NYT gets it wrong on vaccines, too; See Allen Steere's HLA
Mort Zuckerman
Spin...@yahoogroups.com, kshe...@calea.org, fit...@gmail.com,
patrick.f...@usdoj.gov, model...@sbcglobal.net,
jdr...@nejm.org, let...@courant.com, Jgerb...@cdc.gov,
michae...@po.state.ct.us, con...@po.state.ct.us, executive-
edi...@nytimes.com, managin...@nytimes.com, news-
ti...@nytimes.com, the-...@nytimes.com, biz...@nytimes.com,
for...@nytimes.com, nati...@nytimes.com, dv...@cdc.gov,
brigidc...@optonline.net, tr...@hotmail.com, illino...@aol.com,
jle...@courant.com, tinaj...@yahoo.com, jhorn...@fff.org,
thomas...@usdoj.gov, thoma...@po.state.ct.us,
kur...@washpost.com, georg...@washpost.com, p...@allegorypress.com,
commissi...@po.state.ct.us, brans...@comcast.net,
vts...@comcast.net, o...@po.state.ct.us, freet...@charter.net,
scott....@po.state.ct.us, govern...@po.state.ct.us,
attorney...@po.state.ct.us, randall...@usdoj.gov,
Robert....@yale.edu, conta...@gmail.com
Cc: criminal...@usdoj.gov, sash...@sheller.com,
ajbr...@sheller.com, fra...@ucia.gov, dr-ahma...@president.ir,
eugener...@washpost.com, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
bmi...@newstimes.com, tr...@hotmail.com, rast...@aol.com,
billc...@gmail.com, amcg...@rms-law.com, rjmu...@aol.com,
paulcrai...@yahoo.com, sidney_b...@yahoo.com,
criminal...@usdoj.gov, karla.d...@usdoj.gov,
christophe...@usdoj.gov, richar...@yale.edu,
harol...@yale.edu, james.p...@yale.edu, inq...@aldf.com,
ly...@idsociety.org
Subject: NYT gets it wrong on vaccines, too; See Allen Steere's HLA
Date: Feb 13, 2009 1:52 AM
NYT Editorial Below
==================================
This is the reason Steve Sheller sued SmithKline:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&Cmd=DetailsSearch&Term=Steere+AC[Author]+AND+HLA[All+Fields]
Steve Sheller (Sheller.com) claimed that Steere et al
did not warn people that if they were HLA predisposed
to Lyme arthritis they should have been warned against
getting the very thing that caused the hypersensitivity
response- OspA, the vaccine.
Now, we learned that HLA differences have bioweapons
value from the probably defector Russians at New York
Medical College, since most of them have some experience
in studying diseases and HLA differences in different
regions of the world:
http://www.actionlyme.org/BOGUS_RUSSIAN_NYMC_ARTICLES.htm
The CDC will not relate that all children should be
pre-screened for these HLA differences since to do so
will no only invoke liability, it would let the cat out
of the bag as far as their "race-specific bioweapons"
or HLA differences and bioweapons agenda.
http://www.actionlyme.org/PNAC.pdf
(see page 60)
What Sheller did not do, is explain that ONLY the
people with Steere's HLA ever test positive for Lyme
in the first place, that being the Steere in Europe
or the CDC's Dearborn scam:
http://www.relapsingfever.org
http://www.actionlyme.org/CRYMEDISEASE_CHP3_B.htm
You can see it (hypersensitivity response) with your
own eyeballs, in pages 3 and 4 of the RICO complaint
against Yale et al:
http://www.actionlyme.org/USDOJ_COMPLAINT_RICO.htm
Bottom Line? We know all children should be pre-screened
for immune competence - either way; either for potential
hypersensitivity (Sheller's case) or immune insufficiency.
If a child is unable to mount enough of an immune response
to the vaccines, and the viruses are not fully heat killed
then some remain active. The child then gets perhaps
a subclinical version of the infection. Congenital Rubella
causing autism was the reason for the Rubella vaccines
in the first place.
Lastly, if you look at the older vaccine "data" from the
1960s and 1970s, the data is as incomplete and crappy
as the LYMErix "data."
http://www.actionlyme.org/DICKSON_FDA_SUBMISSION_FULL.htm
SmithKline and Yale had no data.
NO DATA.
The Times pays CDC officer Lawrence Altman to be one
of their "science writers." That's clearly a conflict
of interest.
See for yourselves what's on page 7-8 of this MMR monograph:
http://www.merck.com/product/usa/pi_circulars/m/mmr_ii/mmr_ii_pi.pdf
What happens after 30 days, and how many kids were
ever followed for longer than that during these
vaccines's trials?
NONE, as far as I can tell from the older articles.
The Times needs to stay the hell out of the debate.
Kathleen M. Dickson
http://www.actionlyme.org
===============================================
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/13/opinion/13fri2.html?_r=1&pagewanted=print
The New York Times
Printer Friendly Format Sponsored By
February 13, 2009
Editorial
Vaccines Exonerated on Autism
A special federal vaccine court issued three devastating verdicts on
Thursday that should help demolish lingering fears that childhood
vaccines can and have caused autism. The verdicts won’t satisfied die-
hard adherents of the theory that the medical establishment is
recklessly harming their children. But the vast majority of parents
ought to accept the verdicts as persuasive evidence that no child need
forgo vaccinations against dangerous diseases out of fear that the
vaccines might cause autism.
A slew of major health organizations and scientific studies long ago
concluded that there was no link between vaccines and autism, a
condition whose victims lack social skills, can’t communicate well and
engage in repetitive behaviors. But thousands of parents are seeking
federal compensation for alleged vaccine injuries and pinning their
hopes on a special court in Washington to find merit in their claims.
On Thursday, in a ruling on the first three test cases, three
different special masters, or judges, demolished a leading speculative
theory as to how vaccines might cause autism. Their judgments rendered
it unlikely that the other leading theory will survive verdicts still
to come.
These first cases — based on the theory that the vaccine for mumps,
measles and rubella can work in combination with vaccines containing
thimerosal, a mercury-based preservative, to cause autism — were not
even a close call. As one special master saw it, the evidence was
overwhelmingly against the parents. Medical studies around the world
have come down strongly against their contentions, and the experts who
testified in defense of the vaccines were far better qualified than
those speaking for the parents, in his judgment.
There was no doubt that the child in question had autism and other
severe disorders but no evidence that vaccines caused those problems.
Another child’s case was deemed “speculative and unpersuasive” by the
special master who heard it.
Many parents had contended that the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine
alone could cause autism, but this round of decisions also demolished
that theory as well. The court must still rule on test cases
contending that thimerosal-containing vaccines alone could have caused
autism, a theory that medical authorities have long dismissed as
contrary to the evidence.
At any rate, thimerosal has been removed from most vaccines for
children, allowing fearful parents to dodge it. The verdicts on
Thursday suggest that fear of autism was never a valid reason to
forego vaccinations that can protect children from illness and even
death.
Home
* World
* U.S.
* N.Y. / Region
* Business
* Technology
* Science
* Health
* Sports
* Opinion
* Arts
* Style
* Travel
* Jobs
* Real Estate
* Automobiles
* Back to Top
Copyright 2009 The New York Times Company
* Privacy Policy
* Search
* Corrections
* RSS
* First Look
* Help
* Contact Us
* Work for Us
* Site Map