Lyme and LYMErix increase the risk of breast cancer and pregnancy loss.
Mort Zuckerman
ca...@drcarolgoodheart.com, lPick...@cdc.gov, Durlan...@yale.edu,
Aa...@columbia.edu, gary_w...@nymc.edu,
scientifi...@ostp.gov, pkru...@princeton.edu,
Stanle...@fiu.edu, emcsw...@niaid.nih.gov, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
Spin...@yahoogroups.com, kshe...@calea.org, fit...@gmail.com,
patrick.f...@usdoj.gov, model...@sbcglobal.net,
jdr...@nejm.org, let...@courant.com, Jgerb...@cdc.gov,
michae...@po.state.ct.us, con...@po.state.ct.us, executive-
edi...@nytimes.com, managin...@nytimes.com, news-
ti...@nytimes.com, biz...@nytimes.com, for...@nytimes.com,
nati...@nytimes.com, dv...@cdc.gov, brigidc...@optonline.net,
tr...@hotmail.com, illino...@aol.com, jle...@courant.com,
tinaj...@yahoo.com, jhorn...@fff.org, thomas...@usdoj.gov,
thoma...@po.state.ct.us, kur...@washpost.com,
georg...@washpost.com, p...@allegorypress.com,
commissi...@po.state.ct.us, brans...@comcast.net,
vts...@comcast.net, o...@po.state.ct.us, freet...@charter.net,
scott....@po.state.ct.us, govern...@po.state.ct.us,
attorney...@po.state.ct.us, randall...@usdoj.gov,
Robert....@yale.edu, edi...@greenwich-post.com,
harol...@yale.edu, sedm...@nswbc.org, rrmcg...@aol.com,
fr...@nytimes.com, dpr...@stmartin.edu, saint....@sbcglobal.net
Cc: fra...@ucia.gov, dr-ahma...@president.ir,
eugener...@washpost.com, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
bmi...@newstimes.com, tr...@hotmail.com, rast...@aol.com,
billc...@gmail.com, amcg...@rms-law.com, rjmu...@aol.com,
paulcrai...@yahoo.com, criminal...@usdoj.gov,
karla.d...@usdoj.gov, christophe...@usdoj.gov,
richar...@yale.edu, harol...@yale.edu, james.p...@yale.edu,
inq...@aldf.com, ly...@idsociety.org, meganm...@theatlantic.com
Subject: Lyme and LYMErix increase the risk of breast cancer and
pregnancy loss.
Date: May 26, 2010 5:29 AM
SCIENTIFIC FRAUD ARTICLE BELOW:
Lyme and LYMErix increase the risk
of cancer, leukemia and breast cancer:
http://www.actionlyme.org/OspA_4.htm
The highest rate ^^^ of adverse event
was "BREAST NEOPLASM," the rest were like
strokes and heart attacks ("INJURY", meaning
vascular).
This Phase IV OspA study report says that "out
of 173 women, 15 of them got BREAST NEOPLASM,"
which is nearly 10%.
Pregancy loss from Lyme (3-4 reports from
Yale and IDSA):
http://www.actionlyme.org/MOMS_CAN_GIVE_LYME_TO_BABIES.htm
Pregnancy loss from LYMErix:
http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/01/transcripts/3680t2.rtf
Page 105:
"The pregnancy registry, and the comments that I've heard really
disturb me. You've made it sound as though you find no consequences,
and yet you summarize, in one situation, that you know the outcomes of
only 13 of 30 pregnancies, and in 4 of those 13 pregnancies the
outcome was an abortion."
4/13 pregnancies lost with LYMErix
vaccination. That's mearly 30%.
I don't know if it is criminal or not
to post such lies as this below, but
it certainly should be.
And as regards the risks of ceftriaxone?
These are PSEUDO gallstones that go away
on their own and never needed surgery:
http://www.actionlyme.org/DEBUNKING_THE_CEF_IS_BAD_STUDY.htm
Kathleen M. Dickson
http://www.actionlyme.org
==================================================
http://www.newswithviews.com/Howenstine/james183.htm
ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY CAN INCREASE THE RISK OF BREAST CANCER
By Dr. James Howenstine, MD.
