"Terrorists" and the overal warcrimes agenda
Mort Zuckerman
scientifi...@ostp.gov, pkru...@princeton.edu,
Stanle...@fiu.edu, emcsw...@niaid.nih.gov, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
Spin...@yahoogroups.com, kshe...@calea.org, fit...@gmail.com,
patrick.f...@usdoj.gov, model...@sbcglobal.net,
jdr...@nejm.org, let...@courant.com, Jgerb...@cdc.gov,
michae...@po.state.ct.us, con...@po.state.ct.us, executive-
edi...@nytimes.com, managin...@nytimes.com, news-
ti...@nytimes.com, biz...@nytimes.com, for...@nytimes.com,
nati...@nytimes.com, dv...@cdc.gov, brigidc...@optonline.net,
tr...@hotmail.com, illino...@aol.com, jle...@courant.com,
tinaj...@yahoo.com, jhorn...@fff.org, thomas...@usdoj.gov,
thoma...@po.state.ct.us, kur...@washpost.com,
georg...@washpost.com, p...@allegorypress.com,
commissi...@po.state.ct.us, brans...@comcast.net,
vts...@comcast.net, o...@po.state.ct.us, freet...@charter.net,
scott....@po.state.ct.us, govern...@po.state.ct.us,
attorney...@po.state.ct.us, randall...@usdoj.gov,
Robert....@yale.edu, edi...@greenwich-post.com,
harol...@yale.edu, sedm...@nswbc.org, rrmcg...@aol.com
Cc: fra...@ucia.gov, dr-ahma...@president.ir,
eugener...@washpost.com, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
bmi...@newstimes.com, tr...@hotmail.com, rast...@aol.com,
billc...@gmail.com, amcg...@rms-law.com, rjmu...@aol.com,
paulcrai...@yahoo.com, sidney_b...@yahoo.com,
criminal...@usdoj.gov, karla.d...@usdoj.gov,
christophe...@usdoj.gov, richar...@yale.edu,
harol...@yale.edu, james.p...@yale.edu, inq...@aldf.com,
ly...@idsociety.org, meganm...@theatlantic.com,
bob.d...@latimes.com
Subject: "Terrorists" and the overal warcrimes agenda
Date: Jun 10, 2009 3:13 PM
CHURCHIE ARTICLE BELOW
=================================
The BIG(s') PICTURE is about population
control- short for "mass-murder for property."
The PATRIOT Act, the cover-up of who pulled
the 9/11 stunt, the War on Terror, Gitmo,
Torture, bogeymen, was entirely about PROPERTY.
It is/was about a NWO Agenda where the *EARTH*
is the priority, and not the people in it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth_Charter
^^^ Notice the arrangement of priorities.
http://www.actionlyme.org/DURHAM_BUSH_CRIME.htm
http://www.actionlyme.org/AARON_RUSSO.htm
Now, the reason we in Corrupticut know it so well
is because of John Rowland's plans and participation
in the Agenda where all the poor people, all the
black people and all the other useless people
(like sick people) are either going to leave the
State, go to jail, or die. (You would probably
have to live in Corrupticut to understand why
Corrupticut is the choice spot for the globalists
to make their home base.)
And the NWO is not a-religious or atheist. It's
population reduction Agenda is simultaneously
pursued with this as the religion:
http://www.actionlyme.org/KABBALAH_YING.htm
"*YOU* ARE A GOD!!!" (It's a new derivative of
the older perverted derivative of the Modernist
perversion we commoner refer to as psychiatry:
http://www.actionlyme.org/DIABOLICAL_PERVERSION_PSYCHOANALYSIS.htm
"IT'S ALL ABOUT MEEEeee" (And if for you, it's
NOT all about YOU, you're mentally ill, because
"altruism is a mental illness.")
So, the NWO will protect the EARTH... by getting rid of
all the "extra mouths to feed" (a Henry Kissingerism),
but the survivors must drink the New Age Religion
Kool-Aid of Me-ism in combination with Buddhist-like
"meditation" with subserviance. <<< One must become
a mellowed out fruitcake, like the 70s' flower
children, and MEDITATE ABOUT ONESELF, rather than
pray to God.
Here is what happens in such meditation:
http://www.actionlyme.org/KABBALAH_YING.htm
See the video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mphZWXxyNfs&feature=related
^^^ This power of Qi comes from the demonic.
You know for sure when you watch it through to
the end.
Now, whoever OBJECTS to the perverted formulary of
EARTH and ME as the Gods, will be called a terrorist,
but the overall goal is population reduction with
population refinement (no Darkies and no physiologically
Inferiors who are worthless).
- - -
Put yourself in the position of one of the Princes
of Earth, like, say, a Rockefeller. What do you see?
