COURANT re: CT's Illegal FOI Shenanigans
Mort Zuckerman
scientifi...@ostp.gov, pkru...@princeton.edu,
Stanle...@fiu.edu, emcsw...@niaid.nih.gov, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
Spin...@yahoogroups.com, kshe...@calea.org, fit...@gmail.com,
patrick.f...@usdoj.gov, model...@sbcglobal.net,
jdr...@nejm.org, let...@courant.com, Jgerb...@cdc.gov,
michae...@po.state.ct.us, con...@po.state.ct.us, executive-
edi...@nytimes.com, managin...@nytimes.com, news-
ti...@nytimes.com, biz...@nytimes.com, for...@nytimes.com,
nati...@nytimes.com, dv...@cdc.gov, brigidc...@optonline.net,
tr...@hotmail.com, illino...@aol.com, jle...@courant.com,
tinaj...@yahoo.com, jhorn...@fff.org, thomas...@usdoj.gov,
thoma...@po.state.ct.us, kur...@washpost.com,
georg...@washpost.com, p...@allegorypress.com,
commissi...@po.state.ct.us, brans...@comcast.net,
vts...@comcast.net, o...@po.state.ct.us, freet...@charter.net,
scott....@po.state.ct.us, govern...@po.state.ct.us,
attorney...@po.state.ct.us, randall...@usdoj.gov,
Robert....@yale.edu, edi...@greenwich-post.com,
harol...@yale.edu, sedm...@nswbc.org, rrmcg...@aol.com,
fr...@nytimes.com, dpr...@stmartin.edu
Cc: fra...@ucia.gov, dr-ahma...@president.ir,
eugener...@washpost.com, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
bmi...@newstimes.com, tr...@hotmail.com, rast...@aol.com,
billc...@gmail.com, amcg...@rms-law.com, rjmu...@aol.com,
paulcrai...@yahoo.com, sidney_b...@yahoo.com,
criminal...@usdoj.gov, karla.d...@usdoj.gov,
christophe...@usdoj.gov, richar...@yale.edu,
harol...@yale.edu, james.p...@yale.edu, inq...@aldf.com,
ly...@idsociety.org, meganm...@theatlantic.com,
bob.d...@latimes.com
Subject: CT's Illegal FOI Shenanigans
Date: Sep 27, 2009 3:40 PM
COURANT ARTICLE BELOW
============================
DCF refused my FOI requests for any emails
between AAG Jessica Gauvin and the likes
of Durland Fish or Edward McSweegan - the
notorious stalkers of Lyme:
http://www.actionlyme.org/GOLDWATER_LETTER.htm
http://www.actionlyme.org/McSweegan.htm
http://www.actionlyme.org/TICK_BITE_CONSPIRACY.htm
or anyone at the NIH or CDC or through their
anonymizers, anything with my name on it from
or to outside parties, and anyone who was an outside
party who had any correspondence with or to
Donald Dickson through DCF.
I addition, "Judge" John C. Driscoll refused
to turn over to me all the transcripts which
proved that James Phillips came up with the
"like Ted Kascynski" "chemist" crap, and that
DMHAS's Kenneth Marcus came up with
the "dangerously intelligent," crap which Gauvin
later falsely charged me with saying myself,
when she knows damned well who said it,
having orchestrated that insane perjury from
these malpractitioninig perjuring nitwitnesses,
herself.
So, it is a matter of policy to deny the information
that is owed to, belongs to, and should be shared with
the public so that we can see how the so-called
agencies ruin the people for a buck, like cannibals.
See with your own eyeballs:
http://www.actionlyme.org/GAUVIN_DEATH_PENALTY.htm
You can ^^^ see she never provided the Berlin Police
with that email when she falsely reported that I claimed
I would kill her.
There ^^^ it is.
So, now, What are the consequences?
A whole lot more dead and disabled people, thanks
to DCF whose job I was doing for them, since
it is THEIR JOB to assure children get healthcare.
Now, is it obvious Lyme is a crime, if even the
CT AG understood it? Is is a crime, if now the
whole world knows Pam3Cys screws up the
immune system and is ACTING ON THAT
KNOWLEDGE?
Did DCF participate in this crime?
Are we entitled to know?
