, con...@po.state.ct.us, executive-
edi...@nytimes.com, managin...@nytimes.com, news-
ti...@nytimes.com, biz...@nytimes.com, for...@nytimes.com,
nati...@nytimes.com, dv...@cdc.gov, brigidc...@optonline.net,
tr...@hotmail.com, illino...@aol.com, jle...@courant.com,
tinaj...@yahoo.com, jhorn...@fff.org, thomas...@usdoj.gov,
thoma...@po.state.ct.us, kur...@washpost.com,
georg...@washpost.com, p...@allegorypress.com,
commissi...@po.state.ct.us, brans...@comcast.net,
vts...@comcast.net, o...@po.state.ct.us, freet...@charter.net,
scott....@po.state.ct.us, govern...@po.state.ct.us,
attorney...@po.state.ct.us, randall...@usdoj.gov,
Robert....@yale.edu, edi...@greenwich-post.com,
harol...@yale.edu, sedm...@nswbc.org, rrmcg...@aol.com,
fr...@nytimes.com, dpr...@stmartin.edu
Cc: fra...@ucia.gov, dr-ahma...@president.ir,
eugener...@washpost.com, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
bmi...@newstimes.com, tr...@hotmail.com, rast...@aol.com,
billc...@gmail.com, amcg...@rms-law.com, rjmu...@aol.com,
paulcrai...@yahoo.com, sidney_b...@yahoo.com,
criminal...@usdoj.gov, karla.d...@usdoj.gov,
christophe...@usdoj.gov, richar...@yale.edu,
harol...@yale.edu, james.p...@yale.edu, inq...@aldf.com,
ly...@idsociety.org, meganm...@theatlantic.com
Subject: WaPo Editor on Healthcare Paralysis (National Inst of Immune
Deficiencies?)
Date: Nov 21, 2009 6:25 AM
ARTICLE BELOW
==========================
Dear Mr. WaPo Editor, Sir,
Um, Do you see a National Institute of
Genetic and Acquired Immune Deficiencies
listed here?
http://www1.od.nih.gov/oma/manualchapters/management/1123/
Please excuse my commoner-ness and
lack of being wealthy. And please
excuse my Unabomber-Chemist-ness
http://www.actionlyme.org/PHILLIPS_JE_PERVERT.htm
I realize I have no dog in this
fight, not being a lying pervert
or fat-bleep politician, or not
even a lawyer's secretary!
But one day I was wondering how in
the heck Anthony Fauci could be lying
his face off on the Lou Dobbs show
http://www.actionlyme.org/The_Fauci_Files.htm
about a "scientifical" vaccine that was the
100% reverse of the a scientifically validated
vaccine for an infection that causes all the
others diseases, the New Great Imitator:
http://www.actionlyme.org/CHP_9_IDSA_REVIEWS.htm
MS, Stroke, ALS, Cancer, Chronic Fatigue,
Lupus, Arthritis, Sarcoidosis, Transverse
Myelitis, Dementia, ...
Here, below, you wonder about how
America is "STUCK" due to all the greedy
players in Healthcare, and it sounds to
me like you're making an argument that
Medicine should be socialized- or, um,
made FEDERAL, like the FBI/USDOJ (Federal
only in reach, but not as re JUSTICE, since
we know there ain't any JUSTICE around
here; there is only "USDOJ" Kevin O'Connor
http://www.actionlyme.org/USDOJ_COMPLAINT_RICO.htm
joining Rudy Guiliani's International Oil-Bankster
White Collar Petrodollar-911-Protecting Firm
http://www.actionlyme.org/LYME_CORRUPTICUT.htm
protecting the Yalie, Bushies, and their
911 Israeli Partners in Pipeline Crime.
Okay, so here is *THE* question: Why does
Anthony Fauci own a patent for the
http://www.actionlyme.org/KMLEMPNER.htm
immune suppression outcomes of infection -
like Cancer and Multiple Sclerosis - yet
there is no Institute of Immune Suppression/
Dysregulation Disorders? Especially in a
time where the co-argument for the co-hysteria
that global warming is ruining human health,
and that insurance companies have decided
that they're not paying for global-warming
or-bioweapons-linked medical outcomes?
http://www.actionlyme.org/ANTHRAX_SWEEG_KNOWS.htm
Um, global warming would be the case
where we get African Diseases being transferred
from New Englander vectors, like this:
http://www.actionlyme.org/PIIB.htm
Durland Fish, Plum ^^ Island and his
African Swine Fever experiments:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC109458/?tool=pubmed
)
The USDOJ thinks healthcare fraud is
a 50 year old lady claiming she has
a bad back but was caught raking
leaves. The USDOJ thinks healthcare
fraud is where some drug-addicted MD
turns his friends on to the Rx-pain-
and-brain-candy.
The USDOJ never would go after the likes of
Yale for committing this "Lyme Disease"
fraud and all the disability (and COST
to Medicare and Social Security) that
resulted from it. Just like the USDOJ
has never gone after whoever caused the
WTC7 to fall at the acceleration due
to gravity:
http://www.actionlyme.org/070426.htm
It seems to me that you write about, here,
everything but the criminal aspect of
America being "STUCK," while 70% or more
of the rest of the world (including Americans)
think 911 wasn't exactly, um, real.