May 26, 2010
NewsWithViews.com
An important study from the JAMA published on February 18, 2004
revealed that women who have taken antibiotics are at increased risk
for developing breast cancer. Ten thousand Dutch women were studied,
including 2,266 who had breast cancer. As the number of prescriptions
for antibiotics increased the risk of breast cancer steadily climbed.
The women who had more than 25 prescriptions for antibiotics filled
over a 17-year follow-up exhibited twice the incidence of breast
cancer as women who took no antibiotics. The women who had fewer than
25 antibiotic prescriptions had a 50% greater risk than women who took
no antibiotics. There did not seem to be any differences related to
various types of antibiotics.
Research from Finland in 2000 involving 10,000 women revealed that
women below the age of 50 who had taken antibiotics for urinary
infections had an increased risk of breast cancer.
Having a healthy gastrointestinal tract is a key component for good
health. All antibiotics kill healthy intestinal bacteria that keep our
immune systems strong. When these bacteria are killed by antibiotic
therapy, they are replaced in the intestines by more dangerous
anaerobic bacteria, parasites, fungi, yeast and mycoplasma. We then
become more likely to develop generalized infections from this greater
population of undesirable organisms. Additionally, the escape from
some of these organisms of neurotoxic substances released into the
blood may lead to dysfunction of the endocrine glands (hypothyroidism,
adrenal insufficiency) and neurological systems symptoms similar to
(multiple sclerosis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis etc). In addition,
our ability to kill cancer cells is probably being compromised by
decreased production of intestinal immune cells. More than 70% of our
immune system cells reside in the intestines. Gastrointestinal
bacteria also supply the body with important nutrients and vitamins.
This function can also become compromised by the decrease in healthy
gastrointestinal bacteria.
I urge you to be certain that the benefit exceeds the risk when
antibiotic therapy is suggested. In addition, the use of probiotics,
unpasteurized goat and cow yogurt, sauerkraut, kefir, kombucha, and
raw milk can help preserve normal numbers of healthy bacteria in the
intestines during a course of antibiotics. This is also smart for all
persons to keep the bad intestinal organisms suppressed and make it
less likely an illness will originate in the intestinal tract. It also
helps to preserve optimal function of the immune system. Whether other
malignancies will be found to be more frequent after use of
antibiotics is not known currently. Research in this are could prove
injurious to antibiotic sales so it may remain unfunded.
Long term use of antibiotics may be the primary reason why patients
with Lyme Disease are now frequently being discovered to have
lymphomas. It is quite common for patients with Lyme disease to take
antibiotics for months even years. Suppressed activity of killer
lymphocytes related to decreased production of immune cells by damaged
intestines whose health has been compromised by loss of healthy
intestinal f;lora could be a key contributing factor to the lymphoma
problem.
Advertisement
We need to be aware that cancer cells are appearing by the millions
daily in our bodies and are being steadily killed if our immune
systems are healthy. By the time a cancer is large enough to be picked
up by diagnostic tests, it may have been present eight to ten years
and contains billions of cells.
How Did Norway Defeat MRSI Infections?
Twenty five years ago Norway had a serious problem with
MRSI(methicillin resistant staphylococcal infections). The key measure
that helped conquer the problem was making sure that every antibiotic
prescription was truly needed. Overuse of antibiotics and misuse of
antibiotics produces mutations in bacteria that are easily spread
among species of bacteria. This results in many bacteria being created
that no longer can be eliminated by an antibiotic that easily killed
the same species 5 years earlier.
