Subject: Arthur Weinstein in charge of "Work Group" to falsify what
happened at Dearborn
Date: Sep 19, 2009 9:12 PM
http://www.actionlyme.org/index.htm
http://www.actionlyme.org/WEINSTEIN_DEARBORN2.jpg
"Recommendations of the Work Group" to accept
Steere's crazy "The-More-Antibodies-The-Better"
ridiculous proposal with the funky "ROC":
http://www.relapsingfever.org
How many people don't agree with Weinstein that
Lyme is an inflammatory disease?
http://www.actionlyme.org/index.htm
Going on 30, including all of the Lyme crooks, LOL.
I can't figure out how he would dare to claim he
had no conflicts of interest, when everywhere
a scientific fraud crime occurred, Weinstein was
the author of it.
Kathleen M. Dickson
http://www.actionlyme.org
How many people say Arthur Weinstein is a liar, that he most certainly
had conflicts of interest (is a liar and a murderer as regards his
participation in the ImmuLyme OspA trial) and that "Lyme Disease" and
OspA vaccination are not inflammatory diseases but diseases of
immunosuppression and immune dysregulation?
1) Allen Steere
2) Gary Wormser
3) Justin Radolf
4) Sigal and Persing say Weinstein's Western Blots in Weinstein's
ImmuLyme trial were unreadable
Weinstein in charge of "data safety" for the ImmuLyme OspA vaccine
trial and using MarDx test strips, just like the ▲LYMErix trial:
http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/339/4/216
"Supported by Pasteur Mérieux Connaught.
"We are indebted to the members of the data and safety monitoring
board: Arthur Weinstein, M.D. (chairman), George Washington School of
Medicine, Washington, D.C.; Cynthia Aranow, M.D., State University of
New York Health Science Center at Brooklyn, Brooklyn; Dennis Clements,
M.D., Ph.D., Duke University..."
Weinstein reported a "92% safe and effective vaccine" despite no one
being able to read the Western Blots to determine if anyone given the
vaccine got "Lyme Disease"- which would have meant vaccine failure
(eg., "Whoops, no Lyme here, the vaccine must have worked")
5) John Dunn at Brookhaven says Lyme is a stealth pathogen that
results in non-knee diseases
6-15) All the labs invited to Dearborn (Imugen, Wisconsin, Igenex,
etc)
16) Anthony Fauci
17) David Volkman
18) Paul Duray (twice)
19) Schoen and Persing in the RICO patent
20) JJ Halperin
21) Magnarelli and Fikrig Spiking with "G" section of Fikrig's
flagellin patent to pick up extra cases.
22) Coyle and Schutzer
23) Institute for Immunology, Munich, Germany
24) Ben Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel
25) University of Maryland:
"Pretreatment of macrophages with a pure TLR4 agonist (protein-free
Escherichia coli (Ec) LPS) or with TLR2 agonists (Porphyromonas
gingivalis LPS or synthetic lipoprotein Pam3Cys) led to suppression of
TNF-alpha secretion, IL-1R-associated kinase-1, and IkappaB kinase
(IKK) kinase activities, c-jun N-terminal kinase, and extracellular
signal-regulated kinase phosphorylation, and to suppression of NF-
kappaB DNA binding and transactivation upon challenge with the same
agonist (TLR4 or TLR2 "homotolerance," respectively).
26) Alan Barbour
Barbour also says OspA would not work as a vaccine since it also
undergoes antigenic variation or "selection pressure")
Schroder and Schumann:
"With the exception of Mycoplasma-caused pneumonia, clinically
important pathogens carrying lipoproteins represent causes of slow,
cyclic or chronic infectious diseases, e.g., Lyme disease or
tuberculosis. Even mycoplasm pneumonia, although frequent in children,
is often afebrile and self-limiting in contrast to pneumonia caused by
other pathogens (61). Our data suggest that recognition of these slow-
acting microorganisms may also be accomplished by LBP. Synthetic
lipopeptides have been the basis for broad vaccine development lately
for a wide variety of diseases including HIV, malaria, CMV, and HSV
(reviewed in Ref. 16). Understanding of the molecular mechanisms of
host recognition of lipopeptides and lipoproteins in more detail may
further help to further improve these innovative strategies."
Too bad these Lyme criminals lied ▲about the outcomes of LYMErix,
since clearly discovery in other diseases which are outcomes of
Pam3Cys induced immune suppression were negatively affected. These
evil thugs knew since the mid-1990s that there was a problem with OspA
as a vaccine.
"[Real] scientists are *fiercely* independent. That's the good
news."-- NIH's Top Fool, Anthony Fauci