Subject: Whistleblowers once again in the bag...
Date: Feb 12, 2009 9:43 AM
ARTICLE BELOW
=========================
Okay, 4 times the Lyme crooks admitted they
could not read their Western Blots in OspA
vaccinated people:
http://www.actionlyme.org/DICKSON_FDA_SUBMISSION_FULL.htm
1) SCHOEN and PERSING, with JOHN ANDERSON,1996 - the RICO report:
http://jcm.asm.org/cgi/reprint/35/1/233?view=long&pmid=8968914
2) SCHOEN AND PERSING IN THEIR 1996 RICO METHOD PATENT:
The Dave Persing, Mayo Clinic FRAUD Patent-6,045,804
http://patft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=6045804.PN.&OS=PN/6045804&RS=PN/6045804
3) PERSING WITH SIGAL EXPLAINING THAT THE WESTERN BLOTS WERE
UNREADABLE, 2000:
http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdf/10.1086/313920
4) Yale's ROBERT SCHOEN in the 1998 Munchausen's Book, instructing MDs
to blow off LYMErix systemically injured people ("but send the post-
vaccination blood to the Yale L2 Diagnostics RICO lab if you must
bother to be a physician").
http://www.actionlyme.org/SCHOEN_INSTRUCTING_DOCS_TO_BLOW_OFF_LYMERIX_INJUREES.htm
http://www.actionlyme.org/MUMCHAUSENS.htm
But Lenny Signal, Gary Wormser, Robert Schoen, Mark
Klempner, and Allen Steere reported to the FDA that
OspA prevented Lyme, and that they were using the
Dearborn method:
LYMErix results (76% "safe and effective"):
http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/339/4/209
ImmuLyme results (92% "safe and effective"):
http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/339/4/216
There were two standard for Lyme. The 1986 Steere
Relapsing Fever one:
http://www.actionlyme.org/CDC_DOCUMENTS_1990.htm
And the "high-passage strains" in Europe one:
http://www.actionlyme.org/CRYMEDISEASE_CHP3_B.htm
Now, do a whistleblower calculation. In 2008
Anthony Fauci admitted that the NIH, CDC and DHHS
don't know dick about vaccines because the HIV
vaccine and the Lyme vaccine are the same basic
antigen:
http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/359/9/888
In 1998, Yale's Robert Schoen published instructions
for MDs to blow off LYMErix injurees, or else send
the blood to Yale's RICO lab, L2 Diagnostics:
http://www.actionlyme.org/SCHOEN_INSTRUCTING_DOCS_TO_BLOW_OFF_LYMERIX_INJUREES.htm
That's 10 years of research funding thrown
out on Lyme, HIV, MS, Cancer, ALS, and tuberculosis,
not to mention the bodies:
http://www.actionlyme.org/PAM3CYS_IMMUNE_SUPPRESSION.htm
because Yale et al, *CHOSE* to lie to the US Government
about Lyme and LYMErix to set up the RICO, "the enterprise,"
"the monopoly," on all the national blood testing for
bector borne diseases, on funding, on patents, on test kits,
and on HLA data, or data related to genetic susceptibilities
to disease:
http://www.actionlyme.org/LYME_CORRUPTICUT.htm
10 EFFING YEARS WORTH OF RESEARCH ON ALL THESE
MAJOR DISEASES, when the crux of it all was
Pam3Cys or LYMErix.
Kathleen M. Dickson
http://www.actionlyme.org
=======
http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Whisteblower_protections_stripped_from_stimulus_bill_0212.html
Whistleblower protections axed from stimulus
John Byrne
Published: Thursday February 12, 2009
Print This Email This
So much for keeping the federal government from blowing millions in
taxpayer money.
The Senate quietly stripped whistleblower protections from the final
stimulus package Wednesday afternoon, as the bill's authors bragged of
a bipartisan compromise. The removal is particularly significant
because of the bill's $789 billion price tag.
Despite the ugly record of federal spending in Iraq -- where auditors
found problems with $88 million in federal contracts, and couldn't
account for 8.8 billion dollars -- senators quietly nixed the measure
from the bill, without explanation.
Talking Points Memo, which cited a source close to the final bill,
said the provision was removed by Republican Sen. Susan Collins (R-
ME), one of the senators brokering the compromise.
"According to a person following the bill closely, Collins used
today's conference committee to drastically water down the measure,
citing national security concerns as the reason for her opposition,"
TPM's Zachary Roth wrote. In the end, the protections were so weakened
that House negotiators balked, and the result was that the entire
amendment was removed."
Some Republicans take umbrage with the idea of blanket whistleblower
protections, saying they could damage the US's ability to collect
intelligence.
Project for Government Oversight, a government watchdog group, blasted
the removal.
"Accountability got mugged today when congressional leaders stripped
federal whistleblower protections from their compromise stimulus
bill," the group said in a release.
Part of the reason for government mismanagement of massive federally-
funded projects is that federal whistleblowers have few effective
protections from retaliation under current law. Of 55 whistleblowers
who've filed complaints with the Merit Systems Protection Board for
being fired or demoted, just two have won their cases.
"Federal workers who expose lax oversight of drugs at the Food and
Drug Administration, cozy relationships between FAA inspectors and
certain airlines, hundreds of billions of dollars in conscious
"underestimates" for the cost of prescription drug coverage, and
billions of dollars wasted in no-bid defense contracts face
intimidation and retaliation and often are fired or demoted," the
Kennebec Journal wrote in a Wednesday editorial. "And their efforts to
go through the chain of command or seek relief from retaliation by
agency managers nearly always fail."
The Obama Administration hasn't spoken out about the whistleblower
provision's removal. Thus far, they've been relatively accommodating
to Republicans' requests -- for example, removing a provision that
would have provided money for the prevention of sexually-transmitted
diseases.
Yet, the Administration said they'd be protectors of whistleblowers as
recently as last week. During his Feb. 5 confirmation hearing, Deputy
Attorney General designate David Ogden told a Senate committee that he
was "a big believer" in whistleblowers.
“I think what we need is a process that encourages whistleblowing in
this administration and any other administration going forward. The
business of making sure that we’re doing the right thing is an ongoing
business,” Ogden said.
The Center for American Media's Washington Independent bemoaned the
measure's removal late Wednesday.
"It’s an odd outcome, given that federal employees are often the first
people to notice fraud and other abuses by government contractors, as
exhibited in many of the House oversight hearings on the subject over
the past few years," the Independent's Daphne Eviatar wrote.
"(Remember Bunnatine Greenhouse, who lost her job after blowing the
whistle on the no-bid contracts for Halliburton?)"
"The sticking point on the federal workers may be, as I explained
before, the strong opposition from Republicans to providing
whistleblower protection to intelligence employees," Eviatar added.