Is DCF helping criminals maim and murder
children, worldwide?
Did they obstruct that prosecution?
Damned right they did. Gauvin stole Blumenthal's
RICO mail CC'd from me right off of his desk:
http://www.actionlyme.org/BLUMENTHALS_MAIL_STOLEN_BY_JESSICA_GAUVIN.htm
There it ^^^ is.
Mail stolen off of AG Richard Blumenthal's desk
by DCF... for whose benefit, now?
Kathleen M. Dickson
http://www.actionlyme.org
=============================
http://www.courant.com/news/politics/hc-missing-email-0927.artsep27,0,5487999.column
GOVERNMENT WATCH
Moody's Missing E-Mail Speaks Volumes
Jon Lender Government Watch
September 27, 2009
* EmailE-mail
* printPrint
*
Share
* increase text size decrease text size Text Size
Some of the most interesting things you can learn about how government
works are found in e-mails between officials.
For example, some readers said they found it interesting to read in
last week's Government Watch column about two e-mails between
gubernatorial chief of staff M. Lisa Moody and state budget director
Robert Genuario, which The Courant obtained via a freedom of
information request.
The e-mails showed that on Sept. 1 — when Republican Gov. M. Jodi Rell
declared on TV that she would let the Democrat-approved state budget
become law without signing it, and would then veto excessive "pork"
line-items from it — she already had been advised by two top lawyers
in her administration that this would be unconstitutional.
But the column didn't even tell the entire story, because it turns out
that a third e-mail was missing from the stack of printouts that
Rell's office provided 1½ weeks ago in response to The Courant's
request.
The third one — obtained last week via a renewed FOI request, after
sources said the administration withheld it — puts a new, sharper edge
on the e-mail exchange.
Here's the full exchange, including all three e-mails:
•At 2:13 p.m. on Sept. 1, three hours before Rell's televised
announcement at 5:15 p.m., chief gubernatorial legal counsel Anna
Ficeto e-mailed Moody to say "based on a reading of the CT
constitution and case law, the Governor's exercise of line item veto
would require her approval and signature of the remainder of the
bill."
•A half-hour later, Genuario, head of the Office of Policy and
Management, e-mailed Moody to say Ficeto's message was consistent with
advice he'd received from top OPM deputy Jeffrey Beckham, also an
attorney. Genuario wrote: "Our two lawyers agree. Isn't that amazing?"
•"The Governor and I don't we win (isn't that amazing)" That's how
Moody replied to Genuario a minute later, in the previously missing e-
mail that Rell's office finally released Friday.
The third e-mail adds an element; it is consistent with the reputation
of Rell's publicity-avoiding staff chief, Moody, for stubbornness and
combative partisanship. Moody, who once was suspended for conducting
political fundraising efforts on the job at the Capitol, is widely
feared among Rell's agency commissioners. She has been criticized —
most vocally by Democrats — as an unelected operative to whom Rell has
entrusted control over too much.
Even without the third e-mail, last week's column stirred discussion
of whether a key decision was based on good government — which Rell
has preached as her guiding principle — or empty posturing to look
good politically and blame Democrats for budget problems. She
abandoned her stance a week later after the attorney general gave the
same advice that Ficeto had: You need to sign the budget before
vetoing items from it. Rell let the budget become law as-is rather
than sign it and veto the "pork."
On one level, this is just a story about the inside give-and-take of
the dealings between the press and a particularly image-conscious
state administration. But it's also about the legal duty of government
officials to provide all the public documents that citizens request
from them, without regard to whether they think it makes them and
their bosses look good or bad.
The state Freedom of Information Commission says that it is against
the law for an official to fail to produce a requested public document
"if there are no reasonable grounds to withhold it." The civil penalty
for that can be $20 to $1,000 per violation.
Moody was unavailable for comment personally.
But when Ficeto was asked Friday why the third e-mail was missing, she
said she had talked to Moody — and "she said she would swear on a
stack of Bibles" that "it was in there."
However, two Courant reporters had sifted through the e-mails together
and found only the first two, even though they looked at them again
carefully because it seemed that there should have been a reply from
Moody.
It wasn't there.