The commoners are not doing what you think they should
be doing. They're stupid and they're bums. And
you can't CONTROL THEM!!!
So, you decide to set up an educational system:
http://www.actionlyme.org/BRITISH_PSYCHIATRY.htm
You steal it from the Jesuits. And/Or, you corrupt
the Jesuits.
[Which they did. So, now no one listens to the Catholic
Church because of the perversion of psychiatry and
the perverted Jesuits. ("*DO* YOURSELF, because
it is nattuurrallll...")]
Now, you, the Princes, have greater access to the
Population Reduction Agenda, because no one listens
to the Catholic Church any more.
"Terrorism" and this whole NWO Agenda is all about
reducing the numbers of nuisance people in the way
of the various property Agendas, but it's disguised
now as a humanitarian agenda where people, humans,
rank second to the PROPERTY.
Another reason we Lyme victims are familiar with
this Agenda is because of the Weld brothers, the
ALDF.com (run by David Weld), and R-New Britain's
http://www.actionlyme.org/ALDF_BOARD.htm
Congressman Nancy Johnson being sent on a $17,000
dollar junket to the "NATURE CONSERVANCY's (run by
the Welds) Easter Islands, presumably to convince her
to let BigPharma write the New Medicare Plan, where
the old people have to pay 600 dollars more a year
out of pocket for their meds.
Because that was an example of the paradise on
Earth the elite envision for themselves.
All of this natural beauty is not to be wasted
on the Darkies and the Inferiors.
Kathleen M. Dickson
http://www.actionlyme.org
PS: I really do know what I'm talking about
since I grew up around these kind of people
and heard quite a bit about Darkies and how
"poor people are lazy and deserve what they get."
(They're German Baptists.)
=========================================
http://www.counterpunch.org/alberts06102009.html
Haunted By The "Suspected Terrorists"
First the Torture of Truth ...
By Rev. WILLIAM E. ALBERTS
The Pew Research Center Forum on Religion & Public Life’s recent
survey of the correlation between religious belief and support for the
torture of “suspected terrorists” is itself an example of the
pervasiveness of the torture of truth in America. Representatives of
four major religious groups were asked, “Do you think the use of
torture against suspected terrorists in order to gain important
information can often be justified, sometimes be justified, rarely be
justified, or never be justified?” (“The Religious Dimensions of the
Torture Debate,” PewForum, Apr. 29, 2009). The deeper issue is not
the finding that people who attend church regularly (54 per cent) are
more supportive of torturing “suspected terrorists” than people who
never or rarely attend services (42 per cent). Nor is the finding
that “more than six in 10” white evangelical Protestants support
torture, whereas “only four in 10” persons unaffiliated with a
religious group support it. (“Survey: Support for terror suspect
torture differs among the faithful,” CNN.com/US, Apr. 30, 2009) The
deeper issue is the extent to which human beings have been demonized
as “terrorists” by our political leaders and mainstream media for
opposing America’s exploitive and violent foreign policy. The fact
that people who resist US imperialism can be so stereotyped as to show
up as “suspected terrorists” in a reputable research center’s survey
on religion and torture is an alarming revelation of the cancer
dehumanizing the soul of America. “Suspected terrorists” have
replaced “the Communist scare” as the needed bogeyman to justify
America’s global domination.
“Suspected terrorists?” Or, as reported, people like the Afghanistan
“villagers, crazed with grief [italics added] . . . collecting mangled
bodies in blankets and shawls and piling them on three tractors . . .
113 bodies being buried, including those of many women and children”
after “American airstrikes . . . had killed dozens and perhaps more
than 100 civilians in western Afghanistan,” and “threaten to stiffen
Afghan opposition to the war just as the Obama administration is
sending 20,000 more troops to the country?” (The New York Times, May
7, 2009)
“Suspected terrorists?” Or human beings like the Afghan villagers
who, the governor of Farah Province was quoted as saying, “brought two
tractor trailers full of pieces of human bodies to his office to prove
the casualties that had occurred,” with “everyone at the governor’s
office . . . crying watching that shocking scene?” (Ibid)
“Suspected terrorists?” Or, as reported, fathers and brothers like
“villagers reached by telephone [who] said many [civilians] were
killed by aerial bombing?” (Ibid) “Terrorists?” Or people like the
“villagers and Afghan lawmakers [who] disputed the initial American
claims that Taliban grenades had caused the casualties?” Villagers
like Muhammad Jan, who said, “Later, planes came and bombs fell, but
by then no Taliban fighters were in the village?” He continued, “The
bomb damage was so extensive that it could not have been caused by
grenades. . . . Taliban have no strong weapon to bring these kind of
casualties,” and added, “The Taliban did not throw grenades in to
civilian homes.” (“The New York Times, May 8, 2009) This account was
supported by a later, front-page, New York Times story captioned,
“Afghans Recall Airstrike Horror, and Fault U.S.: Death Toll High—
Taliban Had Left, Villagers Say.” May 15, 2009)
A few days later the New York Times published a story, headlined ”U.S.
