The Council on Foreign Relations and the HIV-TB-LYMErix fiascoes
Mort Zuckerman
afa...@niaid.nih.gov, Spin...@yahoogroups.com, kshe...@calea.org,
fit...@gmail.com, patrick.f...@usdoj.gov,
model...@sbcglobal.net, jdr...@nejm.org, let...@courant.com,
Jgerb...@cdc.gov, michae...@po.state.ct.us,
con...@po.state.ct.us, executiv...@nytimes.com, managing-
edi...@nytimes.com, news...@nytimes.com, the-...@nytimes.com,
biz...@nytimes.com, for...@nytimes.com, nati...@nytimes.com,
dv...@cdc.gov, brigidc...@optonline.net, tr...@hotmail.com,
illino...@aol.com, jle...@courant.com, tinaj...@yahoo.com,
jhorn...@fff.org, thomas...@usdoj.gov,
thoma...@po.state.ct.us, kur...@washpost.com,
georg...@washpost.com, p...@allegorypress.com,
commissi...@po.state.ct.us, brans...@comcast.net,
vts...@comcast.net, o...@po.state.ct.us, freet...@charter.net,
scott....@po.state.ct.us, govern...@po.state.ct.us,
attorney...@po.state.ct.us, randall...@usdoj.gov,
Robert....@yale.edu, edi...@greenwich-post.com,
harol...@yale.edu
Cc: fra...@ucia.gov, dr-ahma...@president.ir,
eugener...@washpost.com, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
bmi...@newstimes.com, tr...@hotmail.com, rast...@aol.com,
billc...@gmail.com, amcg...@rms-law.com, rjmu...@aol.com,
paulcrai...@yahoo.com, sidney_b...@yahoo.com,
criminal...@usdoj.gov, karla.d...@usdoj.gov,
christophe...@usdoj.gov, richar...@yale.edu,
harol...@yale.edu, james.p...@yale.edu, inq...@aldf.com,
ly...@idsociety.org
Subject: The Council on Foreign Relations and the HIV-TB-LYMErix
fiascoes
Date: Apr 9, 2009 5:55 AM
Dear Sir,
You should know who has been trying to
run this ball game:
http://www.actionlyme.org/ALDF_BOARD.htm
Mortimer Zuckerman, Anthony Walton, Kaiser-Permanente,
the AIG Greenbergs - basically, the Council on Foreign
Relations - and now, today, in the New York Times runs an
argument from the Israeli National Review on the dangers
of single payor health insurance.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/09/opinion/09ponnuru.html
Hilarious.
They're a danger to national security because they
blew the whole Plum Island Thang out of the water.
See the proofs on my website.
The winner of the Nobel Prize for discovering
the HIV virus is now following up on why the
Lyme and tuberculosis vaccines failed for the
same Pam3Cys-Immune-Suppression-Plum-Stupid-Island
reasons.
(Whoops)
Kathleen M. Dickson
http://www.actionlyme.org
http://www.relapsingfever.org
=====================================
From: act...@singlepayeraction.org [Add to Address Book]
To: KMDickson <janmu...@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: "And these private insurance companies are deserving of
the death penalty."
Date: Apr 8, 2009 1:03 PM
thank you
please sign up at singlepayeraction.org
and urge others to sign up and donate
best
russell
Oh, yeah.
> That's what I been sayin.
>
> Who sold out NYMC - a Catholic Medical school -
> to Kaiser-Deathemente?
>
> John J. "medical groups are just going to have to
> get used to the idea that BigInsurance is taking
> over medicine" Connolly.
>
> http://www.actionlyme.org/UCONN_NO_HOSPITAL.htm
>
> Yes, there were 2 groups interested in controlling
> diseases definitions: Thems who owned the patents
> for the products, and Thems who wanted to treat
> nobody except with vaccines, when, of course, there
> can never be a vaccine for Relapsing fever, and
> CDC officer Alan Barbour explains why:
> Flagellin is no good:
> http://www.actionlyme.org/STEALTH_DISABLERS.htm
> and OspA and all the other surface antigens
> undergo antigenic variation:
> http://www.actionlyme.org/BARBOUR_MUTANTS_1992.htm
>
>
> What's IDSA gonna do?