Tuberculosis and malaria have become diseases where only a few
antibiotic drugs are still effective. Many drugs used to treat
tuberculosis currently are not very useful and all these second line
therapies are poorly accepted by the public because of troublesome
side effects. To make matters even worse a prolonged course of
tuberculosis therapy may cost up to $250,000 per patient per year. Few
countries can afford this expense and few patients complete the course
of therapy because of onerous side effects. This results in more
untreated patients which are a public health menace. Concomitant
infection of tuberculosis with HIV compounds the problem because HIV
patients have severely damaged immune systems which prevent them from
getting well from a serious infection like tuberculosis. High does of
Vitamin D3(10,000 I.U. daily) or the South African herb umckaloabo
have both been able to cure drug resistant tuberculosis.
Dr. John Birger Haug is in charge of managing the MRSI infection
problem in Norway. The number of antibiotic drugs available is sharply
decreased when compared to other nations. Physicians must comply with
sound reasons for antibiotic use before being permitted to use an
antibiotic.. New antibiotic drugs do not appear in the nations
formulary where physicians would be tempted to use them.
Why Does Norway’s Program Work?
• Norwegian doctors prescribe fewer antibiotics than any other nation.
This prevents the bacteria from being able to mutate into mutant forms
like MRSI.
• All patients with MRSI are isolated. Medical staff members who test
positive for MRSI are not permitted to work
• Every patient with an MRSI infection is careful monitored by its
individual strain. This permits spread of MRSI within a hospital to be
promptly detected and the causes of spread can be uncovered so that
the same mistake does not get repeated in the future.
Norwegians have learned that colds and coughing are properly managed
without antibiotics. Symptoms are treated without using antibiotics.
Workers are paid on days they stay home with illnesses. Drug makers
are not allowed to advertise which decreases patient pressure for
antibiotic prescriptions. Penicillin is no longer a cough medicine.
Less than 1 % of health care providers are carriers of MRSI.
Staphlococci. These days nearly every case of MRSI seen in Norway
involves someone who has traveled abroad.
Forty years ago new antibiotic drugs enticed many physicians to
promptly use these therapies. As more antibiotics were used greater
numbers of antibiotic resistant strains started to appear. In the
1980s Norway swiftly responded to MRSA outbreaks by curtailing
antibiotic use. This warded off MRSI infections while other nations
saw the problem becoming steadily worse.
In Norway MRSI infections have accounted for less than 1% of staph
infections for many years. Japan has seen the rate rise to 80% which
is the highest level in the world. Israel has a rate of 44% and Greece
is 38%. Rapidly rising numbers of MRSA infections in the USA caused
the cost of these infections to soar to $5 billion in 2009. The
incidence of MRSI which was only 2% in 1974 reached 63% of
staphloccocal infections by 2004.
Subscribe to the NewsWithViews Daily News Alerts!
Enter Your E-Mail Address:
One percent of persons in developed nations carry MRSA on their skin.
These bacteria penetrate the skin through scratches. Because victims
of MRSI infection have a difficult to eradicate bacteria the death
rates from MRSI infection in the USA had risen to 18,650 persons by
2005. This exceeds the number of deaths from HIV. Nations that
institute programs restricting the use of antibiotics will see a
prompt steady fall in MRSA infections.
© 2010 Dr. James Howenstine - All Rights Reserved
E-mail This Page
Sign Up For Free E-Mail Alerts
E-Mails are used strictly for NWVs alerts, not for sale
Dr. James A. Howenstine is a board certified specialist in internal
medicine. The Second Edition of his book A Physicians Guide To Natural
Health Products That Work is available.
Dr. Howenstine can be reached by phoning 001-506-2262-7504.
E-Mail: dr.j...@gmail.com
"[Real] scientists are *fiercely* independent. That's the good
news."-- NIH's Top Fool, Anthony Fauci
Jen
> pregnancy loss.
>
> Date: May 26, 2010 5:29 AM
>
> SCIENTIFIC FRAUD ARTICLE BELOW:
>
> Lyme and LYMErix increase the risk
> of cancer, leukemia and breast cancer:http://www.actionlyme.org/OspA_4.htm
> The highest rate ^^^ of adverse event
> was "BREAST NEOPLASM," the rest were like
> strokes and heart attacks ("INJURY", meaning
> vascular).
