Lyme Fraud Explainer. Stay with us folks, the bad guys are going to jail.

kathleen

unread,

Oct 12, 2005, 6:35:33 AM10/12/05

to

http://actionlyme.org/LymeFraudShort.htm

Greetings,

If you all could just print these out and put them all together in one
place, and look at them as one relatively small package of data, you
will see how Lyme is scientific fraud.

The fraud is in three parts. 1) They know how to detect Lyme disease,
the CDC is complicit in this fraud, there are conflicts of interest,
they deliberately conspired to hide data, 2) The know we are very sick,
because the "bad guys" themselves discovered the real markers of
disease, 3) The "bad guys" tried to discredit Lyme activists,
intimidate Lyme-treating physicians, fraudulently claim that the "bad
guys" were being stalked by Lyme "terrorists" (Steere, Klempner,
Gauvin).

I) Conspiracy to commit fraud.

A) Edward McSweegan and Durland Fish conspire to send the Lyme
Foundation "a bogus article."

Not reporting adverse events in the vaccine trial:

http://www.whale.to/m/lymerix8.html "Big Pharma Takes on the Wrong
Little Osp" - 2001 FDA meeting as a result of adverse events not
reported to the FDA and SmithKline.

Myself giving an explainer to the FDA on how LymeRIX wasn't qualified
with a valid standard, and was not shown to be a vaccine, therefore:
http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/01/slides/3680s2_11.pdf

B) Lewis Bull: The experience of being blown off as regards adverse
events to LymeRIX.

C) Hiding the bad data: The Schoen and Fikrig chapter in Rahn and
Evans In the chapter 9 of this textbook, Schoen and Fikrig recommend
not to do testing on adverse events vaccinees- anticipating them, even
before the vaccine was approved.

MOTION TO COMPEL, September 29, 2005

D) CDC on Lyme testing.

1) http://www.hhs.gov/asl/testify/t040129.html First they say
"There is no substitute for sound clinical judgment." (CDC's Paul
Mead)

2) Then they say that a positive test for Lyme is required:
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5405a6.htm

"Health-care providers are reminded that a diagnosis of Lyme
disease should be made after evaluation of a patient's clinical
presentation and risk for exposure to infected ticks, and, if
indicated, after the use of validated laboratory tests."

CDC promised AG Richard Blumenthal they would update their website to
reveal that this standard was NOT to be used for diagnostic purposes,
but the CDC did the opposite: They discredited all the other labs, and
said this own standard for testing was "valid," when they knew this to
not be true:

Blumenthal Hearing Transcript::
http://www.cslib.org/attygenl/health/0129lyme.pdf

Blumenthal May '05 Lyme Conference Video:
http://autoimmunityresearch.org/photos/blumenthal.ram

E) The CDC's World Patents for Borreliosis, demonstrating that they
know there are different forms of this disease, because they used
genetically engineered mice to represent the arthritis-prone and the
neuroborreliosis-prone forms of Lyme disease:

http://v3.espacenet.com/family?DB=EPODOC&IDX=WO9324145&F=8&OREQ=0&textdoc=TRUE

That is, "MHC-restricted" means Major Histocompatibility Complex (or
tissue-type) restricted antibodies.

Some people have arthritis, and some have the immune incompetent form
of the disease. See the Home Page of this website regarding
HLA-DQB1*0602 and Klempner, and Justin Radolf and toll-like receptors.
What that all means is that this lipoprotein type, OspA, turns off the
antibody response in a known mechanism. The HLA molecules
downregulate, basically.

Klempner said neuroborreliosis patients have a significant
representation in the MS, Lupus, and narcolepsy haplotype (as did
Roland Martin of the NINDS). Then he more recently said there was no
such relationship. YOU DECIDE.

"The CDC is a disgrace. It is a corrupt organization," said Stephen A.
Sheller, a Philadelphia attorney who has sued vaccine makers for what
he says were bad vaccines. "The drug companies have them on their
payroll." -- YOU DECIDE.

Lyme physician and Lyme patient harassment.

Stalking Steere (a bunch of baloney).

Stalking Klempner (more baloney)

Stalking Gauvin (more baloney)

II) The fraud of the testing.

A) The testing for Lyme is bogus- that is, "positive" for Lyme is
based on Lyme arthritis as you can see from the graphical explainer in
the RICO complaint.

Allen Steere's first CDC standard.

This is the same document:

http://www.pubmedcentral.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=423723&blobtype=pdf

Lyme is a relapsing fever borreliosis and IgM counts. That is,
"changing and expanding IgM" used to be diagnostic of ongoing
infection.

The CDC agrees, in 1990

B) The next document is a graphical explainer on how people with
neuroborreliosis don't tend to have the hypersensitivity reaction
(allergy) to Borrelial lipoproteins. That is, they have a lower
concentration of antibodies, so their Western Blots appear faint:

http://actionlyme.org/USDOJ_COMPLAINT_RICO.htm

C) This is a Yale report, which is about 5 pages, and in the last few
paragraphs, Yale's Erol Fikrig is discussing what is wrong with OspA
vaccination- read especially the last few paragraphs:

http://iai.asm.org/cgi/reprint/63/5/1658?view=reprint&pmid=7729870

"Selection pressure" is what relapsing fever borrelia, basically, do.
They change surface components to escape antibody attack.

Later CDC left these IgM antibodies basically out of the serodiagnostic
standard. (The consensus is that no one figure out what CDC thinks
they are doing.)