> Say Kaiser isn't there at NYMC "training" MDs?
> http://www.actionlyme.org/JUNE_13_2005_LETTER_TO_SPITZER.htm
> I think we can prove Kaiser's still there:
> http://xnet.kp.org/permanentejournal/spring98pj/strategy.html
>
> And we sure can prove death is in the pix:
> http://www.actionlyme.org/ALSLYME47.htm
>
> Superslick ALS-LYME-JJ Halperin does an end-run around
> Superblumenthal with the Neurology "guidelines:"
> http://www.actionlyme.org/080430_RICO_CABAL_CAVES.htm
>
>
> Lil' ol ALS-LYME-JJ don wanna hang.
>
>
> (Not that I am in favor of the death penalty.
> A good 40 years in the sodomy-pens we call
> prisons is fine for these debased animals.)
>
>
>
> KMDickson
> http://www.actionlyme.org
> http://www.relapsingfever.org
> ==================
>
> http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/04/08-0
> Published on Wednesday, April 8, 2009 by CommonDreams.org
> PBS Lashes Back over Single Payer Dustup
>
> by Russell Mokhiber
>
> Last week, I wrote an article - "Something is Rotten at PBS" - about a
> slanted PBS Frontline documentary - "Sick Around America."
>
> Frontline hired former Washington Post reporter T.R. Reid to put together
> the documentary.
>
> Reid did the reporting.
>
> He turned over his interviews to the Frontline producers.
>
> And they came back with a documentary Reid couldn't agree with.
>
> Frontline tried to get Reid to narrate the film anyway - whether he agreed
> with it or not.
>
> Reid refused.
>
> Reid and Frontline parted ways.
>
> After "Something is Rotten at PBS" ran last week, I got a ton of e-mail.
>
> So did Frontline.
>
> "Something is Rotten at PBS" struck a nerve.
>
> This week, Frontline lashed back.
>
> Frontline issued a statement yesterday attacking "Something is Rotten at
> PBS" - saying that the article "falsely characterizes both the reporting
> in ‘Sick Around America' and the disagreement between Frontline and T.R.
> Reid."
>
> Frontline defends "Sick Around America" as an objective piece of
> mainstream journalism.
>
> Frontline says that "Sick Around America," in fact, "made no assertions
> about the path health care reform should take, but simply reported on the
> current state of health insurance in the country, focusing primarily on
> how inadequacies in the current private health insurance system, both
> for-profit and non-profit companies, were negatively impacting many
> Americans."
>
> T.R. Reid, on the other hand, was an advocate with a point of view,
> Frontline said.
>
> "The dispute with Mr. Reid centered on a decision to include a section on
> the recent attempts by Massachusetts to reform its health care system,"
> Frontline said. "Mr. Reid objected to the inclusion of Massachusetts, the
> only state to require its citizens to purchase health insurance, and to
> require insurance companies to sell them policies with an adequate
> standard of coverage."
>
> "Reid repeatedly told Frontline that including Massachusetts in the
> program at all, was to advocate for that kind of reform as opposed to
> Reid's preference of a ‘Medicare for all,' one payer system for the
> entire country."
>
> "Frontline's position was that simply reporting on the state's plan was
> not advocacy and, in fact, our reporting would focus not only on the
> benefits, but also on the problems with the Massachusetts plan. We think
> any objective viewing of that sequence in ‘Sick Around America' will
> confirm Frontline's view that it was a piece of reporting not advocacy."
>
> Frontline noted that "on March 17, just three weeks after he asked to be
> removed from the film, a Denver magazine reported that T.R. Reid said he
> was interested it being appointed to a vacant seat in the Colorado House
> of Representatives, citing that his concerns about health care reform in
> the U.S. were ‘enough to push him from the reporting side over to the
> policy-making side. And he thinks Colorado would be a perfect testing
> ground.'"
>
> "Frontline's editorial guidelines explicitly state that ‘when working on
> any politically controversial programs the producer [or correspondent]
> should engage in no personal political activities...and should not lobby
> for or against any specific piece of legislation.'"