That leaves the question of why it wasn't. Here is how Rell's office
handled the FOI request, according to Ficeto: The Courant requested e-
mails between Moody and OPM for dates including Sept. 1; Moody printed
hers out and gave the stack to Ficeto to examine; Ficeto noticed all
three e-mails, then gave the stack back to Moody; sometime later,
Moody delivered the stack back to Ficeto; Ficeto brought the stack to
Rell's press office, and a Courant reporter picked them up.
Ficeto said that when Moody returned the stack to her, she assumed
nothing had changed and didn't look at them again before leaving them
at the press office.
"I never looked at them again," Ficeto said. "I didn't think there was
a reason to."
Jon Lender is a reporter on The Courant's investigative desk, with a
focus on government and politics. Contact him at jle...@courant.com,
860-241-6524, or c/o The Hartford Courant, 285 Broad St., Hartford, CT
06115.
Related stories
From other Connecticut sources
"[Real] scientists are *fiercely* independent. That's the good
news."-- NIH's Top Fool, Anthony Fauci
Dan Sullivan
Lipanj
> "Mort Zuckerman" <morph...@yahoo.com> wrote zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
If your so sleepy why do you read her posts-----------------does the
truth hurt.
Greegor
"Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote: zzzzzzzzzzzzz
Lipanj > If your so sleepy why do you read
Lipanj > her posts-----------------does the truth hurt.
That's just Daniel J Sullivan III of Patchogue New York,
He's a 61 year old ineffectual twit trying to be a bully on usenet.
He does that to any issue that doesn't pad his ass.
He thinks it's his free speech right to shout down people.
krp
"Greegor" <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:62d764b2-bec1-44ed...@33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
He's a 61 year old "Artificial Intelligence" he was the prototype and it
SHORTED OUT years ago! Nobody seems able to find the OFF button.
womanGoddess
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/...
>
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote: zzzzzzzzzzzzz
>
> Lipanj > If your so sleepy why do you read
> Lipanj > her posts-----------------does the truth hurt.
>
> That's just Daniel J Sullivan III of Patchogue New York,
> He's a 61 year old ineffectual twit trying to be a bully on usenet.
> He does that to any issue that doesn't pad his ass.
> He thinks it's his free speech right to shout down people.
Projection noted. You and Kennie tend to do all that yourselves.
Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
"http://home.earthlink.net/~19ranger57/blies.htm
Know your scum--- http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
Greegor
Lipanj > If your so sleepy why do you read
Lipanj > her posts-----------------does the truth hurt.
G > That's just Daniel J Sullivan III of Patchogue New York,
G > He's a 61 year old ineffectual twit trying to be a bully on
usenet.
G > He does that to any issue that doesn't pad his ass.
G > He thinks it's his free speech right to shout down people.
Moe > Projection noted. You and Kennie tend to do all that yourselves.
Any comments about the FOI games in the top post?
http://www.courant.com/news/politics/hc-missing-email-0927.artsep27,0,5487999.column
GOVERNMENT WATCH
Moody's Missing E-Mail Speaks Volumes
Jon Lender Government Watch
September 27, 2009
Some of the most interesting things you can learn about how
government
works are found in e-mails between officials.
For example, some readers said they found it interesting to read in
last week's Government Watch column about two e-mails between
gubernatorial chief of staff M. Lisa Moody and state budget director
Robert Genuario, which The Courant obtained via a freedom of
information request.
The e-mails showed that on Sept. 1 — when Republican Gov. M. Jodi
Rell
declared on TV that she would let the Democrat-approved state budget
become law without signing it, and would then veto excessive "pork"
line-items from it — she already had been advised by two top lawyers
in her administration that this would be unconstitutional.
But the column didn't even tell the entire story, because it turns
out
that a third e-mail was missing from the stack of printouts that
Rell's office provided 1½ weeks ago in response to The Courant's
request.
The third one — obtained last week via a renewed FOI request, after
sources said the administration withheld it — puts a new, sharper
edge
on the e-mail exchange.
Here's the full exchange, including all three e-mails:
- At 2:13 p.m. on Sept. 1, three hours before Rell's televised
announcement at 5:15 p.m., chief gubernatorial legal counsel Anna
Ficeto e-mailed Moody to say "based on a reading of the CT
constitution and case law, the Governor's exercise of line item veto
would require her approval and signature of the remainder of the
bill."