D) Here is myself, explaining what happened with LymeRIX, and what
happened at Dearborn, only those last couple of pages were put on the
FDA's website in the wrong order:

http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/01/slides/3680s2_11.pdf

E ) Accurate testing for Lyme is available. Here is the Yale
Flagellin method, which is about 94% accurate: PMID 1894359

As you can see, Daniel Rahn is an author of that 1991 Yale flagellin
article. The US patent for that is 5,618,533 and was applied for in
1993.

III The Markers of Illness.

A) They say we are "crazy" and don't have a real disease. That is, the
very same people who determined we have a real illness,via the valid
scientific, objective testing, later said we don't have these valid
markers of disease. In the RI Tick Borne Diseases Management Plan, see
the second half for the markers of disease- and who wrote them or
identified them (Sigal, Klempner, Pachner, Halperin...)

Pathologies Index. Click on the "X" to bring you up to date on whether
or not that marker has been found in that illness.

B) Here is Pam3Cys, which is what is unique about OspA (LymeRIX):
Immune suppression/dysregulation.

Inasmuch as in some people this type of lipoprotein is inflammatory, in
others, it basically shuts off the immune system response to it (we
become tolerized to it).

C) Here is Corixa and SmithKline now joined as one company, creating
allergy vaccines based on what they learned about OspA, represented in
*fungal* antigens like pam3cys/OspA/mycobacterial lipopeptides.:
http://www.corixa.com/default.asp?pid=products

THAT IS, people with chronic Lyme, or post-LymeRIX syndrome are immune
suppressed, particularly as regards mycoplasmal and mycobacterial
infections, but also as regards all infections, because as you can see,
Yale is also now interested in the damage they have done activating
Epstein-Barr:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Yale+and+epstein-Barr+fikrig&btnG=Google+Search

'Which was what Paul Duray noted in 1992 about how lymphocytes of
chronic Lyme patients looked, as explained by Duray in Steve Schutzer's
1992 book, "Lyme disease, Molecular and Immunological Approaches."

Lyme is a borreliosis. That means, it is just one typw of many
borrelioses. To verify, use the taxonomy database, and see how many
strains of borrelia have been identified.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?CMD=search&DB=taxonomy

Type in "borrelia"

Click on the word.

See how many strains there are.

See how many strains there are just in California (the
CA-XXX strains).

STARI is a bovine borreliosis.

J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Feb;39(2):494-7.

Lone star tick-infecting borreliae are most closely related to the
agent of bovine borreliosis.

Rich SM, Armstrong PM, Smith RD, Telford SR 3rd.

Division of Infectious Disease, Tufts University School of
Veterinary Medicine, North Grafton, Massachusetts, USA.

Although Borrelia theileri, the agent of bovine borreliosis, was
described at the turn of the century (in 1903), its relationship with
borreliae causing Lyme disease or relapsing fever remains undescribed.
We tested the previously published hypothesis that spirochetes
infecting Lone Star ticks (Amblyomma americanum) may comprise B.
theileri by analyzing the 16S ribosomal DNAs (rDNAs) and flagellin
genes of these spirochetes. B. theileri, the Amblyomma agent, and B.
miyamotoi formed a natural group or clade distinct from but most
closely related to that of the relapsing fever spirochetes. B. theileri
and the Amblyomma agent were 97 and 98% similar at the nucleotide level
within the analyzed portions of the 16S rDNA and the flagellin gene
respectively, suggesting a recent divergence. The agent of bovine
borreliosis might be explored as a surrogate antigen for the
as-yet-uncultivatable Amblyomma agent in studies designed to explore
the etiology of a Lyme disease-like infection associated with Lone Star
ticks.

PMID: 11158095 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

derdritt...@yahoo.com

unread,

Oct 12, 2005, 12:58:53 PM10/12/05

to

kathleen wrote:

"Bad guys going to jail"?

Oh sure, Kathleen. Any day now.

We believe you. And YOU are going to put them there.

Right?

>
> "MOTION TO COMPEL, September 29, 2005"
>

ROFLAMAO.

Apparently, you have no idea what a "motion to compel" is used for.

Last night, I filed a "motion for an extra large pepperoni and
mushroom" (with extra cheese). Motion was granted.

I don't hold out much hope for equal success in your case.

zipzip

unread,

Oct 12, 2005, 5:02:26 PM10/12/05

to

> "Bad guys going to jail"?

i wonder if they'll fraternize with the Halliburton boys and Tom Delay?
lol. only non-aborted black people go to jail, didn't you know? bill
bennet never lies.

trepcheck

unread,

Oct 12, 2005, 8:35:58 PM10/12/05

to

kathleen wrote:

> Lyme is a relapsing fever borreliosis and IgM counts. That is,
> "changing and expanding IgM" used to be diagnostic of ongoing
> infection.
>
> The CDC agrees, in 1990
>

maybe, the CDC realized after 1990, that they missed the treponemas
from the syphilis(aids)-patients in 1983.
(homology between testing late stages of lyme and syphilis).
so they were not interested for testing chronic spirochete diseases,
because of patient charges:
from 1987 on they gave very high doses of AZT (dna terminator).

interesting link from the azt-hiv fraud:

http://aids-info.net/micha/hiv/aids/english.html

kathleen

unread,

Oct 12, 2005, 8:45:48 PM10/12/05

to

Most people think the reason the CDC and the IDSA are
acting completely insane over borreliosis is because
at least in 2000, 8% of the people in RI were infected
with Babesia, so what could be the proportion infected
with Lyme? At least 25% if not closer to half.

Becuase they colluded to defraud the public we did not
have the proper information years ago when it would have
made sense to do what they are doing now- get rid of
the deer. That is, CONSIDERING getting rid of the deer.

To admit they actually have long had an accurate test
for borreliosis would be admitting they lied to us, so
they simply have to be brought to court and charged
with their crimes.

Including Anthony Fauci.

Kathleen