You make grandiose claims about America
being able to meet every problem, when
America met the problems produced by the
Fed and the funny petrodollar by producing
the 911 show, and the "Terrorists," in order
to take over the Iraq and Afghanistan
property, oil, and Caspian pipelines
(see once again, Rudy Guiliani's lawfirm
since that's what they specialize in:
http://www.bracewellgiuliani.com/index.cfm/fa/lawyers_practice.group/attorneys_practice/19e289da-f26b-4adb-8318-3a08a78b8f68/Energy.cfm
"Bracewell & Giuliani represents domestic and international energy
industry clients in matters related to operations, finance,
restructuring, governmental regulation, tax, environment, governance,
litigation and strategic communications. We counsel developers,
operators and suppliers in the deregulated United States electric
energy industry, many of which have a growing focus on renewable
energy. We also represent clients engaged in upstream, midstream and
downstream oil and gas business transactions across the U.S., Europe,
the North and Caspian Sea Regions, and Latin America."
Okay. So. I was wonderin why, if'n youz
CFR-ite peoples could essplain to a commoner
ignoramus sech as myself, why there is no
http://www1.od.nih.gov/oma/manualchapters/management/1123/
National Institute on Global Warming-
and Guiliani Caspian-911/Oil-Induced Immune
Suppression Disorders?
Thanks,
Kathleen M. Dickson
http://www.actionlyme.org
http://www.relapsingfever.org
========================================
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/20/AR2009112002416_pf.html
Health reform's vital signs
By Fred Hiatt
Sunday, November 22, 2009
Is American democracy in paralysis? That question emerged at a
conference of big thinkers and experts in various fields organized
last week by Foreign Policy magazine, our sister publication.
To an extent, the question reflects an America-in-decline-ism that
becomes fashionable from time to time, especially when the U.S.
economy is dragging. The United States always has turned out to be
more resilient than the pessimists expect, while the supposed
advantages of less democratic rivals (the Soviet Union in the 1960s,
Japan in the 1980s) have been trumped by the rigidities of one-party
rule. This decade's juggernaut -- communist China -- also faces
challenges that may become more evident with time.
Yet as health-care reform sputters and lurches toward an uncertain
finish line, the question is understandable. Foreigners see a
Democratic Party that supposedly is alarmed by climate change, that
decisively captured the White House and both houses of Congress a year
ago -- and yet that will send an administration to a crucial
conference in Copenhagen next month with little but hopes and
promises. Now there is talk that cap-and-trade legislation will wait
until not just next year but the next Congress.
Meanwhile, more than a year after his electoral triumph, President
Obama has filled only 55 percent of Senate-confirmed slots in his
government. He has nominated few judges, won confirmation for fewer.
The principal item on the agenda of the unions that went all in for
him, labor law reform, is on hold. Almost everyone agrees that
America's immigration laws are broken, yet no fix is in sight. Long
after the collapse of our financial system, new systems of regulation
have yet to emerge. There is no discernible trade policy.
Fretting over a possible quagmire in Afghanistan, the administration
appears stuck in its own bog of decision-making. Meanwhile, American
power seems powerless to bend events in Iran, North Korea, the Middle
East, Sudan, Congo or even tiny Honduras to our south.
Underlying all is the nation's growing debt -- to other countries and
to future generations. The retirement system (Social Security) and
health insurance for the elderly (Medicare) are headed for bankruptcy,
with state and local pension funds and the federal pension insurance
fund not far behind. Pretty much everyone understands that the
government must spend less and tax more, but the system seems
incapable of taking a first step in either direction.
And didn't candidate Obama promise to fix the college football Bowl
Championship Series?
Many people indeed blame Obama not only for this year's lackluster
football season but for all these other problems as well. Some say he
went for too much, too fast, over-interpreting both his electoral
mandate and the opportunity presented by the economic crisis. Others
say he went for too little, allowing Congress to tangle itself up when
he should have been twisting arms and dictating legislation.
Also cited at times are the divisions among Americans, which make
paralysis in Washington natural and maybe even healthy. Obama, after
all, was backed by only 53 percent of those who voted, who in turn
represented only 64 percent of adults eligible to vote. When half the
country passionately fears government intrusion and the other half is
passionately ashamed that Americans may be dying for lack of health
care, reform is not going to be easy.
Or maybe the country isn't all that divided -- most of us would
welcome common-sense improvements in health-care delivery and
insurance -- but the system feeds on and exacerbates our differences.
The advent of the 60-vote rule in the Senate has magnified the already
formidable checks and balances built into the Constitution, with the
disproportionate blocking power it awards small and rural states.
Cable television and the Internet have empowered those with the
greatest intensity of feeling. The self-serving redistricting habits
of the political elite, designed to protect incumbents, have left most
legislators vulnerable only to primary challenges from the extremes of
their respective parties.
Whichever explanation appeals to you -- and no doubt they all contain
some truth -- the perception of paralysis increases the urgency of
passing health-care reform. Failure would damage the Obama presidency,
and it would also deepen the fear, here and abroad, that America is
stuck.
Paradoxically, though, it also increases the urgency of doing health-
care reform right. If Congress and the administration manage only to
extend expensive new benefits, without improving the health-care
system or controlling rising costs, it will be an achievement -- but
not one that will long reassure anyone concerned about the U.S.
ability to get things done.
"[Real] scientists are *fiercely* independent. That's the good
news."-- NIH's Top Fool, Anthony Fauci