>
> "In the end, Frontline believes the dispute centered on a conflict between
> Frontline's journalistic commitment to fair and nuanced reporting and its
> aversion to policy advocacy and Mr. Reid's commitment to advocacy for
> specific health care policy reforms, for positions he apparently advocates
> in his forthcoming book."
>
> Wow!
>
> Reid is biased.
>
> And Frontline is an objective, neutral observer.
>
> I couldn't reach Reid to respond to Frontline's attack on him.
>
> But last week, he told me he didn't think single payer could pass in
> America.
>
> Instead, he favored giving Americans an option to buy into a public plan
> that would compete with private, regulated non-profit health insurance
> companies.
>
> Reid has a point of view.
>
> So do I.
>
> I believe the health insurance corporations - whether for-profit or
> non-profit - are engaged in what should be considered criminal activity -
> selling basic health insurance to the American people to gain profit,
> outrageous salaries, power and privilege.
>
> And these private insurance companies are deserving of the death penalty.
>
> Countries like Canada and the UK agree. It's illegal in those countries
> for a private company to sell basic health insurance.
>
> Other countries like Germany, Japan and Taiwan heavily regulate private
> health insurance companies - so much so, that they would be unrecognizable
> to health insurance execs in this country.
>
> So, I have a point of view as to how to remedy the situation. (In fact, I,
> and a group of friends last month launched singlepayeraction.org - to
> secure single payer health care in the United States in our lifetimes. We
> believe one million Americans will get the job done. Sign on and donate at
> singlepayeraction.org.)
>
> Our motto - no compromise with the health insurance industry.
>
> Either we die first.
>
> Or the health insurance corporations die first.
>
> Fight to the finish.
>
> (By the way, according to a Institute of Medicine report, 22,000 Americans
> dies every year because of a lack of health insurance. That's 60 deaths a
> day. Again, either they die first. Or we die first.)
>
> Reid has a point of view.
>
> I have a point of view.
>
> But the Frontline producers don't have a point of view?
>
> Is that why they included no advocate for single payer in their
> documentary?
>
> Is that why they included no advocate for a point of view supported,
> according to recent polls, by the majority of Americans, the majority of
> doctors, the majority of health economists and the majority of small
> business people?
>
> Is that why they included no mention of single payer in their documentary?
>
> (Frontline says I made a factual error by assuming that Karen Ignagni,
> head of America's Health Insurance Plans, represents only for-profit
> health insurance companies. I didn't assume that at all. Of course,
> Ignagni's group represents both non-profit and for-profit health insurance
> corporations. But the two types of insurance companies in America differ
> little in the level of their disregard for Americans. I was just pointing
> out that Frontline was giving Ignagni a free ride - misleading Frontline's
> viewers into believing that forcing them to buy from American insurance
> corporations would create a similar system as in some countries in Europe
> - like Germany and Switzerland - where the insurance industry is heavily
> regulated, where profits are banished, where executive salaries are a
> fraction of what they are here.)
>
> I salute T.R. Reid for telling Frontline and PBS to go stuff it.
>
> As for his advocacy for a public plan to compete with the private
> insurance companies - I disagree with him.
>
> A single payer doc in Ohio - Dr. Johnathon Ross - put it this way to me
> last year.
>
> The health insurance industry is like a vicious dog, Dr. Ross said.
>
> Those who would create a public plan to compete with the health insurance
> are just kicking the dog in the face.
>
> The dog is going to counterattack and rip your face off.
>
> Better to put the dog out of his misery.
>
> Yes, singlepayeraction.org has a point of view.
>
> Death to the health insurance corporations.
>
> Health and life to Americans.
>
> Russell Mokhiber is editor of the Washington, D.C.-based Corporate Crime
> Reporter. He is also founder of singlepayeraction.org.
>
>
> "[Real] scientists are *fiercely* independent. That's the good news."--
> NIH's Top Fool, Anthony Fauci
>
"[Real] scientists are *fiercely* independent. That's the good
news."-- NIH's Top Fool, Anthony Fauci