Counts Civilian Toll At Far Below Afghan Tally,” which reported, “The
American military on Wednesday rejected a claim by the Afghan
government that a recent aerial bombing had killed 140 civilians, but
acknowledged that 20 to 30 civilians may have been killed.” (May 21,
2009) Two weeks later a front-page New York Times story, entitled
“U.S. REPORT FINDS ERRORS IN AFGHAN DEATHS,” told a different story:
“A military investigation has concluded that American personnel made
significant errors in carrying out some of the airstrikes in western
Afghanistan on May 4 that killed dozens of Afghan civilians, according
to a senior American military official. . . . The report represents
the clearest American acknowledgment of fault in connection with the
attacks.” (June 3, 2009). Perceived American lies, about the killing
of loved ones and other Afghan civilians, is believed to motivate and
outrage civilians, “crazed with grief,” to join the mostly indigenous
Afghan Taliban
“Suspected terrorists?” Or people like the “protestors,” for whom
“Secretary [of Defense Robert M.] Gates’ remarks did little to relieve
the anger?” Gates “accused the Taliban of using civilians as shields
and of causing civilian casualties by hiding among noncombatants
during attacks in a tactic to divide the population from the
government and its American supporters.” (The New York Times, May 8,
2009)
“Suspected terrorists?” Or outraged citizens like those among the
Afghan population? As reported, “The [United States Special
Operations] forces have often been blamed for nighttime raids on
villages, detentions and airstrikes that have brought the population
in southern Afghanistan to the point of revolt.” (The New York Times,
May 7, 2009).
“Suspected terrorists?” Or fathers and mothers like those reported by
the Associated Press? “Civilians cowered in hospital beds and trapped
residents struggled to feed their children yesterday as Pakistani war
planes . . . encouraged by Washington [italics added] . . . pounded a
Taliban-held valley . . . The offensive,” the story continued, “has
prompted the flight of hundreds of thousands of terrified
residents . . . “ (The Boston Globe, Mat 10, 2009) The number of
displaced residents is now reported to be some three million. (The
New York Times, June 5, 2009)
“Suspected terrorists?” Or people like poverty-and grief-stricken
villagers who, as reported, “trekked to the provincial capital to
receive condolence payments from the Afghan government?” How much is
an Afghan person’s life worth in American dollars these days?
“Relatives received a payment of about $2,000 for family members
killed and $1,000 for those injured.” (The Boston Globe, May 13,
2009) The American-financed puppet Afghan government. The
capitalistic underwriting of American tyranny, with its immoral
mentality that money can fix anything, including the murder of
innocent human beings. To devalue life and attempt to buy off grief
is to create anti-American outrage.
“Suspected terrorists?” Or human beings like those “crazed with
grief,” whose terrible pain is made even more unbearable by the
reported predictable apology of Secretary of State Hillary Rodham
Clinton? “Washington,” she said “‘deeply, deeply’ regrets the loss
of life, apparently [italics added] as a result of a bombing there on
Monday. ‘Any loss of innocent life is particularly
painful.’” (“Clinton Apologizes for Afghan Civilian Deaths,”
Associated Press, Military.com, May 6, 2009) Words that comfort the
aggrieved or cover the aggressor?.
“Apparently as a result of the bombing there on Monday.” A few days
later Reuters reported, “The US military acknowledged yesterday that
air strikes in western Afghanistan this week had killed civilians, and
President Hamid Karzai of Afghanistan put the death toll at up to
130.” The report continued: “If that toll was confirmed, it would be
the deadliest incident affecting Afghan civilians since US-led forces
started battling the Taliban in 2001.” (The Boston Globe, May 10,
2009)
“Suspected terrorists?” US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi made a
“surprise visit to Iraq” on Mother’s Day. The “important thing”
Pelosi wanted to tell the Iraqi people? Evidently not that they were
the tragic victims of a criminal war based on lies. Nor apparently
not the resulting deaths of over one million Iraqi civilians. Nor the
deadly civil war between the Shiites and Sunnis triggered by the
unnecessary war. Nor the uprooting of over four million Iraqi
citizens. Nor the devastation of the country’s infrastructure.