- A half-hour later, Genuario, head of the Office of Policy and
Management, e-mailed Moody to say Ficeto's message was consistent
with
advice he'd received from top OPM deputy Jeffrey Beckham, also an
attorney. Genuario wrote: "Our two lawyers agree. Isn't that
amazing?"
- "The Governor and I don't we win (isn't that amazing)" That's how
Mort Zuckerman
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/...
>
> Lipanj > her posts-----------------does the truth hurt.
>
> G > That's just Daniel J Sullivan III of Patchogue New York,
> G > He's a 61 year old ineffectual twit trying to be a bully on
> usenet.
> G > He does that to any issue that doesn't pad his ass.
> G > He thinks it's his free speech right to shout down people.
>
> Moe > Projection noted. You and Kennie tend to do all that yourselves.
>
> Any comments about the FOI games in the top post?
>
It's all about doing whatever you
can get away with. DCF is quite good
at that, due to eons of practice. Nowadays,
however, they've run out of places to put
all the kidnapped black children because
no one wants to foster them, so they
almost exclusively take white kids now
and leave the black ones in abusive
homes.
Sad and sick, but true, and what we
expect from these debased whores.
Kathleen
http://www.actionlyme.org
Greegor
Probably true in some states.
Apparently not true in some others.
Perhaps this varies depending on how
white bread the population of some places is,
combined with the level of fanatical liberalism.
Oregon CPS supposedly takes black kids
at a disproportionately high rate, according
to a recent news story.
I grew up in Minnesota, and there are white
folks there who fall all over themselves to
get liberal ""brownie points"". This often
includes patronizing any minority group.
I once saw somebody who moved there
from out of state complaining that white
folks didn't want to adopt minority kids.
In fact, Minnesota had only months
before made a law to STOP the massive
adoption of Native American and black
children by white folks there.
Affluent people in England have a long tradition
of adopting kids from very different cultures.
At one point a few years after the millennium
there was a big media stink because refugee
immigrant families were being deported
but their kids were being kept to adopt.
There's some kind of wealthy liberal tradition
where they take somebody on like this
as a ""project"" ala Eliza Doolittle (My Fair Lady).
Is it an ego trip or what? I don't know.
The very first child removal case in the USA
was a little girl who was being abused
by a person who was basically a foster parent.
American Human Association is STILL behind
the ""Child Protection"" INDUSTRY.
They still print propaganda posters for CPS
you might spot at your local CPS offices if
you look at the fine print at the bottom.
Ironically the real story behind that first case
was that she had been written up to sell
newspapers, and the idle rich became
wrapped up in the story like a modern
day soap opera, and they made her into
a ""project"".
Ironically, while they took on this ""project""
many of them continued to profit on the
backs of NUMEROUS poor children dying
in their very own factories and coal mines.
The books about Mary Ellen were written
by a guy who is a ""Child Protection""
INDUSTRY contractor.
The books play down the FOSTER caretaker angle
and make no mention of the absurd hypocrisy
of the wealthy (naive?) benefactors.
Do you suppose those society women were
shielded from the realities of children being
used to build their fortunes?
How many of them knew but pretended they did not?
Sounds like the mindset of many
FOSTER CONTRACTORS today.
Many Fosters just don't want to know that the kids they cared for
are basically stolen from their parents using the
steamroller courts and violating constitutional rights.
Mort Zuckerman
Many Fosters just don't want to know that the kids they cared for
are basically stolen from their parents using the
steamroller courts and violating constitutional rights.
-----------
That's the essence of the calamity, plain and
simple. If you'e ever interviewed any of them
anonyously, they give you their Holier Than
Thou routine, while explaining how they put
the kidnapped children to work, and about
their no-nonsense "parenting" of these children.
That's why so many children end up with
the "Dysthymia" that develops into drug abuse
that develops into jail-fodder for the foster
mother's jail guard husband or brother...
They're cannibals, plain and simple.
It's Nepocannibalism. Staties spawn more
Staties who eat people.
Connecticut is the worst offender because
of the pressure to appear to be a rich person
in a land of former thread mills and the like.
We used to have something to do with all
the Whitey morons.