>
> This Phase IV OspA study report says that "out
> of 173 women, 15 of them got BREAST NEOPLASM,"
> which is nearly 10%.
What is the rate that women get breast cancer in the population at
large? Is it 10% or something else? I remember seeing a poster on the
train for a marathon to benefit breast cancer research, and I think it
said something about 1 in 8 women, but perhaps I remember incorrectly?
How does anyone know the vaccine causes breast cancer?
Correlation != causation
> Pregancy loss from Lyme (3-4 reports from
> Yale and IDSA):http://www.actionlyme.org/MOMS_CAN_GIVE_LYME_TO_BABIES.htm
> Pregnancy loss from LYMErix:http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/01/transcripts/3680t2.rtf
> Page 105:
> "The pregnancy registry, and the comments that I've heard really
> disturb me. You've made it sound as though you find no consequences,
> and yet you summarize, in one situation, that you know the outcomes of
> only 13 of 30 pregnancies, and in 4 of those 13 pregnancies the
> outcome was an abortion."
>
> 4/13 pregnancies lost with LYMErix
> vaccination. That's mearly 30%.
I've read that Lyme can be transmitted to the fetus during pregnancy.
I've also seen mention of a woman w Lyme in "Under Our Skin" having
multiple miscarriages... One can test the in vivo possibility pretty
easily, since a fetus isn't trampling out in the woods... there is no
other way for the fetus to get Lyme.
But there are many reasons a woman may miscarry. Again, is there a way
to prove the vaccine causes miscarriage?
> I don't know if it is criminal or not
> to post such lies as this below, but
> it certainly should be.
>
> And as regards the risks of ceftriaxone?
> These are PSEUDO gallstones that go away
> on their own and never needed surgery:http://www.actionlyme.org/DEBUNKING_THE_CEF_IS_BAD_STUDY.htm
>
> Kathleen M. Dicksonhttp://www.actionlyme.org
> ==================================================
>
> http://www.newswithviews.com/Howenstine/james183.htm
> ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY CAN INCREASE THE RISK OF BREAST CANCER
>
> By Dr. James Howenstine, MD.
> May 26, 2010
> NewsWithViews.com
>
> An important study from the JAMA published on February 18, 2004
> revealed that women who have taken antibiotics are at increased risk
> for developing breast cancer. Ten thousand Dutch women were studied,
> including 2,266 who had breast cancer. As the number of prescriptions
> for antibiotics increased the risk of breast cancer steadily climbed.
> The women who had more than 25 prescriptions for antibiotics filled
> over a 17-year follow-up exhibited twice the incidence of breast
> cancer as women who took no antibiotics. The women who had fewer than
> 25 antibiotic prescriptions had a 50% greater risk than women who took
> no antibiotics. There did not seem to be any differences related to
> various types of antibiotics.
If this is all true, then those who are treating Chronic Lyme with
long-term antibiotics have an increased risk of developing cancer.
So... if a doctor states they don't want to give a patient long-term
antibiotics due to the risk of resistance and creating super bugs, now
the doctor can add the risk of cancer to that list?
If there is a chronic underlying infection of Borrelia in some
patients, what are they supposed to do? IDSA calls it Post Lyme
Syndrome, and basically says live with it. ILADS gives people more
antibiotics. I think another treatment has to be found because having
no treatment versus all the risks of taking antibiotics longer term or
many courses of them sounds like a lose-lose proposition to the
patient.
Gah.
Jen
Mort Zuckerman
We, ActionLyme.org and LymeCryme.com,
propose new treatments based on the
State of the Science.
But we don't have ILADS.org on deck.
They're clueless and can't fight for us.
Kathleen
Jen
> propose new treatments based on the
> State of the Science.
>
> But we don't have ILADS.org on deck.
> They're clueless and can't fight for us.
>
> Kathleen
Some of those who go on long-term courses of antibiotics do seem to do
better, while others do not.