Protected from “suspected terrorists” in Baghdad’s American-fortified
Green Zone, US House Speaker Pelosi was quoted as saying, “ ‘The
important thing is that the people of Iraq know that their democracy
is very important to the United States and to the world. . . . All of
this struggle will be worth it in the end,’ she promised.” (“Pelosi
makes surprise visit to Baghdad,” by Jack Dolan, McClatchy Newspapers,
Kansas City Star, May 10, 2009)
“Worth it?” To Whom? The Iraqi dead? Their widows? The orphans?
The dying? Their loved ones? The injured? Their loved ones? The
thousands of US troops dying for a needless war based on lies, and the
tens of thousands more wounded in body and mind? Their loved ones?
Or the US military industrial complex? The big oil companies? Those
now in power in Washington and in Baghdad? The US control of the
Middle East?
President Obama engaged in the same torture of the truth during his
recent “unannounced trip” to Iraq to visit US troops. A New York
Times story reported that his arrival coincided with “a car bomb
[that] exploded in Kadhimiya, a predominantly Shiite neighborhood in
Baghdad,” killing eight people and wounding two dozen more. The story
continued, “That attack was carried out a day after a series of six
car bombings killed at least 33 people and wounded scores in an around
Baghdad, one of the bloodiest days in Iraq this year.” Obama was then
reported to have referred to the attack as “this senseless
violence.” (Apr. 8, 2009) “This senseless violence?” President
Obama’s very “unannounced” presence in Iraq personifies the horrible
“senseless violence” America unleashed against the whole country of
Iraq.
In Cairo, President Obama remained in denial of the “senseless
violence” perpetrated by the U.S. government in our name. Like former
President Bush, Obama, predictably, made it “clear that America is not—
and never will be—at war with Islam. “We will, however, confront
violent extremists who pose a grave threat to our security,” [Bush
called them “terrorists.” “Change” you can believe in.] Then came
Obama’s denial wrapped in religion [the repeated ploy of the former
prayerful president]: “Because we reject the same thing that people of
all faiths reject: the killing of innocent men, women, and children.
And it is my first duty as President to protect the American
people.” (“President Obama Addresses Muslim World in Cairo,” CQ
Transcriptwire, The Washington Post, June 4, 2009)
For President Obama, it is apparently about saying it right to cover
not doing right. His moral blindspot: The killing-- and maiming-- of
all those “innocent men, women, and children” in Iraq by our
government in our name. And now, under his administration, the
bombing and “killing of innocent men, women, and children” in
Afghanistan and Pakistan. And the turning of over three million
“innocent” Pakistani “men, women, and children” into refugees.
“Suspected terrorists?” What about President Obama? US House Speaker
Pelosi? Secretary of State Clinton? Defense Secretary Gates?
Washington? The United States Special Operation Forces? Former
President George W. Bush? Former Vice President Dick Cheney? The
mostly accommodating mainstream media? The 54 percent of regular
Sunday churchgoers who support the torture of “suspected terrorists?”
The “more than six in 10” white evangelical Protestants who also
believe in torture rather than the Golden Rule?
Many professing Christians are oblivious to Jesus’ teaching, “Love
your enemies. . . . that you may be sons of your Father in heaven. He
causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the
just and the unjust.” (Matthew 5: 44,45) For these Christians,
religion is about having the right belief, not doing right by loving
their neighbor as themselves, as Jesus also taught. In fact, belief
in torture goes to the theological heart of “right”-believing
Christians, who profess: all who do not believe that Jesus died on
the cross for their sins, and thus is their saviour, will suffer
horrible torment in hell—forever.
“Taliban.” “Insurgents.” “Militants.” “al-Qaeda.” Violent Islamic
forces.” “Islamic militants.” “Extremists.” “Miscreants.” “Antistate
elements.” “Suspected terrorists.” Or, as Professor C. G. Estebrook
has written, “It should be clear by now that-- whether we call them al-
Qaeda, Taliban, insurgents, terrorists, or militants—the people whom
we are trying to kill in the Middle East are those who want us out of
their countries and off their resources.” (“Minion of the Long War,”
Counterpunch, May 1-3, 2009).
Our children and grandchildren will remain threatened by “suspected
terrorists” until we Americans allow ourselves to see all people as
human beings, who laugh and cry and love and hate and grieve and hope
as we do. To see each other’s tears and to hear each other’s
laughter is to experience each other’s humanness. Therein lies
everyone’s security and fulfillment.
Rev. William E. Alberts, Ph.D. is a hospital chaplain, and a diplomate
in the College of Pastoral Supervision and Psychotherapy. Both a
Unitarian Universalist and a United Methodist minister, he has written
research reports, essays and articles on racism, war, politics and
religion. He can be reached at william...@bmc.org.
"[Real] scientists are *fiercely* independent. That's the good
news."-- NIH's Top Fool, Anthony Fauci