Subject: IDSA Claims "Lyme Disease" for once and for all.
Date: Apr 22, 2010 1:16 PM
ARTICLE BELOW
==================================
Good.
"Lyme Disease" is "Steere's HLA-linked
hypersensitivity reaction in a knee to
OspA as shown in the RICO Western Blot graphics:
http://www.actionlyme.org/USDOJ_COMPLAINT_RICO.htm
and by what he published in MedLine prior to
and including 1992:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2078208
"This imaginary disease was invented by Allen Steere
alone in Europe (High passage strains, recombinant
OspA and B without the lipid attached):
http://www.actionlyme.org/STEERE_IN_EUROPE.htm
"
That's why everyone who was bitten
by a tick has Diagnostic Code:
http://www.relapsingfever.org
http://www.icd9data.com/2007/Volume1/001-139/080-088/087/087.1.htm
087.1 Tick-Borne Relapsing Fever.
The name "Relapsing" refers to its
chronicity:
http://www.actionlyme.org/RICOCHRON.htm
http://www.actionlyme.org/BRAIN_PERMANENT.htm
If you were bitten by a sand flea, you
can have this disease, too, since it too
is governed by TLR2 agonists, like OspA:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=TLR2[All%20Fields]%20AND%20%28%22leishmania%22[MeSH%20Terms]%20OR%20%22leishmania%22[All%20Fields]%29&cmd=DetailsSearch
That's why I changed to all the names
of all the Imitators to Gulf War Illness:
http://www.actionlyme.org/CHP_9_IDSA_REVIEWS.htm
on honor of Simon Wessely, who says, "All
soldiers are faggots":
http://www.actionlyme.org/ROCKET_SCIENCE.htm
And who says, "I love myself and am
proud of myself and my accomplishments!!!
"So I don't understand the Popes on Pride,
because I, I I, I-Meeeee-My; I AM so clearly
great! and gifted!! and wonderful!!!:
http://www.bmj.com/archive/7072-7d.htm
"To be genuine pride must be earned."
One ^^^ of the funniest stories in the
History of Medicine.
Meanwhile, we're claiming everything
else; the New Disease Paradigm, where
LYMErix Disease is ALS/MS/Cancer/Chronic Fatigue,
etc., from activated viruses of all kinds:
http://www.actionlyme.org/PAM3CYS_APPLICATIONS.htm
and badly cloned B cells:
http://www.actionlyme.org/index.htm
======================================
IDSA and Yale must be scared to death, to have
simply defaulted on the Blumenthal lawsuit agreement:
http://www.actionlyme.org/080430_RICO_CABAL_CAVES.htm
http://www.actionlyme.org/BLUMENTHAL_IDSA_FEB_2010.pdf
Either that, or they feel the whole
thing has totally gotten away from
them and no one cares what they
say, anyway.
Which would be true.
Kathleen M. Dickson
http://www.actionlyme.org
http://www.relapsingfever.org
=======================================
http://www.courant.com/health/hc-lyme-treatment-guidlines-panel-0422,0,2950661,print.story
courant.com/health/hc-lyme-treatment-guidlines-
panel-0422,0,1097144.story
Courant.com
Review Panel Says Lyme Treatment Guidelines Don't Need To Change
By ARIELLE LEVIN BECKER
The Hartford Courant
12:06 PM EDT, April 22, 2010
Click here to find out more!
A special review panel for the Infectious Diseases Society of America
announced Thursday that, after more than a year of work, it was
recommending against making any changes to the society's controversial
guidelines for treating Lyme disease.
The guidelines, developed in 2006, said most cases of Lyme disease can
be cured with a short course of antibiotics and recommended against
long-term antibiotic treatment.
The guidelines drew criticism from some patients and doctors who say
Lyme disease can be a chronic condition that requires long-term
antibiotic therapy. Members of the so-called chronic Lyme camp said
the guidelines have been used to deny insurance coverage for long-term
treatment and raised questions about the infectious disease society's
process for developing the guidelines.
But the review panel voted unanimously to uphold the earlier
guidelines, stating in its report that "In the case of Lyme disease,
there has yet to be a single high quality clinical study that
demonstrates comparable benefit to prolonging antibiotic therapy
beyond one month."
The report said "the inherent risks of long-term antibiotic therapy
were not justified by clinical benefit."
The review was prompted by an agreement with Connecticut Attorney
General Richard Blumenthal, who raised concerns about the process used
to develop the guidelines.
After an investigation, Blumenthal found that some members of the 2006
guidelines panels had conflicts of interest, such as financial stakes
in companies involved in tests or treatments for Lyme disease.
Representatives of the infectious diseases society said the panelists
had nothing to gain by recommending short-term treatment, but they
agreed to the special review of the guidelines, calling it "an effort
to clear the air."
The review was intended to determine whether the guidelines should
stay in place, be partially revised or fully rewritten.
The review panel — chosen by a jointly selected medical ethicist —
held a hearing in July. Even before the hearing, some chronic Lyme
advocates raised concerns about the impartiality of the committee, but
said they hoped the panel would be open-minded.
Copyright © 2010, The Hartford Courant
"[Real] scientists are *fiercely* independent. That's the good
news."-- NIH's Top Fool, Anthony Fauci