While there are options to antibiotic treatment, such as herbs and
acupuncture, most doctors view these as additional treatments on top
of antibiotics rather than a substitute for antibiotics. Also, a
number of alternative treatments can conflict with antibiotics and
some of them are not scientifically proven to work.
As of this writing, patients who state they have Chronic Lyme only
have the option to 1) do nothing, or 2) take antibiotics for however
long is 'deemed necessary', 3) try antivirals - some doctors suspect a
retrovirus leads to immunosuppression too and suspect XMRV, and/or 4)
do herbs and other alternative treatments.
I would be interested in hearing about the kinds of treatments
ActionLyme.org and LymeCryme.com propose, and the basis for their use.
Jen
Mort Zuckerman
Well, they're on our websites.
K
Mort Zuckerman
Not only are they on our websites,
it is ActionLyme - myself - who first
proposed antivirals, since it is myself who
first re-brought to everyone's attention the
issue of Activated Epstein-Barr
(Duray).
Kathleen
Mort Zuckerman
http://www.medicalconversation.com/showthread.php?t=60693
2005
Activated Epstein-Barr.
Kathleen ActionLyme.org Dickson
Jen
scouring your ActionLyme site for information.
What I mainly took away from the site is that patients with late-stage
Lyme/Chronic Lyme have relapsing fever, essentially, and not Steere's
arthritic knee disease, and that it can only be treated by long-term
courses of antibiotics and potentially antivirals because of the
reactivation of EBV and other virii.
Y'know, how about antifungals while we're at it, since we're
immunosuppressed and open to new infections, and latent infections
that were in balance before and no problem now are, then let's do
antifungals and antiprotozoals while we're at it.
The whole bloody kitchen sink.
I did read about Pam3Cys and the BSK primer shell game and how Lyme is
like HIV... and I could actually wrap my brain around a fair bit of
it. I'm disgusted, frankly, with all of it. I hear a lot of anger in
your writing, and if all of what is there is true, I'd be angry, too.
No treatment end stage. Treatment duration unknown. $200 k per year
treatment cost? Seriously? Nobody can afford that, really. Or very few
people.
Damn.
If you aren't on the IDSA's side because they committed fraud, and
you're not on ILADS side because they're scientifically behind and
other reasons, then I assume you're on your own side. Which leads me
to wonder who you go to to get treated for Lyme, if as you say you
have abandoned both parties for reasons you've cited on your web site.
I continue to wade through your pages... there's a LOT there to read.
But ultimately, on top of finding out the history behind this disease,
I want to know what the hell patients can do about it once infected.
I thought that getting antibiotics within 8 wks of the bite was
adequate. High doses of them. Now I've read something in your files
which indicate that if you didn't hit the illness hard within the
first week after the bite, you're basically screwed with Chronic Lyme.
Glee. Rapture. Behold the power of Borreliosis. =(
Jen
Mort Zuckerman
Yes, of course I am furious because I had
explained to the FDA Vaccine Committee
back in Jan 2001, that LYMErix was producing
a Lyme-like illness due to the immune dysregulation:
http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/01/slides/3680s2_11.pdf
That's only the first 11 of the 30 page booklet
I provided all 15 members of the Committee,
which included several pages of the Dearborn
booklet, as well as the full text of the Dressler/Steere
report from whence came the bogus CDC criteria
http://www.actionlyme.org/STEERE_IN_EUROPE.htm
I am treated with nothing because I can
barely afford to eat.
Having been thrown in jail and accused
of being a terrorists for having solved the
entire cryme:
http://www.actionlyme.org/CRYME_DISEASE.htm
They can kill me.
They can kill all of us, and suffer hell for
all eternity. Nobody can slam them better
than the Almighty
http://www.actionlyme.org/EXORCISMS.htm
Only the websites, I keep up for the likes
of other nations... who don't hate their
own people as much as ours does.
Most of my traffic is from abroad, and
in particular, universities in Europe
and the Governments of, like, South
America and Saudi Arabia.
Kathleen M. Dickson
http://www.actionlyme.org